Progressivism and Islam have
common ideology, interests and purpose. Quote: "What Nazism-fascism and
communism were to the 20th century, Western ideologies on homosexuality
and abortion and Islamic fanaticism are to today,” noted Sarah.
“Certain keys allow us to discern the same demonic origin of these two
movements: they both advocate a universal and totalitarian law, they’re
both violently intolerant, destroyers of families and the Church, and
openly anti-Christian,” he concluded. Indeed, while there are
exceptions, the “progressive” left is overwhelmingly anti-Semitic,
anti-Christian and pro-Muslim. Liberals and Islamists, such as those
belonging to the American-Islamic terrorist group CAIR, as well as
Obama’s pals in the Muslim Brotherhood and Iran, have forged a bizarre
and notably incongruous sociopolitical partnership I call the
“Islamo-’progressive’ axis of evil.” The only explanation for this, as
far as I can tell, is best illustrated by the maxim: “The enemy of my
enemy is my friend.” http://www.wnd.com/2015/10/islam-and-liberalism-twin-beasts-of-the-apocalypse/
The vitriol of this writer and
the willingness of Salon to publish such is beyond reason and indicative
of their arrogance and absolute belief in the rightness of their own
views and beliefs which put on display their obvious intolerance of the
views and disrespect for the beliefs of those who differ with them.
While I fully support free expression this type of journalism is
something that is indicative of our times and should be of concern to
all. Quote: The writer says that "Professing belief in a fictitious
celestial deity says a lot about the content of a person’s character,
and what sort of policies he or she would likely favor." To use his own
words they tell me "a lot about his character, rather his lack of
character. His arrogance, intolerance and religious bigotry is on full
display. The writer 's piece addresses the upcoming 2016 elections
and bemoans the fact that the announced Republican candidates are
"God-fearing clowns and faith-mongering nitwits [are] groveling before
Evangelicals." Further, he denigrates the candidates when he writes
that they are “nattering on about their belief in the Almighty and their
certainty that if we just looked, we could find answers to many of our
ills in the Good Book.” And he also bemoans the fact that "There will
almost certainly be no (declared) atheist or even agnostic among the
candidates. This is scandalous, given the electorate’s gradual,
relentless ditching of religion. A survey just out shows that 7.5 million Americans have abandoned their faith since 2012, the year of the Pew Research Center poll
that established that one out of five have no religious affiliation.
Nonbelief is trending, and among a sizable, growing demographic." As
far as I am concerned he is the real "nitwit" instead of the Christian
candidates. Further, he exposes his enormous ignorance of (or willful
dismissal of) the history as to the reasons why people fled Europe
seeking religious freedom in colonial America and the religious basis
underpinning our nation's founding. He displays that ignorance with his
totally baseless and disrespectful nonsense. If he thinks his ranting's
contribute to reasoned dialogue about matters that count he is dead
wrong. Please read the piece and see if you agree. http://www.salon.com/2015/04/19/marco_rubios_deranged_religion_ted_cruzs_bizarre_faith_our_would_be_presidents_are_god_fearing_clowns/
If anyone thinks this is the way
to run a taxpayer funded government and treat our veterans then by all
means support this totally irresponsible Democrat tactic being taken for
all the wrong reasons. When the Democrats held control of Congress any
such attempt by Republicans was called anti-American or worse. They
are truly disgusting in their belief that more and more and more debt is
good for the country. Their idea of good government is irresponsible
government willing to give free stuff to potential voters but not take
care of historical government responsibilities. Quote: "If and when
Washington is pushed to the brink of another government shutdown in
December, as the just-passed
stopgap funding measures approach their expiration, we'll inevitably
hear a lot of sound and fury from Democrats about "extreme" Republicans
holding crucial federal spending "hostage" in pursuit of an ideological
agenda. Setting aside arguments over the wisdom and efficacy of using a
shutdown threat as political leverage (which was attempted and sort of
conduct, for reasons that aren't likely to impress many voters.
Yesterday, Harry Reid and friends filibustered a spending bill that would fund the VA -- which Democrats routinely claim is underfunded, as a means of explaining away the department's systemic, deadly corruption and concealing the disastrous failure of government-run healthcare." http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2015/10/02/senate-democrats-filibuster-veterans-funding-bill-n2059902?
When government officials, the
power elites and liberals/progressives start speaking in the terms
highlighted in this link the nation's mainstream citizenry needs to rise
up and vigorously refute such arrogance and self righteousness. It
illustrates their total disdain for the Constitution and the Bill of
Rights and the vast majority of the nation's citizenry. It is crystal
clear that they only care about themselves and their position in all
matters and have no regard for average American citizens and our
opinions and rights. They are right and know they are right and
obviously take offence if you challenge their all knowing
righteousness. http://eaglerising.com/18610/liberals-believe-you-must-be-made-to-obey/
This item extends the conversation in the previous link. http://townhall.com/columnists/victordavishanson/2015/05/21/think-like-a-liberal--or-else-n2001619/page/full
Now consider this. Leftist
government/courts in their self-righteous arrogance ignore the long
established First Amendment rights of one group and ng-says-no-thanks-to-obama-visit-n2061768?
Was it the gun or this poor soul who killed these innocent people? The
gun grabbers either do not understand or choose to ignore the common
thread behind these type actions. It is the demented/mentally sick soul
of the person pulling the trigger. Taking everyone's guns away for the
sake of keeping guns out of their hands is foolhardy. Why is it that
the only time something like this happens the chorus of "do gooders" cry
lets take away people's guns? Why don't these same people instead seek
solutions to rampant black on black gun violence that goes on almost if
not every day in major cities? Their death toll is an order of
magnitude more that these random events. Are we to think that they
think blacks killing blacks using illegal weapons is okay? Here are
some early facts about this unfortunate shooter - like the others he was
on medications. Have you ever read the warnings on the labels of
physician prescribed legal drugs for mentally disturbed patients? If
not, you need to know that they say "may cause violent behavior and
suicidal thoughts". Does anyone think that may actually be the problem
instead of the guns? If you still think the guns are the problem then
explain to me why way more deaths result from rampant gun violence by
gangs (presumably on illegal drugs) using illegally obtained weapons and
precious little if anything is said or done? http://www.naturalnews.com/051453_Christopher_Mercer_psychiatric_medications_autism_spectrum_disorder.html?
George Burns
No comments:
Post a Comment