Some Considerations The Supreme Court Needs To Deal With In Determining The Future Of Abortions in America 2

Does that language suggest that it is possible for anyone to kill a baby and not be punished for doing so? The only obvious reason is that the Supreme Court unconstitutionally used their Roe v. Wade ruling to cut out an exemption for the benefit of women who do not want to carry their baby to full term. But that is only a court ruling. It is not a law. The legislature never took the step of enacting a law subsequent to the Supreme Court ruling. My guess is that the then leaders of the legislature knew that doing so would never pass the legislative process, so the supporters of the Court ruling "dubbed" Roe v. Wade the law of the land hoping no one would challenge their false declaration. That declaration has unlawfully permitted abortions to persist for the last 50 years. As a consequence millions of babies protected by 18 U.S. Code Section1841 have been unlawfully murdered. Who knows what those lives lost could have contributed to humanity.

     

       W

orse yet it has been condoned by abortion proponents, abortion clinics, the U.S. Government and its three branches: Administrative, legislative and Judicial. The U.S. government even funds abortion facilities with taxpayer funds, violating the conscience and religious beliefs of many American citizens. The fact is that it is even possible that these entities may have long consciously or not engaged in genocide which is a crime against humanity.   Still no successful appeal has been launched to repeal Roe v. Wade.  Do you wonder why? I do.  

     This is a portion of an article published by the Criminal Defense Website what they say about genocide. "Genocide is considered to be one of the world’s worst crimes against humanity, so it should come as no surprise that the United States federal government has strict laws prohibiting genocide. Those who are accused of committing genocide need to understand the nature of the charges, determine how to respond to accusations, and get the right legal help from an experienced attorney who understands genocide laws.  [...]   Genocide crimes are defined in18 U.S. Code Chapter 50A. There are a total of three different statutes within Chapter 50, including a statute with definitions applicable throughout the chapter. The relevant federal laws related to genocide include:  18 U.S. Code section 1091 ; 18 U.S. Code section 1092 ; 18 U.S. Code section 1093."   Notably Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger was an avid eugenicist.  Margaret Sanger’s extreme brand of eugenics | America Magazine   So is Bill Gates.    Bill Gates: From Bioethics To Eugenics (technocracy.news)    And, Dr. Anthony Fauci.    EUGENICS: Anthony Fauci, America’s High Priest of Death by Exotic Disease | RIELPOLITIK   Does anyone really believe that the Supreme Court Roe v. Wade ruling trumps established U.S. laws prohibiting genocide? Do you wonder why Roe v. Wade is not applicable in this case? And, why the abortion industry and its enablers have not been charged with genocide?  I have.
 

It is understandable that some women and girls who get pregnant for a variety of reasons do not want to carry their baby to term. It is my opinion that some of those reasons are reasonably justified but most are not. Justifiable examples include victims of rape or incest as well as a verified medical risk to the life of the mother. Those are certainly morally compelling considerations. Maybe in such cases the nation's legislature should do their job and enact well defined laws supporting such situations. But that is not what the majority of abortions are about.

       Making abortion the preferred prophylactic is pure nonsense and only benefits the abortion industry which profits from them both doing abortions and the subsequent selling of the baby parts to industries who further profit from the use of the aborted baby parts. Little to no thought is given to the pain and suffering of the aborted victim. Protestations by pro-abortionists that babies feel no pain is patently false. Pretending they do not suffer is the worst possible form of child abuse and represents the most egregious violation of existing U.S. child abuse laws.    New Study Shows Babies Suffer Incredible Pain During Abortion (pulpitandpen.org)  

      Likewise, little to no thought is given to the use of morning after pills and other preventative devices available to prevent unwanted pregnancies. Having an abortion is a dangerous procedure with resulting deaths and/or emergency treatments for the mothers not being infrequent.  Don't believe me?  Read this item lifted from the NIH article linked below. Quote: " Every year, worldwide, about 42 million women with unintended pregnancies choose abortion, and nearly half of these procedures, 20 million, are unsafe. Some 68,000 women die of unsafe abortion annually, making it one of the leading causes of maternal mortality (13%). Of the women who survive unsafe abortion, 5 million will suffer long-term health complications.

       Unsafe abortions is thus a pressing issue. Both of the primary methods for preventing unsafe abortion—less restrictive abortion laws and greater contraceptive use—face social, religious, and political obstacles, particularly in developing nations, where most unsafe abortions (97%) occur. Even where these obstacles are overcome, women and health care providers need to be educated about contraception and the availability of legal and safe abortion, and women need better access to safe abortion and postabortion services. Otherwise, desperate women, facing the financial burdens and social stigma of unintended pregnancy and believing they have no other option, will continue to risk their lives by undergoing unsafe abortions."    Unsafe Abortion: Unnecessary Maternal Mortality (nih.gov)   

Then there is the reality of why so many abortions are required. Social and governmental ineptitude and religious stigma are the primary factors involved. First and foremost, sexual promiscuity can be traced to the lowering of social behavioral standards, decayed notions of morality and undermining legitimate sexual behavioral standards long promoted by the political left. Their obsession with and protection of permissive sexual behavior of all kinds, they claim should be accepted by modern society, normalized even. They claim that abiding responsible sexual behavior is passe' and long out of fashion. No matter the existence of multiple sexually transmitted diseases that result during illicit unprotected sexual encounters and the dangers inherent in having an abortion.