Stone attempted to obtain evidence that would help his case from Crowdstrike, the Google owned entity that holds the only 'evidence' that Russia hacked the DNC's emails before the 2016.
Stone is being prevented from obtaining Crowdstrike's 'evidence' by Hillary Clinton's attorney!
On May 10, defense lawyers for Trump's longtime friend and political advisor Roger Stone filed a motion to compel the Justice Department to produce unredacted versions of CrowdStrike's reports to the DNC. Much of Stone's legal defense was rooted in an effort to suppress all the evidence obtained in 18 search warrants, citing a conservative conspiracy theory that he argued invalidates the warrants.
On Thursday, Hillary Clinton's attorney representing the DNC filed a response to Roger Stone's request claiming Crowdstrike is under attorney-client privilege and therefore does not have to provide Crowdstrike's 'evidence' that Russia hacked the DNC - the same 'evidence' the FBI relied on to determine that Russia hacked the DNC that was the basis for the Mueller Special Counsel.
In this case, perhaps the most significant in US history, the FBI relied on another firm hired by the DNC to determine that Russia hacked the DNC! Now Crowdstrike is refusing to provide the evidence based on attorney-client privilege.
As we've reported numerous times, Crowdstrike claimed that Russia hacked the DNC's emails but they and the FBI have yet to provide any evidence to support this claim.
So here we are now, nearly three years since Crowdstrike claimed Russia hacked the DNC and Hillary Clinton's attorney is preventing Roger Stone from access to the information that Crowdstrike has to support this assertion.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/exclusive-hillary-clintons-attorney-is-preventing-roger-stone-from-obtaining-evidence-of-russia-hacking-from-crowdstrike/
Stone is being prevented from obtaining Crowdstrike's 'evidence' by Hillary Clinton's attorney!
On May 10, defense lawyers for Trump's longtime friend and political advisor Roger Stone filed a motion to compel the Justice Department to produce unredacted versions of CrowdStrike's reports to the DNC. Much of Stone's legal defense was rooted in an effort to suppress all the evidence obtained in 18 search warrants, citing a conservative conspiracy theory that he argued invalidates the warrants.
On Thursday, Hillary Clinton's attorney representing the DNC filed a response to Roger Stone's request claiming Crowdstrike is under attorney-client privilege and therefore does not have to provide Crowdstrike's 'evidence' that Russia hacked the DNC - the same 'evidence' the FBI relied on to determine that Russia hacked the DNC that was the basis for the Mueller Special Counsel.
In this case, perhaps the most significant in US history, the FBI relied on another firm hired by the DNC to determine that Russia hacked the DNC! Now Crowdstrike is refusing to provide the evidence based on attorney-client privilege.
As we've reported numerous times, Crowdstrike claimed that Russia hacked the DNC's emails but they and the FBI have yet to provide any evidence to support this claim.
So here we are now, nearly three years since Crowdstrike claimed Russia hacked the DNC and Hillary Clinton's attorney is preventing Roger Stone from access to the information that Crowdstrike has to support this assertion.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/exclusive-hillary-clintons-attorney-is-preventing-roger-stone-from-obtaining-evidence-of-russia-hacking-from-crowdstrike/
No comments:
Post a Comment