A recent article discusses a recorded conversation involving Dr. Bobby Mukkamala, president of the American Medical Association (AMA), which highlights serious issues concerning the AMA's approach to "gender-affirming care" for minors. The call reveals deceptive practices, misinformation, and the potential harm caused by medical interventions such as puberty blockers and surgeries, all framed under the guise of supporting children's rights and identities.
1. The AMA's Deceptive Practices:
• The AMA has been accused of prioritizing ideology over scientific evidence, leading to potentially harmful medical recommendations.
• Dr. Mukkamala advocates for treatments like puberty blockers without adequately addressing their irreversible consequences, which include infertility, bone density loss, and cognitive issues.
2. False Claims About Puberty Blockers:
• Contrary to Dr. Mukkamala's statements that puberty blockers are “reversible,” numerous studies indicate they can cause long-term health issues.
• The AMA's stance overlooks substantial clinical evidence contradicting the safety claims surrounding these treatments.
3. Regret Rates and Misinformation:
• The AMA's claims regarding low regret rates (cited at 2%) are based on selective data that omits crucial details, like non-genital surgeries and long-term outcomes.
• A significant number of patients cease treatment after transitioning, which the AMA does not adequately acknowledge.
4. Suicide Rate Manipulation:
• Dr. Mukkamala's assertion of a 50%+ suicide completion rate among trans identified individuals is exaggerated and not supported by existing data, which shows a lower rate.
• The AMA’s misrepresentation of suicide statistics contributes to alarming narratives that pressure parents and policymakers.
5. Contradictory Positions on Gender:
• The AMA toggles between asserting that gender is immutable while also suggesting that it is not stable, creating logical inconsistencies in their academic position.
• Such contradictions reflect a broader ideological agenda rather than a mission to advance medical understanding and patient care.
6. Medical Misconduct:
• Criticism arises regarding how institutions provide gender transition treatments while ignoring dissenting expert opinions and real patient testimonials from detransitioners.
• The discussion also implies that medical schools are being influenced by political agendas at the expense of scientific integrity.
7. Ideological Capture:
• There is concern about the AMA being manipulated by social ideology, leading to negligence regarding patient welfare.
• This situation represents a troubling trend in which medical institutions prioritize activism over evidence-based practice.
8. Critique of the Medical Establishment:
• The article concludes that the AMA has lost its role as a trusted health authority, becoming instead a source of political and ideological advocacy.
• Stakeholders in healthcare, especially concerning children's health, are encouraged to scrutinize the data and assertions made by prominent medical institutions.
The recorded conversation unveils significant conflicts within the AMA regarding gender-affirming care, revealing that vulnerable children may be subjected to irreversible medical interventions based more on ideology than proven health practices. This raises urgent questions about the ethics and governance of medical organizations and their responsibilities in safeguarding the health of minors against potentially harmful treatments. The broader medical community is called to reassess and prioritize honest dialogue and evidence-based practices in the treatment of gender dysphoria and related conditions.
No comments:
Post a Comment