This
is what happens when political or financial interests form the basis of
scientific predictions, especially when made by non-scientists. http://survivaljoe.net/blog/al-gore-embarrassed-by-mother-nature-polar-ice-caps-grow-by-43-percent/?
This study suggests that
fracking is not a ground water pollutant as so many claim. But will it
put an end to claims that it does? Not likely. Instead, in this
case, claims will arise that "the science is not settled." Quote:
"What humans add to natural emisions as a result of drilling is so minor
as to be of little consequence. If some future study confirmed this
fact, it would help to counter the myth that oil and gas drilling is
polluting an otherwise pure land and sea environment. The reality is
that wherever shale and other carbon-rich formations occur, natural
leakage of petroleum and/or methane is inevitable. Oil and gas are
naturally occurring features that are constantly interacting with the
environment and entering the water supply through natural processes. As
is so often the case, the idea that there once existed an environment
free of all that modern intellectuals might consider unpleasant is
simply a fantasy." http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/09/the_science_is_settled_fracking_is_safe.html
The National Science Foundation
is held in high regard, as it should be. But even that vaunted
institution can succumb to the political forces of the day and
facilitate the promotion of government sanctioned propaganda. This is
an example and should be a poster child for science sticking to science
especially when spending taxpayer dollars. http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/09/climate_change_the_musical.html
This former Obama official,
a scientist who served as Under Secretary For Science in the Energy
Department, says that "climate science is not settled." In fact he
claims that those insisting such claims are "misguided" and stifle
debate on the matter. http://www.newsmax.com/newswidget/climate-change-science/2014/09/21/id/595969/?
Another liberal Democrat and professional scientist defects from the Climate Change mob. Even calls Obama delusional. http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/09/23/politically-left-scientist-dissents-calls-president-obama-delusional-on-global-warming/
This should disturb anyone who resides on the Global Warming side of the equation. http://www.wnd.com/2014/09/secret-weapon-to-take-over-america-revealed/
I wonder where the science is that supports these claims? http://eaglerising.com/8781/8-horrible-things-liberals-blame-global-warming/
George Burns
No comments:
Post a Comment