We will now depose Obama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers, and Clinton aides under oath.
The court rejected the DOJ and State Department's objections to our discovery plan.
Rice's talking points and State's understanding of the attack play an unavoidably central role in this case: information about the points' development and content, as well as their discussion and dissemination before and after Rice's appearances could reveal unsearched, relevant records; State's role in the points' content and development could shed light on Clinton's motives for shielding her emails from FOIA requesters or on State's reluctance to search her emails.
This includes asking about emails suggesting he knew about her private email use in 2014, and emails he received concerning a December 2012 FOIA request from Citizens for Responsible Ethics in Washington regarding senior officials' personal email use-topics State's 30(b)(6) deposition in Judge Sullivan's case never addressed.
The former State Department senior advisor who helped facilitate State's receipt of Hillary Clinton's emails.
Incredibly, Justice Department attorneys admit in a filing opposing our limited discovery that, "Counsel for State contacted the counsel of some third parties that Plaintiff originally included in its draft discovery proposal to obtain their client's position on being deposed." This collusion occurred despite criticism from the Court that the DOJ engaged in "Chicanery" to cover up misconduct and that career employees in the State and Justice Departments may have "Colluded to scuttle public scrutiny of Clinton, skirt FOIA, and hoodwink this Court."
The court order states that WPATH's standards of care for gender dysphoria include changes in gender expression, hormone therapy to feminize of masculinize the body and surgical changes of the primary or secondary sex characteristics.
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/weekly-updates/weekly-update-big-court-victory-on-clinton-emails-and-benghazi/
The court rejected the DOJ and State Department's objections to our discovery plan.
Rice's talking points and State's understanding of the attack play an unavoidably central role in this case: information about the points' development and content, as well as their discussion and dissemination before and after Rice's appearances could reveal unsearched, relevant records; State's role in the points' content and development could shed light on Clinton's motives for shielding her emails from FOIA requesters or on State's reluctance to search her emails.
This includes asking about emails suggesting he knew about her private email use in 2014, and emails he received concerning a December 2012 FOIA request from Citizens for Responsible Ethics in Washington regarding senior officials' personal email use-topics State's 30(b)(6) deposition in Judge Sullivan's case never addressed.
The former State Department senior advisor who helped facilitate State's receipt of Hillary Clinton's emails.
Incredibly, Justice Department attorneys admit in a filing opposing our limited discovery that, "Counsel for State contacted the counsel of some third parties that Plaintiff originally included in its draft discovery proposal to obtain their client's position on being deposed." This collusion occurred despite criticism from the Court that the DOJ engaged in "Chicanery" to cover up misconduct and that career employees in the State and Justice Departments may have "Colluded to scuttle public scrutiny of Clinton, skirt FOIA, and hoodwink this Court."
The court order states that WPATH's standards of care for gender dysphoria include changes in gender expression, hormone therapy to feminize of masculinize the body and surgical changes of the primary or secondary sex characteristics.
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/weekly-updates/weekly-update-big-court-victory-on-clinton-emails-and-benghazi/
No comments:
Post a Comment