Here
is a bit of background on Hillary. Socialist, Saul Alinsky, and his
book "Rules for Radicals" were mentioned above. Obama followed much
of his teachings during his community organizing days in Chicago and
throughout the remainder of his career to present. Hillary was so
intrigued with Alinsky that her college senior paper was all about him
and his ideas. She even interviewed him several times and exchanged
correspondence with him. Alinsky was taken with Hillary and even offered
her a job but she turned it down to go to law school where she met Bill
and the rest is history. To get more details of Hillary's connection
with Alinsky and his revolutionary ideas see the links. Quotes from the
first link: "Alana Goodman’s revelation at the Washington Free Beacon
of previously unknown correspondence between Hillary Clinton and Saul
Alinsky shows that Clinton has not been honest about her far-left past.
The lost Alinsky letters also remind us of what we ought to know but
have forgotten: Hillary is not “Clintonian.” While Bill and Hillary have
worked, schemed, and governed as a couple for decades, Hillary has
always been to the left of Bill. As president, she would govern more
like Obama than like her husband." And, "Alinsky was a democratic
socialist. He worked closely for years with Chicago’s Communist party
and did everything in his power to advance its program. Most of his
innovations were patterned on Communist-party organizing tactics.
Alinsky was smart enough never to join the party, however. From the
start, he understood the dangers of ideological openness. He was a
pragmatist, but a pragmatist of the far left. (See Chapter Four of
Spreading the Wealth for details.) Hillary Clinton understood all of
this. As she noted at the conclusion of her undergraduate thesis on
Alinsky, “If the ideals Alinsky espouses were actualized, the result
would be social revolution.” In her letter to Alinsky, Hillary says, “I
have just had my one-thousandth conversation” about Reveille for
Radicals (Alinsky’s first book). Nowadays, people focus on Alinsky’s
more famous follow-up, Rules for Radicals. But Reveille, which Hillary
knew inside-out, is the more ideologically revelatory work." http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/388560/why-hillarys-alinsky-letters-matter-stanley-kurtz More: http://washingtonmonthly.com/2016/03/15/hillary-clinton-barack-obama-and-saul-alinsky/ and, http://freedomoutpost.com/exposing-hillary-clintons-ties-to-saul-alinsky-communist-doctrine/
*This item literally devastates
Hillary's capacity to be president. FBI Director Comey confirmed that
the FBI found Hillary to be incompetent, not criminal (Lot's of
competent lawyers both left and right challenge the FBI's finding).
Quote: "The presumptive Democratic Party nominee is suffering from a
“cognitive impairment.” In testimony before Congress on Thursday, Comey
said Hillary Clinton was not just careless, but implied she didn’t
understand the importance of the information she was handling. U.S.
Rep. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., asked Comey if a “sophisticated” person would
understand the importance of handling very sensitive information.
Noting Clinton signed documents from the FBI, which acknowledged the
importance of appropriately handling classified information, DeSantis
asked how then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton could possibly have
thought having an unsecured private server was appropriate. Comey
responded with a bombshell that cuts to the heart of Hillary Clinton’s
competence. Comey stated:
“Well, I want to take one of your assumptions about sophistication. I
don’t think that our investigation established she was actually
particularly sophisticated with respect to classified information and
the levels and treatment.” DeSantis replied, “Isn’t she an original
classification authority, though?” While she was secretary of state,
Clinton would, as an “original classification authority,” have had the
authority to designate certain information as Secret or Top Secret,
implying extra responsibility for her to safeguard her own records.
Comey responded, “Yes, sir. Yes, sir.” “Good grief!” replied a stunned
DeSantis." http://www.wnd.com/2016/07/comey-testimony-reveals-hillarys-cognitive-impairment/
*Quote: "You would think Hillary
haters everywhere would be rejoicing the fact that the FBI found her
guilty of committing multiple federal crimes. But a funny thing happened
on the way to prison: FBI director James Comey inexplicably recommended
that Hillary not be indicted and thus be allowed to continue her
decades-long crime spree. That’s right — the Face of Evil once again
proved that the Clinton Book of Laws for Elites overrides the laws of
the United States of America. Of course, everyone — even those on the
radical left — realizes that Hillary is guilty of multiple felonies and
that her being allowed to skate was made possible by a collaboration
among BHO, Loretta Lynch, Bubba, and James Comey. But you already know
all this, so it’s not any great revelation." https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/07/robert-ringer/shes-walking-crime-machine/
*When you close the voting booth
curtain in November and consider whether to cast your lot with Hillary
or Donald, keep these facts in mind. Quote: "And you must choose one,
because one will be the president of the United States, the most
powerful person on the planet. You may notice something about the
examples here and many others I could cite. They illustrate a certain
hierarchy of the horrible, and that is this: Hillary Clinton has
committed crimes against the very nation she pretends to serve. Donald
Trump’s “crimes” are mostly boorish infringements of good taste or
taking savvy advantage of existing law. Hillary’s crimes are
international in scope and staggering in personal enrichment, such as
when she and Bill helped Russia obtain 20% of U.S. uranium in a
convoluted scheme exposed
last year by the New York Times that put millions in the Clintons’
pockets. Trump’s infractions are almost embarrassingly small ball in
comparison." http://townhall.com/columnists/joyoverbeck/2016/07/10/clinton-crimes-vs-trump-crimes-n2190401?
This
is a very good question. The discussion substantiates the reason for
concern in the case where Hillary was not charged for crimes Comey laid
bare during his press conference. Where has integrity gone? http://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2016/07/07/what-happened-to-integrity-n2188854?
This extends that thought. Three consequences which are sure to
follow. Quote: First, it is hardly an exoneration for Hillary, although
her supporters will seek to portray it that way. Rather, what she did
was criminal, even if she was not convicted of criminal behavior. The
public (and specific) exposing of her recklessness will be another
strike against her in what could end up being a razor-tight election.
Second, the FBI’s
Our leftist government is
unconditionally corrupt. Consider this. Congress authorized cuts in
American veterans benefits to fund benefits for Afghan translators
relocated to the US. Quote: "The Special Immigrant Visa program allows Afghan interpreters who aide the U.S. government to get out of harm’s way by
resettling in the United States, and last year the Senate authorized a
major expansion of the program. The $336 million price tag of the
expansion fell on U.S. military veterans in the form of increased
pharmacy co-pays, The Daily Caller News Foundation has learned." And, "Last year’s defense bill increased co-pays for military families, saving the government about $1.5 billion, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). A
portion of the money saved was used to pay for the extra Afghan visas, a
spokesman for the Armed Services Committee told TheDCNF, although the
bulk of the money went elsewhere. Budget caps require lawmakers offset
increases in spending with budget cuts." http://eaglerising.com/33679/congress-stole-millions-from-our-veterans-to-resettle-afghanis/ Congress
and the administration spend our money any way they want. Rarely, if
ever, do they check with us as to how WE want them to spend OUR money.
Well that may be wrong...we do tell them at election time...they just
ignore us. Their arrogance is unlimited but must be dealt with by the
people. Term limits is the only real solution. Professional
politicians was not the Founders view of how to run a "representative"
government.
*Want to find out about others
punished for doing less than Hillary? This piece will fill the gap
after a short discussion setting up that information. Quote: "Damn, it
feels good to be a Clinton! The FBI invested time and resources
investigating Hillary Clinton’s frequent mishandling of documents.
General David Petraeus endured worse consequences for less. So have at
least ten other high-profile political creatures from the DC
military-industrial complex." http://townhall.com/columnists/arthurschaper/2016/07/09/hillary-clinton-an-animal-more-equal-than-others-n2189985? So, why do you think Hillary got a free pass after committing a goodly number of crimes?
This Marine is doing the right
thing and will make the point of how unjust the DOJ has been in its
unbelievably ridiculous treatment of Hillary. See if he gets away with
far less (one classified item) than Hillary (hundreds of items) did and
for honorable reasons, unlike Hillary whose reasons were persistent,
long standing and self serving. Quote: "Recently, the FBI has said that Hillary Clinton should not be charged
for her breech of national security by sending and receiving thousands
of classified emails through a personal email server in violation of
federal law. They claim this because they say that Mrs. Clinton did not know she was breaking the law while breaking the law.
Yes, it's a ridiculous argument, but only for the little people. Now, a
US Marine sent just one classified email via a Yahoo email service to
protect his fellow Marines is now engaged in a legal battle over what
basically amounts to the same actions as Clinton, only in this case, it
was not a national security breech, but an honest attempt to protect
those who were his brothers." http://freedomoutpost.com/marine-who-sent-classified-email-to-save-fellow-marines-will-use-hillary-clinton-to-demonstrate-lack-of-fairness-in-law/
*Please read this item! Quote:
"The Obama administration supported the terrorist group that became ISIS
as the group struggled to gain control of the Syria-Iraq border where
ISIS now claims its caliphate, according to an intelligence report sent
to Hillary Clinton." http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/15/memo-received-by-clinton-obama-admin-aided-group-that-became-isis-to-control-area-where-isis-formed-caliphate/ Hillary knew of, aided and abetted the effort.
This is something conservatives
have long know but is either ignored or embraced by the liberal left.
This is an endorsement of white privilege (whatever that means) if ever
their was one. Here is Hillary insulting honest, decent American whites
and pandering to blacks for votes. Quote: "Clinton used a CNN interview
on Friday to completely embrace the Democrats’ claim that white people
and cops must change to help reduce the number of African-Americans
killed in tense exchanges with cops." Here she copies Obama who
mischaracterizes, history and facts to promote the delusion that
Democrats are the only party blacks should ever vote for and whites are
the cause of all black problems. I have elsewhere provided both history
and facts that refute this progressive left nonsense so will not repeat
it here. This is they type behavior that encourages black hatred of
whites...whites blaming whites for black problems is music to their
ears. It suggests blacks have no responsibility for their status so
blame whites instead for their plight. This is blatantly dishonest,
misleading, immoral, unethical and more. It caters to the
repulsive long standing progressive narrative that racial conflict is
necessary to bring about revolution and destruction of the American
Republic so they can install socialism. Then things will be really bad
for everyone of every race, color, sexual orientation, religion and
creed that is not a member of the socialist elite. Study history.
*A brief piece that discusses
the nature of ruthlessness which gets equated with Hillary and her
ruthlessness. Quote: "The pass on Hillary Clinton carries grave
implications, not because it is being executed by those in the employ of
the equally nefarious Obama administration, but because her crimes
(which are a matter of public record even if the FBI chose to gloss over
them) have also been tacitly endorsed by her ostensible political
opponents – i.e., the Republican leadership – through their refusal to
even acknowledge them. This is a stark indicator of the nascent statist
megalith that has been 100 years in the making finally coming into its
own. In the aforementioned television series and the Clinton-Obama axis,
we have dark cabals with no reservations with regard to ignoring the
law or sweeping away opponents both large and small through subterfuge,
intimidation, or even murder like so many crumbs on a dining table – and
we have every reason to fear." http://freedomoutpost.com/netflix-series-exemplifies-hillarys-ruthlessness/
Hillary
Clinton IT specialist Bryan Pagliano invoked the Fifth more than 125
times during a 90-minute, closed-door deposition Wednesday with the
conservative watchdog Judicial Watch, a source with the group told Fox
News. The official said Pagliano was working off an index card and read
the same crafted statement each time. “It was a sad day for government
transparency,” the Judicial Watch official said, adding they asked all
their questions and Pagliano invoked the Fifth Amendment right not to
answer them.
Pagliano was a central figure in
the set-up and management of Clinton’s personal server she used
exclusively for government business while secretary of state. The State
Department inspector general found Clinton violated government rules
with that arrangement. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/22/clinton-it-specialist-invokes-5th-more-than-125-times-in-deposition.html?
I don't know if all of this is
true but the number of coincidences are certainly there. Maybe some
are, maybe some aren't. You decide. So many of these type things have
occurred throughout the Clinton's history that it is increasingly hard
to believe they are coincidental. Quote: "Call it conspiracy theory,
coincidence or just bad luck, but any time someone is in a position to
bring down Hillary Clinton by testifying they wind up dead. In fact, there’s a long history of Clinton-related body counts, with scores of people dying under mysterious circumstances." http://freedomoutpost.com/this-u-n-official-accidentally-crushed-his-own-throat-right-before-he-was-set-to-testify-against-hillary-clinton/
*I am sorry to say this but I
believe Hillary is beyond salvation. Even after FBI Director Comey laid
out the unchallengeable facts of her incompetence and unbounded lies
Hillary has the audacity to again repeat the publically stated lie
that she did not lie or do anything wrong. This woman should never get
anywhere close to the White House. Once again she demonstrates that she
is void of honesty, decency, ethics and has no moral fiber. She is, in
my opinion, a total reprobate. Unbelievably she suggests her
subordinates are responsible for "her" failures. She never takes
responsibility for anything. (Remember when she lied that the Benghazi
debacle was caused by a non-descript video and that she was unaware of
the embassy's more than one hundred requests for beefed-up security
because of mounting threats? Hogwash!! It is beyond impossible to
believe she did not know.) Her many, many mistakes and performance
shortfalls constitute dereliction of duty but her claim is they were
never her fault, never. With her in the White House her ineptitude,
incompetence, dishonesty, lawlessness and lack of accountability will
only continue or worsen. Nonetheless, in her deluded mind she believes
it is her "right" to be president and can lie her way into the White
House to continue pursuit of fame and fortune, all at the expense of the
American public. How anyone can even like her, support her or much
less vote for her is beyond me. http://www.redstate.com/california_yankee/2016/07/09/hillary-still-lying-emails-denies-careless-blames-others/?
But, anything is possible. As unbelievable and irresponsible as it is
Obama was not only voted into office once, but twice. The voting public
had best not be fooled again by this charlatan or we will face another
lawless Obama-like radical Alinskyite term with her in charge. A term
I am not at all sure we would survive....
George Burns
No comments:
Post a Comment