This
piece provides good insight into the UN and its efforts to sit atop a
global New World Order. The UN is not alone in its efforts nation
states such as the US, Canada, Germany, etc. are in league with the
initiative. http://batr.org/autonomy/092215.html
This
item discusses the downside of US membership in the UN. An instructive
piece. Quote: "A realistic assessment of the U.N.’s actual conduct
teaches us not to be beguiled by the idealism propounded by its
supporters. We should reconsider our country’s commitment to this
problematical institution." http://humanevents.com/2015/10/23/the-united-nations-at-70-should-the-united-states-drop-out/?
The
UN continues its power grab. It is highly unlikely that the Senate
knows of this UN initiative just as in the above item. And, my guess is
that Obama could not care less. Those interested in psychiatry and
psychology will be especially intrigued. But, I hasten to add it should
concern us all. Quote: "The mandatory imposition of the World Health
Organization's classification of diseases (ICD-10th revision) upon the
practice of medicine and all allied professions including psychology on
October 1, 2015 is a major step in the radical transformation of the
United States into a subjugated territory of a one-world regime under
the auspices of the United Nations." http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/10/icd10_the_un_occupies_medicine.html
You
need to read this item if you still don't think the UN is a power
hungry tyrannical monster AND is collaborating against the interests of
the US and other free nations. Quote: "
Negotiators at the UN climate
talks in Bonn, Germany resurrected the “International Tribunal of
Climate Justice” and inserted it into the text they are preparing for
nations to agree to at the big UN summit in Paris in December.
The draft text will allow
developing nations to sit in judgment over the U.S. and its allies, but
not subject those nations to the tribunal’s jurisdiction themselves." http://www.cfact.org/2015/10/23/un-climate-text-adds-an-international-tribunal-of-climate-justice/?
All along this is what the whole
immigration game Obama has been playing is all about. He, of course,
has the full support of Democrats. It is as dirty and unethical as you
know what. It is all about Democratic party control of
our government. The will of the people does not matter. Progressive
leftist/Democrat control over the population does. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/18/us/white-house-campaign-legal-immigrants-citizenship.html?
Somehow the whole process of handling the Middle Eastern refugee mess
(which the UN has failed miserably in handling in the first place) fell
to the UN. They are telling free nations what number
of immigrations/refugees each will be required to absorb. Since when
did they acquire that authority? Ask yourself why Muslim nations get a
free ride or have refused to accept any. One more time I will say the
UN is not a friend of our Republic.
UN indoctrination supporting
their goal to establish a One World Government has long been underway.
Our compliant government has played along. Two quotes: "This is a part of a huge propaganda campaign designed to make UN Agenda 21 cool and hip, and unassailable." And,
"Popular culture is supporting UN Agenda 21 through all media, through
schools, through all levels of bureaucracy, and peer pressure.
Transformation is the term you’ll hear, ‘change’, and it can only happen
by destroying the existing order. Young people are the most
vulnerable; they’ve been fed this line all of their lives and see
themselves as the saviors of the poor and downtrodden. The salvation is
packaged as Sustainable Development / Agenda 21." http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/the-young-global-citizen-and-un-agenda-21/
While not UN related. It does
illustrate how governments and their crony businessmen control things.
This so called treaty has been railed against by members of both
political parties. Past performance of these type deals have resulted
is the loss of US jobs. Big businesses win the people lose. To get a
sense of how problematic this treaty is read just one quote. Quote:
"The IP Chapter of the TPP has perhaps been the most controversial
chapter due to its wide-ranging effects on internet services, medicines,
publishers, civil liberties and biological patents. “If TPP is
ratified, people in the Pacific-Rim countries would have to live by the
rules in this leaked text,” said Peter Maybarduk, Public Citizen’s
Global Access to Medicines Program Director. “The new monopoly rights
for big pharmaceutical firms would compromise access to medicines in TPP
countries. The TPP would cost lives.” https://wikileaks.org/tpp-ip3/
This helps to emphasize the
oppressive controls the UN wishes to impose on a global basis.
Quote: Regarding climate science "... a sizable percentage of the
population that consists of both scientists and laymen disagree with
popular opinion, then it can hardly be called a settled science. This
situation calls for more research and debate until the truth, whatever
it may be, becomes indisputable and everyone can get on board with that
reality. You know what it doesn’t call for? Persecuting and prosecuting
the minority that has dared to disagree with popular opinion. And
that’s exactly what a secretive UN funded legal conference decided to do
last month, when they met to discuss climate change
and how the International Court of Justice should tackle it." This is
scarry. Note this, too. What is "... interesting about this whole
situation, is that I [author of the article] don’t remember hearing
about anyone calling for pro-global warming opinions to be made illegal
(as a matter of fact, if you can find a single instance of this
happening, post it in the comments.) This type of behavior seems to stem
exclusively from the other side of the aisle, and it doesn’t do their
argument any favors. If this is how top global warming proponents
approach science and debate, then it’s hard to imagine anyone taking
their assertions seriously in the future." http://www.thedailysheeple.com/secretive-un-legal-conference-wants-to-outlaw-climate-change-denial_102015?
George Burns
No comments:
Post a Comment