The letter details how Christopher Steele, the former British spy who allegedly authored the documents claiming ties between the Trump campaign and Russia, told the FBI he wasn't talking to the press about his investigation.
Writing in the Washington Post July 21, 2016, Applebaum explained how a "Trump presidency could destabilize Europe." The issue, she explained, was Trump's positive attitude toward Putin.
So is the claim that in exchange for Russia releasing the DNC emails, "The TRUMP team had agreed to sideline Russian intervention in Ukraine as a campaign issue."
Trump's expressed admiration for Putin and other "Equivocating, mercenary statements," wrote Goldberg, are "Unprecedented in the history of Republican foreign policymaking." However, insofar as Trump's fundamental aim was to find some common ground with Putin, it's a goal that, for better or worse, has been a 25-year U.S. policy constant, across party lines.
"Trump's understanding of America's role in the world aligns with Russia's geostrategic interests." Here Goldberg rang the same bells as Applebaum-the Trump campaign "Watered down" the RNC's platform on Ukraine; the GOP nominee "Questioned whether the U.S., under his leadership, would keep its [NATO] commitments," including Article 5.
Citing the "Original reporting" of Foer's seminal Slate article, the New Yorker editor contended "That one reason for Trump's attitude has to do with his business ambitions." As Remnick elaborated, "One of Trump's foreign-policy advisers, has longstanding ties to Gazprom, a pillar of Russia's energy industry." Who could that be? Right-Carter Page.
After eight years of Obama's appeasement of a Russia that threatened to withhold natural gas supplies from the continent, did the Trump team pose a unique threat to European stability?
http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/15/media-stopped-reporting-russia-collusion-story-helped-create/
Writing in the Washington Post July 21, 2016, Applebaum explained how a "Trump presidency could destabilize Europe." The issue, she explained, was Trump's positive attitude toward Putin.
So is the claim that in exchange for Russia releasing the DNC emails, "The TRUMP team had agreed to sideline Russian intervention in Ukraine as a campaign issue."
Trump's expressed admiration for Putin and other "Equivocating, mercenary statements," wrote Goldberg, are "Unprecedented in the history of Republican foreign policymaking." However, insofar as Trump's fundamental aim was to find some common ground with Putin, it's a goal that, for better or worse, has been a 25-year U.S. policy constant, across party lines.
"Trump's understanding of America's role in the world aligns with Russia's geostrategic interests." Here Goldberg rang the same bells as Applebaum-the Trump campaign "Watered down" the RNC's platform on Ukraine; the GOP nominee "Questioned whether the U.S., under his leadership, would keep its [NATO] commitments," including Article 5.
Citing the "Original reporting" of Foer's seminal Slate article, the New Yorker editor contended "That one reason for Trump's attitude has to do with his business ambitions." As Remnick elaborated, "One of Trump's foreign-policy advisers, has longstanding ties to Gazprom, a pillar of Russia's energy industry." Who could that be? Right-Carter Page.
After eight years of Obama's appeasement of a Russia that threatened to withhold natural gas supplies from the continent, did the Trump team pose a unique threat to European stability?
http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/15/media-stopped-reporting-russia-collusion-story-helped-create/
No comments:
Post a Comment