There Can Be No Peace Or Unity With A Violent, Unrepentant Left

Following the assassination of Charlie Kirk by a radical Antifa member, discussions have emerged about political violence in the U. S. This piece critiques the notion that both political sides are equally culpable for violence, arguing that the left has a significantly larger share of the blame. The author discusses the media's role in shaping narratives around violence and highlights specific incidents of political violence attributed to left-wing activities.

1. Critique of "Both-Sidesism": The author dismisses the idea that political violence is a problem on both the left and right. He argues that this narrative serves as a moral failing and undermines the truth about who is primarily responsible for violence.

2. Response to Media Figures: The author specifically targets David French, a commentator who suggests that both sides have issues with political violence. French believes that viewing the left as more violent is simply confirmation bias.

3. Perception of Political Violence: The article highlights a series of violent events, alleging that they predominantly originate from the left:

• The 2017 shooting of Republican lawmakers by a Bernie Sanders supporter.

• The violent BLM protests in 2020 that resulted in multiple casualties and widespread property damage.

• Recent violent acts involving leftist motivations, such as the shooting in Nashville by a trans-identifying woman.

4. Disputing Left-Wing Examples: The author critiques examples cited by French of right-wing violence, arguing they are flawed or misrepresented. For instance, he discusses the assassination of a Minnesota lawmaker and the failed plot to kidnap Governor Gretchen Whitmer, arguing they don't demonstrate a significant trend of right-wing political violence.

5. Media’s Role: The narrative surrounding Kirk's murder and similar incidents is portrayed as minimized or ignored by mainstream media when the perpetrator is identified as left-leaning, which the author argues skews public perception of violence sources.

6. Consequences of the Narrative: The author believes the incorrect framing of political violence promotes a dangerous environment by diminishing the accountability for acts committed by those on the left.

The article's argument emphasizes that the narrative of political violence must reflect reality, with a significant portion of violence stemming from leftist ideologies. It critiques attempts to equate violence on both sides as disingenuous, urging a more honest discourse in the media about the origins of political violence and accountability for such acts. As discussions continue in society about peace and unity, the author advocates for truth and clarity in discussions surrounding political violence. 

https://thefederalist.com/2025/09/16/there-can-be-no-peace-or-unity-with-a-violent-unrepentant-left/