- I's one thing to say, I'm reviewing the inspector general's work, and another thing to say, I';m reviewing the inspector general's work with the subpoena power of a U.S. attorney, he said.
- Huber, the Justice Department said, is that as a U.S. attorney he could use grand jury subpoena powers to obtain documents and witness statements that the inspector general might not.
- Roughly one year after U.S. Attorney John Huber was appointed to investigate whether accusations that the FBI and Justice Department abused their powers during the 2016 election season merit prosecution, his work remains shrouded in mystery.
- The scope that Huber was supposed to be looking at was much more broad than what the inspector general was supposed to be looking at.
- I don't know that Huber looking over Horowitz's shoulder is the most prudent thing to do, Mr.
- It sounds like he's just looking over Horowitz's shoulder to see if anything warrants a criminal referral, but they don't need a U.S. attorney to do that, she said.
- Huber can subpoena witnesses, including past government employees, and prosecute cases himself, all powers the inspector general does not possess.
It's becoming increasingly difficult to discern fact from fiction, and unfortunately the media has a strong bias. They spin stories to make conservatives look bad and will go to great lengths to avoid reporting on the good that comes from conservative policies. There are a few shining lights in the media landscape-brave conservative outlets that report the truth and offer a different perspective. We must support conservative outlets like this one and ensure that our voices are heard.
Elections have consequences, so it is important that voters who want to save our democracy, should v
Monday, October 29, 2018
John Huber's FBI-Justice Department probe shrouded in mystery
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment