Clinton Emails: Billionaire Power Brokers

Let's not look at the goofy conspiracy theories about the infamous Rothschild and Rockefeller families. Let's look at the more realistic influence these billionaire power brokers actually have, rather than the flimsy ideas about Satanic death cults and the Illuminati. If there is a conspiracy, it's an open secret with roots in money, not Lucifer and reptilian shapeshifters.

These powerful banking families have built their wealth over generations and pedalled their influence through organizations like the Council On Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. Both organizations have Rockefeller/Rothschild fingerprints and act as fodder for conspiracy theorists, but neither organization has roots in anything more than basic political advocacy. Their objectives are open and available for anyone to see. Their advocacy for globalization and borderless communities is not a secret. 

Globalism is an ideology, just like nationalism. It's the idea that our wealth, prosperity and responsibilities should be shared in one global community. Nationalism is the exact opposite. Nationalism is represented by people like Donald Trump, Marine Le Penne and Frauke Petry.

American globalism is represented by Hillary Clinton, the Bush family and several Republican candidates, most of which have been members of – and participated in events organized by – the Council On Foreign Relations. Almost all American candidates that subscribe to globalism have received direct and indirect financial support from Rockefeller/Rothschild offshoots. This isn't a conspiracy, it's politics as usual.

http://www.poletical.com/clinton-rothschild-rockefeller.php 

The bizarre optimism in Donald Trump’s theory of the economy

There is a theory on the fringes of economics and finance that the United States is riding another bubble, which is about to burst and plunge the economy into a deep recession. It is not a housing bubble, like the one that triggered the last recession, but a stock bubble, puffed up by years of monetary easing from the Federal Reserve. Few professional economic forecasters subscribe to that theory, but a few finance pundits do, and so, too, does Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump.
Trump made that embrace clear in his interview with The Post's Bob Woodward and Robert Costa released today, which included a long back-and-forth on economic issues. From the transcript emerges a three-legged Trump theory of what ails the American economy and how to heal it, starring a stock bubble, bad trade deals and a massive tax cut.
Those legs do not form an argument that most economists would call coherent.
Instead, Trump appears to blend economic conspiracy theories with magical-thinking accounting: Stocks are a bubble inflated by "easy money"; government regulators have taken control of banks and choked off lending to everyone but the rich; the "real" unemployment rate is closer to 20 percent than 5 percent, and his crowd sizes prove it; cutting taxes and renegotiating the terms of trade will reinvigorate the economy and the middle class and somehow pay off the federal debt within eight years.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/04/02/the-bizarre-optimism-in-donald-trumps-theory-of-the-economy/ 

Principle, Federalism, and Passion: GOP Needs All Three to Win and Govern

Donald Trump continues to lead the Republican presidential contest. Ted Cruz continues to gain ground against the frontrunner. John Kasich continues as the outside chance in the race.
The eventual Republican nominee needs to take something from all three candidates to win.
Forget the personalities for a moment, hard as that might be. All three sometimes seem to do their best to irritate friends as well as foes.
But all three also have strengths. Whoever gets the nomination needs to draw on those advantages in November and beyond. Because it is critical for America that another Clinton—or, even worse, an admitted “democratic socialist”—not sit in the Oval Office.
The starting point for the GOP nominee must be principle. America needs a dedicated constitutional conservative in the White House. Otherwise we can expect more of the same. Unfortunately, Republicans as well as Democrats have presided over the vast expansion of government regulation and spending.
In truth, when it comes to the growth of government there wasn’t a lot of difference between Presidents Bush I and II and their Democratic successors. Government grew steadily. The GOP presidents talked a good game. And they had good intentions. But they were unable to resist the extraordinary pressure, including from congressional Republicans, for Washington to grab ever more control over people’s lives.

http://townhall.com/columnists/kenblackwell/2016/04/03/principle-federalism-and-passion-gop-needs-all-three-to-win-and-govern-n2142629 

Why Is the Press Not Talking About the Rigged Democratic Presidential Nomination?

Why is John Kasich still in the campaign? Ted Cruz has to get 87% of the remaining delegates to win the nomination. Donald Trump will never get enough delegates to stop a brokered (read that contested) convention. Controversy everywhere. If it bleeds it leads. But the real story is how the Democratic bosses have stolen the nominating process for Hillary Clinton from the vastly more popular Bernie Sanders, everyone’s favorite socialist running for president.
Sanders captured three states (Hawaii, Alaska and Washington) -- and by substantial margins --and the next day the talk was about him getting out of the race. I was watching Fox News Sunday and a man of the Left (Juan Williams) and a man of the Right (Jason Riley) concurred on the fact that Sanders is dead meat and is only angling for a big speech at the convention.
I could understand if this guy was drawing 100-person crowds and getting John Kasich-like numbers in primaries, but that is clearly not the case. As of the writing of this column, The Congenital Liar (TCL) has won 1,243 delegates and the kindly, old Socialist has won 975. With the total number necessary to win the nomination being 2,383 delegates, one could easily judge this to be a horse race with a couple of furloughs to go.

http://townhall.com/columnists/brucebialosky/2016/04/03/why-is-the-press-not-talking-about-the-rigged-democratic-presidential-nomination-n2141507 

Round Up

You will find this piece most interesting and far more truthful than not.  Quote: "Why does Obama know better? Not out of any intense study of or reflection on diplomatic and world history and international relations theory. Not because he served in the military or in the diplomatic corps or held senior posts in government prior to election as president. What graces Obama with superior insight and prudence is the simple fact of his own existence. He is his own proof of his superiority."   And, "Confidence is one thing. But Obama is more than confident. He’s narcissistic. He looks at the world and sees nothing but his reflection: rational, cool, unmoved, and always right. When reality surprises him, it’s not because he’s in error. It’s because Putin or Assad or the mullahs have failed to live up to the standards he’s set for them. Forget about them being true to themselves. They’re not being true to Barack Obama. And Barack Obama, lest we forget, is all that matters."     http://freebeacon.com/columns/president-obama-is-a-political-narcissist/

Ponder this item with great care.  You will be exposed to things that will make you uncomfortable.  Check the links to add credibility to the summary offered by this author.  Quote: "I could cite much more from Cartalucci and Turbeville, who effectively argue that ISIS is a created tool of the US government and its allies. I strongly recommend you read and study their work.  As far as the Brussels attacks are concerned, if we assume that ISIS was responsible, the whole scenario is turned upside down after analyzing the basis of ISIS.  The Obama administration (jointly with the Bush administration) should be announcing: “Well, we keep ISIS alive. Unfortunately, things happen. One of those things is Brussels.”   And then you could go on to query the sincerity of the word “unfortunately.”     https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/03/23/isis-attacked-brussels-the-us-created-isis-therefore/

If you think this is a good trend then you can thank our progressive, liberal and Democrat leaders/cultural warriors in government, academia, media and the Hollywood cesspool.   http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/children-seven-years-old-sexting-facebook-twitter-a6951066.html

This item provide insights that reinforces the previous item.  Quote: "Scientists researching the common characteristics of psychopathy now use a list of predominant qualities displayed by psychopaths that they’ve meticulously studied. The characteristics are quite telling and perhaps disturbing, as many can recognize these attributes in people around them.  While they estimate only 2 to 4% of the population are psychopaths, Amerika ranking with a high percentile of those they have identified, they clearly understand that these types of non-empathic dehumanizing freaks gravitate towards positions of power.  See how these attributes ingrained in such ideas as manifest destiny and American supremacism match up to the collective American way of life and its effect on the world of today:"   http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/amerikan-way-study-psychopathy/

And progressives brag about how compassionate and understanding they are.  They really care about the little people.  Well, their vaunted identity politics has blown up in the face of this little six year old girl and the prospective couple who wanted to adopt her.  Legalized progressive identity politics takes precedence over the life of a child.  She is 1 & 1/2%  Choctaw Indian so the law say she belongs to the Choctaw tribe.  Quote: "Because of the Inadian Child Welfare Act - a federal law from the 1970s - Lexi must live with Native Americans even though the Pages are the only family she has ever known. This is one of many sad examples.     http://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2016/03/24/the-latest-victim-of-progressives-identity-politics-n2138310/page/full

How one's mind and the times change when you have control over revisionist history and the propaganda pushed by schools and the media.  More truth by Thomas Sowell.  Quote: "Southern segregationists who railed against blacks were often also Progressives who railed against Wall Street. Back in those days, blacks voted for Republicans as automatically as they vote for Democrats today." And, "Later, when the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was sponsored by Democrats, a higher percentage of Congressional Republicans voted for it than did Congressional Democrats. Revisionist histories tell a different story. But, as Casey Stengel used to say, "You could look it up" -- in the Congressional Record, in this case."  And, "The biggest difference between the left and right today, when it comes to racial issues, is that liberals tend to take the side of those blacks who are doing the wrong things -- hoodlums the left depicts as martyrs, while the right defends those blacks more likely to be the victims of those hoodlums."   Think about it.  Maybe the truth will filter through.   http://townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/2016/03/22/black-and-white-left-and-right-n2137316/page/full

This truth has a long history and lets all hope the necessary and badly needed backlash to its horrendous reality will soon be forthcoming.  These guys think it may be upon us.  Quote: "I have been saying in this space for some time that the illiberalism of the Social Justice Warrior left is going to call forth and legitimize a backlash. Trump is that backlash. Douthat is right that Trump’s authoritarianism is a temptation, but I think it’s important to recognize, as Douthat does, that the militant left plays a key role in giving Trump fuel for his fire. And not just the militant left that turns up to no-platform conservative speakers. I’m talking the militant left that makes normal, everyday life impossible because it is forever finding a new reason to be offended and demand satisfaction."    http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/leftist-provocateurs-for-trump/   Are you proud of this behavior of your supporters people of the political left???   http://teapartyjournal.com/anonymous-hackers-declare-all-out-war-on-this-gop-candidate/

More and more radical liberal Democrats are showing their real colors.  This guy is unhinged.   http://eaglerising.com/31791/democrat-state-senator-says-if-i-was-a-white-guy-id-get-my-semiautomatic-weapon-and-mow-everybody-down/

This is a blatant example of the left trying to impose its will, its values, its demands on the broad public.  Tyrannical, yes.  Fair, no.  Quote: "The Georgia legislature recently passed a religious freedom bill. It was a compromise piece of legislation. Supporters wanted it to apply to for-profit businesses. That did not happen. Opponents wanted specific language saying the legislation did not allow discrimination. That was added.  The legislature compromised, but the left wants to compromise. They want total submission."      http://theresurgent.com/the-left-demands-georgia-bow-to-hollywood-values/

Speaking of the truth, consider this interesting piece.  Quote: "The mainstream media -- that is, the liberal media -- share all the views and characteristics of the left.  Among these is the left's view of truth. There are honest individuals with left-wing views, and dishonest individuals on the right. But truth is not a leftist value. Everything the left believes in is more important than truth: social justice, economic equality, reducing carbon emissions, expanding the power of the state, battling sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, racism, and above all of these, destroying its conservative opposition.  The media's coverage of President Barack Obama's nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court should serve as one of the most blatant examples of both the left-wing orientation of the news media and their willingness to play with truth.    http://townhall.com/columnists/dennisprager/2016/03/22/judge-garland-and-the-lefts-disdain-for-truth-n2137592/page/full  

Who says gun ownership is dangerous?  There are hundreds if not thousands of more examples.  http://2ndamendmentinsider.com/play-stupid-games-win-stupid-prizes/

This is something the many of us have known for a long time.  It is finally getting the attention it deserves although it may be too late to repair the damage.  Quote: "This staggering level of debt simply can’t be paid by taxpayers.  The stark fact is that governments all over the Western world have enriched themselves and created a protected elite of their own employees comparable to a feudal system in which the peasants struggle to survive while handing over all of their surplus to a governing elite that rules them."
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/03/the_great_global_governing_elite_scam.html

This is a logical follow-on to the previous item.  http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/03/government_exempts_itself_from_the_rules_everyone_else_must_follow.html

This is evidence that "the most transparent administration in history" failed that test many times over.  The record is truly abysmal.  Quote: "Obama has long described his administration is the most transparent in history."  BUT, "The number of records cases in which federal officials came up empty increased by 35 percent over fiscal year 2014."   http://freebeacon.com/politics/report-obama-admin-comes-up-empty-for-130k-records-requests/

 

It is really, really hard to find a Democrat who is not full of you know what and lies with impunity.  Take Obama,  Hillary, Nancy, Elijah, Joe, Chuck, Debbie, etc..  They are all well known to have trouble with the truth.  While multiple other examples could be offered this will do.  It deals with Harry Reid.  Take note of his words when George W. Bush was in office which are the direct opposite of those his more recent words.  Quote: "In 2005, Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) spoke on the Senate floor and insisted he and his colleagues had no constitutional duty to approve President George W. Bush’s Supreme Court nominee. Fast forward to 2016, he’s changing his tune. In a Washington Post article, Reid writes, “The Senate’s constitutional duty to give a fair and timely hearing and a floor vote to the president’s Supreme Court nominees has remained inviolable.”  All those cited above have said similar things, some multiple times.  They either have short memories or think the public is too stupid to call out their obvious lies and blatant hypocrisy.  Good job Chuck Todd.  http://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2016/03/21/chuck-todd-confused-by-reids-scotus-hypocrisy-n2136988?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm&newsletterad

I am not a fan of Bill Maher but I admire his willingness to call out foolishness/irresponsibility/lies when deserved/warranted.  Quote: "If vaccines are so perfect, why are we condemning those who research them fairly? Their accolades should stand on their own merits and come out unscathed to a little push back. My biggest fear is that people are continuing never to question anything are going to lead us down a path of severely deprived autonomy.  Our liberty is at stake here. Nothing Maher is saying in this video is out of line, nor is it anti-science and nor is it conspiracy theorist.  For all you vaccine proponents, doesn’t it scare you that those who merely ask a question about vaccines are shunned? Isn’t that a little suspicious?"    http://beforeitsnews.com/terrorism/2016/03/bill-maher-speaks-out-against-dangerous-vaccines-2457876.html

Again I agree with Maher.  Although he likes Obama he also knows he is a liar.  In a recent interview he corrected Obama lies.   Quote: "Granholm re-iterated her point that tagging all Muslims with the actions of a “small slice” is wrong. Maher countered, “But it’s not one small slice. You know, everybody talks about this, like there are no numbers. Obama said it’s very important for us to align ourselves with the 99.9% of  Muslims who are looking for the same thing we’re looking for, order, peace, prosperity. I love the president, but he just pulled that number right out of his a**. There are numbers. We had a guest on a couple of weeks ago, Raheel Raza. … She goes by the numbers. That’s what her video was called. 53% of the population of 39 Muslim countries that were surveyed want, Sharia Law. sharia law, death for leaving Islam, death for insulting the prophet, or the Koran, stoning a woman to death for adultery, amputation for theft, whipping for missing Friday prayers ,or drinking alcohol. The numbers vary from country to country, but this idea that it’s just this small problem, the reason why this is a unique problem, why I was imploring [Sen.]

Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ)"

to say that, is because it is distinct a threat based on the size. The New York Times says there are 5,000 militant Islamic groups in the world, armies, like Boko Haram, and ISIS, and the Taliban, and al Qaeda, intent — they want to get nuclear weapons, support from the local population. I’m not saying most people want to commit terrorist acts, I’m saying they have illiberal ideas, that are sometimes in line with what the terrorists believe, and recent events.”   http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/03/25/maher-obamas-pulling-his-numbers-on-islam-right-out-of-his-a-its-not-one-small-slice-that-are-dangerous/

Because it is quite lengthy, when time permits please read this piece which links communism/marxism and the environmental movement.  Quote: "We don’t need to be “saved” by allegedly benevolent central planners and self-anointed world improvers. If humanity and civilization are to continue to advance, the idea that a select few wise men will be able to coerce us toward Utopia has to be vigorously opposed. Ideologies based on Marxist ideas have done more than enough damage already.  The popularity of these ideas continually waxes and wanes and they have recently gained currency again – not least because the current system of cronyism has been falsely advertised as representing free market capitalism. While a market economy continues to be in place, it is a severely hampered one and it is not surprising that many people feel it isn’t delivering what they think it should.  It is important though to make clear that there is no salvation in an even more statist and socialist system. Voluntary cooperation and freedom are the only way forward."   https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/03/pater-tenebrarum/marxism-environmentalism/ 

George Burns

Hillary

Past notes shared information regarding the leftist shenanigans of billionaire and socialist, George Soros, who has long funded disruption and destructive actions within the US.  He is a Democrat fund raiser who has access to the White House and is a long time supporter of both Obama and Hillary.  Quote: "Several veteran “agents provocateurs” of the Occupy Wall Street movement who are now part of the Bernie Sanders presidential campaign have been enlisted by groups like Unbound Philanthropy, an immigrant rights group, to disrupt Trump rallies. Together with the Soros-financed group Black Lives Matter, these professional street hooligans have carefully, and in compliance with the Sharp model, staged their demonstrations to achieve maximum media coverage while achieving the maximum level of disruption to the primary election process."    http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2016/march/21/soros-disruption-american-style/

Quote: "The Los Angeles Times reported Sunday that the FBI and federal prosecutors are setting up interviews with Clinton’s top aides, a group that presumably includes Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills.  According to the Los Angeles Times:  Her attorney, David Kendall, declined to comment. Her campaign spokesman, Brian Fallon, said in an email that Clinton is ready to work with investigators to conclude the investigation.  ‘She first offered last August to meet and answer any questions they might have,’ Fallon wrote. ‘She would welcome the opportunity to help them complete their work.’  Lawyers for her closest aides – Huma Abedin, Jake Sullivan, Cheryl Mills, and Philippe Renes – either did not respond to messages or declined to comment.  The case hinges on whether Clinton violated a provision of the Espionage Act of 1913."    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/03/27/fbi-to-interview-hillary-clintons-top-aides-in-email-investigation/

More on the status of the case against Hillary and the perils she faces.  They are many.  Quote: "Some Democrats who now understand the gravity of the case against Clinton have taken to arguing lately that the feds should establish a different and higher bar -- a novel and unknown requirement for a greater quantum of evidence and proof of a heavier degree of harm -- before Clinton can be prosecuted. They have suggested this merely because she is the likely Democratic presidential nominee.  The public will never stand for that. America has a bedrock commitment to the rule of law. The rule of law means that no one is beneath the law's protections or above its requirements. The DOJ is not in the business of rewriting the law, but the Democrats should get in the business of rethinking Clinton's status as their presumptive presidential nominee, lest a summer catastrophe come their way."    http://townhall.com/columnists/judgeandrewnapolitano/2016/03/31/the-clinton-investigation-enters-a-dangerous-phase-n2141105/page/full

This adds to the previous item.  Given her history, we should have known.  Quote: "An article for The Daily Caller by Roger Stone reports the protests were actually motivated by supporters of Hillary Clinton.  The website credits Clinton supporters, such as George Soros, MoveOn.org, as well as David Brock with Media Matters for America, for providing funds for the protests.  Billionaire Jonathan Lewis, heir of Progressive Insurance Company founder, Peter Lewis, also reportedly contributed funds."  And,

"Some of the protesters said they attended the march after answering an ad on Craigslist promising protesters would be paid $16 per hour.  The article states that Clinton realizes many Republicans will not vote for Trump if he wins the nomination; however, due to his crossover appeal, many fed up Democrat and independent voters would vote for him.  Stone writes that Trump is the only populist nationalist candidate, which appeals to the blue-collar, hardworking voters, many having lost jobs in the past. These people are abandoning party lines and supporting Trump by the masses.  According to the article, the protests serve two purposes for the Clinton campaign. They discredit Sanders by portraying his supporters as violent, while it portrays Trump as a racist, effectively disqualifying him for future votes."    http://www.westernjournalism.com/wow-anti-trump-protesters-just-made-stunning-admission-that-totally-changes-the-story/  

More of Hillary's "lost" emails have been found.  More trouble for Hillary and her mountain of lies throughout this whole debacle.  Quote: "Previous emails released as a result of Judicial Watch’s lawsuit have shown that the NSA dismissed initial attempts by Clinton’s team to secure her BlackBerry.  Fitton, the Judicial Watch head, described Thursday’s email as a repudiation of Clinton’s timeline.  “So now we know that, contrary to her statement under oath suggesting otherwise, Hillary Clinton did not turn over all her government emails,” he said in a statement. “We also know why Hillary Clinton falsely suggests she didn’t use clintonemail.com account prior to March, 18, 2009 — because she didn’t want Americans to know about her February 13, 2009, email that shows that she knew her Blackberry and email use was not secure.”    http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/274230-lost-emails-discovered-from-clintons-server

The more you dig the more dirt you find in Hillary's past and present.  Here is an example.   http://freebeacon.com/issues/hillary-clintons-anti-corruption-partner-mired-corruption-scandals/?

Here is another example I bet you have not heard about.  I hadn't.  Quote: "Justin Cooper, a little-known Clinton political operative with important financial ties to both Bill and Hillary Clinton, is certain to be at the center of the “official acts” part of the FBI investigation into Secretary Clinton’s use of a private email server, which is examining whether she committed criminal acts by using her State Department office to influence donations to the Clinton Foundation.  Cooper was copied in an email that shows, contrary to Hillary Clinton’s original claims, she used more than one private account while serving as secretary of state.  As first reported by Breitbart in September 2015, archived Internet records establish that Hillary Clinton’s private email server was registered to Justin Cooper on Jan. 13, 2009, approximately one month before she was sworn in as secretary of state."     http://www.wnd.com/2016/03/clinton-aide-could-prove-criminal-acts-in-hillary-probe/

This is an analysis of Hillary's plan to fix Obamacare.  Anyone with a single brain cell can figure out that her proposals are, well, simply preposterous.  Her "solutions" make things worse.   http://townhall.com/columnists/debrajsaunders/2016/03/31/clintons-phony-health-care-fixeseditors-note-debra-j-saunders-is-off-the-following-column-is-by-betsy-mccaughey-n2141104/page/full

A recent event signaled her total submission to the authority of Islam over our Constitution.  Quote: "Double-speak acts are signals to both Muslim and Red totalitarians, while normal Americans are being played for suckers. Last month, when the US sucker media celebrated Obama’s first public visit to a mosque, the imams put out a big sign, proclaiming “There is no Progress without Struggle.” The Arab word for Struggle is Jihad. They all know that, and Americans don’t.   By visiting that (radical) mosque with its double-speak sign, the President of the United States was endorsing Jihad. After all, there  is no Progress without Jihad, right?"  And, "Democrats are imitating Jihad in the art of double-speak. Hillary and a Muslim propagandist presented a five-minute pack of lies in defense of Jihad, with Hillary only nodding, nodding, and nodding, and never saying a word  — like a properly submissive woman under Shari’a law. The purpose of imam-approved wife-beating in Islam is to turn women into nodding slave dolls. Hillary is signing over and over again that she has been properly beaten by her man."
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/03/jihadi_doublespeakdemocrat_doublespeak.html

Talking about the leadership crisis.  Hillary says she is a warrior against terrorism.  I fail to see anything she has done to back that up.  Indeed, evidence exists that the total opposite is true.  Consider this quote.  Rudy Giuliani had this to say in a recent interview:  "She says we should 'stand with Europe, but her president was sitting at a baseball game doing the wave and laughing instead of trying to rally the West against ISIS. What he did yesterday embarrassed me as an American. To rally our forces against ISIS, you have to come back to the White House and not leave until you have a plan. Hillary Clinton helped create ISIS, she could be considered a founding member! She was part of an administration that withdrew from Iraq and did not intervene in Syria at the proper time."    http://eaglerising.com/31765/ouch-rudy-giuliani-says-hillary-clinton-could-be-considered-a-founding-member-of-isis/  

The things the Democrats are willing to do to protect their presidential candidate are disgusting.  Democrat members of the Committee Investigating Hillary's Benghazi Scandal refuse to cooperate with committee rules.   Rep Elijah Cummings was specifically appointed to the committee by Nancy Pelosi for the purpose of obstructing justice.   http://patriotupdate.com/trey-gowdy-just-exposed-what-dems-are-doing-to-block-benghazi-investigation-with-this/

Watch this video at your own risk.  It depicts Hillary and her incessant lies and lawlessness she is so well known for.   http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/unbelievably-scandalous-video-hillary-wishes-never-saw-daylight-video/

Random Items

This should serve as a stark reminder for anyone inclined to support leftist political policies and the dangers that lurk therein.  Our country's incessant movement to the political left, said differently its movemet towards socialism with the Democratic party leading the way should be of concern to everyone who cherishes freedom from government oppression.  Quote: "Socialism demands that we place blind trust in whoever takes the power to distribute society’s goods and services. History shows those who have this power abuse it in horrific ways." And, "Socialism, by the way, is just such a system. This is the case whether you call it by any other name, whether communism, utopianism, or collectivism. Oh, go ahead and slap some lipstick on that pig and call it “democratic” socialism or “progressivism” or “communitarianism.” Lenin and his gang all started out calling themselves socialists. Social democrats, to be exact. So the fact remains: the path of socialism is ultimately paved with coercion, censorship, and, yes, terror. Does stating this make me an alarmist? No. It makes me a realist."  And, "We need to remember that, when soft socialism with its siren song of “equality” is left to its own devices, it takes ever more rigid forms. The political hubris of “progressives” who know better than you and me—and with such utter certainty—always leads to central control, corruption, cronyism, censorship, and abject conformity.  The more than 100 million victims of communism shows just how slippery a slope socialism is. Any person of goodwill who is familiar with the history and realities of socialism would do everything possible to avoid going down that minefield of a road."  Just to be clear Hillary calls herself a social democrat and Bernie is an avowed socialist so you cannot remove either from the ranks of those who actually or unwittingly support the destructive history of the political left.  And it is not by accident that the terroristic tactics are being actively perpetrated against the Republican front runner for president.  Such actions are totally consistent with past historic behavior of socialists seeking to destroy its opposition.  Now read this article providing us with an excellent reminder of what we have to look forward to if things don't immediately change direction.   http://thefederalist.com/2016/03/15/socialisms-bloody-history-shows-millennials-should-think-twice-before-supporting-it/

It is well understood that progressives are not particularly self reflecting people.  They think they are always right, no self reflection required.  When things go wrong they simply double down on the same thing ignoring Einstein's counsel that "doing the same thing over and over again does not produce a different outcome".  This piece deals with this issue offering insights into why the national mess we are now in is a direct result of irresponsible, even illogical, policies but which happen to be popular, which is what motivates progressives to persist in their failures. The unfortunate consequence is that progressivism has long been wreaking havoc on the Western World in general and the United States in specific. Social Security serves at the illustrative stalking horse. Quote: "Like government schools, Social Security is a failed program that nevertheless remains popular with the American people.  Why?  Keep in mind that progressivism is not a rational system of thought but a means to make progressives feel better about themselves and provide a (false) sense of control over a big, complex and often hostile world.  As such, the mindset necessarily excludes any notion that progressive programs might fail or might cost too much which, in the case of Social Security, is a critical issue.  If progressivism was sensitive to its own failures, it would not be what it is and would not serve the purposes that make it so popular."   https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/03/james-ostrowski/socialism-security/  

The smartest man on earth is either an idiot or a hard core propagandist for evil political systems, or both. Quote: "“The Marxist in the White House is erasing the lines between two dangerous ideologies and the one that made the US great, just as he erased our borders. This is a man who would be at home in communist China,” chided the Independent Sentinel."  For a more accurate breakdown of how capitalism beats socialism every time, watch the video:   http://www.infowars.com/obama-theres-little-difference-between-communism-and-capitalism/

Socialists are either stupid in their devotion to its utopian vision in spite of its history of total failure and the resulting suffering of the masses or they are totally ignorant of history and foolishly believe the utopian propaganda of its idiotic proponents.  History has proven them wrong over and over again.  Yet they persist always thinking the next approach will work.   Quote: "Socialism is back in vogue, especially among America’s college-educated youth. They are too young to remember the Cold War and few study history. It is, therefore, timely to remind the millennials of what socialism wrought — especially in some of the world’s poorest countries.  Those of us who remember the early 1980s will always remember the images of starving Ethiopian children. With bellies swollen by kwashiorkor and eyes covered with flies, these were the innocent victims of the Derg — a group of Marxist militants who took over the Ethiopian government and used starvation to subdue unruly parts of the country.  Between 1983 and 1985, some 400,000 people starved to death. In 1984, Derg earmarked 46 percent of the gross domestic product for military spending, thereby creating the largest standing army in Africa. In contrast, spending on health fell from 6 percent of GDP in 1973 to 3 percent in 1990."    http://eaglerising.com/31854/just-a-reminder-socialism-has-starved-tens-of-millions-even-as-capitalism-has-fed-hundreds-of-millions/

This is what the socialistic progressive philosophy of the political left, academia, and media has wrought.  It makes you want to cry.  According to CBS news, "Americans born after 1980 are lagging their peers in countries ranging from Australia to Estonia, according to a new report from researchers at the Educational Testing Service (ETS). The study looked at scores for literacy and numeracy from a test called the Program for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies, which tested the abilities of people in 22 countries.  The results are sobering, with dire implications for America. It hints that students may be falling behind not only in their early educational years but at the college level. Even though more Americans between the ages of 20 to 34 are achieving higher levels of education, they’re still falling behind their cohorts in other countries. In Japan, Finland and the Netherlands, young adults with only a high school degree scored on par with American Millennials holding four-year college degrees, the report said."    http://patriotpowerednews.com/depressing-survey-results-show-how-extremely-stupid-america-has-become/

A real life story on why we should not embrace socialism. Quote: "Also the lack of historical knowledge. I would say the school system is responsible for that. You get courses at the university on the Holocaust, but you don’t get courses on the history of communism. Last time I checked, [it was estimated] 100 million people were killed under communism by various regimes in various parts of the world. That seems to have passed without a note in the academic world. I think that lack of prominence in the curriculum, in other words, not teaching what really happened, and the sheer ignorance about the disaster in terms of human cost, economic cost, in tragedy in general is responsible for this rosy picture of socialism."    http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/26717/

From whence came the current leadership crisis?  This interesting piece provides insights.  Quote: "There are two aphorisms at play here, both famous, each oft-misinterpreted but worth recalling. The first is the philosopher George Santayana's dictum that "those who forget history are condemned to repeat it." The second, of course, is Marx's famous notion that history repeats itself, first time as tragedy, second time as farce. Those of us who came into our majority during the tumultuous late sixties and early seventies are now witnessing the truth of both dicta."    https://pjmedia.com/michaelwalsh/2016/03/23/the-curse-of-santayana-the-revenge-of-karl-marx/

This item is two years old but very current.  Here are words written by the esteemed Thomas Sowell. "What socialism, fascism and other ideologies of the left have in common is an assumption that some very wise people -- like themselves -- need to take decisions out of the hands of lesser people, like the rest of us, and impose those decisions by government fiat.  The left's vision is not only a vision of the world, but also a vision of themselves, as superior beings pursuing superior ends. In the United States, however, this vision conflicts with a Constitution that begins, "We the People..."   That is why the left has for more than a century been trying to get the Constitution's limitations on government loosened or evaded by judges' new interpretations, based on notions of "a living Constitution" that will take decisions out of the hands of "We the People," and transfer those decisions to our betters.  The self-flattery of the vision of the left also gives its true believers a huge ego stake in that vision, which means that mere facts are unlikely to make them reconsider, regardless of what evidence piles up against the vision of the left, and regardless of its disastrous consequences.  Only our own awareness of the huge stakes involved can save us from the rampaging presumptions of our betters, whether they are called socialists or fascists. So long as we buy their heady rhetoric, we are selling our birthright of freedom."    http://townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/2012/06/12/socialist_or_fascist/page/full  

This item provides a summary of the absolute absence of common sense in Washington, D.C.  Elected officials, appointed bureaucrats, judicial appointees, etc. have elevated themselves to the position of our overseers and impose oppressive and irresponsible laws, dictates, demands, etc, etc..  This item provides details.  Quote: "For seven years, our “Try and stop me” president and administration have used and abused their powers to impose their agenda. What we need now is a “Try and make me” president, who will refuse to enforce their edicts. Who will use his pen, phone and power to review them, root out any fraud and abuse behind them, and defund and bury them. Who will work with Congress to restore the rule of law and our Constitution, economic growth, and the role of personal liberties, opportunities and responsibilities." http://www.cfact.org/2016/03/23/washingtons-despotic-lawlessness/

This is what the leftist billionaire trouble makers are up to.  Disgusting.  Quote: "And now we have MoveOn.org, funded in part by George Soros (see here), ramping up their nationwide protests against Trump. They’re clearly pointing toward the Republican Convention in July in Cleveland (see also this).  Their whole strategy depends on how much blame for their protests and violence can be successfully attributed to Trump himself—which is the clear media strategy. The standard line is: Trump started this whole thing with his incendiary statements about immigration and Muslims; therefore, everything that happens after that is his fault. He is the prime mover. The protests are merely a response to him. “The blood is on his hands.”  If that can be sold, and if the action in Cleveland in July can rise to a new height of violence, then a significant number of fence-sitting voters would decide to opt for Hillary, who will, of course, position herself as the peacemaker and the uniter.  It doesn’t matter that she’s never met a war she didn’t like (or could invent). She’s the “calm force that will lead the nation into eight years of collective tolerance and sanity.”  In other words, Hillary stands to benefit the most from the planned and highly organized attacks on Trump.  It’s not hard to trace a connection between Soros, one of the money men behind MoveOn.org, and Hillary Clinton. Just for starters, as Politico noted, on 1/31/16 (“George Soros donates $8 million to boost Hillary”):  “George Soros in December donated $6 million to the leading super PAC supporting Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, marking the return of the billionaire financier as among the biggest givers in all of American politics. The massive check brings to $8 million the Hungarian-born investor’s total 2015 giving to pro-Clinton groups.”  Apparently, though, these obvious connections don’t rate major coverage in mainstream media."    https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/03/26/trump-violence-moveon-org-its-1968-all-over-again/

This follows-up the previous item.  Far leftist billionaire George Soros is doing every underhanded thing he can to get Hillary elected president.  He probably knows he can manipulate her to his ends.  He is a most unethical man.   http://beforeitsnews.com/u-s-politics/2016/03/trump-under-attack-by-187-organizations-directly-funded-by-george-soros-2497479.html

Before proceeding to Hillary, consider this item.  Since the Paris disaster Obama had allowed 911 Syrian refugees into the country.  Meanwhile only 4 Christians were admitted despite the genocide being committed by Muslims against Christians across the Middle East and North Africa.  Even Secretary of State Kerry recognizes the genocide and appealed to the UN who has not and will not take any action, but Obama does not care.  Muslims are his preferred people to protect.  Christians are expendable.  This is a function of and led by the political left progressives and liberals across the globe.  Obama is at the head of the pack.  This is but a teeny tiny example of what is going on.   http://patriotupdate.com/beware-christians-not-even-churches-protected-now/