Preface: The Bush and Obama administrations both claimed that
spying on Americans was justified by 9/11. Specifically, they said that
they could have caught one of the 9/11 hijackers living in San Diego if
they could have spied on phone calls on American soil.
However – as demonstrated below – that claim is totally false.
Investigative journalist ProPublica notes:
http://www.infowars.com/the-bush-and-obama-administrations-justification-for-mass-surveillance-has-been-debunked/
However – as demonstrated below – that claim is totally false.
Investigative journalist ProPublica notes:
In defending the NSA’s sweeping collection of Americans’ phone call records, Obama administration officials have repeatedly pointed out how it could have helped thwart the 9/11 attacks: If only the surveillance program been in place before Sept. 11, 2001, U.S. authorities would have been able to identify one of the future hijackers who was living in San Diego [named Khalid al Mihdhar (to help remember his last name, think of "mid-air" whenever you see his name.)].
Last weekend, former Vice President Dick Cheney invoked the same argument.
***The reality is different.
Indeed, the Obama administration’s invocation of the Mihdhar case echoes a nearly identical argument made by the Bush administration eight years ago when it defended the NSA’s warrantless wiretapping program.
http://www.infowars.com/the-bush-and-obama-administrations-justification-for-mass-surveillance-has-been-debunked/
No comments:
Post a Comment