Among other unethical undertakings the Biden Administration is
going all out with their false claims of the looming and totally
unfounded travesty we are facing from global warming/climate change.
What they are doing is not based on actual science. It is instead based
on their left wing politics. They are singularly focused on human causes
and totally disregard natural causes that have been the drivers of
climate change throughout history. In order to get their way they need
to instill fear in the human population to legitimize their theft of
funding needed to accomplish their Green New Deal which is a vital
ingredient in their role in aiding globalists implementation of their
new world order/global reset initiative. Hence, their unfounded claim
that human activity is the cause of climate change. They need funding
for their devious purposes. In other words they subvert the scientific
process by pre-determining that humans are the cause. That is the worst
possible abuse of science. This item lays out facts that support that
charge. By reading the below items the truth of their lies should
become patently obvious.
Everyone knows that former
President Obama signed on to the notion that by not attending to the so
called "settled" climate science charge that humans are destroying the
planet and disaster looms if something is not done soon. Now President
Biden has doubled down on the issue and has gone even further than
Obama. Here is what a scientist who worked in Obama's administration
recently had to say. Quote: "Former President Barack Obama’s
undersecretary for the Department of Energy, Steven Koonin, said that
science does not support the “hysteria” of the Biden administration’s
stance on the global “climate crisis.” “What I realized, is that,
although you hear people talking about ‘we’re going to believe in the
science, the science is settled, we’ve got an existential crisis,'”
Koonin told Fox News on Thursday. “When you actually read the science, it doesn’t support that kind of hysteria at all.”
The physicist and New York University professor was responding to President Joe Biden’s speech Thursday
morning on the first day of the virtual Leaders Summit on
Climate. During his speech, Biden said that scientists have noted that
the current decade will be crucial to address the climate crisis and he
wants to listen to the science. Koonin explained that the assessment
reports from the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC) and the United States’ National Climate Assessment
actually don’t support drastic changes to stop climate change,
as Biden asserted. Although temperatures are rising globally and have
risen by about 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit in the last century, Koonin said
that humans have made advances like expanding food sources and accessing
electricity. “Eventually we will probably need to do something about
this, but the scope and scale of what the Biden administration proposed
for the U.S., I think is just not there in the data. It’s not there in
the science,” he said. “I prefer to see us take a much more measured and
thoughtful approach to doing this.” He even said that what Biden's plan
includes will probably not work as advertised. He added this: "Koonin
argued that these lofty goals may not be attainable. The ambition to
have a high percent of weather-dependent renewables on the electrical
grid is something I would question,” he said. “The wind doesn’t blow all
the time, the sun doesn’t shine all the time. And you’ve got to have
backup systems for when that happens.” Koonin advised exploring
geoengineering options or creating a better understanding of how to pull
carbon dioxide out of the air." Ex-Obama
Admin Scientist Slams Biden's 'Climate Crisis' Narrative: Data 'Doesn't
Support That Kind of Hysteria' (westernjournal.com)
Here's more. Quote: "Democrats
and their media lapdogs are rabidly hyping the bogus narrative that
climate change is an imminent “existential threat” to mankind as part of
a cynical move to promote left-wing agendas. That’s
the takeaway from a Fox News interview with physicist Steven Koonin,
who offered scientific support to those who believe grifting climate alarmists are flippantly weaponizing this sham talking point to enrich and empower themselves. “It’s a fiction of the media and the politicians who like to promote that notion,” Koonin said on Fox Nation’s “Tucker Carlson Today.” Lest
anyone dismiss Koonin as “right-wing,” it bears pointing that he was
undersecretary for science in former President Barack Obama’s Department
of Energy. The theoretical
physicist and engineering professor is currently the director of the
Center for Urban Science and Progress at New York University. Despite
the nonstop environmental fearmongering from Democrats and the
left-wing media, he said “human influences” are not responsible for
natural disasters such as hurricanes and intermittent heatwaves, which
are just as common today as they were in 1900. “The warmest temperatures have not gone up in the last 60 years,” Koonin said. Koonin scoffed at Biden administration officials such as Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and jet-setting climate czar John Kerry,
saying they mindlessly parrot the term “existential threat” when
discussing the climate even though they don’t understand what they’re
talking about. “I don’t think
the science says what … Secretary Pete thinks it says,” he said. “In
fact, I can guarantee you he’s never read the science.” Koonin
continued: “Fact, I can guarantee you that Sen. [Bernie] Sanders,
President [Joe] Biden, Ambassador Kerry, [Energy] Secretary [Jennifer]
Granholm have never read the science — because you need to be a
scientist in order to do that. And in fact, when you read it, there’s
very little in terms of extreme weather that has changed over the last
many decades.” There is more... so read the entire link. Physicist to Tucker Carlson: Climate Change Is 'Fiction of the Media,' Not an 'Existential Threat' (westernjournal.com
Yet more cogent analysis. Quote: "Democrats want to hand climate science over to the mob. The
House of Representatives had an opportunity this week to take
meaningful steps toward combating climate change. But instead of
proposing bipartisan reforms that would enable new clean energy
technologies to flourish, Democrats opted to politicize science and add
costly new regulatory hurdles that would do nothing to reduce global
emissions. Inside the new 900-page Clean Economy Jobs and Innovation Act is
a proposal to adopt a new "community-based science" model that allows
for “voluntary public participation in the scientific process.” This
means that instead of allowing scientists to have the final say in
conducting experiments, collecting data, interpreting results, and
developing new technologies, the so-called “party of science” would let
everyone have a say. They call it the “democratization of science” — and
if you’re against it, you’re probably against democracy, too. In
another attempt to politicize science, the Clean Economy Jobs and
Innovation Act proposes establishing a new 26-person Environmental
Justice Advisory Council to ensure the “fair treatment” of different
groups based on race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. They would
accomplish this by taking the already cumbersome National Environmental
Policy Act review process, which is used to approve new energy and
infrastructure projects, and require these projects to undergo an
"environmental justice" review. This review would need the consultation
and meaningful participation of different groups, likely leading to long
and costly litigation. Instead of accomplishing net-zero carbon
emissions, this proposal would result in net-zero job growth. And
instead of more justice, the Environmental Justice Advisory Council
would result in fewer clean energy options for underserved communities.
Democrats claim to have the moral high ground when talking about their
lofty goals of decarbonizing our economy in the next decade. But by
prioritizing complex regulations and woke mandates over innovation and
markets, they curtail the causes they claim to support." And, "Instead
of furthering an agenda that’s designed to appease far-Left activist
mobs, Democrats should work across the aisle with their Republican
colleagues who are offering serious, science-based solutions for a clean
energy future. So, don’t believe the false narrative that Republicans
aren’t doing anything to reduce global emissions. Considering the
anti-science framework of the Clean Economy Jobs and Innovation Act,
it’s quite the opposite. Republicans are serious, and it’s time
Democrats are, too." Democrats want to hand climate science over to the mob (msn.com)
No
responsible person denies the very real fact that climate change
occurs. The question is whether or not any changes are, in fact, because
of Human Activity. History proves that climate change has occurred over
and over again without any human cause. Yet the fear mongers pushing
the current narrative assigns the entire cause to human activity. Most
sane scientists not caught up in the "human cause only" web cast by the
UN's IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) offer
much credible evidence that man has little if any real impact on
climate change. But, left wing advocates want nothing to do with natural
causes or documented history. They have an agenda and intend to stick
with it. Things like the sampling that follows are dismissed since they
do not involve human activity. Climate Change 101: The Evidence Humans Aren’t Destroying the Climate | The Freedom Pub (heartland.org) ; The climate is changing, but not just because of humans. Here's why that matters. (nbcnews.com) ; Top 10 Reasons Humans Are Not Causing Global Warming (listland.com) ; What climate change is happening to other planets in the solar system? (skepticalscience.com) ; New research shows Earth's tilt influences climate change (phys.org) ; A
difference of degrees: NAU scientist examines Earth’s changing tilt,
its effect on Antarctic ice cores and what that says about climate – NAU
News ; Non-Human Causes of Climate Change by Jessie Merenda (prezi.com) ; Causes | Facts – Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet (nasa.gov)
This does not mean we do not need to take care of our planet to keep
it healthy. In that endeavor humans really do have a huge role to play.
No comments:
Post a Comment