Thursday, February 15, 2018

Secret Service report on targeted school violence

The Safe School Initiative, implemented through the Secret Service's National Threat Assessment Center and the Department of Education's Safe and Drug-Free Schools Program, combined the Department of Education's expertise in helping schools facilitate learning through the creation of safe environments for students, faculty, and staff, and the Secret Service's experience in studying and preventing targeted violence.

During staff meetings in a school in a California School District, the names of students are posted, and school faculty members are asked to put stars next to the names of those students with whom they have the closest relationships.

Educators can play an important role in ensuring that students are not bullied in schools and that schools not only do not permit bullying, but also empower other students to let adults in the school know if students are being bullied.

With respect to disclosure of student information contained in school law enforcement unit records, FERPA provides that: - Personally identifiable information about a student may be disclosed by school officials if that information is held in a school law enforcement unit record that was created to enforce a federal, state, or local law.

37 THREAT ASSESSMENT IN SCHOOLS GUIDE a school resource officer or other police officer assigned to the school; 3) a mental health professional, such as a forensic psychologist, a clinical psychologist, or a school psychologist; and 4) other professionals, such as guidance counselors, teachers, coaches, and others, who may be able to contribute to the threat assessment process.

School Information A school threat assessment inquiry should begin with what is known about the student from records, teacher interviews, and other information easily accessed at the school and from school officials.

As investigators proceed with a threat assessment investigation, they continuously should ask themselves the following questions: Does the information collected prompt more concern or less concern about the possibility that the student is moving on a path toward a school attack? What information might prompt less concern? What information might heighten concern? What options exist for intervening in the behavior of or redirecting the student away from ideas of or plans for a school attack? Should potential targets be contacted, warned, and/or protected? As with a threat assessment inquiry, it is critical that investigators document and keep a record of the information that they gather and evaluate in carrying out a school threat assessment investigation.

https://www.secretservice.gov/data/protection/ntac/ssi_guide.pdf 

No comments: