Saturday, June 1, 2024

Fauci Says 'Free Speech' To Blame For Public Anger Towards Globalists

Dr. Anthony Fauci says he blames the First Amendment for the public's growing anger towards globalists who imposed lockdowns and mandatory vaccinations during the pandemic.

During testimony released on Friday, Fauci said not enough was done to censor outspoken Americans and squash anti-globalist sentiment.

Daily Caller reports: Fauci went on to say these threats are discouraging people from becoming public health officials.

"One of the things is to show obvious support for public health officials," Fauci answered, adding, "There certainly are disagreements that are valid disagreements for discussion. But when public health officials and individuals are demonized, I think there needs to be a lot of support for those people publicly by everyone, including all branches of government."

Former President Donald Trump recently hinted at holding Fauci accountable by potentially prosecuting him if he is reelected.

"One of the things that we could do is to encourage public officials, who supposedly have the good of the country involved, not to be part of the problem of demonizing. And I have been demonized by a lot of public officials. I mean, I have become a campaign slogan throughout some of the election cycles, which is very, very clear. And that's no secret. I can say that definitively as opposed to 'I can't recall.' I do recall definitively what that is. I have been completely demonized in various elections, you know. 'Fire Fauci. Throw him in jail. Vote for me.'".

While many American workers and businesses suffered financially in part because of the COVID-19 pandemic policies he had a role in imposing, Fauci and his wife's net worth expanded by $5 million during that period. 

https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/fauci-says-free-speech-to-blame-for-public-anger-towards-globalists/

149 Words In Sen. Lankford's 'Border Act' Could Help Curtail The Biden/Mayorkas Border Fiasco

I have personally identified 149 words that are indeed ... helpful! I could work with those 149 words to help curtail the Biden/Mayorkas border fiasco.

Wait one New York minute! DHS can only utilize the summary removal power if illegal aliens are arriving at the rate of 1,460,000 a year?! And DHS is only required to utilize summary removal if illegal aliens are arriving at the rate of 1,825,000 a year, or at the rate of 3,102,500 a year?! Our nation has never experienced such yearly levels until the Biden/Mayorkas border fiasco.

Arthur has written that this "'5,000 a day' rule would ... concede[] defeat at the border" and "Accept the dismal status quo at the Southwest border as the new standard, forever, or at least until Congress is forced to act again", "Resign[ing] Congress and the country to the idea that 1.825 million aliens pouring over the Southwest border per year is the 'new normal', and that there's nothing this administration can do about it".

The Border Act provides that "The border emergency authority shall not be activated with respect to ... [a]n unaccompanied alien child [UAC]." Such an exemption will only encourage more unaccompanied minors to come to the U.S. illegally, a journey that DHS and the Department of Justice have described as "Long, arduous, and extremely dangerous" and "Bring[ing] with it a great risk of harm".

To add insult to injury, the Border Act mandates that aliens who manifest a fear and are placed in its newfangled "Protection merits removal proceedings" cannot be detained.

The border emergency authority shall not be activated with respect to ... [a]n alien who an immigration officer determines, with the approval of a supervisory immigration officer, should be excepted from the border emergency authority based on the totality of the circumstances, including consideration of significant law enforcement, officer and public safety, humanitarian, and public health interests, or an alien who an immigration officer determines, in consultation with [ICE], should be excepted from the border emergency authority due to operational considerations.

AUTHORITY TO PROHIBIT INTRODUCTION OF CERTAIN ALIENS.- If the Secretary of Homeland Security determines, in his discretion, that the prohibition of the introduction of aliens who are inadmissible under subparagraph or of section 212(a)(6) or under section 212(a)(7) at an international land or maritime border of the United States is necessary to achieve operational control (as defined in section 2 of the Secure Fence Act of 2006 (8 U.S.C. 1701 note of such border, the Secretary may prohibit, in whole or in part, the introduction of such aliens at such border for such period of time as the Secretary determines is necessary for such purpose. 

https://cis.org/Fishman/149-Words-Sen-Lankfords-Border-Act-Could-Help-Curtail-BidenMayorkas-Border-Fiasco

Biden's Deal Gives Hamas Everything It Wanted

The deal does not require the surrender or elimination of Hamas or, as floated previously, the departure of Hamas leaders.

To try and make this palatable, Biden claimed that, "The people of Israel should know they can make this offer without any further risk to their own security because they've devastated Hamas form- - forces over the past eight months. At this point, Hamas no longer is capable of carrying out another October 7th."

No one in the Biden administration expected that Hamas was capable of carrying out another October 7th the day before it happened.

Biden's proposed deal gives Hamas everything it wants and puts it on track to execute another Oct 7.

Not even Biden proposed making deals with ISIS. Yet Biden insists that Israel make a deal that will leave Hamas intact and in power.

Biden claimed that, "If Hamas fails to fulfill its commitments under the deal, Israel can resume military operations. But Egypt and Qatar have assured me and they are continuing to work to ensure that Hamas doesn't do that."

The Biden administration will decide if Israel gets to defend itself based on assurances from Qatar, a state sponsor of Hamas, and Egypt, which was caught red-handed with tunnels leading into Rafah to Hamas. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/bidens-deal-gives-hamas-everything-it-wanted/

Power Grab: Dem Rep. Raskin Says Biden DOJ Should FORCE Alito, Thomas to Recuse.

Democrat Representative Jamie Raskin is arguing Joe Biden's Justice Department can force Supreme Court justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito to step down from cases related to the January 6 protests.

According to Raskin, U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland can petition other Supreme Court justices to enforce recusal under judicial disqualification statutes and the U.S. Constitution.

 "It seems unfathomable that the two justices could get away with deciding for themselves whether they can be impartial in ruling on cases affecting Donald Trump's liability for crimes he is accused of committing on Jan. 6," Raskin whines.

"The U.S. Department of Justice can petition the other seven justices to require Justices Alito and Thomas to recuse themselves not as a matter of grace but as a matter of law," he argues.

"The Justice Department and Attorney General Merrick Garland can invoke two powerful textual authorities for this motion: the Constitution of the United States, specifically the due process clause, and the federal statute mandating judicial disqualification for questionable impartiality, 28 U.S.C. Section 455," he claims.

SEPARATION OF POWERS? The Biden Justice Department's attempting to stack the court against Donald Trump while prosecuting him would be a significant attack on the separation of powers, with the Supreme Court being a branch of the U.S. government co-equal with the executive.

He is also pushing for Congress to stack the court with four additional justices and to impose an "Ethics code" which would make it easier for Congressmen to impeach justices considered problematic. 

https://thenationalpulse.com/2024/05/31/power-grab-dem-rep-raskin-says-biden-doj-should-force-alito-thomas-to-recuse/

The West Needs Radical Political Change Towards Freedom

It is becoming clear that a radical political change is urgently needed in the West in order to loosen the globalist grip on the international political agenda and national interventionist policies.

When such radical political change is evoked, the "Classic" revolution comes to mind: the violent government overthrow leading to deep political and social changes.

Though political violence is sometimes a trigger of such change, it is usually the graphic, superficial expression of a deeper, nonviolent opposition to the existing ruling minority.

Secondly, though parliamentary elections do sometimes allow a radical antiestablishment party to slip through the corporate media watchdogs, to gain a majority or form a government is rare, and such a party then tends to quickly fall in line with the ruling establishment.

The current minority in power in the West also requires the continued passive support of the majority over which it rules with such a sense of impunity and entitlement.

Thus, radical political change takes place when the ruling minority is drained of the passive support of the majority.

The Western ruling minority, responsible for the current decadent and illiberal times, should be discredited and disempowered by a radical political change toward freedom. 

https://mises.org/mises-wire/west-needs-radical-political-change-towards-freedom

Check out these 12 infuriating decisions by trio of prominent, ultra-progressive district attorneys

Three ultra-progressive district attorneys in major urban centers - Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, Los Angeles County DA George Gascon, and Philadelphia DA Larry Krasner - arguably are the most prominent and powerful among the soft-on-crime crowd.

George Soros-backed Gascon has had his share of embarrassing moments, too - such as when he refused to file felony charges against an alleged sex offender, only to move forward with them following public outcry.

Here's a look at a dozen infuriating decisions by the trio: DA Gascon refuses to jail thug accused of slashing man's neck; same suspect later accused of murdering woman who was shot 19 times Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascon Gina Ferazzi / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images Stefen Sutherland allegedly slashed a construction worker's neck in November 2020 after a noise complaint and was charged with assault with a deadly weapon, law enforcement sources said.

Gascon's office said it didn't know about Tubbs' murder allegations when the juvenile-facility sentence was handed down earlier in the year.

Gascon subsequently changed his controversial policy after outcries, noting that juvenile offenders now may be transferred to the adult court system "In the most egregious cases that warrant a state prison commitment." Amazingly, Gascon in early 2023 suspended a prosecutor for "Deadnaming" and "Misgendering" Tubbs, who later that year was sentenced to 15 years in prison for manslaughter.

The teen's light sentence - courtesy of Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascon - was reported in June 2022.

The mother, who ripped Gascon for the light sentence against the teen who hit her and her baby, had this to say about the teen's murder: "The universe delivered the justice we weren't given in court, but a much harsher punishment than he'd have been dealt in a court of law." LA county sheriff reveals grim consequences of DA Gascon's justice reform in connection with child porn case Robert Gauthier/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images Then-Los Angeles County Sheriff Alex Villanueva said in January 2021 that Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascon's progressive reform policies resulted in a lighter sentence for a child porn suspect. 

https://www.conservativereview.com/blaze-news-original-check-out-these-12-infuriating-decisions-by-trio-of-prominent-ultra-progressive-district-attorneys-2668428157.html

Editor's Commentary:


It seems that in their quest to appear "woke" and please their radical leftist supporters, they have forgotten their fundamental duty to uphold the law and protect the innocent. Here are just a few examples of their misguided and downright dangerous decisions:

Refusing to enforce laws against quality-of-life crimes: Whether it's turning a blind eye to public drug use, camping, or shoplifting, these DAs seem to believe that enforcing these laws is somehow "unjust". Well, I tell you, the only thing that's unjust is the suffering inflicted on law-abiding citizens and small business owners who have to bear the brunt of this nonsense.

Declining to prosecute certain crimes based on personal beliefs: In their wisdom, these progressive DAs have decided that for certain crimes, prosecution is simply optional. This means that criminals who commit offenses that the DAs deem "low-level" or non-violent are let off the hook, often with just a slap on the wrist. This is a slap in the face to the very concept of equal justice under the law.

Pushing to end cash bail: These DAs have joined the chorus of radical leftists calling for an end to cash bail, claiming it disproportionately affects the poor. What they don't seem to understand is that releasing potentially dangerous criminals back onto our streets is a recipe for disaster. The very notion that someone's freedom should depend on their ability to pay is offensive to common sense and fair play.

Supporting the defund the police movement: Incredibly, but perhaps not surprisingly, these DAs have expressed support for efforts to defund the police. This is a direct attack on the brave men and women who put their lives on the line every day to keep us safe. It's unconscionable and a clear indication of their warped priorities.

Advocating for prison abolition: Taking their progressive agenda to its logical extreme, these DAs have even flirted with the idea of prison abolition. This is not reform, my friends, this is surrender. It's a surrender to the criminals, to lawlessness, and to chaos.

Misusing their discretion to further their political agenda: Perhaps the most concerning aspect of all this is the blatant misuse of prosecutorial discretion. These DAs are selectively enforcing the law to fit their political narrative and advance their careers. It's an abuse of power and a betrayal of the trust placed in them by the people.

We cannot stand idly by and watch as these progressive district attorneys undermine our criminal justice system and endanger our communities. It's high time we hold them accountable and restore law and order in our great nation.

DOJ Urged To 'Take Immediate Action' To Prosecute Michael Cohen Over String Of Alleged Lies

 House Majority Whip Tom Emmer is demanding that the Justice Department "Take immediate action" to prosecute ex-Trump attorney Michael Cohen for making false statements and admitting to stealing during the unprecedented criminal trial of former President Trump.

Fox News Digital exclusively obtained a letter Emmer, R-Minn., sent to Attorney General Merrick Garland Wednesday, urging the DOJ "Take immediate action" on the multiple criminal referrals from congressional committees related to alleged lies Cohen has told Congress.

Michael Cohen was Bragg's "Star witness" in the unprecedented criminal trial against Trump, who pleaded not guilty to all charges.

This fall, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner, R-Ohio, and House Republican Conference Chair Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., sent a criminal referral to the DOJ with evidence that Cohen committed perjury during a deposition in 2019.

During his testimony before the House Oversight Committee in 2019, Emmer said Cohen "Repeatedly claimed that he did not seek employment in President Trump's White House, despite evidence from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York demonstrating that 'Cohen privately told friends that he expected to be given a prominent role and title in the new administration.'".

TOP REPUBLICANS DOUBLE DOWN ON CALL FOR DOJ PROBE INTO BRAGG'S 'STAR WITNESS' MICHAEL COHEN. During the NY v. Trump criminal trial, Emmer said Cohen's "Lie to Congress was further confirmed" when a witness "Gave a firsthand account of Mr. Cohen's rage in December 2016 about not receiving a job in the Trump administration."

NY V. TRUMP: HOUSE JUDICIARY INVESTIGATES BRAGG PROSECUTOR WHO HELD SENIOR ROLE IN BIDEN DOJ. Emmer demanded the DOJ "Take immediate action on the criminal referrals," and declared that President Biden's DOJ "Already appears to be colluding" with Bragg in the case against Trump, pointing to former senior DOJ official Colangelo.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doj-urged-take-immediate-action-prosecute-michael-cohen-string-alleged-lies