Monday, April 29, 2013

The Pigford Affair

It is likely that most Americans have never heard of the Pigford class-action settlement case.  Until recently neither had I. 

Here is a short introduction lifted from Wikipedia:  "Pigford v. Glickman (1999) was a class action lawsuit against the United State Department of Agriculture (USDA), alleging racial discrimination in its allocation of farm loans and assistance between 1983 and 1997. The lawsuit ended with a settlement on April 14, 1999, by Judge Paul L. Friedman of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. To date, almost US$1 billion has been paid or credited to more than 13,300 farmers under the settlement's, under what is reportedly the largest civil rights settlement to date. As another 70,000 farmers had filed late and not had their claims heard, the 2008 Farm Bill provided for additional claims to be heard; and in December 2010, Congress appropriated $1.2 billion for what is called Pigford II, the second part of the case."

According to the linked articles Andrew Breitbart (before his death) was investigating this little-known case, and as reported in the New York Times (see link), it started "...with plausible accusations that the U.S. Department of Agriculture had discriminated against a small number of black farmers, but...spiraled into a billion-dollar, open-ended government kickback machine for untold thousands that showed no signs of letting up.  The Pigford case represented everything Breitbart raged against in the American political order - large-scale cronyism, corrosive and cynical identity politics, unrepentant 
hypocrisy, and the predictable indifference of the mainstream media."  

So, what is the issue?  Substantial evidence exists of massive fraud in the continuing handouts to claimants having little or no justification.  Efforts to turn off the spigot have failed.  Indeed, "as the Times reports in great depth, instead of closing the spigot, in 2010 the Obama administration did not just acquiesce to, it spearheaded the expansion of, the Pigford con on the taxpayer’s dime, and saw to it that not just black Americans, but any woman, Hispanic, or Native American who could so much as gesture at discrimination had access to a billion-dollar pool of easy money."

This whole matter stinks to the high heavens. "Pigford and its spawn...resembles in organization and aim a criminal conspiracy of breathtaking proportions, and one in which the federal government was first complicit and then ultimately responsible."

Now you know about the case.  Check out the evidence for yourselves and tell me this is not government criminality.  Oh, by the way have you heard this reported on any of the major TV news networks?  Koudos to the New York Times.  How long are we going to put up with the government handing out taxpayer resources to undeserving claimants and making unethical lawyers rich??? 

George Burns

No comments: