The Last Chance Of Freedom

It's becoming increasingly difficult to discern fact from fiction, and unfortunately the media has a strong bias. They spin stories to make conservatives look bad and will go to great lengths to avoid reporting on the good that comes from conservative policies. There are a few shining lights in the media landscape-brave conservative outlets that report the truth and offer a different perspective. We must support conservative outlets like this one and ensure that our voices are heard.

Saturday, April 5, 2025

Schumer: Republicans Seem Willing to ‘Buck Donald Trump’ on Tariff Power

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer expressed that some Republicans appear ready to challenge former President Donald Trump regarding tariff authority through the Trade Review Act of 2025.

• On CNN’s "Inside Politics," Schumer noted that Republicans, particularly Senators Chuck Grassley and Maria Cantwell, have introduced a bipartisan bill. This bill aims to require Congress's approval for new tariffs and allows Congress to revoke tariffs with a disapproval resolution.

• Schumer highlighted the importance of this bill in reaffirming Congress's constitutional role in trade policy.

• He welcomed the bipartisan support for the bill and remarked that it indicates a shift among some Republicans who have typically supported Trump’s policies, even when they disagreed with them.

• Schumer believes the bill has a good chance of passing, given its bipartisan backing.

Chuck Schumer's comments reveal a potential shift in Republican support regarding tariffs, indicating that some lawmakers are willing to break away from Trump’s influence in trade matters. This proposed legislation might pave the way for greater congressional oversight on tariffs in the future.

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2025/04/04/schumer-republicans-seem-willing-to-buck-donald-trump-on-tariff-power/

In unprecedented payout, L.A. County will settle sex abuse claims for $4 billion

Los Angeles County plans to settle nearly 7,000 claims of childhood sexual abuse in its juvenile facilities and foster homes for $4 billion. This settlement, if approved, will be the largest sex abuse payout in U. S. history.

1. Settlement Overview:

The proposed $4 billion settlement is in response to lawsuits from thousands of former foster children and others who allege they were abused in juvenile facilities, including the defunct MacLaren Children’s Center.

2. Comparison with Other Settlements:

This amount significantly surpasses previous large settlements, such as the $2. 46 billion paid by the Boy Scouts of America and about $1. 5 billion by the Archdiocese of Los Angeles.

3. Legislative Background:

The settlement is a consequence of Assembly Bill 218, a law allowing abuse victims to file claims even after the statute of limitations expired, leading to a surge in lawsuits in California.

4. Nature of Allegations:

Many victims report sexual abuse by staff members while incarcerated as children in county facilities. The allegations span multiple decades, primarily from the 1980s to the 2000s.

5. Emotional Impact on Victims:

Survivors like MaryAlice Ashbrook and Shirley Bodkin express shock and a desire for justice, recalling traumatic experiences from their time at facilities like MacLaren.

6. County's Response:

L. A. County officials, including Chief Executive Officer Fesia Davenport, have acknowledged the harm done and emphasized efforts to prevent future abuse, including better vetting of staff.

7. Financial Implications:

The payout poses significant financial challenges for the county, which may have to cut its budget or borrow money to settle the claims. The payments to victims will occur between January 2026 and January 2030.

8. Remaining Cases:

The settlement will not cover all lawsuits, with ongoing negotiations for other claims. The situation remains complex, as some accused staff members were still employed until recently.

The $4 billion settlement by L. A. County signifies a historic acknowledgment of the failures in protecting vulnerable children from abuse within its care facilities. As the county navigates the financial repercussions, it aims to provide some measure of healing for the victims involved. The settlement awaits approval from county officials and may set a precedent for future responses to abuse claims.

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2025-04-04/in-unprecedented-payout-l-a-county-settles-sex-abuse-claims-for-4-billion

GOP Rep. Biggs invokes Constitution's 'good behavior' clause in resolution to remove anti-Trump federal judge

Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) has introduced a resolution aimed at removing U. S. District Judge James Boasberg by using the "good behavior" clause of the U. S. Constitution instead of the impeachment process.

• President Donald Trump has faced obstacles from partisan judges who have issued injunctions against his policies, leading to calls for their impeachment.

• Rep. Biggs argues that the Senate impeachment process, which requires a two-thirds majority, is too difficult. He suggests using the Constitution's "good behavior" clause for a simpler removal process that only requires a simple majority from both the House and Senate.

• The resolution specifically targets Judge Boasberg for allegedly exceeding his judicial authority by blocking Trump's immigration policies, thereby failing to maintain "good behavior" as specified in Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution.

• Biggs believes that the current judicial system allows for lifetime tenure for judges, which he claims is misleading. He emphasizes that judges should only serve "during good behavior" and raises concerns about judges who may have conflicts of interest or political biases.

• He argues that the ability to remove judges with a simple majority could empower Congress to hold judges accountable for abusing their power, similar to how they confirm judges now.

Rep. Biggs is advocating for a new method of holding judges accountable by proposing legislation to remove them from office based on their conduct rather than through impeachment. He believes this approach would ensure judges adhere to the law without personal agendas affecting their decisions.

https://conservativeinstitute.org/conservative-news/biggs-invokes-good-behavior-clause-remove-anti-trump-judge.htm?utm_source=CFA&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=CFA1&utm_content=CFA1

Friday, April 4, 2025

Police Watch and Do Nothing as Masked Antifa Vandals Violently Attack TPUSA Students, Staff at UC Davis

On April 3, 2025, a violent incident occurred during a Turning Point USA (TPUSA) tabling event at UC Davis, where masked Antifa protesters attacked TPUSA staff and students.

• The TPUSA event, featuring former police officer Brandon Tatum, was disrupted when Antifa protesters destroyed their setup by stealing a tent, ripping banners, and attempting to steal electronics.

• Police officers present did not intervene as the attackers assaulted students and vandalized property.

• Protesters chanted slogans like "Antifascista! A! Anti! " while approaching the TPUSA team.

• An Antifa member reportedly hit a TPUSA supporter in the head with a sign, shouting insults during the attack.

• Just days earlier, a TPUSA Chapter President was attacked at the University of Texas at Dallas with a metal bike lock by a transgender individual, raising concerns over the safety of TPUSA members at events.

The assaults on TPUSA staff and students at UC Davis and UT Dallas highlight ongoing tensions and violence surrounding political events on campuses, raising important questions about safety and law enforcement response during such incidents.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/police-do-nothing-as-masked-antifa-vandals-violently/

Democrats Want 'Misgendering' And 'Deadnaming' To Be Considered Child Abuse

In Colorado, Democrats have proposed a bill known as "The Kelly Loving Act," which aims to recognize "misgendering" and "deadnaming" as forms of child abuse for minors identifying as transgender.

• The legislation defines "deadnaming" as calling someone by their birth name instead of their chosen name, and "misgendering" as using pronouns or titles that do not align with the individual's gender identity.

• If passed, the law would influence child custody cases, where courts must consider misgendering and deadnaming as forms of "coercive control" by a parent.

• The bill was prompted by societal changes regarding gender identities, with concerns that non-affirming parents could risk losing custody of their children.

• The legislation also aims to prohibit enforcement of out-of-state laws that may remove children from parents supportive of transition-related procedures.

• Additionally, it mandates schools to implement policies for recognizing chosen names and to deter dress codes based on gender.

• The bill has passed a House committee and is proceeding to a full House vote.

The proposed bill in Colorado seeks to legally protect the identities of transgender minors by classifying certain parental behaviors as abusive. This has the potential to significantly impact custody decisions and school policies across the state.

https://modernity.news/2025/04/03/democrats-want-misgendering-and-deadnaming-to-be-considered-child-abuse/

Media Eviscerated For Claiming Jailing Marine Le Pen Is ‘Good For Democracy’

TIME Magazine is receiving criticism for stating that Marine Le Pen's conviction on a bureaucratic charge is “good for French democracy. ” This conviction bans her from office for five years and includes a prison sentence. Critics argue this is part of a broader effort across Europe to prevent nationalist candidates from gaining power.

Le Pen will serve two years of her four-year sentence under house arrest with an ankle monitor. The Paris Court of Appeal will decide on her election ban by next year. Le Pen sees this as positive news and plans to appeal the ruling, asserting that the ban violates the principle of innocence during appeals. Current polls indicate she is likely to win if she runs in 2027.

https://modernity.news/2025/04/02/media-eviscerated-for-claiming-jailing-marine-le-pen-is-good-for-democracy/

Democrats Are Terrified Of Trump’s Plan To Make Election Secure

The SAVE Act has been proposed to improve election integrity by requiring documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote. This legislation follows President Trump's executive order and aims to address concerns about noncitizen voting.

• Executive Order and SAVE Act: President Trump signed an executive order that aligns with the SAVE Act, which mandates proof of citizenship for voter registration.

• Current Voting Laws: Although noncitizen voting is illegal, existing laws lack enforcement, making it difficult to ensure that only eligible voters participate in elections.

• Democratic Opposition: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer expressed strong disapproval of the SAVE Act, claiming it could disenfranchise millions of American citizens, although he provides no proof of this claim.

• Call for Proof of Citizenship: The SAVE Act would amend the National Voter Registration Act to require proof of citizenship. Critics argue that the current system is vulnerable to fraud, as it relies on individuals’ honesty regarding their citizenship status.

• Examples of Noncitizen Voting: Reports indicate that noncitizens have participated in elections, such as a Chinese student who voted illegally and a case in Iowa involving a noncitizen voting in a local election. Other states, like Oregon and Ohio, have also recorded instances of noncitizen voting.

• Need for Legislative Action: Advocates for the SAVE Act argue that without requiring proof of citizenship, there is no reliable way to confirm that noncitizens are not voting. The Department of Justice has reportedly shown little interest in prosecuting noncitizen voting cases.

• Accountability and Integrity: Proponents believe that safeguarding voter eligibility is essential for the integrity of elections, especially in closely contested races where every vote can change the outcome.

Supporters of election integrity advocate for the SAVE Act, believing it is crucial for preventing noncitizen voting. Opposition from Democrats raises questions about the enforcement of voter laws and the need for a system that ensures only eligible voters can participate. The ongoing debate emphasizes the importance of election security in American democracy.

https://thefederalist.com/2025/04/04/democrats-are-terrified-of-trumps-plan-to-make-election-secure/

Sen. Ron Johnson Probes ‘Development’ And ‘Safety’ Of Big Pharma’s Covid Shots

Senator Ron Johnson has taken significant steps to examine the safety and development of COVID-19 vaccines. He has reached out to major pharmaceutical companies to gather information regarding their vaccine production.

1. Inquiry into Big Pharma: Sen. Johnson is demanding information from the CEOs of Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, and BioNTech about the creation and safety of their COVID-19 vaccines. This inquiry is part of a broader investigation being conducted by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.

2. Request for Documentation: In his letters, Johnson has requested detailed records including:

• Names and titles of employees involved in vaccine development.

• A complete list of entities involved in the testing and creation of their vaccines.

• All communications relating to vaccine development between these companies and federal entities since January 2020.

3. Concerns About Vaccine Safety: Johnson’s inquiry comes amidst growing concerns over the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. For instance, there have been reports of increased risks, such as myocarditis in young men, linked to the mRNA vaccines.

4. Communication with Big Tech: Johnson also demands records of communications between these pharmaceutical companies and major technology firms regarding adverse events connected to the vaccines. He specifically mentions companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter.

5. Government and Big Tech Collaboration: The senator points out that the Biden administration has been involved in efforts to censor information regarding vaccine safety on social media, raising concerns about First Amendment rights.

6. Deadline for Compliance: Johnson has set a deadline for the pharmaceutical companies to respond to his requests by April 16.

Sen. Ron Johnson's inquiries seek to uncover information that could address public concerns about COVID-19 vaccines. His requests for documentation and communications aim to ensure transparency regarding vaccine safety and efficacy.

https://thefederalist.com/2025/04/04/exclusive-sen-ron-johnson-probes-development-and-safety-of-big-pharmas-covid-shots/

Big Pharma gravy train hits the skids under Trump, panicking revolving-door regulators, investors

The article discusses recent changes in the U. S. regulatory environment under the Trump administration, focusing on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and its relationship with the pharmaceutical industry. It highlights the implications of job cuts and leadership changes on drug approval processes and public health.

1. The Trump administration is undergoing significant changes in the public health workforce, leading to fears within the pharmaceutical industry about the future of drug approvals.

2. A notable departure is that of FDA's Peter Marks, whose exit has caused drug stock prices to drop and raised concerns about the FDA's future role in regulating drug safety and efficacy.

3. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced cuts to its workforce, including substantial job losses at the NIH, which has prompted further changes in health research priorities.

4. Many former regulators express concern that these changes will slow down drug discovery and approval, potentially causing delays for patients needing treatments, especially in the area of rare diseases.

5. Critics argue that the FDA has historically favored the pharmaceutical industry's interests over patient safety, and previous management allowed less rigorous studies for approvals.

6. There's contention regarding the effectiveness of COVID boosters authorized under Marks' leadership, with some researchers criticizing these decisions lacking solid scientific backing.

7. The reduction of federal funding and structural changes at key health agencies may impact scientific progress and discourage development of innovative therapies like gene therapies and mRNA vaccines.

The ongoing upheaval within the FDA and HHS raises significant concerns over the effectiveness and priorities of U. S. drug regulation. With a history of collaboration between regulators and the pharmaceutical industry, the current shifts could lead to a reevaluation of drug approval processes and raise questions about future public health outcomes.

https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/big-pharma-gravy-train-hits-skids-under-trump-panicking-revolving-door

No Evidence Aired in the Media? No Duty. No Apologies.

Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national deported to El Salvador, is portrayed in the media as a victim of harsh Trump-era policies. However, allegations of his ties to the violent MS-13 gang raise questions about the media's narrative.

• Garcia is being depicted as a loving family man by outlets like CNN while omitting crucial details about his alleged gang connections.

• The media's outrage centers around the Trump administration's lack of transparency in providing evidence for the deportation.

• Critics argue that the administration has no obligation to disclose sensitive intelligence to the press, especially regarding national security matters.

• The demand for evidence by the media appears to serve a political agenda rather than a genuine quest for transparency.

• The piece highlights a double standard in media scrutiny, contrasting the treatment of Trump’s administration with that of President Biden, whose potential cognitive issues have not elicited similar demands for accountability.

• The author argues that actions taken against Garcia and others suspected of gang affiliation reflect law enforcement vigilance rather than cruelty.

• The discourse surrounding this case should prioritize community safety over media narratives that sensationalize immigration enforcement.

The media's focus on the lack of evidence for Garcia's deportation seems more politically motivated than concerned for justice. While the press demands accountability, law enforcement actions must prioritize public safety over media scrutiny. The administration is not obligated to satisfy hostile networks with evidence.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/04/no_evidence_aired_in_the_media_no_duty_no_apologies.html

Judge Considers Holding Trump Admin Officials in Contempt of Court Over Illegal Alien Deportations

Trump Officials Could Be Held in Contempt for Deportation Flights, Judge Says

NYC Mayor Adams will skip Democratic primary and run for reelection as an independent
Fewer Americans file for jobless benefits last week as labor market shows strength
Pentagon watchdog launches probe into Signal chat
Trump threatens funding cuts for public schools over DEI policies
JFK Library to honor former VP Pence with “Profile in Courage Award”
Florida election exposes deep divisions within GOP
Russia calls Trump threats to bomb Iran ‘illegal and unacceptable’
Top House Republican backs Byron Donalds for Florida governor
Jasmine Crockett sets off social media after touting being Black as qualification for public defender job
Alleged MS-13 gang leader linked to nearly a dozen murders, on the run for years nabbed in Long Island: DOJ
Columbia University students tie themselves to gate in protest of Mahmoud Khalil’s detention by ICE
Trump predicts stock market rebound after tariffs plunge: ‘Markets are going to boom’
Laura Loomer claims she met with WH privately before 3 NSC staffers were reportedly fired
Howard Lutnick defends Trump tariffs, says EU hates US meat: ‘Our beef is beautiful and theirs is weak’
Trump Reportedly Fires Several Members Of National Security Council
State Lawmaker Compares Parents Opposed To Pro-Transgender Bill To KKK
Feds Arrest Texas Man After Threatening To ‘Open Fire’ On ICE Agents
Man Set To Plead Guilty In Failed Assassination Attempt Against Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Yale Professor Flees US for Canada, Citing Trump
Biden Chief of Staff Ron Klain Was ‘Startled’ by Octogenarian’s Mental Decline Before Trump Debate: New Book

Oil and Gas Turning Poor Countries into Economic Miracles

The article discusses how oil and gas resources are transforming the economies of several nations that were previously seen as economically disadvantaged. These countries are experiencing significant growth thanks to their energy production capabilities.

1. Global Energy Dependence:

• Affordable and reliable energy is essential for economic growth.

• The ability to access domestic energy resources or secure imports leads to job creation, infrastructure development, and increased government revenue.

2. Guyana’s Economic Boom:

• Guyana has emerged as the fastest-growing economy, with a GDP growth of 63% in 2022 and 38% in 2023, projected to continue growing by 27% in 2025.

• The country's economic transformation is primarily driven by oil reserves found in the Stabroek Block.

3. Niger's Oil Prospects:

• Niger is set to benefit from the Niger-Benin pipeline, which will significantly increase oil production.

• This development is expected to significantly boost the country's GDP.

4. Senegal's Energy Advancement:

• Senegal is investing in oil and gas projects, like the Sangomar oil field and the Greater Tortue Ahmeyim (GTA) project, leading to notable GDP growth expected to exceed double digits in 2025.

• Energy exports are anticipated to make up 30% of the government’s revenue.

5. Côte D’Ivoire's Hydrocarbon Expansion:

• Côte D’Ivoire is becoming an energy leader in West Africa, doubling its oil production and heavily relying on natural gas for electricity.

• The country aims to further increase oil production and significantly reduce its poverty rate.

6. Focus on Energy Poverty:

• The immediate threat to these regions is energy poverty rather than climate change.

• Countries like Guyana, Niger, Senegal, and Côte D’Ivoire prioritize their citizens' welfare over distant climate targets.

The success of oil and gas production in these countries highlights an essential truth: access to energy is fundamental for economic development. Instead of focusing solely on reducing carbon emissions, these nations are choosing to enhance their energy capabilities, which they view as vital for improving their citizens' quality of life. The article underscores the need for practical energy solutions to foster progress in developing regions.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2025/04/03/oil-and-gas-turning-poor-countries-into-economic-miracles/

Private Jets, Ferraris, and False Claims: Inside An Obscure Federal Program Rife With Fraud

The Universal Service Fund (USF) is a government program aimed at subsidizing communication services for low-income consumers. However, it has faced severe fraud issues, leading to significant losses.

• Jeffrey Ansted, an Ohio telecommunications company owner, embezzled millions from the USF, funding a lavish lifestyle with a private jet and luxury car.

• He fraudulently signed up deceased individuals for services to obtain subsidies and transferred funds into his personal accounts.

• The FCC fined Ansted’s company over $63 million for this fraud.

• Experts criticize USF for having a flawed structure that allows potential for fraud, as the program relies on a private company, the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC), to set its fees while also being a beneficiary.

• The surcharge on consumer phone bills has sharply increased from 5. 7% in 2000 to 36. 6% in 2025.

• Legal challenges have questioned the program’s constitutionality, focusing on its funding practices and how much control is held by a private entity.

• A serious lack of oversight has resulted in widespread fraud, with many ineligible individuals receiving benefits. Reports show significant improper payments attributed to the program.

• Critics argue that the way USF operates undermines taxpayer interests, with little accountability for expenditures.

The issues surrounding the USF highlight significant flaws in its administration, leading to major fraud problems and questioning its future sustainability and oversight.

https://freebeacon.com/politics/private-jets-ferraris-and-false-claims-inside-an-obscure-federal-program-rife-with-fraud/

House committees: New questions emerge about Democrat fundraising platform ActBlue

A congressional investigation is underway regarding ActBlue, a Democratic campaign contribution platform. This follows concerns about potential circumvention of campaign finance laws.

• A recent report highlights that ActBlue leaders did not adequately address fraud on their platform, despite awareness of misuse.

• The platform reportedly relaxed its fraud-prevention measures in 2024, making them more lenient and attempting to conceal these changes.

• ActBlue's internal issues are concerning, with resignations of senior staff members, including its legal officer, since February.

• The House Judiciary Committee has requested more documents and two interviews with ActBlue's CEO, Regina Wallace-Jones, by April 16.

Ongoing scrutiny raises questions about ActBlue's ability to meet federal election laws and manage fraud effectively.

https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_622441ad-065c-43ed-8bca-557976664e74.html

Trump Teases Bombshell DOGE Finding: 'What They Found Is Incredible'

President Donald Trump spoke about an important discovery made by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and praised Tesla CEO Elon Musk for his leadership.

• Trump hinted at a significant finding from DOGE, stating, "They found something today that’s horrible," and promised that details would come soon.

• He credited Musk for leading DOGE to save about $140 billion, which he noted benefits taxpayers.

• Trump called Musk a patriot for uncovering fraud and expressed a desire for him to remain with DOGE for as long as possible.

• Recently, there have been violent attacks on Tesla vehicles, which Trump referred to as “terrorism,” expressing disappointment over these events.

• A claim made by Politico suggested that Musk might be reducing his advisory role, but both Musk and the White House denied this.

• At a Wisconsin rally, Musk and a DOGE volunteer revealed that over 2 million noncitizens were given Social Security numbers under President Biden’s administration, linking it to a new ability to share data across agencies initiated by Trump.

Questions remain regarding the “horrible” discovery made by DOGE and whether it serves as a distraction from recent tariffs and political issues.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-teases-bombshell-doge-finding-what-they-found-incredible

What Was the Purpose of Opening Our Southern Border?

Victor Davis Hanson discusses the drastic changes at the U. S. southern border during the Trump administration, leading to a significant reduction in illegal entries. He questions the motivations behind previous open border policies and their long-term implications.

1. Record Reduction in Illegal Entries: The Trump administration achieved a 96% reduction in illegal border crossings within eight weeks without comprehensive immigration reform. This raises questions regarding the previous open-border policy.

2. Impact of Immigration on Population: Currently, the U. S. has between 50 to 60 million residents who were not born in the country. This includes a high percentage of foreign-born residents in California, leading to challenges in integration and assimilation.

3. Possible Motives Behind Open Borders:

• Government Dependency: There's speculation that an influx of unskilled immigrants could create a dependent population benefiting from federal assistance, bolstering government growth and requiring higher taxes from the wealthy.

• Globalist Ideology: Some may view borders as outdated and believe in a universal chance for opportunity across the globe, leading to a push for open borders.

• Political Strategy: Concerns are raised about whether bringing in large numbers of immigrants could eventually influence voting patterns in favor of certain political agendas.

• Chaos and Nihilism: There is the belief that flooding the U. S. with newcomers may stem from a desire to disrupt the status quo established during the Trump era.

4. Uncertain Future: Hanson concludes that the motivations behind these policies are unclear, especially given the COVID-19 pandemic and the unprecedented encouragement of immigration.

Victor Davis Hanson highlights the complexities surrounding U. S. immigration policy, posing questions about the motives and consequences of past decisions while acknowledging the lack of clear answers.

https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/04/03/the-inexplicable-invasion-on-our-southern-border/

7 Takeaways From Trump’s Reciprocal Tariff Rollout

On April 2, 2025, President Donald Trump announced significant changes to U. S. trade policy, introducing "reciprocal tariffs" that impose a minimum 10 percent tariff on all imported goods and additional tariffs on countries with high trade barriers. This was touted as "Liberation Day in America. ”

1. 10 Percent Universal Tariff: The president has implemented a base tariff of 10 percent on imports from all countries, effective April 5, at 12:01 a. m. This tariff aims to balance the high trade barriers that other nations impose on U. S. goods.

2. Reciprocal Tariffs on High Barrier Countries: Along with the universal tariff, reciprocal tariffs will be higher for nations deemed "worst offenders. " These start at 12:01 a. m. on April 9. For example, the European Union will face a 20 percent tariff, Japan 24 percent, and China 34 percent, leading to a total of 54 percent when combined with previous tariffs.

3. Focus on China: The U. S. imposes tariffs on China to address unfair trade practices. China, with a significant trade deficit with the U. S. , is subjected to a total tariff of 54 percent, aimed at countering its alleged manipulative trade practices.

4. Exemptions for Canada and Mexico: Canada and Mexico are excluded from this new tariff regime, maintaining existing tariffs related to national emergencies concerning illegal immigration and fentanyl trafficking.

5. Justification for the Tariffs: Trump has asserted these tariffs are necessary to rectify long-standing issues in trade, claiming past trade deals have damaged the U. S. economy and harmed American jobs.

6. Projected Economic Impact: While Trump expects these tariffs to boost domestic manufacturing and generate significant revenue, concerns remain about their potential inflationary impact and overall long-term economic effects.

7. Economic Indicators to Monitor: Economists will be watching key indicators such as employment data, real income growth, and domestic versus foreign investment patterns to gauge the tariffs’ actual impact.

President Trump's implementation of reciprocal tariffs marks a substantial shift in U. S. trade policy, aiming to address trade imbalances and generate revenue. The immediate and long-term effects of these tariffs on inflation, job creation, and overall economic health will be closely observed by economists and policymakers alike.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/article/7-takeaways-from-trumps-reciprocal-tariff-roll-out-5835972?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=TheLibertyDaily

No, FDR Did Not Give People “Hope”

The article discusses the widely held belief that Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal helped the economy recover during the Great Depression. It argues that these claims are myths and highlights that the New Deal may have actually hindered economic recovery.

1. Myths and Fallacies: The notion that Roosevelt's New Deal led to economic recovery is a persistent myth, alongside beliefs about capitalism and World War II's effect on the economy.

2. Economic Evidence: Analysis of unemployment rates, GNP, personal consumption, and private investment shows that the New Deal did not achieve recovery and may have worsened the economic situation.

3. Shift to "Hope": When evidence contradicts the effectiveness of the New Deal, supporters often shift their argument to claim that it brought "hope" to Americans instead of economic recovery.

4. Question of Hope: The article critiques the idea that "hope" can replace tangible economic goals. It likens this to a medical treatment that fails while claiming to offer hope.

5. Historical Criticism: Critics like John T. Flynn and Stephen Moore have noted that the New Deal did not end the Great Depression. They argue that it caused more suffering and failed to create a sound economic recovery plan.

6. Changing Narratives: Even those who oppose the New Deal sometimes use the "hope" argument to defend government intervention, illustrating its widespread acceptance in political discussion.

The article concludes that while the New Deal may have been designed to provide help during a difficult time, it ultimately failed to deliver economic recovery and instead provided false hope. The ongoing acceptance of the "hope" narrative, despite contradicting data, highlights the persistence of historical myths in public discourse.

https://mises.org/mises-wire/no-fdr-did-not-give-people-hope

Media, Please Grow Up, Part II

The article discusses the immature conduct of mainstream media journalists, particularly those in the White House press corps, towards changes in their seating arrangements during press briefings.

• Recently, the media has been compared to school children regarding their reactions to climate change alarms and their behavior in the press briefing room.

• The White House Correspondents’ Association has traditionally controlled seating, allowing certain mainstream outlets front-row access, which is now changing.

• Following a seating reorganization, legacy media reporters are being moved to the back, causing an outcry and threats of protests, likened to childish temper tantrums.

• The Associated Press has lost access to the White House press pool, leading the WHCA to encourage support for AP’s press access by wearing First Amendment pins at events, which the article criticizes as hypocritical.

• The article highlights various instances of unprofessional behavior among media personalities, such as CNN reporters creating misleading narratives and other journalists expressing personal grievances rather than focusing on objective reporting.

• It argues that the media’s actions contribute to their declining credibility and approval ratings, suggesting that instead of maturing, they continue to react childishly.

The behavior of some mainstream journalists is criticized for being unprofessional and more focused on their privileges than on serious reporting. The article calls for more adult-like conduct in journalism to regain public trust.

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/04/04/media-please-grow-up-part-ii/

Massive International Pedophile Streaming Network Discovered; TWO MILLION Users Shared Child Porn Across 35 Countries

Europol has recently dismantled a large international network of child pornography known as "Kidflix," revealing alarming details about its operations.

• The "Kidflix" site hosted over 91,000 child porn videos, with about three new uploads every hour.

• Users paid to access and upload their own child sex abuse videos using cryptocurrencies to remain anonymous. They could also earn tokens for uploads.

• The operation spanned 35 countries and had around two million users, leading to dozens of arrests, including 79 confirmed individuals, with 1,400 suspects identified.

• The investigation lasted nearly three years, resulting in the seizure of thousands of devices and the shutdown of servers in Germany and the Netherlands.

• Officials suspect many arrested not only viewed and uploaded content but also engaged in direct abuse.

This case showcases ongoing, widespread issues of child exploitation, with other similar operations being uncovered globally.

https://modernity.news/2025/04/03/massive-international-pedophile-streaming-network-discovered-two-million-users-shared-child-porn-across-35-countries/

RESIGN: Justice Roberts’ secret friendship with Norm Eisen has been revealed…

A report has surfaced revealing that Chief Justice John Roberts has a close relationship with Norm Eisen, known for his involvement in efforts against former President Donald Trump. This raises questions about Roberts’ impartiality in legal matters.

1. Friendship Disclosure: Norm Eisen shared that he and Justice Roberts spent a week together in the Czech Republic, working on issues related to "American rule of law. "

2. Conflict of Interest: Critics argue that Roberts should have recused himself from cases connected to Eisen, as their friendship presents a significant conflict of interest.

3. Eisen's Background: Norm Eisen is described as a major figure in legal strategies aiming to challenge Trump, highlighting his role in efforts against the former president.

4. Public Reactions: Many believe Roberts should resign due to this relationship, as it undermines public trust in the judiciary.

5. Call for Accountability: The article emphasizes that Roberts' actions are reckless and that he cannot be trusted to remain impartial.

The relationship between Justice Roberts and Norm Eisen has prompted calls for Roberts’ resignation, as it raises serious concerns about integrity within the Supreme Court. Critics assert that Roberts’ friendship with a key figure in anti-Trump legal efforts undermines the credibility of his position.

https://revolver.news/2025/04/resign-justice-roberts-secret-friendship-with-norm-eisen-has-been-revealed/

Federal judge finds Trump’s ‘America First’ slogan is racist toward immigrants

President Trump's immigration policy is closely tied to his "America First" slogan. Recently, a federal judge ruled that this policy reveals a biased and racist attitude towards immigrants.

• Judge's Ruling: Judge Edward Chen blocked the Department of Homeland Security from ending a special deportation amnesty for many Venezuelan migrants, citing biases in the justifications that referred to Trump's “America First” agenda.

• White House Response: The White House contended that the judge's interpretation was incorrect and emphasized that Trump's "America First" approach stems from love for the country, not hatred towards others.

• Criticism of Judge: Mike Davis criticized Judge Chen for what he described as political bias and accused him of undermining Trump's duty to protect the country.

• Impact on Venezuelan Migrants: The judge's decision prevented the revocation of Temporary Protected Status for 600,000 Venezuelans, safeguarding many from potential deportation.

• Racist Motives Allegation: An attorney for the National TPS Alliance argued that Trump's past derogatory comments about immigrants support the claim of racism behind his policies.

• Historical Context: The term "America First" has historical ties to racism and antisemitism, and critics argue its use supports discriminatory policies.

The ongoing legal battles illustrate the contentious nature of Trump's immigration policies and the implications of his rhetoric for immigrant communities, particularly in the context of court interpretations regarding racial bias and intent.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2025/apr/3/federal-judge-finds-trumps-america-first-slogan-racist-toward/

Federal judge says she will temporarily block billions in health funding cuts to states

A federal judge has agreed to temporarily stop President Donald Trump's administration from cutting significant funding for COVID-19 initiatives and public health projects.

• U. S. District Judge Mary McElroy plans to grant a request for a temporary restraining order from 23 states and the District of Columbia.

• The judge believes the states have a strong case for their lawsuit against the funding cuts.

• New York Attorney General Letitia James expressed support for the judge's ruling, emphasizing the need for states to provide vital medical services.

• The lawsuit aims to prevent $11 billion in budget cuts, which were allocated for COVID-related efforts and essential public health services.

• The U. S. Department of Health and Human Services argues that the funding is no longer necessary as the pandemic is over.

• Public health departments have already experienced layoffs and significant budget losses, putting future health services at risk.

This temporary block represents a legal challenge to the Trump administration's efforts to reduce health funding, highlighting ongoing disputes over public health policy amid the pandemic’s aftermath.

https://www.aol.com/federal-judge-says-she-temporarily-211130649.html

Thursday, April 3, 2025

Three GOP States Find 300,000 Bad Voter Registrations, Along with Hundreds of Non-Citizens Registered to Vote

Recent findings in Iowa, Idaho, and Missouri have raised concerns about the integrity of voter registrations in these states, with nearly 300,000 problematic registrations identified.

1. Importance of Voting: Voting is a fundamental right in the United States, crucial for the nation's democratic structure.

2. Security Measures Needed: There is a call for stronger voting security measures, as the current systems show significant flaws.

3. Findings in Missouri:

• On March 14, Missouri’s Secretary of State reported the removal of 18,637 deceased voters.

• Additional removals included 133,520 inactive voters and over 4,000 voters who either moved or were disqualified (e. g. , due to felony convictions).

4. Idaho’s Actions:

• On March 19, Idaho’s Secretary of State announced the clearing of 144,121 voter records statewide due to inactivity, changes in address, or ineligibility.

5. Iowa’s Non-Citizen Votes:

• Iowa reported the removal of 277 confirmed non-citizens from the voter registration lists.

6. Total Problematic Registrations: Across these states, close to 300,000 questionable voter registrations were identified within six days.

7. Wider Implications: The scale of issues found in these three states raises concerns about possible similar problems in larger, typically more liberal states.

8. Call for Comprehensive Audits: There is a need for thorough audits of voter rolls nationwide to ensure secure elections, not just at the state level.

9. Political Challenges: The discussion of voting security often becomes partisan, with Democrats generally opposing comprehensive reforms when they hold power in a state.

The integrity of voting in the U. S. is critical, and the recent findings in Missouri, Idaho, and Iowa highlight significant issues with voter registrations. Without comprehensive auditing and reform across all states, secure elections remain a looming concern for the future of American democracy.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/three-gop-states-find-300000-bad-voter-registrations/

Unearthed FBI Chat Logs Reveal 'Gag Order' On Biden Laptop Exposé

Internal FBI chat logs have been released, showing that the agency imposed a gag order on its agents regarding a significant story by the New York Post about Hunter Biden's laptop. This story not only highlighted Hunter's questionable behavior but also suggested involvement from his father, Joe Biden.

• The New York Post published its first article about the laptop on October 14, 2020.

• Following the publication, FBI officials instructed agents not to discuss the Biden matters, effectively enforcing silence about the laptop's authenticity.

• Key FBI personnel were seen discussing the coverage and confirming they were aware of the laptop, yet were prohibited from commenting.

• An FBI analyst who attempted to inform social media companies of the laptop's validity was silenced by a senior FBI lawyer.

• The laptop contained evidence of Hunter Biden's financial issues, drug use, and prostitution, along with allegations of selling access to his father.

• A claim was made that 10% of certain payments were meant for “the Big Guy,” referring to Joe Biden.

• Despite recognizing the laptop's authenticity in 2019, the FBI did not disclose this information while social media companies debated the story's legitimacy, partially due to a prior warning of a potential disinformation campaign related to the election.

The release of the chat logs raises questions about the FBI's transparency and its handling of sensitive information leading up to the 2020 election, as well as the implications of Joe Biden's connections to Hunter's business dealings.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/unearthed-fbi-chat-logs-reveal-gag-order-biden-laptop-expose

Media Outlets Covered Fake Signalgate Scandal 7x More Than Yemen Airstrikes. The Media Don’t See The Problem?

A recent analysis highlights the disparity in media coverage between a perceived scandal involving a Trump administration miscommunication, known as "Signalgate," and actual military operations against Islamic terrorists in Yemen.

1. Coverage Discrepancy: ABC, NBC, and CBS collectively allocated nearly 100 minutes to the Signalgate story over five days but only about 15 minutes to the military airstrikes in Yemen.

2. Specific Coverage Details:

• From March 15 to March 19, ABC reported just under 10 minutes on airstrikes against the Houthis, compared to nearly 32 minutes devoted to Signalgate from March 24 to March 28.

• CBS covered airstrikes for just over two minutes, while it dedicated 35 minutes to Signalgate.

• NBC similarly aired approximately two minutes on airstrikes versus over 32 minutes on Signalgate.

3. Media Priorities: Media Research Center's Senior Analyst Bill D'Agostino indicated that the media seems more focused on stories that could embarrass President Trump than on critical national security matters such as military operations against terror groups.

4. Public Interest: Critics argue that the media's preference for sensational stories over significant news reflects a failure to serve the public interest, prioritizing political drama over discussions on terrorism and military actions.

The analysis raises concerns about media priorities, suggesting the current landscape favors entertainment and political controversy over essential news reporting. This trend may undermine the public’s understanding of crucial national and global security issues.

https://thefederalist.com/2025/04/03/media-outlets-covered-fake-signalgate-scandal-7x-more-than-yemen-airstrikes-the-media-dont-see-the-problem/

On Wisconsin: The pundit class fumbles (again)

The recent loss of Brad Schimel in the Wisconsin Supreme Court race is being interpreted by many as a sign of Donald Trump's weakening influence and potential Republican troubles ahead. However, this analysis argues that such interpretations are misleading.

• The significance of Schimel's defeat is exaggerated; it's not a clear indicator of Trump’s popularity or future Republican prospects in Wisconsin.

• Previous elections, such as Janet Protasiewicz's win in 2023 followed by Trump’s victory in 2024, show that judicial races don’t reliably reflect broader electoral trends.

• Schimel's loss establishes a liberal majority in the court until at least 2028, giving Democrats an advantage to challenge Republican legislative maps and potentially influence federal House districts.

• This judicial shift may lead to challenges against Scott Walker’s Act 10, which limited union power and introduced fiscal reforms; liberal forces may seek to have it overturned.

• The tactic of litigation as a means to achieve political goals, termed "Sue Until Blue," is prevalent, suggesting that when Democrats fail to win via legislation, they turn to the courts for favorable rulings.

• The recent election results represent a more profound shift in Wisconsin’s judicial landscape rather than a straightforward commentary on Trump or upcoming elections.

The situation in Wisconsin is not merely a reaction to Trump but reflects a broader strategic shift by the left toward judicial empowerment. Conservatives need to take proactive steps in judicial reform and build resilience to face continued challenges in the future.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/04/on_wisconsin_the_pundit_class_fumbles_again.html

The dark legacy of the U.S. government’s UNETHICAL medical and military research

The U. S. government has a troubling history of conducting unethical medical and military experiments. These practices include secret tests and exposure to harmful substances, often without the consent of the subjects involved.

• The Tuskegee Syphilis Study (1932-1972) is a notorious example where Black men were deliberately denied treatment for syphilis to study the disease, even after an effective cure became available.

• In 1940, prisoners were intentionally infected with malaria in drug tests, showcasing the exploitation of vulnerable populations.

• Between 1949 and 1969, the military conducted biological warfare tests on civilians by releasing dangerous bacteria and chemicals in populated areas, such as San Francisco and New York City, to observe disease spread.

• Notable experiments included spraying bacteria in airports, using infected mosquitoes in Florida, and contaminating subway systems without public knowledge.

• Many of these experiments remained classified for years, with few victims ever receiving justice or acknowledgment for their suffering.

This dark history of unethical research highlights significant issues concerning medical ethics, government transparency, and human rights. It serves as a critical reminder of the potential dangers of conducting scientific studies without proper oversight and consent, especially in today's environment with advancing technologies and military strategies.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-04-03-dark-legacy-us-govt-unethical-medical-research.html

All the Ukrainian Known Knowns

There is a possibility of a ceasefire in the ongoing Ukraine-Russia conflict, as various leaders and analysts are starting to agree on how to end the war. This summary outlines the expected terms of peace negotiations, the dynamics between the involved parties, and reflects on the future of the situation.

1. Growing Consensus on Peace:

Western diplomats and military experts are leaning toward establishing a demilitarized zone (DMZ) along the Ukraine-Russia border through tough negotiations. This involves determining how far back Russian troops will have to retreat.

2. Ukraine's Military Limitations:

It is now widely acknowledged that Ukraine lacks the military power to reclaim territories such as Crimea and the Donbas, which Russia took in 2014 during the Obama administration. Efforts to recover these areas have not been pushed by any U. S. administration since then.

3. NATO Membership:

There is consensus that Ukraine will not join NATO, which will be used by Russia to justify its actions during the invasion. This understanding is accepted by many Ukrainians as well.

4. Challenges in Deterring Russia:

While Putin's military is currently weakened, he continues to seek to regain territory. Negotiations will likely be complex, with a proposed commercial corridor meant to discourage further Russian aggression.

5. Historical Casualties:

The ongoing conflict has caused significant casualties, with estimates of 1. 5 million Ukrainians and Russians dead, wounded, or missing. Western powers had unrealistic expectations of defeating Russia solely through military support for Ukraine.

6. Trump's Role in Diplomacy:

Trump faces criticism for his approach to diplomacy regarding Ukraine. However, it is pointed out that the Biden administration's strategy has not effectively worked toward ending the war either. The focus has often been on endless military support instead of a concrete end to hostilities.

7. Negotiation Dynamics:

As negotiations progress, any pressure from Trump on Ukraine for a ceasefire could lead to unfavorable actions from Putin, who may increase attacks. Trump would then need to balance demands from both parties effectively.

8. Future Misinformation:

Once peace is achieved, it is anticipated that there will be debates about credit for the settlement, with conflicting narratives likely to emerge around who played a crucial role in the ceasefire.

The prospect of a ceasefire in the Ukraine-Russia conflict involves complex negotiations and an acknowledgment that military solutions have not worked as expected. While various actors face criticism and challenges, there remains uncertainty about the future and how peace will ultimately be framed in public discussions.

https://amgreatness.com/2025/04/03/all-the-ukrainian-known-knowns/

Trump’s Climate Policy Shift Could Save American Farmers from Disaster

Recent developments in agricultural policy reflect a shift away from previous climate-focused regulations under the Trump administration. This change aims to enhance domestic farming practices and remove unnecessary financial obligations tied to international aid.

• The U. S. Department of Agriculture has started removing references to climate change, signaling less regulation for farmers.

• USAID had invested millions in climate-related programs that often did not benefit the climate and favored ideology over productivity.

• Key projects funded included a $55 million credit guarantee to assist farmers and ag-tech companies, and a $1. 5 million program aimed at empowering female climate activists in Kenya.

• USAID's past climate strategy, which spanned 2022 to 2030 and cost $150 billion, created conditions that impeded effective farming practices globally.

• A significant program costing $3. 1 billion aimed at reducing farm emissions is among the cuts from the current funding freeze.

• The administration's focus on practicality contrasts with countries like China and India, which have prioritized agricultural productivity.

• Trump’s withdrawal from international climate agreements, including the Paris Climate Accords, benefited American farmers by eliminating unrealistic mandates.

The transformation in U. S. agricultural policy under President Trump aims to prioritize effective farming practices while moving away from restrictive climate initiatives. This shift is expected to benefit both domestic farmers and international agricultural productivity.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2025/04/03/trumps-climate-policy-shift-could-save-american-farmers-from-disaster/

Australia Drops Covid Vaccine Mandate but Devastating Effects Remain

After three years of mandates surrounding Covid vaccinations, Australia has officially lifted its vaccine requirement for employees of the Australian Federal Police (AFP). However, former officers face lasting hardships from the mandate.

• The AFP ended its Covid vaccine mandate as of February 24, 2025, acknowledging that vaccines offered limited protection against infection and transmission.

• Key documents indicated that the AFP was aware that the vaccines' effectiveness waned over time but continued the mandate, isolating unvaccinated staff and leading to significant job losses.

• Many former officers describe feelings of shame and distress due to job loss and discrimination, with some struggling financially and emotionally since their dismissals.

• AFP imposed the mandate in November 2021 and later included booster requirements, despite internal assessments questioning their effectiveness.

• Former officers shared experiences of discrimination, coercion, and pressure to resign or face termination tied to their vaccination status.

• Medical exemption requests were largely denied, with many reporting adverse reactions or safety concerns associated with vaccines.

• The AFP's policy reportedly contributed to a decline in overall morale within the police force, contributing to staffing issues and vacancies.

• A landmark Supreme Court ruling deemed a similar mandate unlawful, but it did not provide broad legal recourse for affected AFP employees.

• The ongoing impact of these mandates suggests a lack of accountability and support for those affected, as many feel there is no viable legal option to challenge their dismissals.

The decision to end the Covid vaccine mandate for AFP personnel comes too late for many former officers who have already suffered significant personal and financial consequences. Their experiences highlight broader issues of workplace safety, medical discrimination, and the psychological toll associated with vaccine mandates. The situation raises critical questions about accountability and the need for support for those impacted by such policies in the future.

https://brownstone.org/articles/australia-drops-covid-vaccine-mandate-but-devastating-effects-remain/

Federal Judge Orders Trump Admin To Resume Funding Left-Wing Immigration Groups—Including Her Former Employer

A U. S. District Court judge, Araceli Martinez-Olguin, has ordered the Trump administration to resume funding for legal services for illegal immigrants. Martinez-Olguin's previous work raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest, as she was once associated with one of the groups involved in the lawsuit against the Trump administration.

• Araceli Martinez-Olguin is a federal judge who previously worked as a managing attorney for Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto (CLSEPA), where she developed immigrants' rights initiatives.

• CLSEPA is one of the plaintiffs in a lawsuit aiming to restore a $769 million immigration funding contract that was frozen by the Trump administration.

• The Trump administration's funding freeze has been challenged on the grounds that it violates a 2008 anti-trafficking law, a claim supported by Martinez-Olguin in her ruling.

• A temporary restraining order has been placed until April 16 while further arguments are considered.

• Martinez-Olguin's history as an immigration lawyer and her advocacy for open-border policies raises questions about her impartiality in this case.

• There are federal regulations that require judges to recuse themselves if their impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

• The Trump administration has previously called for judicial recusals in other cases due to perceived biases, suggesting they might pursue this route with Martinez-Olguin as well.

• Various advocacy groups involved in the funding case have openly criticized Trump's immigration policies and called for changes to immigration enforcement.

• Martinez-Olguin has recused herself from a previous case when a potential witness endorsed her nomination, indicating awareness of potential conflicts.

• It is uncertain if she will recuse herself in the immigration funding case or if the Trump administration will raise the issue.

The controversy surrounding Judge Martinez-Olguin's prior affiliations and judicial decisions highlights significant concerns about judicial impartiality in controversial immigration cases. The outcome of her ruling will have implications for thousands of children who need legal services after entering the U. S. without parents.

https://freebeacon.com/trump-administration/federal-judge-orders-trump-admin-to-resume-funding-left-wing-immigration-groups-including-her-former-employer/

Trump 2.0 Exposes Deep Democrat Rot

The Democratic Party is depicted as struggling and losing its relevance following President Trump's victory in the recent elections. The article argues that the party's internal issues and lack of vision have led to its decline.

• The article suggests that the Democratic Party was already failing before Trump's victory, describing it as a "rotting, morally adrift derelict. "

• Recent internal conflicts within the party are likened to "rats fighting among themselves" for limited resources.

• The Democrats lack a clear vision that promotes both national strength and citizen prosperity, showing hostility towards federal laws and secure borders.

• A secret agreement among 22 blue states and two sanctuary cities is noted, aimed at obstructing federal efforts regarding birthright citizenship.

• The article traces the historical discomfort of the Democratic Party with the electoral process, recalling the nullification crisis and the Civil War.

• In the 2024 elections, the party allegedly sidelined serious challengers to Joe Biden and tried to prevent Donald Trump from running, which the Supreme Court ruled against.

• A national survey shows that Democrats hold a less favorable view of the Constitution compared to Republicans, indicating a troubling trend.

• Political independents are becoming a significant force, with the number outweighing both major parties.

• The Democrats are viewed as resisting change, failing to recognize the populist sentiments altering their political landscape.

The article concludes that the Democratic Party is in denial about its decline, caught in a struggle against an emerging populist movement. It characterizes the party as an "empty husk" doomed to disintegration due to its internal conflicts and failure to adapt.

https://spectator.org/trump-2-0-exposes-deep-democrat-rot/

'No constitutional authority:' Legal experts denounce recent injunctions against Trump

Republicans are responding to district judges who have temporarily stopped President Trump’s executive actions by moving to limit or eliminate universal injunctions.

• Multiple judges have issued nationwide injunctions against Trump’s reforms based on lawsuits, leading to debates about judicial authority.

• During a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Republican Chairman Chuck Grassley and others argued that judges are misusing their power by issuing broad rulings affecting parties not involved in cases.

• Jesse Panuccio, a legal expert, advocated for legislation that restricts nationwide injunctions, indicating they disrupt the balance of powers between branches of government.

• Panuccio warned against proposals to handle nationwide relief with three-judge panels, as it could normalize an unhistorical judicial practice.

• Grassley has introduced the Judicial Relief Clarification Act, aiming to require class action processes for universal relief and ban nationwide injunctions outright.

• Expert Samuel Bray supported Panuccio's view, asserting that judges lack constitutional authority to grant remedies to people not part of a case.

• Critics argue that Trump’s orders exceeded legal authority, justifying the judges’ actions.

• Stephen Vladeck stressed that instead of limiting judicial power, reforms should target how parties manipulate courts.

• Bray highlighted the bipartisan implications of changes to universal injunctions and urged a long-term perspective on the issue.

The ongoing discussion reflects deep concerns over judicial authority, executive power, and the need for legislative clarity regarding universal injunctions.

https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_437c92f2-683c-4509-9b29-c131e45b480b.html

As Trump aims to curb mail-in voting, some Illinois lawmakers look to expand it

Illinois lawmakers are proposing new legislation to change certain voting procedures, despite opposition from county clerks.

• Curbside Voting Bill: Rep. Nabeela Syed introduced House Bill 1442 to establish curbside voting to reduce long lines for seniors and people with disabilities during elections. Some experienced wait times of up to three hours.

• Opposition from Clerks: Brian Pollock from the Illinois Association of County Clerks argues the bill is unnecessary since curbside voting is already available but rarely used.

• Vote by Mail Options: House Bill 1444 aims to simplify the vote by mail application process by allowing voters to apply for permanent mail-in status. Syed believes this will reduce frustration, while Pollock warns it could increase voter confusion.

• Federal Election Order: President Trump signed an order that mandates states reject ballots not received by Election Day, differing from Illinois’s current postmark rules.

The proposed bills aim to improve voter access but face criticism regarding their necessity and potential complexity.

https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/article_b5149676-f1ea-4cb8-ac4e-0bf94061de7a.html

In a 25-hour speech, Sen. Booker talked about everything but where his money comes from.

Senator Cory Booker recently delivered a 25-hour speech on the Senate floor, which has been viewed as more of a publicity stunt than a serious political tactic. This summary highlights the criticisms surrounding his motivations and past actions.

• Booker's speech was filled with lengthy remarks but lacked substance regarding specific legislative matters.

• His intention appears aimed at garnering attention for a potential presidential run, rather than addressing real issues.

• While claiming to disrupt Senate proceedings, he mainly delayed the nominations of several officials without discussing their qualifications.

• His past political record raises questions about corruption, including mishandling funds intended for Newark's schools and associations with a failed media company.

• Allegations of financial misconduct are linked to his term as mayor, with connections to a nonprofit managing Newark's water authority that suffered from alleged embezzlement.

• Booker has faced scrutiny for not being transparent about his financial disclosures and campaign funding.

• Despite portraying himself as a champion of democracy, critiques suggest that he focuses on protecting his personal interests over accountability for past actions.

Senator Cory Booker’s 25-hour address is seen by critics as an elaborate campaign tactic rather than a legitimate political statement. Questions about his record and financial integrity persist, overshadowing his intentions as he prepares for a future presidential campaign.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/crooked-cory-wont-shut-up/

California bill to ban males from female sports and facilities dies in committee

A California bill aimed at banning biological males from participating in female sports and using female facilities has been rejected in committee. The bill sparked a significant debate about fairness in sports and the rights of transgender individuals.

• California Governor Gavin Newsom expressed support for the idea of the bill during a podcast with conservative activist Charlie Kirk, stating it is a fairness issue.

• The bill, known as Assembly Bill 844, sought to restrict participation in sex-segregated programs and facilities based on biological sex rather than gender identity.

• Bill author Bill Essayli argued that allowing biological males in girls' sports is unfair and poses safety risks. He claimed it infringes on the rights of female athletes and undermines Title IX, which protects against sex discrimination in education.

• Opponents, including Equality California, contended that the legislation would discriminate against transgender students and could lead to harassment. They argued it would violate student privacy and create barriers for those identifying with a gender different from their birth sex.

• The bill failed to gain traction, receiving support only from two Republican committee members, while the majority of Democrats opposed it. Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas abstained from voting.

• At a press conference, Newsom noted there are many pressing issues for the state and acknowledged the difficulty in finding an equitable solution to this topic.

The proposal to ban biological males from female sports and facilities has not advanced in California, highlighting the ongoing conflict between traditional views of gender and the rights of transgender individuals in the context of sports and education. Governor Newsom's openness to discussion on the matter indicates a recognition of the complexity of the issue.

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/california-quashes-bill-ban-males-female-sports-facilities

How Lies from the Biden Administration Expanded the Ukraine War

The article by William L. Anderson discusses how misleading information from the Biden administration contributed to the escalation of the Ukraine War, drawing parallels with past conflicts like the Vietnam War.

1. Vietnam War Reflection: The author reflects on personal experiences from the Vietnam War and how falsehoods often accompany wartime narratives.

2. Promotion of War: The media, particularly the New York Times, is criticized for initially supporting U. S. involvement in conflicts and then expressing disapproval.

3. Media Perspective: Columnist David French portrays a positive image of Ukrainian resistance but later expresses frustration with the Biden administration under new political circumstances.

4. Depth of U. S. Involvement: A New York Times investigation revealed that the U. S. was more involved in the Ukraine conflict than publicly stated, significantly aiding Ukrainian military operations.

5. Criticism of Government Lies: Journalist Matt Taibbi highlights how the Biden administration and its allies misled the public about the nature and extent of U. S. involvement in the war.

6. Risk of Escalation: The article emphasizes that U. S. actions risked nuclear conflict with Russia, underlining a lack of transparency about the administration's true objectives.

7. Proxy War Issues: The Biden administration’s claims of not engaging in a "proxy war" contradict the realities of deep military collaboration with Ukraine.

8. Consequences of War: The author concludes that the Biden administration's decisions led to unnecessary violence and loss of life, along with destruction in Ukraine.

The piece criticizes the Biden administration for perpetuating a series of lies regarding U. S. involvement in the Ukraine War, thereby expanding the conflict and risking global peace. It underscores the consequences of such misinformation, calling for accountability and a reevaluation of U. S. foreign policy.

https://mises.org/mises-wire/how-lies-biden-administration-expanded-ukraine-war