Monday, August 6, 2018

U.S. & China Relations: Who Lost Them?

Today we are hearing the stirrings of a new debate: "Who lost China a second time?" China is marching toward global technological leadership and increasingly challenges the United States both economically and militarily in what Michael Lind has termed Cold War II. Who was responsible for letting this happen?

President Xi Jinping himself has stated that China wants to be "Master of its own technologies." Indeed, China seeks not only mastery but global dominance in a wide array of advanced-technology products including artificial intelligence, computers, electric vehicles, jet airplanes, machine tools, pharmaceuticals, robots, and semiconductors.

The story begins with Richard Nixon, who, on the advice of Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, opened the path to normalized relations with China in order to widen the emerging Sino-Soviet split.

Seven years later, Jimmy Carter, in an effort to normalize relations with China, signed a far-reaching science-and-technology cooperation agreement that over the last 40 years has helped China close its technology gap with the United States.

When the Treasury secretary says that we "Need China to get ahead of growing economic challenges, which now threaten to interrupt its truly remarkable record of economic success in recent decades," and that "We want China to become more of a technology innovator," it's clear this is a not an official who will confront China.

A signal moment came during Obama's first official trip to Beijing, in November 2009, when he downplayed the United States' economic and political grievances and instead stressed how important it was for China to help America fight climate change, emphasizing that he was looking forward to deepening the partnership "In this critical area." But this wasn't all: Obama actually agreed to increase cooperation on civil aviation; to conduct joint research on biotech innovation; and to cooperate with China in other technology areas.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin seeks a resolution to the conflict with China at almost any cost; Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and the president are focused on reducing the trade deficit; U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer appears to be more concerned with rolling back unfair practices stemming from the "Made in China 2025" initiative: This sends a message to the Chinese that the administration can't agree on what it wants.

https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine/2018/08/13/us-china-relations-who-lost-them/ 

No comments: