This small but powerful agency dates back to 1916 and is charged with protecting American domestic industries from "Unfair competition." The ITC has the authority to block the import of any products from firms found to be employing unfair trade practices.
The tools at ITC's disposal are blunt and powerful: an exclusion order prohibiting the importation of any products from firms found to be competing unfairly with a domestic industry.
Given the power that the ITC wields, it is not surprising that it has attracted the interest of some who see it as a venue to benefit their bottom line rather than to address an unfair foreign threat.
First, the ITC is usually quicker than pursuing a case in federal court, the established venue for patent infringement cases.
The Neodron case turns the ITC's mission on its head: rather than protecting a U.S. domestic industry from unfair trade practices, the ITC is being asked by a foreign company to prohibit American companies from offering their products to American consumers.
Neodron is entitled to seek compensation for any patent infringements in the federal courts; it should not be entitled to seek negotiation leverage through the ITC's exclusionary powers at the risk of harming actual U.S. companies and consumers.
Congress should take action to clarify the ITC's role as a trade agency balancing important U.S. interests, and stop the misuse of the agency as a lucrative venue by companies that weaponize patents and do not produce anything other than lawsuits.
https://spectator.org/should-a-federal-agency-defend-unproductive-foreign-interests-at-the-expense-of-domestic-industry-and-u-s-consumers/
The tools at ITC's disposal are blunt and powerful: an exclusion order prohibiting the importation of any products from firms found to be competing unfairly with a domestic industry.
Given the power that the ITC wields, it is not surprising that it has attracted the interest of some who see it as a venue to benefit their bottom line rather than to address an unfair foreign threat.
First, the ITC is usually quicker than pursuing a case in federal court, the established venue for patent infringement cases.
The Neodron case turns the ITC's mission on its head: rather than protecting a U.S. domestic industry from unfair trade practices, the ITC is being asked by a foreign company to prohibit American companies from offering their products to American consumers.
Neodron is entitled to seek compensation for any patent infringements in the federal courts; it should not be entitled to seek negotiation leverage through the ITC's exclusionary powers at the risk of harming actual U.S. companies and consumers.
Congress should take action to clarify the ITC's role as a trade agency balancing important U.S. interests, and stop the misuse of the agency as a lucrative venue by companies that weaponize patents and do not produce anything other than lawsuits.
https://spectator.org/should-a-federal-agency-defend-unproductive-foreign-interests-at-the-expense-of-domestic-industry-and-u-s-consumers/
No comments:
Post a Comment