Prominent Black Americans, Including Progressives, Loathe Clinton

President Obama arrived here on Thursday to encourage black Americans to go vote for Democrat nominee Hillary Clinton, but many black Americans — including progressives and prominent voices in Jacksonville — are not buying. Even among black Obama supporters, enthusiasm for Clinton is low to non-existent. And despite the false and potentially racist image painted by the establishment media of a collectivist “black vote” that belongs to Democrats by right, black leaders from across the political spectrum tell The New American that black Americans, like all Americans, are waking up to “crooked Hillary.” One progressive black leader even described Clinton as a psychopathic anti-Christian criminal who represents a mortal danger to blacks. Many black leaders want Clinton jailed. And the feeling is apparently widespread.   

Clinton, Obama, and the Democrat Party all understand how crucial black voters are to their radical agenda and their hold power. A leaked 2007 memo from now-disgraced Clinton campaign boss John Podesta to a group of far-left billionaires, for example, describes blacks as the “most reliable bloc in the Democratic camp,” and urges continued reliance and exploitation of “minority” groups and “demographic trends.” Sounding the alarm as he visited North Carolina and Florida to try to get black voters out to the polls to pull the lever for Clinton, Obama warned that the “black vote,” as if there were just one collective mass of blacks who all belong to Democrats, “is not as solid as it needs to be” for Clinton to win. Bill Clinton has expressed similar sentiments. And the hysterically pro-Clinton establishment media appears to be in a panic.   

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/24557-prominent-black-americans-including-progressives-loathe-clinton

Two more Clinton classified emails discovered in FBI documents

The State Department this week deemed two more of former Secretary Hillary Clinton’s emails to contain classified information, releasing redacted versions Friday, just days before Election Day.
The messages appear to contain U.S. government policy memos toward Afghanistan and the United Arab Emirates, preparing Mrs. Clinton for phone calls with leaders of those two nations. Information gleaned from foreign governments, as well as U.S. information about other governments, is supposed to be considered classified from the start.
In these instances, like nearly every other of the more than 2,500 messages now deemed classified, there were no markings at the time — a factor Mrs. Clinton’s defenders say excuse her from liability for having sent them over her secret, but unprotected account.
Both of the new messages were not part of the set Mrs. Clinton belatedly returned to the department. Instead they were recovered by the FBI in its investigation into Mrs. Clinton’s mishandling of classified material.
The messages were sent on Nov. 26, 2010, by Mrs. Clinton’s top personal aide, Huma Abedin, whose own emailing practices have come under scrutiny. Ms. Abedin was one of the few people who had access to an account on Mrs. Clinton’s secret server.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/4/two-more-clinton-classified-emails-discovered-fbi/

Memo To The Next President: We Can Grow A Lot Faster

The 2016 presidential battle between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump will go down as one of the bitterest in modern history, and polls show it's still too close to call. But regardless who wins, the next president faces a slow-growing economy with a host of problems.

The U.S. is doomed to be a mature, sluggish economy, creating little growth and few new jobs, some experts say. Can a new president restore the U.S.' once-powerful economic growth of 3% or more?

History and logic suggest the answer is yes. Repeatedly in the past, we've heard that the U.S. has hit a permanent plateau in growth — a limit — that would keep it from expanding faster. We heard it immediately after World War II, again in the early 1960s, the 1970s, the early 1980s, and in the 1990s. And each time, with the right market-friendly policies in place, a powerful surge of new growth ensued. This time is no different.

Since 2008, the U.S. has experienced what could be called the Great Slowdown — the downshifting of the U.S. economy from the 3.4% annual pace of GDP growth from 1949 to 2008, to just 1.8% since 2008. If that doesn't strike you as a big difference, think of it a different way: At 3.4%, the size of the U.S. economy doubles in about 21 years; at 1.8%, it takes 40 years — nearly twice as long.

http://www.investors.com/politics/memo-to-the-next-president-we-can-grow-a-lot-faster/

COUPS, COUNTER-COUPS RAGE WITHIN AMERICAN GOVERNMENT

It’s a struggle taking place at the highest levels of power. Coups, counter-coups and a civil war between the elites. And at the center of it all is one of the America’s most experienced intelligence operatives.
Yes, there is  a nonviolent civil war within Washington, according to Steve Pieczenik, deputy assistant secretary of state under men such as Henry Kissinger and James Baker.

Pieczenik served in the State Department for 20 years. He battled terrorism in the 1970s and, using his training as a psychiatrist, created pioneering tactics and strategies used in hostage situations. He contributed to the success of the Camp David Accords in 1978 by building psychological profiles of the key negotiators.

Since leaving government, he’s been a strategic consultant for groups such as the RAND Corporation and the United States Institute of Peace. Most famously, he formed a partnership with author Tom Clancy to co-create the “Op-Center” and “Net-Force” books and eventually authored several books of his own, including the thriller “State of Emergency,” which posits a second civil war.

And now, this consummate insider, one of the most experienced policy makers and crisis managers alive, says a nonviolent civil war is raging within Washington.


http://www.wnd.com/2016/11/coups-counter-coups-rage-within-american-government/

You Know The IRS Should Be Investigating The Clinton Foundation

Prior to Halloween, The Wall Street Journal asked a very good question: why isn’t the IRS investigating the Clinton Foundation? Leaving out the obvious political stains from their scandal, in which they targeted conservative organizations seeking tax-exempt status, it’s a legitimate inquiry. Wikileaks was able to shed light on what top Bill Clinton aide Doug Band, who helped start the Clinton Foundation and went on to co-found his own consulting firm, Teneo, called Bill Clinton, Inc. The 13-page memo described how money could be obtained to go to both the Clinton Foundation and to the Clintons personally. That strategy centered on using the Foundation’s top tier donor base (Dow Chemical, Coca-Cola, etc.) to also forge paid speaking engagements and consulting deals. The amount that Bill could personally reap with this strategy could be as much as $66 million if everything remained in place.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2016/11/05/wsj-you-know-the-irs-should-be-investigating-the-clinton-foundation-n2239457

How far will Dems go to steal Election 2016?

America seems headed for a real life ‘Ruby Tuesday’ on November 8.

The events of Friday and Saturday should be sending chills down the spines of average citizens IF, as U.S. Intelligence is warning, al Qaeda strikes with terrorist attacks in three states tomorrow and ISIS follows through on its threats to slaughters voters going to the polls on Tuesday.

Last night, Austyn Daniel Crites, 33, of Reno, Nevada self-identified as a member of ‘Republicans Against Trump’ in an incident that saw Secret Service agents hustling the ‘Make America Great Again’ candidate off the stage, in what many see as a dry-run for his assassination.

On Friday, President Barack Hussein Obama seemed to use a Republican veteran plant to go after Donald J. Trump as the wrong president to have his finger on America’s nuclear button.

If these Hillary Clinton suspected stunts are happening two days before Election 2016, and the Democrats playing the role of the Great Pretenders, who knows what is coming next?

My prescient colleague Doug Hagmann is right on target saying, “There is something very odd about the Reno incident, and something equally odd about the man at the center of the attention”.

http://canadafreepress.com/article/how-far-will-dems-go-to-steal-election-2016

Lying about Trump while hiding the fact Democrats accepted Klan support.

She looked the American people straight in the television eye and lied.

I know, I know, she does it all the time. But this time the lie was as bold as it was false.

Appearing in Greenville, North Carolina the other day, Hillary Clinton played the Democratic Party standard — the race card. Said she:

“Just a few days ago, and I want you to hear this because this has never happened to a major, to a nominee of a major party. Just a few days ago Donald Trump was endorsed by the official newspaper of the Ku Klux Klan.”
Catch that line:…“I want you to hear this because this has never happened to a major, to a nominee of a major party.”

Short of saying the sun rises in the West, a political lie doesn’t come much bolder than that.

First of all, the Trump campaign instantly rejected the endorsement in the strongest of terms. Said the Trump campaign statement: “Mr. Trump and the campaign denounces hate in any form. This publication is repulsive and their views do not represent the tens of millions of Americans who are uniting behind our campaign.”

Ahhh. The kind of words spoken about the Klan that America has yet to hear from Democrats apologizing for their tighter-than-ticks relationship with the Klan.

Examples? There are plenty.

http://spectator.org/hillarys-klan-cover-up/