Monday, March 28, 2022

Keeping You Informed 2

Quote: "How the Criminal FDA Protects Big Pharma by Controlling the Media.  The British Medical Journal (BMJ) has released a video of whistleblower Brook Jackson, who was a regional director employed by Ventavia Research Group in Texas in 2020 to monitor the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trials. When she observed the data from the trials being handled improperly, she recommended they stop enrolling people in the trials. But her employer did not agree, so she reported them to the FDA. She thought that the FDA would take action to correct this fraud, but instead, her employer fired her shortly after she contacted the FDA. Brook Jackson learned the hard way that the FDA does not protect the public, but the pharmaceutical industry. Not only did the FDA not respond to her reporting, they did not even bother to investigate the site where the alleged infractions occurred. So she took her story to the British Medical Journal (BMJ), who ended up publishing it because she backed up everything she was reporting with solid facts and information. But when the article in the BMJ was shared on Facebook, the Facebook fact checkers marked it as fake news. This is a common tactic that the FDA has done historically, by controlling the media to cover up the crimes of Big Pharma."   How the Criminal FDA Protects Big Pharma by Controlling the Media (healthimpactnews.com)

Quote: "Local, National Media Paid $MILLIONS To Push COVID-19 Vaccines. In January, the Conejo Guardian reported that $1.8 million of federal COVID money was used by Ventura County supervisors to buy positive local media coverage regarding business-shattering public health mandates. The investigation showed that, among other media outlets, The Acorn Newspapers received $450,000 in forgivable federal “COVID” loans and $262,000 in County funding via advertisements, and the Acorn’s coverage of public health policy was universally positive and affirming during that time. This trend was true with all local news sources the Guardian surveyed. This story has exploded nationally as an investigation by TheBlaze shows that $1 billion of federal money went to hundreds of local newspapers and TV stations, plus major players like Fox News, CNN, Newsmax, The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times (LA Times), to promote the federal government’s message about COVID mandates, “vaccinations” and more."    Local, National Media Paid $MILLIONS To Push COVID-19 Vaccines (healthimpactnews.com)  

Quote: "COVID’s Waning But Moderna Wants More Money. COVID-19 is waning. Mask mandates have been lifted. People no longer feel as though they need to carry their proof of vaccination with them everywhere they go. Life is returning to normal. Oh, but wait. The pharmaceutical companies aren’t making billions at the moment because people aren’t lined up around the block to get a COVID-19 vaccination jabbed into their upper arm. The CEOs are crying into their gold-rimmed coffee cups because they can’t buy a new yacht. Booster shots are the answer, right? Even if Americans don’t need them, it would be great if they could be convinced that they need them. It could generate a few extra billion for Moderna over the span of the year. Then, the pharmaceutical execs can finally buy the latest and greatest yachts and mansions that are on their want lists. All we have to do is roll up a sleeve. We can do that, right?  
        There has to be a line that we draw in the sand to say that enough is enough. Scientists and medical researchers have already come forward to say that too many COVID vaccines will actually start to weaken our immune systems. No other vaccines require us to get this many boosters – especially not this close to one another. If we’ve got the COVID vaccine, we’re protected as much as we’re going to be protected.

Yet, that hasn’t stopped Moderna from asking the FDA for emergency use authorization for a second booster shot. For anyone that’s counting, it would be shot number four. Either Moderna needs the money, or their vaccine is weaker than they want to admit. Either way, they’ll be hard-pressed to convince Americans that they actually need it. It’s been estimated that only 40% of those who were fully vaccinated received the first booster.  

        There aren’t too many people walking around the country begging for an additional booster. As it stands, immunocompromised people have already been authorized to receive a second booster of an mRNA vaccine. Pfizer and BioNTech have gotten the approval to provide this second booster. Further, they have also asked the FDA for emergency use authorization for a second booster for adults who are 65 and older.

Let’s be clear, here. The Omicron variant has basically passed through the country already. The people who have had COVID have the antibodies. Those that haven’t had COVID likely have been vaccinated. We have reached herd immunity. The pharmaceutical companies simply don’t want to admit that because it means their cash cow has no more milk to offer.

 We have been lucky enough that there hasn’t been another variant to follow in the footsteps of Omicron. Just as we had experienced Delta, Omicron was already in the distance. And although Omicron was highly contagious, many people had no symptoms. It meant that many had COVID without even knowing it.

       Moderna has already admitted that they are still working on clinical trials that focus on Omicron-specific boosters. But why? If that’s no longer a threat to us, why would we need such a booster? What kind of protection is it really going to offer? The FDA will convene an advisory committee next month where vaccine experts will decide how to approach COVID boosters moving forward. Will they be needed? When will they be needed? Which demographics will need them? 

      These are all important questions that need to be figured out. Until the FDA can offer some insight, it doesn’t seem probable that anyone will be rolling up their sleeves for another shot unless it’s absolutely required. And, while the FDA is at it, they might want to take into consideration all of the real data that’s been released by the CDC lately. You know, like how they’ve updated reports to show that COVID wasn’t actually as deadly as they said it was."      COVID’s Waning But Moderna Wants More Money | Tea Party Daily Report

 

No comments: