New Primetime Lineup at MSNBC Leads to Drastic Drop in Ratings

 MSNBC's recent changes in its primetime programming have led to a significant decline in viewership. The network's new show hosted by former White House press secretary Jen Psaki has not resonated with audiences, resulting in disappointing ratings.

• MSNBC's new lineup, including Jen Psaki's show at 9 PM, is experiencing a dramatic fall in ratings.

• The network has seen a 41% drop in the primetime demographic and a 34% dip in total day viewership compared to May 2024.

• Jen Psaki took over the 9 PM slot from Rachel Maddow, who returned to a part-time schedule.

• Despite the premiere of "The Briefing with Jen Psaki," the show failed to attract even one million viewers on May 22.

• Comparisons show that Sean Hannity's show on Fox News drew 2.3 million viewers during the same time, highlighting MSNBC's struggle.

• In the key demographic of viewers aged 25-54, Psaki's show garnered only 55,000 viewers, significantly less than Hannity's 210,000.

• The dismal performance is attributed to the audience's perception of MSNBC as biased against Trump and the Republican party, leading to a loss of interest among potential viewers.

The disappointing ratings of MSNBC's new primetime lineup, especially the struggles of Jen Psaki's show, signal challenges for the network as it attempts to attract viewers in a highly competitive landscape. The decline in viewership raises questions about the effectiveness of their programming choices and the network's ability to engage a broader audience.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/05/oops-new-primetime-lineup-msnbc-leads-drastic-drop/

Mapping Every Understaffed Air Traffic Control Tower In The US

 Recently, there has been concern over staffing shortages at U. S. air traffic control towers, especially following a serious incident involving an American Airlines plane and a U. S. Army helicopter.

• The crash, which occurred earlier this year, was one of the deadliest air incidents in two decades.

• Air traffic control shortages were initially considered a factor, although later investigations found otherwise.

• Currently, 44% of FAA-regulated air traffic control towers are short-staffed, according to data from September 2023.

• Out of 290 FAA-operated towers, 128 are under the required staffing level. Rochester Tower in Minnesota is notably the most understaffed, with less than half the required controllers.

• A detailed list ranks all short-staffed towers by their level of staffing.

• Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON) facilities face similar staffing issues, but the staffing rates appear more optimistic when including partially certified controllers.

• The certification process for air traffic controllers takes about 2 to 3 years and has faced disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic.

• High employee attrition due to stress, long hours, and mandatory retirement at age 56 further complicates staffing issues.

The ongoing shortage of air traffic controllers has significant implications for aviation safety and operations, with current conditions pushing controllers into intensive work schedules, leading to increased burnout rates.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/mapping-every-understaffed-air-traffic-control-tower-us

Analysis: Biden Unaware of Executive Orders ‘Signed’ by Autopen

A recent report has raised questions about President Joe Biden's awareness of the executive orders signed during his time in office, suggesting that many were signed using an autopen, a device that replicates a signature without the individual's physical presence.

1. Executive Orders and Autopen Usage:

President Biden issued 162 executive orders, with a report indicating most were signed by autopen, potentially allowing staff to influence policy more than the president himself. The report from Power the Future highlighted that there was no record of Biden discussing or acknowledging specific climate-related orders.

2. Biden's Possible Lack of Awareness:

Daniel Turner, Executive Director of Power the Future, emphasized the need for transparency regarding who was behind the executive orders. House Speaker Mike Johnson recounted an instance where Biden seemed unaware of signing an order on liquefied natural gas, leading to concerns about his knowledge and involvement.

3. Call for Investigation:

The Oversight Project stated that it is essential to investigate who controlled the autopen and the protocols in place. They expressed that it is feasible to determine this information through the right legal processes, especially given Biden's past actions regarding executive privilege.

4. Historical Context of Autopen Usage:

Autopens have been controversial, with their use traced back to early American presidents. While other presidents like George W. Bush opted not to use the device for important legislation, recent presidents, including Barack Obama, have employed it for signing while away. In contrast, Donald Trump criticized Biden's extensive use of the autopen for legal documents, suggesting it might render them void if the president was unaware of signing them.

5. Current Status and Reactions:

The Washington Stand reached out to the Department of Justice about possible investigations regarding Biden’s use of the autopen but received no comment.

Amid growing scrutiny over executive orders signed by autopen, there are serious questions about President Biden's awareness and involvement in these decisions. The discussions highlight the need for accountability in the signing processes and the implications for the legitimacy of these orders. 

https://washingtonstand.com/news/analysis-biden-unaware-of-executive-orders-signed-by-autopen

Declassified FBI memo sheds new light on Clinton's fingerprints, cash on Trump-Russia probe

A newly released FBI memo provides insights into the involvement of Hillary Clinton's campaign in the Trump-Russia investigation, particularly focusing on the activities of Fusion GPS, a research firm contracted by the campaign.

1. Fusion GPS as a Coordinating Hub: The FBI memo suggests that Fusion GPS, hired by Clinton's campaign, played a central role in creating several misleading Trump-Russia dossiers, exhibiting a close relationship with the Department of Justice.

2. Nellie Ohr's Testimony: Nellie Ohr, an analyst for Fusion GPS and wife of a former Justice Department official, is accused of giving false testimony to Congress regarding her knowledge about the Trump-Russia investigation. The memo states she likely lied about her involvement and connections to the investigation, known as "Crossfire Hurricane. "

3. Connections to the DOJ: Evidence from the memo indicates that Nellie Ohr shared Fusion GPS research materials with her husband, Bruce Ohr, who worked at the DOJ, contradicting her earlier statements of having no knowledge of the investigation.

4. Creation of the Steele Dossier: The Steele Dossier, which claimed collusion between Trump and Russia, was produced by Christopher Steele, a former British spy hired by Fusion GPS. The memo reveals how Nellie Ohr's research linked to the content of the dossier.

5. Second Dossier Findings: The memo also discusses a second dossier created by Cody Shearer, a Clinton associate, which was intended to reinforce the claims in the Steele Dossier. Despite media efforts to validate the Steele Dossier through this second document, the FBI dismissed it as being “obviously fictitious. ”

6. Coordination Between Entities: The memo highlighted signs of coordination between Fusion GPS and various officials, indicating that key components were managed collectively rather than individually. It noted that materials were strategically disseminated to influence investigations.

7. Implications of the Findings: The findings in the declassified memo raise questions about the legality and ethics of the actions taken by those involved in the dossier's creation and dissemination, suggesting violations of federal law.

The declassified FBI memo sheds new light on the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation, emphasizing the Clinton campaign's significant role and the questionable testimony given by key figures like Nellie Ohr. The information suggests a coordinated effort to mislead investigations, potentially resulting in legal repercussions for those involved. 

https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/declassified-fbi-memo-sheds-new-light-clinton

There Will Be More Violence -- Socialism Calls for It

The text discusses how modern socialists in the U. S. adopt ideologies reminiscent of Lenin, focusing on their motivations, tactics, and the historical context that shapes their actions. This summarizes the dangers of this political mentality, drawing parallels with Lenin's strategies.

1. Perception of Election Losses:

Liberals/socialists believe they have not lost elections but that the public has made incorrect choices. This reflects Lenin's view that the masses are often deceived in politics.

2. Tactics of Hatred:

Lenin encouraged a communication style that incites hate and scorn towards political adversaries. This tactic has reappeared intensively among U. S. socialists since the last election, with alarming survey results indicating justifiable violence against political opponents.

3. Historical Context of Leninism:

To understand contemporary leftists, one must study Lenin's founding of the socialist state. The quest for power parallels contemporary leftist strategies, which often target capitalists as enemies, echoing Marxist principles.

4. Call for Violence:

Lenin promoted extreme measures against his political adversaries, advocating for a "war to the death" where dissenters are labeled as traitors. This attitude reflects the violent tendencies noted even among political staffers today.

5. Modern Echoes of Leninism:

Recent Democrat rhetoric mirrors Lenin’s views, with expressions of being at "war" and calls for extreme actions against perceived threats. This includes violent calls against those associated with opposition.

6. Patriotism and Globalism:

Some modern leftists adopt a worldview that prioritizes global citizenship over national loyalty, reminiscent of Lenin’s disregard for national boundaries in favor of a global revolution.

7. Influence of Propaganda:

Anti-American sentiment can be traced to continuous, organized disinformation campaigns structured similarly to Soviet propaganda during the Cold War. Many of these themes persist today, linking former communist narratives with current criticisms of U. S. policies.

8. Themes of Disinformation:

The text lists themes that suggest the U. S. poses the greatest threat to world peace, promotes aggression, and operates from a position of arrogance—elements derived from historical propaganda strategies that still resonate today.

9. Socialism's Foundations in Hatred:

Socialism is depicted as relying on hatred and violence, with liberals expressing intense animosity towards political figures like Trump, which fuels their propaganda efforts.

10. Coordinated Messaging:

Evidence suggests that modern leftist media employs systematic, repetitive messaging to shape public perceptions, echoing Soviet tactics like Agitprop, designed to stoke anger against class enemies.

11. Judiciary's Role:

The text concludes by describing modern legal tactics as instruments for enforcing socialist principles in the face of electoral outcomes considered unfavorable.

The ideologies of Lenin have found modern expressions in American socialism, which continues to inspire divisive and potentially violent tactics against political opposition, drawing from historical precedents of propaganda and disinformation. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/05/there_will_be_more_violence_socialism_calls_for_it.html

Trump Admin yanks $700 MILLION in funding from Moderna, staving off another deadly mRNA jab and a combo H5N1/flu shot stab

 The Trump administration has canceled a significant contract with Moderna, aimed at developing a vaccine for the H5N1 avian influenza, reversing a previous agreement made during the Biden administration. This decision raises concerns about future vaccine development and pandemic preparedness.

1. Contract Cancellation:

• Trump's administration terminated a $766 million contract with Moderna for an mRNA-based bird flu vaccine.

• The cancellation was based on a review by the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) which determined the project did not meet necessary scientific standards.

2. Impact on Moderna:

• Moderna's CEO Stéphane Bancel expressed that the loss of funding introduces uncertainty to the company's bird flu program.

• The cancellation has come at a challenging time for Moderna as it is awaiting a decision on its next-generation COVID-19 vaccine and has faced declining demand for its COVID-19 shots.

3. Regulatory and Market Challenges:

• Moderna has also recently withdrawn its application for a combined flu-COVID-19 vaccine due to discussions with the FDA, planning to resubmit later with more data.

• This signals broader regulatory challenges for mRNA vaccine technologies.

4. Concerns about H5N1 Virus:

• The H5N1 virus has posed threats to birds, cattle, and sporadically to humans, raising fears of potential human transmission.

The cancellation of the contract reflects a shift in federal priorities regarding vaccine funding under the Trump administration. While some view this as an essential move for scientific scrutiny, others worry it may weaken the U. S. response to future pandemics. The ongoing discussion around mRNA vaccines continues to shape the future of public health and biotechnology.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-05-30-trump-admin-yanks-700million-funding-from-moderna.html

Sodium-ion battery BREAKTHROUGH offers a faster, safer, and more sustainable revolution in energy storage

Researchers in India have developed a sodium-ion battery that can charge to 80% in just six minutes, offering a sustainable and efficient alternative to lithium-ion batteries.

• Sodium-ion batteries charge rapidly, reaching 80% in six minutes, surpassing many lithium-ion batteries.

• They utilize a nano-structured anode made from carbon-coated, aluminum-doped materials for enhanced efficiency and longevity.

• Sodium is abundant and cost-effective, reducing dependence on the scarce lithium and unethical cobalt mining practices.

• These batteries can endure over 3,000 charge cycles, making them suitable for electric vehicles, grid storage, and consumer electronics.

• They provide better safety and reliability compared to lithium-ion batteries.

Sodium-ion technology may shift the energy storage landscape, challenging lithium's dominance amid ethical and resource limitations. The innovations promise faster charging and greater accessibility, potentially allowing electric vehicles and renewable energy systems to become economically competitive with traditional options. As research advances, sodium-ion batteries could represent a significant move towards ethical and sustainable energy solutions, promoting independence from exploitative supply chains. 

https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-05-30-sodium-ion-batteries-faster-safer-more-sustainable.html

On Congressional and Corporate Collusion with the PRC

 Thaddeus G. McCotter expresses his concerns about the U. S. Congress and corporations working with the People's Republic of China (PRC), highlighting issues that undermine American national security.

• McCotter feels both support and disappointment regarding Steve Cortes’s recent article on preventing U. S. tax credits from benefitting Chinese companies.

• He emphasizes the dangers of allowing Chinese companies to access U. S. markets, which could compromise national security through potential espionage and financial support to a repressive regime.

• Cortes points out that a recent tax bill (the "Big Beautiful Bill") fails to close loopholes that allow Chinese firms to access significant U. S. tax credits, specifically the 45X Advanced Manufacturing Production Credit.

• McCotter agrees with Cortes’s proposal that the Senate should prohibit tax credits for companies connected to the PRC and limit their intrusion into the U. S. industrial base.

• There is worry about whether Congress will act to protect American interests against China’s technological dominance, suggesting that taxpayers might end up financing their adversary.

• McCotter notes historical problems in Michigan and other Democratic-controlled states where partnerships with Chinese firms led to security threats due to the Inflation Reduction Act.

• Both parties, despite their rhetoric, have shown a tendency to prioritize corporate profits over national security, failing to curb the PRC's influence.

• The article discusses how corporations and politicians continue to collude with the PRC, despite public awareness of the risks.

• McCotter monitors congressional actions, believing that the politicians are not committed to protecting Americans from China, focusing instead on election gains.

• He warns that the political maneuvering could obscure the real dangers posed by the PRC.

McCotter's analysis indicates a troubling pattern of congressional and corporate collaboration with China that jeopardizes U. S. security. He calls for more decisive action to prevent financial support to the PRC and remains skeptical about politicians' intentions. The ongoing challenge emphasizes the need for vigilance in national security matters concerning foreign entities.

https://amgreatness.com/2025/05/31/on-congressional-and-corporate-collusion-with-the-prc/

Democrats’ Real Problem with Populism

 The article discusses the irony that Democrats, who define themselves as the party of "the people," now have a negative view of populism. This summary highlights key points regarding the relationship between Democrats, populism, and the notion of elite representation.

• Democratic Identity: The term “Democrat” connects to “demos,” meaning "the people. " Historically, Democrats have been seen as populists, siding with ordinary citizens.

• Election Dynamics: In a democracy, winning elections relies on appealing to the people, who ultimately decide through their votes.

• Party Evolution: Notable historical figures such as Jefferson and FDR were populists, but contemporary Democrats have distanced themselves from this identity.

• Rhetorical Discrepancy: Despite claiming to advocate for "the people," current rhetoric from Democratic leaders seems to be a remnant of the past rather than a reflection of present policies.

• Separation from the Elite: The concept of populism implies a separation from an elite class. Democrats currently identify with this elite, including individuals from various influential sectors like academia and media.

• Policy Focus: Modern Democratic policies often favor elite interests (e.g., radical environmentalism, defunding the police) over the needs of the broader population.

• Conflict with the Public: Democrats display a consistent disdain for the people when they do not align with elite ideas, seen in disparaging remarks from party leaders about certain voter groups.

The Democrats’ disdain for populism is not only about politics but also reflects a broader contempt for the very "people" they once represented. This shift indicates a preference for an elite status, distancing themselves from ordinary citizens and their concerns.

https://spectator.org/democrats-real-problem-with-populism/

Michelle Obama’s Strange Vision of the Female Reproductive System

Michelle Obama's recent podcast comments about the female reproductive system have stirred controversy. She suggested that the primary role of the reproductive system is not to produce life, which contradicts traditional views on its purpose.

• Podcast Remarks: In a podcast episode, Michelle Obama stated that the female reproductive system's least function is to produce life, emphasizing that women’s reproductive health is primarily about their own lives.

• Perception of Pro-Life Views: Obama characterized pro-lifers as primarily concerned about unborn babies and not about women's health. She believes that their views overlook the complexity and needs of women.

• Political Context: Obama linked her statements to political speeches, particularly discussing fears regarding abortion laws. She claimed that new laws could endanger women’s health by limiting access to medical care.

• Medical Scenarios: Obama painted dramatic scenarios where women could die in childbirth due to abortion laws, claiming that doctors would hesitate to act in emergencies. However, these claims have been criticized as exaggerated and unfounded.

• Narrative on Women's Health: She suggested that if reproductive choices are not safeguarded, women would suffer dire consequences, becoming "collateral damage" in political conflicts over abortion.

Michelle Obama's perspective suggests a de-emphasis on the reproductive system’s role in creating life, framing it instead as a matter solely concerning women’s autonomy. This view has sparked debate about the relationship between women's health and reproductive rights, with critics arguing it misrepresents the essential functions of the reproductive system and the nature of motherhood. 

https://spectator.org/michelle-obama-vision-female-reproductive-system/

Deporations of nearly 500,000 allowed to proceed

 The U. S. Supreme Court has allowed the deportation of nearly 500,000 people living illegally in the country, favoring the Trump administration's stance.

• The Court paused a previous decision that permitted individuals from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela to stay in the U. S. for two years.

• Judge Indira Talwani had blocked an executive order from Trump that aimed to end certain parole programs, including the one for CHNV.

• The Supreme Court stated that parole is discretionary and involves a thorough application process.

• The justices noted that the earlier termination of parole by Secretary Kristi Noem was overstepping legal authority.

• Justices Sotomayor and Jackson disagreed with the ruling.

• Following the program's termination, over 531,000 individuals from CHNV entered the U. S. illegally under Biden's term.

The Supreme Court's ruling supports the Trump administration's efforts to enforce immigration laws amid ongoing legal challenges regarding the fate of individuals from specific countries.

https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_9c7793f6-795e-4f67-88fc-87bd433b0f54.html

Trump Says He Will Double US Steel Tariffs To 50%

 President Trump announced on Friday that tariffs on steel imports will be increased from 25% to 50% to protect American steelworkers. This announcement was made during a visit to a U. S. Steel plant in Pittsburgh, where he highlighted a new agreement between U. S. Steel and Japan's Nippon Steel.

• Trump claims the increased tariffs will secure the U. S. steel industry and benefit the new partnership between U. S. Steel and Nippon Steel.

• The decision to raise tariffs aims to make it difficult for foreign competition to penetrate the U. S. market.

• Previous tariffs of 25% on steel and aluminum were implemented with the same goal of boosting the domestic steel industry.

• There has been skepticism about the effectiveness of tariffs, with critics warning they might lead to higher prices for consumers.

• The five main sources of imported steel into the U. S. are Canada, Brazil, Mexico, South Korea, and Vietnam.

• The agreement between U. S. Steel and Nippon Steel is described as a “blockbuster” deal expected to keep U. S. Steel American-owned.

• Trump noted that American workers would benefit from this partnership and sought to reassure steelworkers in Pennsylvania, where U. S. Steel is located.

• U. S. Steel's future was uncertain after Nippon Steel's initial offer for acquisition was proposed at $14.1 billion.

• Both Trump and former President Biden had previously opposed the sale of U. S. Steel, with Biden citing national security concerns.

• The agreement needs further finalization, including a review process that outlines U. S. government powers over the subsidiary.

• The event was celebratory, and Trump was presented with a Pittsburgh Steelers jersey and hard hat, symbolizing his connection to the region.

Trump's tariff increase and partnership announcement aims to revitalize the American steel industry, drawing mixed reactions regarding its potential impacts. The future steps for the U. S. Steel-Nippon Steel deal remain unclear, with further negotiations needed to finalize terms.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/trump-says-he-will-double-us-steel-tariffs-50

Top 9 Supreme Court Decisions to Watch for in June

As the U. S. Supreme Court approaches its summer break, justices are set to announce important decisions in June.

• The Supreme Court, in Washington, will issue significant rulings on various topics, including gender, Obamacare, and pornography regulation.

• Notable cases heard before the recess include issues surrounding e-cigarettes, deportation, ghost guns, and TikTok.

• These upcoming decisions could have lasting impacts on the political landscape, affecting both congressional and executive actions.

The month of June will see the Supreme Court release several key rulings that may shape future policies and legal precedents in the U. S. 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/top-9-supreme-court-decisions-to-watch-for-in-june-5864226?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=TheLibertyDaily

Trump administration approves waivers to ban junk food from SNAP

 The Trump administration is implementing changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by allowing state waivers to remove unhealthy food options, such as junk food and sugary drinks, from SNAP purchases. This initiative initially begins in Nebraska, Indiana, and Iowa, with more states anticipated to follow.

• The new policy aims to address increasing rates of childhood obesity, diabetes, and diseases associated with ultra-processed foods (UPFs) prevalent in SNAP purchases.

• A 69-page report indicates that poor nutrition is a primary cause of health issues in children and calls for reforms to prioritize access to healthy food over taxpayer-funded junk options.

• U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. pledges to eliminate toxins and corruption in the food system, focusing on improving children's health through science-based strategies.

• U. S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Brooke Rollins highlights the importance of farmers in providing healthier food choices, connecting the initiative to Trump's "Make America Healthy Again" campaign.

• The announcement coincides with the release of a report emphasizing the link between poor diets and rising childhood health issues, stating that UPFs are a major contributing factor.

• Nebraska becomes the first state to prohibit SNAP recipients from buying junk food and sugary drinks in a two-year pilot program, with other GOP-led states interested in similar waivers.

The Trump administration's SNAP changes aim to promote better health among children by reducing access to unhealthy food options within the program, with a focus on science-driven policies and the significance of American agriculture in achieving healthier food outcomes.

https://americafirstreport.com/trump-administration-approves-waivers-to-ban-junk-food-from-snap/

‘LEGITIMATE ACT OF RESISTANCE’: Socialist Group Defends Alleged Israeli Embassy Murderer

A faction of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), known as the Liberation Caucus, has supported an open letter claiming that Elias Rodriguez, who allegedly killed two Israeli embassy staff, was justified in his actions to prevent “genocide. ” This stance has sparked backlash from other DSA members and political figures.

• The letter was released by the Palestinian activist group Tariq El-Tahrir and was signed by the DSA Liberation Caucus. In contrast, other DSA sections condemned Rodriguez's actions.

• The letter describes Rodriguez's actions as a legitimate resistance against Israel, referring to the attack on May 21, 2025, as a response to ongoing violence against Palestinians.

• It claims that international law permits violent resistance to prevent genocide and asserts that counter-violence against "the Zionist movement" is an act of justice.

• Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo criticized the letter, calling it a hate crime and urged other mayoral candidates to denounce it.

• The DSA has over 92,000 members but has faced internal conflict over issues related to Israel and Palestine.

The incident highlights divisions within the DSA regarding violence and political perspectives on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, prompting significant public and political reactions. 

https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/05/30/fully-justified-democratic-socialists-america-arm-defends-alleged-murder-israeli-embassy-staff/

83 Percent Of ER Visits Due To Drug-Induced Abortions Miscoded As ’Miscarriages’

A new study reveals that many women who seek emergency care after complications from an abortion have their cases incorrectly classified as miscarriages. This issue could prevent them from receiving the proper urgent care they need.

• Researchers from the Charlotte Lozier Institute conducted a study analyzing nearly 29,000 emergency room (ER) Medicaid claims between 2016 and 2021.

• The study found that 83.5% of ER visits related to drug-induced abortions were misclassified as miscarriages.

• This misclassification rate is significantly higher than previous years (2004 to 2015) and indicates that complications post-chemical abortion are more likely to be recorded incorrectly compared to surgical abortion complications.

• Misclassified cases tend to be more severe and could lead to inadequate medical care, contributing to serious health risks for women.

• The reasons for such misclassifications may stem from advice received by women to present their abortions as miscarriages to avoid stigma and ensure they receive treatment.

• Organizations like Planned Parenthood claim that health professionals cannot determine if abortion pills have been taken, while the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists advises against asking too many questions to protect patient confidentiality.

• The researchers emphasize that these misclassifications can create a public health crisis, limiting doctors' ability to provide evidence-based care.

The study highlights the growing concern over the misclassification of abortion-related emergencies, pointing to a potential risk to women's health as they may not receive appropriate care for complications associated with abortions. Misreporting these medical situations could lead to serious health consequences and reflects broader issues surrounding the conversation on abortion in healthcare. 

https://thefederalist.com/2025/05/30/study-83-percent-of-er-visits-due-to-drug-induced-abortions-miscoded-as-miscarriages/

Anti-Trump Defense IT Specialist Arrested For Attempting to Provide Classified Information to Foreign Government Because He Did Not “Agree or Align with the Values of This Administration”

 An IT specialist working with the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) was arrested for attempting to provide classified national defense information to a foreign government. This incident highlights concerns regarding insider threats within government agencies.

• Nathan Vilas Laatsch, 28, from Alexandria, Virginia, was arrested for trying to share classified information because he disagreed with the current administration's values.

• He became a civilian employee of the DIA in 2019, holding a Top Secret security clearance and working in the Insider Threat Division.

• The FBI launched an operation after receiving a tip that Laatsch had offered classified information to a foreign government in March 2025.

• Laatsch communicated through email, expressing his willingness to share classified information, including completed intelligence products and unprocessed intelligence.

• After several exchanges with an FBI agent, who he believed was affiliated with the foreign government, Laatsch transcribed classified information over a three-day period.

• On May 1, 2025, the FBI observed Laatsch deposit a thumb drive containing a message and multiple classified documents at a public park for retrieval by the foreign entity.

• In subsequent communications, Laatsch indicated he wanted citizenship in the foreign country in exchange for continuing to provide information.

• Between May 15 and May 27, Laatsch repeatedly transcribed more classified notes while logged into his classified workstation and concealed the notes in his clothing to exfiltrate the information.

Laatsch's actions demonstrate a serious breach of trust and security protocols within the DIA. His motivations were linked to a personal disagreement with the administration rather than financial gain. This case serves as a reminder of the ongoing threat posed by insiders within government positions.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/05/us-government-employee-arrested-attempting-provide-classified-information/

Seattle's Woke Problem: You Don't Hate Antifa Or Leftist Politicians Enough

 The situation in Seattle has drawn comparisons to early 20th-century Bolshevism in Europe, highlighting extreme Antifa activism and local governance's apparent indifference. This summary outlines recent events indicating a troubling trend of violence and intimidation associated with Antifa groups in the area.

1. Antifa Behavior and Local Governance: Seattle has become a hub of aggressive Antifa activity where differing political opinions face hostility. Local authorities have shown a lack of effective response to violence, leading to an environment where intimidation flourishes.

2. Incidents of Violence: Recently, Antifa members disrupted a peaceful Christian event organized by Mayday USA, resulting in 23 arrests. However, this number is seen as inadequate given the frequency of such disruptive actions against conservative gatherings.

3. Targeted Harassment: Attendees of conservative events face harassment from Antifa, who aim to intimidate not only speakers but also audience members. Videos and witness accounts document serious threats and violent encounters, yet these incidents often go unreported by major news outlets.

4. Police Inaction: Observers have noted that instead of controlling the violence, police often direct attention towards bystanders filming the events, thereby failing to protect individuals from Antifa aggression.

5. Intimidation Tactics: Antifa employs strategies that provoke reactions from their targets. If a victim retaliates, activists label it as "assault," creating a cycle of fear and compliance from targeted individuals.

6. Legal Protections: The city’s legal environment appears to protect these activists, allowing them to continue their activities with little consequence. Instances of threats and harassment, including towards vulnerable individuals, highlight a concerning trend where rights to free expression are overshadowed by fear of violence.

7. Acknowledging Coordination: The claim that Antifa is merely an idea is dismissed as these groups display organization and tactical training. Investigations into possible funding from NGOs and potential failure of local government to act are suggested.

The rise of Antifa activities in Seattle represents a worrying trend of political violence and social division. As enforcement against these actions remains minimal, a call for stronger government accountability and a reevaluation of how similar actions by conservative groups are treated is emphasized. The culture of permissiveness towards violent leftist activities poses long-term threats to community safety and political discourse. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/seattles-woke-problem-you-dont-hate-antifa-or-leftist-politicians-enough

By Appeasing Rogue Judges, Trump Legitimizes Leftists’ Judicial Coup

 The Trump administration is facing significant challenges from lower court judges who are blocking policy implementations through judicial injunctions. During a recent White House press briefing, questions were raised regarding the administration's strategy to combat these judicial actions.

1. Judicial Coup Allegation: It is argued that a leftist-supported judicial coup is trying to undermine the 2024 presidential election results and disrupt the constitutional order.

2. Press Inquiry: Federalist Editor Mollie Hemingway questioned Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on the administration's specific efforts to address actions by what are deemed "rogue judges. "

3. Lack of Specific Strategy: Leavitt acknowledged that the administration is aware of the issues but did not provide a clear strategy for addressing the challenges posed by the judiciary.

4. Court Compliance: The administration, according to Leavitt, is obligated to comply with court orders while simultaneously fighting back in court to uphold its policies. However, this has led to the perception that Trump has no real plans to counter the judicial actions effectively.

5. Criticism of Judicial Overreach: The article stresses that the judicial branch must adhere to the Constitution and criticizes the judiciary for what is described as an abuse of power through nationwide injunctions.

6. Historical Perspective: The text notes that the framers of the Constitution intended for the judiciary to have limited power compared to the executive branch, suggesting that current judicial actions are an overreach of authority.

7. Reactions to Inaction: The article compares the Trump administration's response to previous Republican strategies, labeling them as ineffective and solely focused on vocal opposition without taking decisive action.

The Trump administration's current strategy regarding judicial challenges is viewed as lacking decisiveness, leading to concerns about the legitimacy of judicial actions undermining the presidency and the will of voters. It emphasizes the need for the executive branch to act firmly if the judicial branch fails to adhere to constitutional mandates. 

https://thefederalist.com/2025/05/30/by-appeasing-rogue-judges-trump-legitimizes-leftists-judicial-coup/

Biden’s AUTOPEN REGIME laundered $93 BILLION through Energy Department right before Trump took office, exposing last-ditch money grab by oligarchs

 The recent actions of the Biden administration, specifically within the Department of Energy (DOE), have attracted significant scrutiny due to reckless financial practices in the final weeks of his presidency.

• The DOE issued $93 billion in loans and commitments in just 76 days, which is more than double the total amount loaned in the past 15 years.

• Energy Secretary Christopher Wright revealed that many loans were granted without proper evaluation, including no business plans or financial documentation from recipients.

• The DOE's budget skyrocketed from $60 billion to $160 billion without any accountability, reflecting a pattern of last-minute funding grabs, including a $100 billion scheme exposed by Project Veritas involving the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

• During a Senate hearing, Senator John Kennedy emphasized the lack of oversight, questioning how money was given to entities without proper business plans or financials. Wright confirmed the lack of scrutiny and admitted that individuals were often hoping to create plans after receiving funds.

• This spending spree is viewed as part of a broader scheme to redirect taxpayer money to politically aligned groups, taking advantage of the administration's last days.

The actions of the Biden administration indicate a troubling pattern of financial mismanagement and favoritism. As investigations arise, concerns grow about who truly benefited from this unprecedented spending, with implications that demand accountability and justice for taxpayers. 

https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-05-30-bidens-autopen-regime-laundered-93billion-energy-department.html

Democrats and Their DEI Albatrosses

 A few Democrats are realizing their party's image is harmful to many Americans. The Biden administration played a significant role in this decline through various actions and policies.

1. Misleading Information: The Biden administration repeatedly misled the public about President Joe Biden’s health and ability to serve. The media eventually admitted that they were misinformed about his condition.

2. Radical Policies: Biden was used by left-wing politicians as a front to implement extreme policies that many Americans opposed, leading to issues like high inflation, massive debt, and an open border.

3. Attack on Opponents: Hard-left Democrats attempted to label Donald Trump and his supporters as extremists, using numerous false allegations and legal tactics against them.

4. Failed Campaign Tactics: The Democrats faced backlash for manipulating the nomination process in 2020, which sidelined popular candidates and brought Biden to the forefront as a COVID-era candidate despite his lack of public campaigning.

5. Future Nomination Issues: As Democrats plan for 2024, they are expected to replace Biden with Kamala Harris, who has not proven herself as a strong candidate.

6. Resistance to Change: Some party members acknowledge the need for reform but fear backlash from the more radical elements within the party. Suggestions for immigration reform, educational improvements, and energy development are seen as controversial.

The left's current approach, especially the focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), is seen as both a dependency and a hindrance. The party struggles to address serious issues without facing accusations of racism or extremism, limiting their ability to reclaim public trust.

https://amgreatness.com/2025/05/29/democrats-and-their-dei-albatrosses/

Doug Casey on Revisionist History and How the “Good Guys” Don’t Always Win

 The text, a dialogue between International Man and Doug Casey, explores the concept of revisionist history and the importance of critical thinking in examining historical narratives. It argues that history, as commonly taught, often lacks nuance and is presented as fact, ignoring alternative perspectives or inconvenient truths. The discussion critiques the establishment's resistance to revisionist history, which can challenge powerful interests and national myths. Casey emphasizes the need for a free society to question official narratives and highlights historical examples where the "good guys" may not have been as virtuous as portrayed. He also warns of contemporary global conflicts and their potential to reshape historical narratives, urging individuals to prepare for an unstable future.

• Critical Thinking in History:
  • Critical thinking involves questioning every proposition and investigating answers for accuracy and logic.
  • History taught in schools often presents singular versions as fact, lacking nuance, akin to different people misinterpreting parts of an elephant.
• Revisionist History and Establishment Resistance:
  • The term "revisionist history" may have been coined by the CIA in the 1960s to discredit alternative interpretations.
  • The establishment opposes revisionism because:
    • It requires detailed investigations that might expose crimes by powerful individuals, threatening their status or wealth.
    • It can overturn myths that unify societies, though truth is generally preferable to myth in the long run.
• Historical Narratives and Myths:
  • History is often a "catalog of the crimes, follies, and misfortunes of mankind" (Gibbon).
  • National myths, like those surrounding the American Revolutionary War, are romanticized to present countries favorably.
  • The Revolutionary War was also a civil war, with a third of the population supporting the British, complicating the heroic narrative.
  • The U.S. Civil War (or War Between the States) was primarily about taxation and economic issues, not solely slavery, despite the popular narrative.
• Challenges to Questioning History:
  • Questioning widely accepted historical events can lead to accusations of extremism or promoting hate, reflecting cognitive dissonance.
  • Emotional attachment to recent events or living figures makes objective analysis difficult, as major historical players often have questionable morals.
• Examples of Contested Historical Events:
  • Pearl Harbor: Evidence suggests Roosevelt provoked Japan, sacrificing Pearl Harbor to galvanize public support, challenging the U.S. "good guy" narrative.
  • Kennedy Assassination: Casey suspects a CIA coup, with Oswald as a patsy, but official narratives persist to maintain national stability.
  • 9/11: Unanswered questions, like the collapse of Building 7, fuel skepticism, but questioning the narrative risks being labeled conspiratorial.
• Contemporary Global Conflicts:
  • Current conflicts in Ukraine, Gaza, and potentially Taiwan are seen as missteps by a "degenerate" U.S. empire, likely to be viewed negatively by future historians.
  • Ukraine is framed as a provoked border war, Gaza as a long-standing territorial dispute, and Taiwan as a potential repeat of U.S. interventions in Vietnam and Korea.
• Implications and Advice for Individuals:
  • The world is entering a chaotic period, with the U.S. on the "wrong side" of history in ongoing conflicts.
  • To protect themselves, individuals should:
    • Invest in stable assets like gold and real estate.
    • Adopt a speculative approach to capitalize on global instability.

The text advocates for a skeptical approach to historical narratives, emphasizing the importance of questioning established truths to uncover potential crimes or inaccuracies. Casey's perspective aligns with libertarian principles, valuing individual liberty and truth over national myths. However, his claims about specific events (e.g., Pearl Harbor, Kennedy assassination) lack detailed evidence in the text, which could weaken their persuasiveness without further substantiation. The discussion of current conflicts is speculative and reflects Casey's bias against U.S. foreign policy, but it effectively ties historical revisionism to contemporary issues. The advice to invest in gold and real estate is practical, though the speculative approach may carry higher risks not fully addressed here.

https://internationalman.com/articles/doug-casey-on-revisionist-history-and-how-the-good-guys-dont-always-win/

Biden admin knew COVID shot risks in early 2021 but kept silent for months: Senate report

 A Senate report reveals that the Biden administration was aware of cardiovascular risks related to COVID-19 vaccines early in 2021 but chose not to inform the public for several months.

1. Early Warnings Ignored:

• In February 2021, the CDC's Vaccine Safety Technical Work Group (VaST) reported about nearly 1,000 deaths post-vaccination, indicating many had cardiovascular causes.

• Israel had already informed the CDC about significant cases of myocarditis in young individuals after the Pfizer vaccine.

2. Delayed Public Announcement:

• Despite knowledge of the risks by June 2021, the administration did not update the vaccine labels to warn about myocarditis and pericarditis risks until late that month.

• Senator Ron Johnson criticized the administration for withholding this information from the public, putting young Americans' health at risk.

3. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting:

• The federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) recorded over 38,600 deaths and numerous other serious cases related to the vaccines.

• CDC research indicated a high verification rate of myocarditis reports following mRNA vaccinations, suggesting under-reporting may be an issue.

4. Other Health Risks Identified:

• A study indicated higher risks of myocarditis post-vaccination, alongside potential links to pericarditis and other serious conditions.

• April 2024 saw the CDC release previously undisclosed reports concerning adverse reactions to the vaccines.

5. Future Safety Trials:

• FDA officials announced plans for new safety trials before recommending additional COVID-19 vaccinations, especially for vulnerable populations.

• Recently, recommendations were withdrawn for healthy children and pregnant women to receive the vaccine, highlighting ongoing changes in policy regarding vaccine safety.

The Senate report underscores significant concerns regarding the transparency of the Biden administration regarding COVID-19 vaccine safety, specifically related to cardiovascular risks identified early on. As studies and reports continue to emerge, discussions surrounding vaccine safety protocols remain critical. 

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/biden-admin-knew-covid-shot-risks-in-early-2021-but-kept-silent-for-months-senate-report/?utm_source=latest_news&utm_campaign=usa

Five Quick Things: The Rescission Cometh

The article, written by a columnist for The American Spectator, reflects on the prescience of their previous column about the "Big Beautiful Bill" and the anticipated rescission package to cut federal spending. The author highlights the lack of attention from critics regarding the likelihood of a rescission following the bill’s passage, emphasizing the strategic moves by the Trump administration to reduce the federal budget. The piece also touches on broader political dynamics, including Stephen Miller’s critique of libertarian arguments against the bill, Charlie Kirk’s observations on the U.K.’s political stagnation, the Democratic Party’s struggles to appeal to young male voters, and the cultural shift toward country music as a reflection of American values. The tone is conversational, confident, and critical of progressive policies, with a strong conservative perspective. The author uses a mix of humor, sarcasm, and pointed commentary to engage readers while reinforcing their arguments with references to key figures like Russ Vought, Stephen Miller, and Charlie Kirk.

Bullet Points:

• Rescission Package Announcement:
  • OMB Director Russ Vought confirmed a rescission package, including DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) cuts, will be sent to Congress when the House resumes session.
  • Targets include foreign aid, USAID, Corporation for Public Broadcasting, and NPR funding, deemed wasteful or counterproductive to U.S. foreign policy.
  • Rescission bills are not subject to Senate filibuster, increasing their likelihood of passage.
  • House Speaker Mike Johnson supports swift action on the rescission, aiming to codify cuts and align with Trump’s 2026 budget.
  • Potential savings of $160 billion or more, contributing to historic reductions in discretionary and mandatory spending (e.g., Medicaid, with $1.6 trillion saved via the Big Beautiful Bill).
  • Republican unity is expected, with minimal dissent; Democrats are unlikely to support the bill, risking their image as the party of wasteful spending.
  • If passed, more rescission bills could follow, and the administration may impound unneeded funds to further reduce the budget baseline.
• Stephen Miller’s Critique of Libertarians:
  • White House policy director Stephen Miller criticized libertarians opposing the Big Beautiful Bill for relying on CBO’s flawed claim that extending current tax rates “costs” $4 trillion.
  • Argues that libertarians adopting this view align with Democrat collectivist logic, contradicting their small-government principles.
  • Highlights the bill’s benefits: tax cuts, spending reductions, welfare reform, and ending mass migration, which Miller sees as essential for fiscal health.
  • Notes CBO’s history of underestimating tax cut revenue effects, undermining its credibility.
• Charlie Kirk on the U.K.:
  • Kirk describes the U.K. as politically paralyzed, akin to pre-Trump U.S., with elites stifling free speech and public discourse.
  • Suggests the U.K. lacks a bold leader to challenge the status quo, unlike the U.S. with Trump’s disruptive influence.
  • References the author’s book, From Hellmarsh With Love, on U.K. free speech issues.
• Democrats’ Struggle with Young Male Voters:
  • The DNC’s $20 million plan to recapture young male voters (under 45) is dismissed as futile, given the party’s perceived hostility toward this demographic.
  • The “abundance agenda” promoting deregulation is seen as inconsistent with the party’s core base and history of opposing progress.
  • Cites Ace of Spades’ commentary on college-attending conservatives moderating their views to appeal to liberal women, though this may not reflect true beliefs.
  • Notes a cultural shift where conservative beliefs are gaining status, particularly among younger women dating older, right-leaning men.
• Cultural Shift Toward Country Music:
  • Argues that country music is increasingly defining American culture, reflecting universal sentiments that resonate with timeless values.
  • Suggests the decline of pop culture’s “coolness” has created a vacuum filled by country artists like Chris Stapleton, Eric Church, and Lainey Wilson.
  • Attributes this trend to the genre’s alignment with human emotions and values Americans are rediscovering.

Additional Notes:

• The article assumes familiarity with the “Big Beautiful Bill” and DOGE, referencing prior columns for context.
• It critiques progressive policies and media (e.g., NPR, CBO) while praising conservative figures like Trump, Vought, Miller, and Johnson.
• The tone is assertive, with a clear conservative bias, and uses pop culture references (e.g., country music, P.J. O’Rourke) to connect with readers.
• No charts or graphs were requested, so none are provided.

https://spectator.org/five-quick-things-the-rescission-cometh/ 

Biden Promised $1.4B in Subsidies to Build Solar Factory. It Just Closed

 This article discusses the failure of a solar factory project funded by government subsidies. Meyer Burger, a Swiss company, received significant taxpayer money to create jobs in the U. S. but ultimately shut down its operations.

1. Subsidy Overview: The article highlights the trend of companies receiving large government subsidies for green energy projects, often with little success or sustainable economic models.

2. Meyer Burger's Promise: Meyer Burger announced plans to build a significant solar cell factory in Colorado, claiming it would generate 350 jobs. The project was supported by $1.4 billion in subsidies from President Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, along with additional funding from local sources and the U. S. Department of Energy.

3. Shutdown of Arizona Facility: Despite the initial investment, Meyer Burger closed its factory in Goodyear, Arizona, citing financial difficulties. This closure affected 282 employees, raising concerns about the effectiveness of taxpayer-funded initiatives in the green energy sector.

4. Public Sentiment: There is skepticism regarding the allocation of such funds, with comments from the public reflecting frustration over wasted taxpayer money and the lack of tangible results from these investments.

Meyer Burger's situation is a notable example of how substantial government subsidies in the green energy sector may not lead to successful, sustainable ventures, resulting in wasted taxpayer funds and job losses. The article prompts readers to reconsider the effectiveness of these financial commitments in producing real economic benefits. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/biden-promised-1-4b-in-subsidies-to-build-solar-factory-it-just-closed/

If The Gigantic Supervolcano In Italy Erupts In 2025, It Could Instantly Cause A Devastating Worldwide Famine

 Scientists are warning that the Campi Flegrei supervolcano in Italy, which is showing signs of awakening, could be on the verge of a major eruption. Such an event could lead to a global famine due to drastic climate changes.

• Threat of Global Famine: A significant eruption can result in a "volcanic winter," causing severe food shortages worldwide, potentially killing millions.

• Supervolcanoes: There are 20 supervolcanoes on Earth, and none have had major eruptions in our lifetimes. However, increasing seismic activity raises alarms about Campi Flegrei.

• Recent Earthquakes: Campi Flegrei has experienced around 6,000 earthquakes in the last six months, indicating pressure building within the volcano. The strongest quake, measuring 4.4, occurred in March and is the strongest seen in 40 years.

• Gas Emissions: The Solfatara crater is releasing approximately 5,000 tons of gas daily, with a significant amount of carbon dioxide originating from magma, further suggesting the volcano's awakening.

• Crust Weakening: Layers within the crater, about 4 km deep, have been weakening since 2005. This deterioration may lead to a failed eruption or the release of significant magma.

• Magma Movements: Magma is now situated just a few miles below the surface, increasing the likelihood of an eruption if pressure continues to build.

• Potential Consequences of Eruption: If Campi Flegrei erupts, it could cool global temperatures for several years, disrupting food supplies and leading to widespread famine. Historical precedents, like the volcanic winter of 536 AD, underscore the severity of such events.

While the eruption of the Campi Flegrei supervolcano is not deemed imminent, scientists caution that it is a possibility in the near future. A significant eruption could drastically alter life as we know it and exacerbate existing global food crises. 

http://endoftheamericandream.com/if-the-gigantic-supervolcano-in-italy-erupts-in-2025-it-could-instantly-cause-a-devastating-worldwide-famine/

Democrats’ Brilliant New Strategy: Learn To Speak Like An American

 Recent discussions highlight how Democrats are facing challenges related to their communication style. Critics suggest that their use of complex terminology is alienating average voters, but the real issue might stem from their ideological stance.

1. Linguistic Criticism: Reports indicate that Democrats are being advised to simplify their vocabulary, avoiding terms like "oligarchs" for "rich people" and "food insecurity" for hunger. This push comes from a desire to reconnect with voters.

2. Need for Change: Some centrist Democrats believe the party should engage more with everyday Americans. Recommendations include stepping out of elite circles and embracing traditional American themes.

3. Study on Voter Engagement: Democrats are investing $20 million in researching how to better connect with "American men", indicating a need for a more relatable approach in their messaging.

4. Phoniness in Messaging: The authors argue that if Democrats merely adjust their language without addressing underlying policy issues, voters will perceive insincerity.

5. Shift to the Right: The political landscape has notably shifted rightward, with a majority of counties moving Republican in recent elections. This trend suggests that Democratic policies are failing to resonate with many voters, especially in working-class areas.

6. Policy Concerns: The core of the problem is not just language but the Democratic agenda. The piece asserts that issues like illegal immigration, economic challenges, crime rates, and various social policies are alienating voters.

7. Contrast with Republican Appeal: The article contrasts Democratic rhetoric with the Republican focus on practical issues such as border security, tax reduction, reduced federal mandates, and enhancing safety and education.

8. Long-term Solutions: The authors conclude that simply changing vocabulary will not improve the Democrats' situation as long as their policies are perceived as disconnected from average Americans' needs and concerns.

The Democratic Party may need more than just a linguistic makeover; they must reconsider their ideological framework to regain voter trust. Their ongoing struggles suggest that policy alignment with the values of average Americans is crucial for future success. 

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/05/30/rogets-thesaurus-wont-save-democrats/

Trump Goes Off on the Federalist Society For Recommending Judges When He Was ‘New to Washington,’ Slams Federal Judges Who Blocked Him From Imposing Tariffs

 President Trump has expressed strong dissatisfaction with a recent ruling by a three-judge panel of the U. S. Court of International Trade, which blocked him from imposing tariffs. He highlighted his disappointment with the Federalist Society, which had previously recommended judges to him when he was new to Washington.

• The three-judge panel ruled that Trump exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977.

• Judges involved in the ruling included Gary Katzmann (Obama appointee), Timothy Reif (Trump appointee), and Jane Restani (Reagan appointee).

• The Trump administration's appeal resulted in an immediate administrative stay from the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

• Trump criticized the panel's decision, questioning the motives of the judges and implying they acted out of personal animosity toward him.

• Trump claimed that the Federalist Society misled him regarding judicial nominations and accused Leonard Leo, a prominent figure associated with the Society, of having his own ambitions detrimental to America.

• Trump expressed pride in some judicial picks but disappointment in others, asserting that judges must prioritize the nation's welfare.

• He emphasized the significance of tariffs for the U. S. economy and described the court's ruling as politically motivated and harmful to presidential power.

• Trump argued that requiring Congress's approval for tariffs could lead to inefficiencies and could undermine the presidency.

• He warned that the ruling could result in substantial financial losses for the U. S. if upheld, framing it as a potential threat to national sovereignty.

Trump's statements reveal a deep frustration with both the judicial ruling against his tariff power and the advice he received from the Federalist Society regarding judicial appointments. He hopes the Supreme Court will reverse the decision quickly, expressing concerns about its impact on the presidency and the U. S. economy. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/05/trump-goes-federalist-society-recommending-judges-when-he/

U.S. government employee arrested for attempting to provide classified information to foreign government

 On May 29, 2025, Nathan Vilas Laatsch, an IT specialist at the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), was arrested for attempting to transfer classified information to a foreign government.

• Background: Nathan Vilas Laatsch, 28, was employed by the DIA and held a Top Secret security clearance. He had worked with the Insider Threat Division since 2019.

• Investigation: The FBI began investigating Laatsch after receiving a tip about someone offering classified information to a foreign government. Laatsch expressed dissatisfaction with the current U. S. administration in communications and indicated he was willing to share sensitive information.

• Classified Information Attempt: Over several days, Laatsch copied classified materials onto a notepad at work and later attempted to provide this information to a foreign country, believing he was communicating with an official of that government.

• FBI Operation: The FBI set up an operation in a public park where Laatsch intended to leave the classified information for retrieval. He deposited a thumb drive containing classified documents, including a personal message detailing the types of classified information he had accessed.

• Further Communications: After confirming the thumb drive's receipt, Laatsch sought compensation, including citizenship in the foreign country, for providing more classified information.

• Final Arrest: Laatsch continued to transcribe more classified information and was arrested on May 29 when he attempted to transmit multiple classified documents to the foreign government.

The case highlights serious concerns about national security and the integrity of government employees. Laatsch's actions were deemed illegal, and he is presumed innocent until proven guilty.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-edva/pr/us-government-employee-arrested-attempting-provide-classified-information-foreign

The Democratic Party Has Moved From Plummeting Approval Numbers to Self-Imposed Implosion

 Since the November election, the Democratic Party has shown clear signs of disorganization. Public support for the party is declining, reflected in various data while more evidence suggests deep internal conflicts are taking shape.

• Various indicators such as polling numbers and public approval rates suggest the Democratic Party is struggling.

• Anecdotal evidence of internal disagreements is becoming common, highlighting a situation similar to the fable of "The Scorpion and the Frog. "

• Members of the press, usually supportive of the Democratic Party, are also feeling the backlash. For instance, CNN's Chris Cillizza recounted a personal experience of his Tesla being vandalized. Rather than understanding the broader implications, he reacted with concern over potential blame directed at "MAGA people. "

• Jake Tapper also faced scrutiny during an interview for a comment about his son's wish to be a cop, which was misinterpreted as a sign of racism. He criticized the reactions and indicated they reflect the party's electoral losses.

• An extensive report from NBC News highlighted a serious internal crisis within the Democratic Party, revealing conflicts among key operatives, particularly those previously aligned with the Obama administration.

• Criticism is growing towards Obama strategists and consultants, once seen as central figures in Democratic politics. Some party officials are now blaming Obama’s lack of support for state parties for hindering local efforts.

• Suggestions of discord have surfaced, particularly relating to President Biden’s decisions and the role of the Obama team, raising questions about their influence in recent electoral strategies.

• The lack of enthusiasm showed by the Obamas during the campaign heightened the perception of their diminishing political power.

• David Plouffe, a former Obama campaign strategist, blamed the Biden administration for Kamala Harris’ failed campaign.

• This criticism has led to backlash from other Democratic party figures, indicating a split in blaming strategies.

• DNC Finance Chair Chris Korge expressed the need for a change in approach, insisting that the traditional Obama strategies are outdated.

• With various party members making rash statements, there is a clear lack of focus within the Democratic leadership. Figures like Sen. Cory Booker and Rep. Jasmine Crockett are not effectively unifying the party.

• Established leaders, including Chuck Schumer and Bernie Sanders, appear ineffective, contributing to the party's chaotic state.

• Overall, the Democratic Party is likened to a sports team struggling with a poor record while facing internal conflicts, suggesting a critical need for reevaluation and strategic changes.

The Democratic Party is currently facing significant internal and external challenges, marked by a noteworthy decline in public support and increasing conflicts among its members. Without a clear strategy or leadership direction, the party risks further estrangement from its base and continued electoral losses.

https://redstate.com/bradslager/2025/05/29/the-democratic-party-has-moved-from-dropping-approval-numbers-to-self-imposed-implosion-n2189779

Federal Court Blocks Trump From Imposing Most of His Tariffs, Rules He Exceeded His Authority to Impose Tariffs Under IEEPA – Trump Admin Appeals

A recent ruling from the Court of International Trade in New York has determined that President Trump exceeded his authority by imposing tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977. This decision temporarily halts several significant tariffs previously enacted by Trump.

• The court stated that Trump’s tariffs, including a 30% tariff on China and 25% tariffs on goods from Mexico and Canada, were beyond his legal authority.

• The ruling does not affect the 25% tariffs on autos, auto parts, steel, or aluminum imposed under a different law.

• A previous ruling by U. S. District Court Judge T. Kent Wetherell supported that Trump may have had authority under IEEPA but did not issue an order and transferred the case to the Court of International Trade.

• The recent ruling by a three-judge panel at the Court of International Trade effectively stops Trump's tariffs, including those referred to as “Liberation Day” tariffs.

• The three judges involved in the ruling included appointees from Presidents Obama, Trump, and Reagan.

• Trump's administration has signaled an intention to appeal the court’s decision.

The court's ruling represents a significant legal setback for Trump’s tariff policies, and the administration is expected to respond with an appeal. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/05/breaking-federal-court-blocks-trump-imposing-some-tariffs/

US lawmakers demand answers from Brussels over alleged foreign interference in Polish election campaign

 Several U. S. lawmakers have expressed concerns over potential foreign interference in Poland's presidential election. They are calling for an investigation into the funding and promotion of political advertisements that may violate Polish election laws.

• A group of senior members from the U. S. House of Representatives, led by Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Brian Mast, sent a letter to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

• The letter requests an investigation into political ads that allegedly supported opposition candidate Rafał Trzaskowski and criticized rivals Karol Nawrocki and Sławomir Mentzen.

• Investigative reporting links these ads to Estratos, an Austrian company believed to be influenced by U. S. Democratic Party connections.

• The letter claims that Estratos has previously supported anti-Orbán candidates in Hungary, raising further concerns.

• Polish media reports indicate that Facebook pages supporting Trzaskowski spent more on ads than official election committees, which is against Polish electoral laws prohibiting foreign-funded campaigning.

• The lawmakers highlighted that 80% of Estratos is owned by Higher Ground Labs, a U. S. fund managed by operatives from the Democratic Party, casting doubt on the integrity of the election process.

• They cited that approximately 420,000 PLN (about $105,000) has been spent on these questionable ads since April 10, 2025.

• The lawmakers concluded that the integrity of Poland’s democratic processes may have been jeopardized due to this alleged interference.

U. S. lawmakers are pushing for a thorough investigation into potential foreign influence in Poland’s election, reflecting a broader concern about the impact of outside funding and advertisements on the democratic process.

https://rmx.news/article/us-lawmakers-demand-answers-from-brussels-over-alleged-foreign-interference-in-polish-election-campaign/

Documents Show DC Bar Skirted Its Own Rules And Due Process To Target Jeff Clark

 The D. C. Bar has come under scrutiny for how it initiated a disciplinary investigation against Jeffrey Clark, a former Department of Justice official during the Trump administration. Documents obtained reveal that the Bar may have deviated from its own rules to target Clark.

• Ed Martin, a former U. S. Attorney for D. C., sought clarity on the Bar's practices, questioning its fairness against Republican lawyers since his office received indications that the investigation into Clark was influenced by a Democratic senator.

• Clark was charged in July 2022 with dishonesty and conduct that interfered with justice. He was also implicated in a broader indictment regarding the 2020 election in Georgia and faced an FBI raid.

• The investigation was prompted by a report from the Democrat-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee that accused Clark of attempting to manipulate the DOJ's authority to alter election outcomes.

• Clark had drafted a letter addressing concerns about the 2020 election results but did not send it following pushback from his superiors and Trump.

• Senate Judiciary Chair Dick Durbin urged the D. C. Bar to investigate Clark, suggesting his actions might constitute professional misconduct.

• Previously, the D. C. Bar’s Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) claimed they required firsthand knowledge to initiate investigations. However, they confirmed that complaints without firsthand knowledge could still be docketed.

• Martin raised concerns that the ODC's rules were inconsistently applied, noting examples where complaints were accepted without firsthand knowledge.

• Clark's legal team argued that the investigation violated the Bar's policy and should be dismissed, requesting documents related to Martin's inquiry into Clark's case.

• In December 2023, Clark faced difficulty obtaining evidence needed for his defense from various government entities. By February 2024, the D. C. Court of Appeals ruled that he did not have to comply with an ODC subpoena violating multiple rights.

• Despite these challenges, Clark has managed to secure a role in the second Trump administration, focusing on compliance with Trump's directives.

The ongoing investigation into Jeffrey Clark by the D. C. Bar raises serious questions about the Bar's adherence to its own rules and the influence of political motives in its disciplinary actions.

https://thefederalist.com/2025/05/29/documents-show-dc-bar-skirted-its-own-rules-and-due-process-to-target-jeff-clark/

Power-Grabbing WI Judges Are Learning From Rogue Federal Jurists

A series of troubling incidents involving liberal judges in Wisconsin has ignited a broader conversation about judicial overreach, political activism from the bench, and eroding public trust in the judiciary. Most recently, Dane County Judge Ellen Berz received a seven-day suspension for behavior deemed impulsive and biased — the latest in a string of controversies exposing deep cracks in Wisconsin’s judicial integrity.

Berz’s case is far from isolated. Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan is facing federal charges for allegedly obstructing immigration enforcement by helping an illegal immigrant avoid arrest. And Judge Monica Isham of Sawyer County stirred up outrage by threatening to shut down her courtroom over ICE activity, invoking rhetoric that critics have likened to political grandstanding.

The common thread? A troubling pattern of judicial activism, personal politics bleeding into the courtroom, and a lack of professional restraint — all of which reflect broader national trends where judges see themselves not as neutral arbiters, but as resistance figures against laws they dislike. Critics argue that these judges, emboldened by activist examples at the federal level, are undermining the very institutions they serve.

Key Takeaways: Wisconsin Judicial Accountability Crisis

• Judge Ellen Berz Suspended

  • Disciplined for attempting to personally retrieve a hospitalized defendant, violating judicial neutrality.

  • Found guilty of acting impulsively and with bias in multiple cases.

  • Suspension aims to “promote professionalism” but is seen as a light punishment by critics.

• Judge Hannah Dugan Indicted

  • Accused of helping an illegal immigrant evade ICE agents in her courtroom.

  • Faces up to 6 years in prison for federal obstruction charges.

  • Still drawing scrutiny due to assignment of case to Clinton-appointed Judge Lynn Adelman, known for anti-conservative writings.

• Judge Monica Isham’s Political Outburst

  • Compared ICE operations to sending people to “concentration camps.”

  • Threatened to cease holding court unless state judicial leaders addressed her concerns.

  • Has moved to Zoom hearings, raising concerns over transparency and legality.

• Broader Pattern of Judicial Activism

  • Critics cite these incidents as local echoes of federal judicial overreach, especially seen during the Trump era.

  • Judges issuing questionable national injunctions and playing politics with immigration and administrative law.

• Public Trust at Risk

  • Editorial boards, legislators, and legal observers warn that these actions are corrosive to the judiciary’s credibility.

  • Violations of judicial conduct codes are becoming too frequent to ignore.

• No Immediate Consequences for Isham

  • Despite growing concerns, Isham remains on the bench, and calls for her resignation have not resulted in formal action.

• Political Implications

  • Critics argue that leftist ideology is compromising judicial independence, turning the bench into a political platform rather than a place for impartial justice.

What’s unfolding in Wisconsin is a microcosm of a national issue: the politicization of the judiciary. Judges are meant to be interpreters of the law, not enforcers of ideology. When judges cross that line — whether by helping defendants evade law enforcement or by using courtrooms as protest platforms — it sends a dangerous signal that the rule of law is secondary to personal beliefs.

The growing chorus demanding accountability is right to be concerned. Judicial misconduct, no matter the political affiliation, must be met with firm consequences to preserve the public’s confidence in a fair and impartial justice system. Without that trust, the courts cease to function as arbiters — and become actors in an increasingly polarized stage. 

https://thefederalist.com/2025/05/29/power-grabbing-wi-judges-are-learning-from-rogue-federal-jurists/

GOP rushes to win Musk back by codifying into law DOGE cuts as billionaire pulls back support

Elon Musk recently announced his decision to reduce political spending for the upcoming midterm elections, causing concern among Republicans who had hoped for his financial backing. This reflects Musk's growing disillusionment with Congress and the GOP's support for his initiatives.

• Musk has faced significant media and public backlash while combating Congress over his plans to cut foreign aid and access Treasury payment systems. A New York court has allowed DOGE staff to access necessary agency data.

• His campaign contribution to Brad Schimel for Wisconsin's Supreme Court has seen little support from GOP leaders, raising questions about their commitment to political spending.

• Musk's frustrations stem from a perceived lack of support from GOP lawmakers during his time leading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which has been criticized by Democrats.

• Despite his withdrawal from political spending, Musk did not completely close the door on future contributions, stating he would consider it if convinced of its necessity.

• Musk's initial involvement in Republican politics began with supporting Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis but later included backing Donald Trump. Nonetheless, he openly expressed his dissatisfaction with Congress.

• In response to Musk's departure, Republican leaders, including DeSantis and Speaker Mike Johnson, have been working to show support and align efforts to advance DOGE initiatives, such as triggers for budget cuts.

• A new rescissions package from the White House is aimed at solidifying previously planned cuts to public broadcasting and foreign aid, reflecting Musk’s initial ambitions to address government waste.

• DOGE initially proposed to identify $2 trillion in wasteful spending, but recent estimates of savings fall far short of this target, with a $9.3 billion rescissions package on the table.

• GOP leadership is rallying together in support of Musk's endeavors, highlighting the importance of reducing government spending as they plan for the future.

Musk's decision to cut back political spending has led to a scramble among Republican leaders to maintain his favor and ensure the advancement of his proposed government cuts, amid concerns about governmental inefficiencies and budget management.

 https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/thurepublicans-rush-win-back-musk-doge-cuts-billionaire-pulls-back-support

The Big Beautiful Bill and the 'Rich Men North of Richmond'

 In this article, Vince Coyner discusses his disappointment with the Republican Party, particularly regarding the recently passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act. He argues that the bill fails to fulfill the promises made to the American people and highlights the ongoing issues within Congress.

1. Disillusionment with Republicans: Coyner initially believed that with Donald Trump’s return, Republicans would confront the political establishment, but he feels betrayed by the party's actions.

2. Criticism of the Big Beautiful Bill: The bill claims to provide benefits like extending Trump-era tax cuts and increased border security funding. However, Coyner compares these efforts to "bailing water from the Titanic" while ignoring significant spending increases that exacerbate the deficit.

3. Deficit Concerns: The article emphasizes that the bill will add $2.5 trillion to the government’s debt without significant cuts to spending or strategies to reduce the deficit, contrasting past policies.

4. Lack of Meaningful Change: Coyner highlights that no major departments will be eliminated, and spending reductions are minimal, suggesting the bill continues the status quo rather than truly addressing the budget issues.

5. Public Opinion Ignored: The article references a public desire, expressed through surveys, for substantial cuts to spending and changes in how government funds are allocated, yet the bill does not reflect this.

6. DOGE Recommendations: The article discusses the recommendations from a group called DOGE, which identified significant waste in the federal budget. Despite successful efforts to reduce waste, Coyner argues that little of their advice has been codified into law.

7. Republican Opportunities Missed: Coyner believes that Republicans squandered the political momentum gained from public interest in reducing spending and regulations, resulting in a lackluster bill that disappoints their supporters.

8. Critique of Political Culture: The author points to the influence of the political culture in Washington, suggesting that congress members often become entangled in the lifestyle and interests of powerful donors rather than serving their constituents.

Coyner concludes that instead of delivering on their promises, Republican leadership has produced a bill that primarily serves the establishment, lacking real cuts and reforms. The article serves as a strong criticism of the current political climate and the actions of Congress in shaping legislation that should align with the electorate's desires.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/05/the_big_beautiful_bill_and_the_rich_men_north_of_richmond.html

North Carolina Supreme Court rules federal vaccine immunity doesn’t trump parental rights

 The North Carolina Supreme Court has ruled on a significant case regarding parental rights in relation to vaccination without consent. The case has broader implications for public health mandates and individual freedoms.

1. Case Overview:

• The Supreme Court of North Carolina reinstated a lawsuit claiming that a school and a medical group vaccinated a 14-year-old boy without his parents' consent.

• The court found that federal laws providing immunity to vaccine administrators do not protect against claims of constitutional rights violations.

2. Federal Vaccine Immunity Challenge:

• The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act typically shields healthcare providers from liability during public health emergencies.

• The court ruled that while the PREP Act protects against claims of loss, it does not apply to constitutional harms, such as violations of parental rights.

3. Constitutional Rights Emphasis:

• Chief Justice Paul Newby asserted that protecting the constitutional rights of bodily integrity and parental authority is crucial.

• This ruling allows the case to proceed, differentiating between claims of physical harm and constitutional issues.

4. Concerns About Vaccine Mandates:

• A declassified 2021 intelligence report indicated that vaccine mandates might provoke violence from extremists, highlighting tensions in society regarding vaccination policies.

• This context adds to the ongoing national debate over health mandates and personal freedoms.

5. Judicial and Public Health Intersection:

• The case illustrates the conflict between pandemic emergency powers and the protection of individual liberties.

• The ruling challenges previous understandings of federal supremacy during emergencies, affirming that state laws regarding parental consent still hold significant weight.

6. Future Implications:

• The ruling is seen as a potential turning point for parental rights in the face of emergency health measures.

• Advocates argue that this decision may redefine how legal protections are enforced during health crises.

The North Carolina Supreme Court's decision underscores a significant legal and cultural debate over vaccination protocols, parental rights, and constitutional freedoms. As the case moves forward, it may set important precedents regarding the balance between public health safety and individual rights. The outcome could influence future government responses to health emergencies without compromising fundamental freedoms.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-05-29-federal-vaccine-immunity-doesnt-trump-parental-rights.html

Democrats and Their DEI Albatrosses

Some Democrats are starting to recognize that their party's reputation is damaging to most Americans. The Biden administration has significantly contributed to this negative image.

1. The administration misled the public regarding President Biden's health and capabilities, only admitting the truth when pressured.

2. Biden was used as a frontman for extreme policies that many Americans oppose, such as high spending, open borders, and controversial social agendas.

3. Democrats have labeled Donald Trump and his supporters with extreme accusations, while launching multiple failed political attacks, including claims of collusion and misinformation.

4. The party has seen unprecedented actions against Trump, including numerous indictments, attempts to remove him from ballots, and aggressive FBI actions.

5. Many voters have become tired of the Democrats' confrontational tactics and sensationalism.

6. The party's nominations have become less democratic since 2008, culminating in the unexpected selection of Biden as the 2020 candidate.

7. Recent actions to push out Biden from the ticket for the 2024 election have sidelined the voices of millions of primary voters.

8. Some party members acknowledge the need to distance themselves from radical elements but fear backlash from the party’s more extreme factions.

9. Proposed common-sense solutions, such as moderate immigration policies, educational reforms, and better energy strategies, are dismissed as racist or harmful.

The Democratic Party faces internal challenges as it grapples with its image and the radical influences within. Many potential reforms that could help the party appeal to a broader audience are disregarded due to fears of controversy from the base. 

https://amgreatness.com/2025/05/29/democrats-and-their-dei-albatrosses/

Reliance on ‘renewables’ makes widespread blackout nightmare more likely

On April 28, a significant blackout affected about 55 million people in Spain, Portugal, and parts of France, demonstrating the vulnerability of modern electric grids.

• Passengers on stalled trains faced communication issues, resulting in chaos as they searched for transportation and cash, with systems like hospitals and traffic lights failing.

• The blackout was one of the worst in Europe, disrupting essential services and prompting emergency responses.

• It was reported that the blackout was linked to the Iberian Peninsula's reliance on renewable energy sources, with 78% of electricity generation coming from renewables just before the failure.

• Raúl Bajo Buenestado, an energy scholar, noted the high percentage of solar energy (almost 60%) and the low contribution from conventional power sources during the crisis.

• Two significant generation losses occurred in southwestern Spain, likely due to large solar installations, highlighting the risks of blackouts in systems heavily reliant on renewables.

• Buenestado emphasized that renewable sources depend on a stable grid and cannot ensure grid stability during disturbances.

• The U. S. and Spain's approaches to energy transitioned towards renewables, with Spain aiming for 74% renewable output by 2030, despite the effectiveness of natural gas as a reliable energy source.

• Despite the blackout, Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez reaffirmed the commitment to transition to renewable energy, ignoring the lessons from the event.

The April 28 blackout raises questions about the reliability of energy policies favoring renewables over traditional energy sources. While natural gas played a critical role in restoring power, the commitment to renewables remains strong among European leaders, posing future risks to energy stability. 

https://empoweringamerica.org/reliance-on-renewables-makes-widespread-blackout-nightmare-more-likely/

Letitia James’s Former Colleague Says ‘Opportunistic’ NY AG Abused Her Power

 Former assistant New York solicitor general Brian Ginsberg has accused New York Attorney General Letitia James of abusing her prosecutorial powers in a case concerning a western New York school district. Ginsberg's claims follow previous criticisms of James’s legal conduct.

1. Allegations of Power Abuse:

• Ginsberg claims James is misusing her authority in a Title IX case involving allegations of sexual misconduct in schools. He urged the Supreme Court to intervene.

• He seeks to clarify the limits of "parens patriae" powers, which allow the government to act on behalf of individuals in specific cases.

2. Historical Context:

• Ginsberg highlighted James’s past actions, including a criticized environmental lawsuit against Pepsi, as examples of her alleged misuse of power. A New York Supreme Court justice reprimanded her regarding this case.

• James is accused of launching lawsuits that could be seen as "predatory" and politically motivated.

3. Current Case Background:

• James is pursuing legal action against the Niagara Wheatfield Central School District for failing to protect students from bullying and sexual assault. She argues that her intervention is justified due to the broader impact on the health of New York's citizens.

4. Court Decisions:

• A federal district court dismissed James's suit in 2022, but the Second Circuit Court of Appeals allowed it to proceed in late 2024. Ginsberg argues that this approval was incorrect.

5. Ginsberg’s Advocacy:

• Ginsberg calls for the Supreme Court to set clearer guidelines on the use of parens patriae litigation, asserting that state attorneys general often apply this doctrine too broadly, undermining the legal protections for defendants.

6. Additional Controversies:

• Recently, the Department of Justice has initiated an investigation into James for allegedly falsifying documents to secure favorable loans, mirroring accusations she made against former President Trump regarding his financial dealings.

7. Political Reactions:

• Prominent Republicans, including Rep. Elise Stefanik, have criticized James, pointing out the apparent hypocrisy in her actions compared to her prosecutorial endeavors against Trump.

The allegations against Letitia James raise significant concerns regarding her prosecutorial conduct and the potential misuse of power by state attorneys general. Ginsberg’s suggestions for clarification from the Supreme Court reflect ongoing debates about the boundaries of legal authority within state offices.

https://freebeacon.com/democrats/letitia-jamess-former-colleague-says-opportunistic-ny-ag-abused-her-power/