Horowitz could have made a much stronger bias charge against Swartz had he been able to review Swartz's handling of the Sandy Berger affair.
On March 22, 2004, two days before Berger's public testimony, senior DoJ attorneys Swartz and John Dion got back to Brachfeld.
The House report singled out Swartz as the one attorney most adamantly protective of Berger.
Swartz refused to admit that Berger could have stolen documents in his first two visits despite Brachfeld's insistence that he had the means and the motive to do so.
At the same time Dion and Swartz were cosseting Sandy Berger, they were eagerly campaigning to out the rascal who blew CIA agent Valerie Plame's imagined cover.
Among the colleagues quoted was Dion's immediate supervisor, Bruce Swartz.
Even after Patrick Fitzgerald took over the Plame investigation, Dion and Swartz stayed on the team, Swartz reportedly as second-in-command.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/12/bruce_swartz_textbook_swamp_dweller.html
On March 22, 2004, two days before Berger's public testimony, senior DoJ attorneys Swartz and John Dion got back to Brachfeld.
The House report singled out Swartz as the one attorney most adamantly protective of Berger.
Swartz refused to admit that Berger could have stolen documents in his first two visits despite Brachfeld's insistence that he had the means and the motive to do so.
At the same time Dion and Swartz were cosseting Sandy Berger, they were eagerly campaigning to out the rascal who blew CIA agent Valerie Plame's imagined cover.
Among the colleagues quoted was Dion's immediate supervisor, Bruce Swartz.
Even after Patrick Fitzgerald took over the Plame investigation, Dion and Swartz stayed on the team, Swartz reportedly as second-in-command.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/12/bruce_swartz_textbook_swamp_dweller.html
No comments:
Post a Comment