Sunday, April 3, 2016

Round Up

You will find this piece most interesting and far more truthful than not.  Quote: "Why does Obama know better? Not out of any intense study of or reflection on diplomatic and world history and international relations theory. Not because he served in the military or in the diplomatic corps or held senior posts in government prior to election as president. What graces Obama with superior insight and prudence is the simple fact of his own existence. He is his own proof of his superiority."   And, "Confidence is one thing. But Obama is more than confident. He’s narcissistic. He looks at the world and sees nothing but his reflection: rational, cool, unmoved, and always right. When reality surprises him, it’s not because he’s in error. It’s because Putin or Assad or the mullahs have failed to live up to the standards he’s set for them. Forget about them being true to themselves. They’re not being true to Barack Obama. And Barack Obama, lest we forget, is all that matters."     http://freebeacon.com/columns/president-obama-is-a-political-narcissist/

Ponder this item with great care.  You will be exposed to things that will make you uncomfortable.  Check the links to add credibility to the summary offered by this author.  Quote: "I could cite much more from Cartalucci and Turbeville, who effectively argue that ISIS is a created tool of the US government and its allies. I strongly recommend you read and study their work.  As far as the Brussels attacks are concerned, if we assume that ISIS was responsible, the whole scenario is turned upside down after analyzing the basis of ISIS.  The Obama administration (jointly with the Bush administration) should be announcing: “Well, we keep ISIS alive. Unfortunately, things happen. One of those things is Brussels.”   And then you could go on to query the sincerity of the word “unfortunately.”     https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/03/23/isis-attacked-brussels-the-us-created-isis-therefore/

If you think this is a good trend then you can thank our progressive, liberal and Democrat leaders/cultural warriors in government, academia, media and the Hollywood cesspool.   http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/children-seven-years-old-sexting-facebook-twitter-a6951066.html

This item provide insights that reinforces the previous item.  Quote: "Scientists researching the common characteristics of psychopathy now use a list of predominant qualities displayed by psychopaths that they’ve meticulously studied. The characteristics are quite telling and perhaps disturbing, as many can recognize these attributes in people around them.  While they estimate only 2 to 4% of the population are psychopaths, Amerika ranking with a high percentile of those they have identified, they clearly understand that these types of non-empathic dehumanizing freaks gravitate towards positions of power.  See how these attributes ingrained in such ideas as manifest destiny and American supremacism match up to the collective American way of life and its effect on the world of today:"   http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/amerikan-way-study-psychopathy/

And progressives brag about how compassionate and understanding they are.  They really care about the little people.  Well, their vaunted identity politics has blown up in the face of this little six year old girl and the prospective couple who wanted to adopt her.  Legalized progressive identity politics takes precedence over the life of a child.  She is 1 & 1/2%  Choctaw Indian so the law say she belongs to the Choctaw tribe.  Quote: "Because of the Inadian Child Welfare Act - a federal law from the 1970s - Lexi must live with Native Americans even though the Pages are the only family she has ever known. This is one of many sad examples.     http://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2016/03/24/the-latest-victim-of-progressives-identity-politics-n2138310/page/full

How one's mind and the times change when you have control over revisionist history and the propaganda pushed by schools and the media.  More truth by Thomas Sowell.  Quote: "Southern segregationists who railed against blacks were often also Progressives who railed against Wall Street. Back in those days, blacks voted for Republicans as automatically as they vote for Democrats today." And, "Later, when the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was sponsored by Democrats, a higher percentage of Congressional Republicans voted for it than did Congressional Democrats. Revisionist histories tell a different story. But, as Casey Stengel used to say, "You could look it up" -- in the Congressional Record, in this case."  And, "The biggest difference between the left and right today, when it comes to racial issues, is that liberals tend to take the side of those blacks who are doing the wrong things -- hoodlums the left depicts as martyrs, while the right defends those blacks more likely to be the victims of those hoodlums."   Think about it.  Maybe the truth will filter through.   http://townhall.com/columnists/thomassowell/2016/03/22/black-and-white-left-and-right-n2137316/page/full

This truth has a long history and lets all hope the necessary and badly needed backlash to its horrendous reality will soon be forthcoming.  These guys think it may be upon us.  Quote: "I have been saying in this space for some time that the illiberalism of the Social Justice Warrior left is going to call forth and legitimize a backlash. Trump is that backlash. Douthat is right that Trump’s authoritarianism is a temptation, but I think it’s important to recognize, as Douthat does, that the militant left plays a key role in giving Trump fuel for his fire. And not just the militant left that turns up to no-platform conservative speakers. I’m talking the militant left that makes normal, everyday life impossible because it is forever finding a new reason to be offended and demand satisfaction."    http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/leftist-provocateurs-for-trump/   Are you proud of this behavior of your supporters people of the political left???   http://teapartyjournal.com/anonymous-hackers-declare-all-out-war-on-this-gop-candidate/

More and more radical liberal Democrats are showing their real colors.  This guy is unhinged.   http://eaglerising.com/31791/democrat-state-senator-says-if-i-was-a-white-guy-id-get-my-semiautomatic-weapon-and-mow-everybody-down/

This is a blatant example of the left trying to impose its will, its values, its demands on the broad public.  Tyrannical, yes.  Fair, no.  Quote: "The Georgia legislature recently passed a religious freedom bill. It was a compromise piece of legislation. Supporters wanted it to apply to for-profit businesses. That did not happen. Opponents wanted specific language saying the legislation did not allow discrimination. That was added.  The legislature compromised, but the left wants to compromise. They want total submission."      http://theresurgent.com/the-left-demands-georgia-bow-to-hollywood-values/

Speaking of the truth, consider this interesting piece.  Quote: "The mainstream media -- that is, the liberal media -- share all the views and characteristics of the left.  Among these is the left's view of truth. There are honest individuals with left-wing views, and dishonest individuals on the right. But truth is not a leftist value. Everything the left believes in is more important than truth: social justice, economic equality, reducing carbon emissions, expanding the power of the state, battling sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, racism, and above all of these, destroying its conservative opposition.  The media's coverage of President Barack Obama's nomination of Judge Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court should serve as one of the most blatant examples of both the left-wing orientation of the news media and their willingness to play with truth.    http://townhall.com/columnists/dennisprager/2016/03/22/judge-garland-and-the-lefts-disdain-for-truth-n2137592/page/full  

Who says gun ownership is dangerous?  There are hundreds if not thousands of more examples.  http://2ndamendmentinsider.com/play-stupid-games-win-stupid-prizes/

This is something the many of us have known for a long time.  It is finally getting the attention it deserves although it may be too late to repair the damage.  Quote: "This staggering level of debt simply can’t be paid by taxpayers.  The stark fact is that governments all over the Western world have enriched themselves and created a protected elite of their own employees comparable to a feudal system in which the peasants struggle to survive while handing over all of their surplus to a governing elite that rules them."
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/03/the_great_global_governing_elite_scam.html

This is a logical follow-on to the previous item.  http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/03/government_exempts_itself_from_the_rules_everyone_else_must_follow.html

This is evidence that "the most transparent administration in history" failed that test many times over.  The record is truly abysmal.  Quote: "Obama has long described his administration is the most transparent in history."  BUT, "The number of records cases in which federal officials came up empty increased by 35 percent over fiscal year 2014."   http://freebeacon.com/politics/report-obama-admin-comes-up-empty-for-130k-records-requests/
 
It is really, really hard to find a Democrat who is not full of you know what and lies with impunity.  Take Obama,  Hillary, Nancy, Elijah, Joe, Chuck, Debbie, etc..  They are all well known to have trouble with the truth.  While multiple other examples could be offered this will do.  It deals with Harry Reid.  Take note of his words when George W. Bush was in office which are the direct opposite of those his more recent words.  Quote: "In 2005, Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV) spoke on the Senate floor and insisted he and his colleagues had no constitutional duty to approve President George W. Bush’s Supreme Court nominee. Fast forward to 2016, he’s changing his tune. In a Washington Post article, Reid writes, “The Senate’s constitutional duty to give a fair and timely hearing and a floor vote to the president’s Supreme Court nominees has remained inviolable.”  All those cited above have said similar things, some multiple times.  They either have short memories or think the public is too stupid to call out their obvious lies and blatant hypocrisy.  Good job Chuck Todd.  http://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2016/03/21/chuck-todd-confused-by-reids-scotus-hypocrisy-n2136988?utm_source=thdailypm&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl_pm&newsletterad

I am not a fan of Bill Maher but I admire his willingness to call out foolishness/irresponsibility/lies when deserved/warranted.  Quote: "If vaccines are so perfect, why are we condemning those who research them fairly? Their accolades should stand on their own merits and come out unscathed to a little push back. My biggest fear is that people are continuing never to question anything are going to lead us down a path of severely deprived autonomy.  Our liberty is at stake here. Nothing Maher is saying in this video is out of line, nor is it anti-science and nor is it conspiracy theorist.  For all you vaccine proponents, doesn’t it scare you that those who merely ask a question about vaccines are shunned? Isn’t that a little suspicious?"    http://beforeitsnews.com/terrorism/2016/03/bill-maher-speaks-out-against-dangerous-vaccines-2457876.html

Again I agree with Maher.  Although he likes Obama he also knows he is a liar.  In a recent interview he corrected Obama lies.   Quote: "Granholm re-iterated her point that tagging all Muslims with the actions of a “small slice” is wrong. Maher countered, “But it’s not one small slice. You know, everybody talks about this, like there are no numbers. Obama said it’s very important for us to align ourselves with the 99.9% of  Muslims who are looking for the same thing we’re looking for, order, peace, prosperity. I love the president, but he just pulled that number right out of his a**. There are numbers. We had a guest on a couple of weeks ago, Raheel Raza. … She goes by the numbers. That’s what her video was called. 53% of the population of 39 Muslim countries that were surveyed want, Sharia Law. sharia law, death for leaving Islam, death for insulting the prophet, or the Koran, stoning a woman to death for adultery, amputation for theft, whipping for missing Friday prayers ,or drinking alcohol. The numbers vary from country to country, but this idea that it’s just this small problem, the reason why this is a unique problem, why I was imploring [Sen.]

Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ)"
to say that, is because it is distinct a threat based on the size. The New York Times says there are 5,000 militant Islamic groups in the world, armies, like Boko Haram, and ISIS, and the Taliban, and al Qaeda, intent — they want to get nuclear weapons, support from the local population. I’m not saying most people want to commit terrorist acts, I’m saying they have illiberal ideas, that are sometimes in line with what the terrorists believe, and recent events.”   http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/03/25/maher-obamas-pulling-his-numbers-on-islam-right-out-of-his-a-its-not-one-small-slice-that-are-dangerous/


Because it is quite lengthy, when time permits please read this piece which links communism/marxism and the environmental movement.  Quote: "We don’t need to be “saved” by allegedly benevolent central planners and self-anointed world improvers. If humanity and civilization are to continue to advance, the idea that a select few wise men will be able to coerce us toward Utopia has to be vigorously opposed. Ideologies based on Marxist ideas have done more than enough damage already.  The popularity of these ideas continually waxes and wanes and they have recently gained currency again – not least because the current system of cronyism has been falsely advertised as representing free market capitalism. While a market economy continues to be in place, it is a severely hampered one and it is not surprising that many people feel it isn’t delivering what they think it should.  It is important though to make clear that there is no salvation in an even more statist and socialist system. Voluntary cooperation and freedom are the only way forward."   https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/03/pater-tenebrarum/marxism-environmentalism/ 

George Burns


No comments: