Panicked Mark Zuckerberg Sacks Meta’s Left-Wing Executive Nick Clegg, Replaces Him With Republican Joel Kaplan

Mark Zuckerberg is working hard to improve his reputation with Donald Trump and his supporters. Nick Clegg, who led global affairs at Meta and enforced strict censorship against Trump and the MAGA movement, is leaving the company. He will be replaced by Joel Kaplan, a Republican who opposed limits on political speech and worked under George W. Bush. This change comes as U. S. companies are shifting their stance to align more with Republicans ahead of Trump’s inauguration.

Meta has recently adjusted its political strategy to suit a Republican Congress. Key figures include Kevin Martin, who has ties with the George W. Bush administration, and Jennifer Newstead, who served as a legal adviser in the Trump administration. Zuckerberg thanked Clegg for his work and expressed excitement for Kaplan’s leadership, highlighting Kaplan's experience in policymaking.

Additionally, there have been reports of Zuckerberg donating $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund after meeting him at Mar-a-Lago. Despite having supported liberal causes and censoring conservative views before, Zuckerberg is now distancing himself from his previous left-leaning actions. In a previous interview, Zuckerberg praised Trump’s resilience in a tough situation, reflecting a notable change in attitude toward the former president.

Ben Kew, the article’s author, has a background in journalism and has worked for various media outlets. The article appears to detail the major changes at Meta in the context of the upcoming political landscape and Zuckerberg's efforts to seek approval from Trump and conservative audiences. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/01/panicked-mark-zuckerberg-sacks-metas-left-wing-executive/

Years of Repeat Central Planning Mistakes Have Doomed China’s Economy

China's economy is currently facing significant challenges due to years of central planning mistakes, leading to issues like overindebtedness, overbuilding, and industrial overcapacity. While China was once expected to surpass the U. S. economy, it is now struggling with slow growth and demographic challenges as its working-age population declines. This demographic shift is reversing the benefits that once fueled China's economic expansion.

For many years, China's economic model heavily relied on substantial investment, which initially resulted in modern infrastructure and robust manufacturing growth. However, maintaining this model has created enormous debts, unoccupied residential units, and excess production capacity. The total debt in China is nearing 300% of its GDP, largely due to "hidden" borrowing by local governments through complex financing methods that obscure the true financial status.

The real estate market in China is undergoing a significant downturn, having peaked in a boom that left about 80 million vacant housing units, sufficient to house half the population of the United States. Despite government efforts to stabilize the market through buyer incentives and easier credit access, new constructions and sales have plummeted since 2020.

In the wake of a slowing economy, President Xi Jinping has directed funds into an already large manufacturing sector, leading to increased industrial capacity but resulting in lower prices and a need for Chinese manufacturers to seek international markets. This situation has led to trade tensions with countries in the West and emerging markets.

China's economic situation is characterized as a "debt deflation trap," where the inability to manage state-owned enterprises and admit to prior mistakes exacerbates the financial crisis. The previous dependency on real estate for growth has become evident as many developments are now essentially worthless, contributing to the narrative of "ghost cities. "

China's impressive GDP figures, especially when adjusted for purchasing power parity (PPP), are often debated. Critics argue that these figures do not accurately reflect the economic reality, and caution against the idea that the Yuan is undervalued. Many economists, including Michael Pettis, argue that the way GDP is adjusted for PPP has significant flaws, making it hard to rely on it as a measure of economic strength.

There is a widespread belief in the "savings glut" theory, suggesting China's high savings rates balance U. S. trade deficits. However, the current debt levels raise questions about where the savings truly exist. The narrative that property investments constitute savings is misleading since many developments are now deemed worthless, and the associated debt remains.

The ongoing structural problems in China's economy lead to questions regarding its future growth potential, with no signs of necessary corrections being implemented. Many remain skeptical of predictions concerning China's economic dominance over the U. S. , especially in light of recent failures in managing both real estate and manufacturing sectors.

In the broader context, historical economic parallels are drawn with countries experiencing similar debt traps, like Japan. The expansion of debt and economic issues showcase the challenges faced by governments and central banks in implementing effective economic policies without exacerbating underlying problems.

The ongoing conversations about the future of the global economy reflect anxieties about China's path, with some arguing that lessons from China's situation might inform other countries about avoiding similar pitfalls. However, opinions differ greatly on the implications of these economic trends, necessitating continued observation and analysis.

In summary, the challenges facing China's economy as a result of years of central planning mistakes, excessive debts, and demographic changes forewarn a complex road ahead, one that diverges starkly from the earlier trajectory of economic growth expected by many. 

https://mishtalk.com/economics/years-of-repeat-central-planning-mistakes-have-doomed-chinas-economy/

Freedom Is the Only Way to Beat Authoritarianism

Andy Kessler writes in his recent Wall Street Journal column that the United States is strong because people think differently, leading to new ideas and advancements. He emphasizes that individual perspectives on the present and future vary widely, which is beneficial for progress.

Kessler uses examples from the entertainment industry to illustrate his point. Chevy Chase turned down a role in Animal House for another film, while Donald Sutherland chose to negotiate for more money in a different way. Their decisions show that good choices aren’t always clear, highlighting a similar issue with U. S. politicians and their approach to TikTok. There is concern that TikTok could be used by the Chinese Communist Party for spying, but Kessler argues that data on Americans exists regardless and is already being sold globally.

He suggests that the interest from international producers in understanding Americans is positive because it enhances productivity. Disagreements among people lead to economic progress, which is why entrepreneurs thrive. Rather than banning TikTok, Kessler believes U. S. politicians should allow commerce to flow freely. He notes that the current market often sees big companies stumble, reminding us that predicting the future is difficult.

Kessler warns against using force against a competitor like TikTok, arguing that freedom is a better approach for fostering market innovation and understanding consumer needs. 

https://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2024/12/27/freedom_is_the_only_way_to_beat_authoritarianism_1081051.html

Trump, Title IX and 2025: Restore Real Learning; Stop Fringe Sexual Politics

Title IX was originally designed to ensure equal access to education, but it has evolved into a tool for identity politics in schools. The hope is that the Trump Administration will reverse changes made by Biden's Education Department, especially the Title IX rule issued in April, which has faced legal challenges in many states. Critics argue that Trump may be labeled as anti-woman for these changes, but if he focuses on stopping sexual identity politics, he could resolve many controversies surrounding Title IX.

Title IX was established in 1972 to ban sex discrimination in federally funded education, emerging from earlier equal opportunity efforts. However, it has been misused by some feminists to demand equal funding for female sports, even if participation is low. The law’s definitions have broadened, with harassment and a hostile environment becoming subjective terms that can lead to Title IX complaints over innocent actions. Past administrations, particularly Obama’s, pushed these definitions further, compromising due process rights and resulting in unfair campus adjudications.

Under Biden, Title IX was further radicalized by redefining "sex" to include sexual orientation and gender identity, which has led to conflicts in women's sports. Though Biden’s regulation has been deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, Trump's administration could reinstate previous guidelines that protect due process while supporting accusers.

Trump’s potential actions include reissuing the DeVos rule, which was more favorable to accused individuals and upheld in courts, and invalidating questionable agreements made under Biden's administration. Many of these agreements impose demands that exceed legal requirements and are politically driven.

The author warns that the issue of identity politics isn't limited to Title IX and pervades broader education policy with terms like "diversity, equity, and inclusion. " This politicization has negatively impacted students' learning in essential subjects. Therefore, the call is for Trump to eliminate these ideologies, restore genuine education, and become a champion for parents and the nation. 

https://amgreatness.com/2025/01/02/trump-title-ix-and-2025-restore-real-learning-stop-fringe-sexual-politics/

Liz Cheney Should Be Criminally Investigated For Her Corruption, Not Rewarded

The House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight has suggested that Liz Cheney should be investigated for witness tampering. This recommendation comes after President Biden awarded Cheney, a former Congresswoman from Wyoming, the Presidential Citizens Medal for her involvement in the disbanded Jan. 6 Select Committee, which some view as undermining democracy. Biden has expressed regret that the Justice Department did not act more forcefully against political opponents, which adds to the controversy surrounding Cheney's recognition.

Cheney received this honor along with Rep. Bennie Thompson, who led the House investigation into the Capitol riot. Critics argue that Thompson previously exhibited questionable behavior by refusing to certify George W. Bush's 2004 election victory in Ohio. There is also a comparison to the different treatment of Democrats and Republicans regarding election objections, as the Jan. 6 Committee made criminal referrals against Trump and jailed some of his advisers for not complying with subpoenas.

House Republicans conducted their own investigation into the Capitol incident and accused Cheney of witness tampering. Cheney allegedly worked with former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson using encrypted messages to help Hutchinson change her testimony against Trump, suggesting a strategy to enhance the impact of the hearings. Hutchinson's original statements were not very significant, but her testimony became much more dramatic after her interaction with Cheney. However, some details from Hutchinson’s testimony were later disputed.

The investigation report stated that Hutchinson's story changed notably after Cheney advised her to switch attorneys. Before this change, Hutchinson did not mention significant events during earlier interviews. Furthermore, Cheney's committee was trying to undermine Hutchinson's previous lawyer, suggesting that he was advising her to be untruthful, though that lawyer, Stefan Passantino, was eventually cleared of any wrongdoing. He has filed lawsuits against those he believes wronged him, including Cheney.

The report pointed out the irony of Cheney potentially facing charges for witness tampering after she had previously condemned attempts to influence witness testimonies. After Hutchinson's testimony, Cheney threatened anyone attempting to manipulate witnesses, further highlighting the contradictions in her actions.

The report suggests that Cheney’s comments may indicate a lack of self-awareness or an effort to distract from her own behavior. It asserts that the committee, while accusing Trump and associates of wrongdoing, was engaging in similar tactics they criticized.

Tristan Justice, a correspondent for The Federalist, covered these developments and provided context for the ongoing political drama surrounding the consequences of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot and the responses from various political figures. 

https://thefederalist.com/2025/01/03/liz-cheney-should-be-criminally-investigated-for-her-corruption-not-rewarded/

Mike Johnson vows big spending cuts, starting with $200B Biden student loan giveaway

 House Speaker Mike Johnson expressed confidence in reelection while aiming for significant government spending cuts, starting with President Biden’s green energy initiatives and student loan forgiveness. In an interview, Johnson indicated that Congress has a limited margin to work with but believes "significant" cuts can be achieved using the budget reconciliation process, which requires only a majority for tax, spending, and debt limit legislation. He emphasized the need to reduce the size of government, stating it is too large and ineffective.

Johnson noted that while essential programs like Social Security should be preserved, he aims to target non-mandatory discretionary spending, particularly the Biden student loan bailout, which he estimates could save $200 billion. He mentioned that reversing aspects of the Democrats' policies from the past four years will yield substantial savings. Johnson described the upcoming budget review process as lengthy and detailed but believes the effort will be worthwhile in the end.

The vote on these budget measures is scheduled for 12 p. m. Friday.

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/johnson-says-hes-confident-friday-vote-will-go-his-favor-plans-big-spending

The FBI's Oblivious Terror Agenda

The FBI has focused heavily on arresting individuals involved in the January 6, 2021, Capitol incident, labeling them as terrorists. This pursuit has consumed significant resources, diverting attention from other serious criminals, like Shamsud-Din Jabbar from New Orleans. The document detailing the arrests of those associated with January 6 shows extensive effort spent on tracking these citizens. Many FBI agents, including those with specialized counterintelligence roles, have dedicated time to these cases, while actual threats have been overlooked.

An example is Lavrenz Lavrenz, a great-grandmother who was tracked by an FBI agent for entering the Capitol. Despite her peaceful intentions, she was treated like a serious criminal. The FBI investigated her based on tips that she had entered the Capitol, and agents spent considerable time to confirm her presence there amidst a crowd. When approached by the FBI at her home, Lavrenz was baking a cake and even requested to reschedule their visit, which they allowed.

Agents later returned for an interview where she clarified her peaceful purpose: praying for the nation. The agent's report misrepresented her intentions, claiming she attended a different rally. Although she briefly entered the Capitol, her actions were peaceful; she engaged in prayer for a short time. Despite this, she faced charges for entering a restricted area and disrupting procedures. A few months after the interview, she was notified that she would be charged with misdemeanors, leaving her perplexed as she felt she did nothing wrong.

Lavrenz ultimately had to surrender, going through the arrest process, but remained steadfast in her beliefs, refusing to accept a plea deal despite the government's push for quick resolutions. The authorities aimed for fast-track processing of the January 6 cases due to the high number of participants. Lavrenz faced four charges that reflected her actions, regardless of the context surrounding her entry into the Capitol.

After an extensive wait, she went to trial in March 2024. The jury, likely expecting to convict someone more notorious, instead found her guilty of all counts. She received a more severe sentence than some offenders while still being afforded a lighter penalty than others. This case illustrates the disproportionate resources allocated to pursuing January 6 participants compared to other riots or violent incidents, raising questions about priorities in law enforcement.

The piece suggests reflecting on the imbalance in how different situations are handled, as seen through Lavrenz's experience and the comparative leniency shown to those involved in other violent protests. For further details about Lavrenz and similar cases, readers can explore the referenced material on the experiences of women involved in the January 6 event. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/01/the_fbi_s_oblivious_terror_agenda.html

Former CIA Analyst: Up to 1,500 Islamic Terrorists From Afghanistan Are in U.S. With Plans to Carry Out October 7 Style Attacks in 2025

A former CIA analyst, Sarah Adams, warns that there could be up to 1,500 Islamic terrorists from Afghanistan in the United States planning attacks similar to those on October 7, 2025. She criticizes the Biden administration for focusing on domestic threats while allowing real threats to enter the country, aided by an open border policy. Adams claims that Islamic terrorist groups are preparing for various attacks, including suicide bombings and assaults on embassies, and they are using U. S. taxpayer funds for their operations.

Adams, who has experience in intelligence and was involved in the Benghazi Committee, notes that al Qaeda operates 45 training camps in Afghanistan, and other Iranian and Pakistani terrorist groups are also active there. She highlights that some attackers involved in the recent Hamas incident trained at al Qaeda camps in Afghanistan. According to her, these groups use Afghanistan as a base for training and launching operations against the West and have approximately 50,000 members combined.

With U. S. taxpayer funding supporting the Taliban, Adams argues that these funds are being diverted for terrorist activities, calling it an "insider joke" among terrorists. She claims that Iran and the Taliban are collaborating to develop advanced weapons. The exact number of terrorists crossing the U. S. border is unknown, but local sheriffs report significant insecurity, with military-aged males entering without proper checks.

Adams believes many terrorists arrived in the U. S. through a dangerous route in Panama, emphasizing an organized effort to bring them into the country. She predicts that attacks will vary in style depending on the groups involved, with al Qaeda aiming at symbolic locations and ISIS focusing on high casualty counts. She describes the possibility of coordinated attacks across multiple cities as a way to avenge Osama bin Laden’s death.

Adams considers recent Hamas attacks as a trial run for larger attacks planned in the U. S. and Europe, stating the main attacks are scheduled for 2025. She advises that people should prepare by stocking up on supplies, indicating that further violence is anticipated. 

https://amgreatness.com/2025/01/02/former-cia-analyst-up-to-1500-islamic-terrorists-from-afghanistan-are-in-u-s-with-plans-to-carry-out-october-7-style-attacks-in-2025/

Biden Will Reportedly Hand Environmental Lobby One Last Gift On His Way Out The Door

President Joe Biden is preparing to restrict offshore oil and gas drilling as he nears the end of his presidency. This move aims to satisfy environmentalists and hinder President-elect Donald Trump’s plans for the energy sector. The expected order would permanently ban new lease sales for drilling in specific areas of the outer continental shelf, particularly off the coast of California and in the Gulf of Mexico.

The timing of this announcement is uncertain, but it could happen soon. While many of Biden's energy policies can be reversed, the offshore drilling ban would be permanent and challenging to undo, as it is supported by a law that gives presidents the power to protect federal waters.

The Biden administration has also implemented the most restrictive five-year leasing schedule in modern history and is working on various climate policies and green initiatives. The White House has yet to respond to requests for comments on these developments. 

https://dailycaller.com/2025/01/02/biden-reportedly-hand-green-lobby-one-last-win/

The Limits of Transactionalism

 I recently went to Spain for a seminar about Emmanuel Todd's book, "The Defeat of the West. " While I don't agree with all of Todd's ideas, I find the book engaging since it combines various theories to support its arguments. It's surprising that such a notable historian's work has not gained much attention in the U. S. , even though it discusses the cultural decline in societies that ignore clear realities.

Todd connects cultural decline with nihilism, meaning a lack of shared moral beliefs in society. He views the rise of Protestantism as vital to the West's dominance, arguing that the decline of this ethos among elites signals the end of Western prominence. He believes that societies need a common set of moral values derived from a higher power to inspire significant, creative actions. Without such norms, people tend to revert to their base instincts, leading to internal conflicts and eventual collapse.

I could criticize Democrats for damaging the human tendency to revere, particularly among the youth. However, it is essential to acknowledge that this ground was already prepared by Republicans through fear and harsh social divisions following September 11.

The way people discuss issues has been limited by the words available to them. Those controlling media understand that limiting discourse helps them achieve their goals, as seen after September 11, where questioning narratives was discouraged. This pattern repeated itself during the COVID-19 response.

Americans often take a transactional approach to interactions, which has been evident with the recent election of a transactional President. While this approach has its merits, particularly in foreign policy, it can overlook the necessity of establishing a commonly accepted moral framework. Transactionalism tends to manipulate existing realities and may neglect what a society needs to strive for ethically in the future.

My assessment suggests that the President's vision focuses mainly on restoring material prosperity, respecting authority like the military and police, and transforming the U. S. into a promoter of peace. However, pursuing material gains alone does not address Todd's concern regarding cultural nihilism. We risk accelerating our decline by prioritizing materialism over higher goals.

The focus on authority figures like the military creates problems by narrowing the scope of social role models, shifting to an excessive emphasis on military service. This limits our understanding of good character and the “good life. ” Additionally, advocating for peace becomes challenging when the U. S. is seen as indifferent to the suffering of children abroad.

Focusing predominantly on those who accumulate wealth or achieve fame does not provide a holistic view of exemplary behavior. It's crucial to discuss what it means to live a fulfilling life beyond economic success or titles. Many may avoid contemplating these essential questions because of societal pressures to remain pragmatic and efficient.

The broader historical context reveals that those focused solely on pragmatic concerns may miss enriching experiences associated with deeper, spiritual thinking. Key figures have argued that true satisfaction comes from aligning our inner beliefs with our outward actions and discussions, suggesting we need to reconnect with our spiritual side to develop a new societal ethos.

If Todd is correct about the loss of the spiritual ethos that contributed to Western success, we must actively work to build a new social creed. This undertaking must recognize that those fixated on material concerns often lose touch with a deeper understanding of their surroundings.

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-limits-of-transactionalism/

My Lord, the Lies

The legacy media is attempting to undermine independent media while spreading false information to the public. The author, Scott McKay, highlights a list of various lies propagated by mainstream media over the years, such as claims about Trump and various political events. The media often accuses the Right of spreading misinformation, using tactics to suppress independent voices that challenge their narratives.

Organizations have colluded with nonprofit entities, some funded by the government, to attack independent media and silence dissenting opinions. This media landscape is dominated by a small number of corporations, which own a majority of cable channels and newspapers, resulting in limited community involvement and trust in news coverage. The author criticizes how major advertisers, such as pharmaceutical companies, influence news reports through their advertising spending, creating a corrupt system where substantial issues regarding these industries remain unreported.

A suggestion is made to examine whether these conglomerates violate antitrust laws, proposing that breaking them up could lead to a more diverse media landscape. This diversity could help restore public trust and allow for a multitude of viewpoints. The author believes a healthy media would not have spread so many falsehoods for extended periods. With the public increasingly rejecting mainstream narratives, the time is ripe for significant media reforms.

The author also reflects on political battles faced by conservative nominees in the past, suggesting that the conservative movement needs to become more proactive in supporting their candidates to prevent aggressive attacks from the left. There is an overall call for the conservative base to unify and take action to protect nominees and engage more aggressively in the political process.

In conclusion, the critique emphasizes the need for reformation within the media industry and suggests that a reevaluation of corporate control could promote a fairer and more accurate dissemination of news, benefiting society as a whole. 

https://spectator.org/my-lord-the-lies/

Chief Justice Roberts warns of threats to judges in annual report

U. S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts expressed concerns about rising threats to judges in the country, including disinformation, violence, intimidation, and challenges to court decisions. In his year-end report, he emphasized that these threats undermine the judicial system and are unacceptable.

Roberts noted that the spread of disinformation online complicates the ability of the federal judiciary to operate independently. He explained that when people distort the facts or legal basis for court rulings, it can erode public confidence in the justice system. Judges typically communicate through their decisions and do not generally hold press conferences or issue rebuttals, making it harder to combat this issue.

The report comes on the heels of significant Supreme Court rulings regarding presidential immunity and follows Donald Trump's criticism of judges and prosecutors involved in his criminal cases. Roberts acknowledged that criticism of the judiciary is an old practice, stating that some criticism could be healthy in a democracy. However, he pointed out that not all criticism is constructive and mentioned four main threats to judicial independence: violence, intimidation, disinformation, and defiance of lawful judgments.

He highlighted alarming incidents, citing acts of violence against judges and their families over the years. The U. S. Marshals Service reported that threats against judges have surged, with over 1,300 incidents investigated in 2022 alone. 

https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_3aa805f0-c944-11ef-b1ff-2b0f45b1cc08.html

Johnson Looks to Retain Speakership but Republican Holdouts Remain

 House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La. ) aims to keep his position at the start of the new Congress on January 3, 2025. The first task for the 119th Congress will be to elect a speaker, as no official business can occur, including the certification of President Donald Trump’s election victory, until this is done.

To retain his speakership, Johnson must secure a majority of votes in the House, which is complicated due to the number of seats that may be vacant. With Rep. Matt Gaetz’s seat vacant, there are 434 total members in the House, meaning Johnson needs 218 Republican votes, but he faces at least one outright opponent among the GOP.

Despite being favored, Johnson’s path to keeping his role appears challenging. Some House Republicans have expressed uncertainty or opposition to his re-election as speaker, even with Trump's support. The upcoming vote is compared to the previous Congress's experience when it took several ballots to elect Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif. ) as speaker due to concerns about his political stance.

Johnson remains optimistic about his chances, emphasizing the need for unity within the party and swift action in Congress. However, the current closely divided Republican majority means any dissenting vote against him could be detrimental.

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky. ) has publicly stated he will not vote for Johnson, urging other colleagues to join him, and voicing concern over Johnson’s capability to lead effectively. Other Republicans, such as Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), are undecided, citing worries about Johnson's previous performance and his handling of legislative challenges.

Members of the House Freedom Caucus are also viewed as a potential obstacle, with some indicating they have yet to decide on supporting Johnson. Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md. ), the chairman of the caucus, and others have not made firm commitments regarding their votes and have raised questions about Johnson's plans moving forward.

Rep. Victoria Spartz (R-Ind. ) has expressed doubts about Johnson’s ability to fulfill President Trump’s agenda without a strong vision and plan. There is also speculation about Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s stance, who had previously stated she would not challenge Johnson but may change her position.

As the new Congress convenes, Johnson must navigate these challenges in an attempt to secure his leadership role amidst a divided party that could hinder his ability to govern effectively.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/johnson-looks-to-retain-speakership-but-republican-holdouts-remain-5785429?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=TheLibertyDaily

Bernie Sanders Exposes Inconvenient Truth: H-1B Visas Keep Wages Down

 Senator Bernie Sanders has publicly criticized the H-1B visa program, asserting that it allows companies to hire cheaper foreign labor, thus harming American workers. In a recent statement, Sanders challenged Elon Musk's support for the program, arguing that instead of hiring the best talent, companies are using H-1B visas to replace American jobs with low-paid workers from other countries. According to Sanders, large companies utilizing H-1B visas have collectively laid off approximately 85,000 American workers while bringing in over 34,000 foreign workers.

Sanders points out that there are many Americans with advanced degrees in science and technology who are currently unemployed, raising questions about claims of a skilled labor shortage. He cited Tesla's layoffs of over 7,500 American employees, including software developers and engineers, while hiring H-1B workers, questioning how this aligns with claims of a labor shortage.

Musk, along with President-elect Donald Trump, has defended the H-1B visa program, stating it helps companies fill employment gaps. Trump reaffirmed his support for the program, emphasizing the need for skilled workers and suggesting that the country needs more competent individuals coming in. This position somewhat contradicts earlier statements where he appeared to oppose the program during the 2016 election.

The debate over the future of the H-1B visa program is ongoing, particularly in light of Trump's upcoming inauguration and potential plans to change immigration policies. Musk's and Trump's support for H-1B visas stands in contrast to Sanders' strong criticism, emphasizing the divide on this issue among political leaders.

https://headlineusa.com/bernie-sanders-h-1b-visas-keep-wages-down/

Biden Presented With Options To Strike Iran Nuke Sites If Tehran Speeds Toward Bomb

President Biden has been given options for a potential US attack on Iran's nuclear sites if Tehran shows signs of speeding toward developing a nuclear bomb. This information comes from a recent Axios report which stated that discussions happened in a secret meeting weeks ago. However, no final decision has been reached, and the talks were based on "prudent scenario planning" concerning a possible increase in uranium enrichment by Iran.

Concerns have arisen among Western officials about Iran's intentions, especially following the military challenges faced by Hezbollah and the Assad government. There is a sense of urgency among Iranian leaders to secure their position by possibly pursuing nuclear weapons due to the shifting balance of power in the region. Despite the heightened tensions, Biden previously indicated that the US would not support Israeli military actions against Iran's nuclear sites.

While internal discussions about military action were ongoing, sources reported that there are currently no active discussions in the White House regarding such actions. Iran has raised its uranium enrichment to 60%, suggesting it can develop a bomb if it chooses to. Should Iran decide to pursue a weapon, it would take additional time to create a nuclear warhead.

The discussions about potential strikes on Iranian facilities have taken place without Congressional debate or approval, reflecting a trend among US administrations to bypass Congress for such military actions. With the changing dynamics in the Middle East, there are increased fears of a broader conflict involving the US, Iran, and Israel if military action were undertaken. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/biden-presented-options-strike-iran-nuke-sites-if-tehran-speeds-toward-bomb

Islamic terror group that vows to 'defeat' America to host annual conference in Canada

 A terror group that aims to "defeat" America will hold its annual Islamic supremacy conference in Mississauga, Ontario, on January 18. This conference, hosted by Hizb ut-Tahrir, will focus on "eliminating the obstacles that are delaying the return" of a global Islamic caliphate, according to the Western Standard.

Hizb ut-Tahrir, meaning "Party of Liberation," announced the Khalifah (Caliphate) Conference on Facebook, questioning whether America is truly so powerful that the Muslim community cannot defeat it. The group mentioned historical superpowers like the Romans and Persians that were overcome by the Muslim community. They urged attendees to learn how the community can prevail over current powerful nations, including America, Europe, Russia, and China.

Hizb ut-Tahrir operates under Sharia Law and seeks to establish a global Muslim state. It is labeled a terrorist entity in multiple countries including the UK, Germany, and Egypt. While the group didn’t disclose the conference venue, interested individuals can register through Eventbrite to receive the location. The group is banned in most Arab countries except Lebanon, Yemen, and the UAE.

https://thepostmillennial.com/islamic-terror-group-that-vows-to-defeat-america-to-host-annual-conference-in-canada

World War I—The Great Banker Bailout

World War I resulted in an estimated 15-22 million deaths, along with countless injuries and widespread property destruction. The harsh realities of war are illustrated in quotes from literature, showing the gruesome conditions faced by soldiers. The entry of the United States into the war, contrary to President Woodrow Wilson's earlier promises to avoid such conflict, largely benefitted American bankers who had been financing the Allies. Wilson recognized that the war was rooted in commercial and industrial competition but failed to acknowledge how U. S. bankers were benefiting from the situation.

Historian Niall Ferguson pointed out that J. P. Morgan's financial interests in Britain positioned him to benefit greatly when the U. S. entered the war in 1917. The Federal Reserve was able to finance this entry by greatly increasing the money supply, thus avoiding direct taxation from the American public. This situation enhanced the power and central authority of the Federal Reserve and its close connections with bankers and industrialists.

American banks, especially Morgan's, profited significantly, acting as both financial supporters and suppliers of war materials to the Allies. The money loaned by the U. S. to England and France often returned quickly to American companies, enriching those banks and businesses tied to Morgan. This financial interconnection played a vital role in pushing for U. S. involvement in the war, as the prospect of loss prompted financial interests to advocate for entry into a conflict that benefitted them.

The war created new opportunities for the banking system and large companies, which had previously been struggling financially. The influx of war profits led to a significant increase in the number of wealthy individuals in America, as war contracts funneled money from the federal government to the richest families in the country. This process of wealth redistribution mainly benefited those controlling banks and industries connected to the war effort.

General Smedley Butler highlighted how a small number of people profited immensely from World War I, with at least 21,000 new millionaires emerging from the conflict. U. S. involvement in the war ensured an Allied victory and prevented a negotiated peace, leading to severe consequences for Germany and contributing to the rise of oppressive regimes in the following decades.

In summary, the U. S. entry into World War I was driven by financial interests that prioritized their wealth and stability over the human costs of war. The profit motive connected to the conflict had lasting ramifications, reflecting a pattern where wealth was derived from political means rather than voluntary market actions, altering the course of history and leading to significant turmoil in the 20th century. 

https://mises.org/mises-wire/world-war-i-great-banker-bailout

Biden’s Boondoggles Boggle The Mind

 As President Joe Biden approaches the end of his term, he is focused on enhancing his legacy rather than addressing the significant waste and fraud that has occurred during his time in office. A report from Politico highlights where the $1. 6 trillion spent on clean energy and infrastructure went, revealing that much of the money remains unspent or unaccounted for. Specifically, more than half of the $1. 1 trillion in new spending has not been committed, and only a small fraction has actually been disbursed.

While it is somewhat reassuring that much of the funds are still available, there is concern that a future administration may not act to cancel or stop these unspent programs. The article mentions significant failures in spending, such as a $42 billion broadband expansion that has not connected any households and only 47 electric vehicle charging stations constructed from a planned 5,000, even though the funding for this was supposed to support 500,000 installations by 2030.

Questions arise regarding where the allocated funds have gone and what impact they have made. For instance, it is unclear how many jobs have been created from a $551 billion tax break for clean energy and semiconductor manufacturing, especially after Intel received nearly $9 billion but then laid off a significant portion of its workforce. The $27 billion allocated for the “Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund” appears to have had minimal results as well.

Additionally, it is unknown whether the $7 billion set aside for solar panels in low-income areas has resulted in any installations. Similarly, the $14 billion “clean investment fund” and $6 billion for the “clean communities accelerator” show questionable outcomes, as the primary beneficiary of the investment fund has reported only minimal projects.

There is a strong call for the new Congress to investigate these spending issues and demand accountability from the Biden administration regarding the use of taxpayer money. The expectation is for a full and honest report on how the $1. 6 trillion has been spent and what results, if any, have been achieved, emphasizing the need for transparency in government spending.

This editorial highlights the importance of responsible fiscal management and keeping government programs accountable to taxpayers to ensure funds are being used effectively.

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/01/03/biden-boondoggles-boggle-the-mind/

Media: Remember That Whole Disinformation Thing? It Was All Made Up

Disinformation, BLM, and masks are mentioned as three moral panics that have caused significant harm to individuals, yet questioning them led to severe consequences. The media, which could not be questioned, later downplayed these issues, acting like they were never significant. Disinformation, once a key element of the Russiagate narrative, was used to enforce censorship and control speech under the claim that it threatened democracy.

Now, a recent article has dismissed the panic over disinformation without acknowledging the damage it caused. For nearly a decade, lawmakers worried about the types of speech social media should censor, claiming these ideas were damaging society. A new industry called “Big Disinfo” emerged to combat misinformation, with NGOs funding initiatives aimed at protecting democracy from false information. An article from Harvard highlights a “crisis” in misinformation studies, noting that despite years of focus, scholars struggle to understand misinformation's real-world effects, such as its influence on elections.

Key issues, such as how to define misinformation, remain unresolved. Polarizing debates hinder progress, with questions about Facebook’s influence on the 2016 elections still unproven. Misinformation is often understood as what the other side believes to be false. Efforts to censor dissenting views are seen as attacks on the First Amendment, but experts previously dismissed concerns about government interference with speech on social media.

According to a Politico article, the panic over disinformation is subsiding as the narrative around it crumbles. The original campaign against disinformation was largely aimed at preventing Trump from being elected, and with his second term now won, the urgency to maintain this narrative has lessened. Although Kamala Harris did not create a false narrative of her loss, Hillary Clinton is noted for giving rise to the disinformation controversy.

Even as Politico describes those studying disinformation as “researchers,” it admits the field lacks scientific credibility. Some scholars argue that the subjective nature of defining misinformation makes it unsuitable for scientific study. Critics say that the movement started as a partisan reaction to Trump, leading to biased definitions of misinformation, which unfairly target conservative viewpoints.

Research in this area tends to reflect a partisan bias, labeling conservative beliefs as dangerous and attempting to suppress them. The study of misinformation lacks the rigor of a true scientific field, resembling the unpredictability of witchcraft. Those participating in this arena are often perceived as motivated by financial gain and political agendas rather than genuine belief in their cause. Ultimately, it is suggested that those promoting misinformation narratives pose a greater threat to democracy than the beliefs they seek to suppress. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/media-remember-that-whole-disinformation-thing-it-was-all-made-up/

Democrats Weaponized FBI To Falsely Claim White Supremacists Posed Greater Terror Threat Than Radical Islamists

Democrats are accused of misusing the FBI to falsely assert that white supremacists are a bigger terror threat than radical Islamists. The claim lacks evidence showing an increase in right-wing political violence. A man named Shamsud-Din Jabbar, a former Army IT specialist, was identified by the FBI as a terrorist for killing 15 people with his truck in New Orleans on New Year’s Day. There is strong evidence, including family testimony and his social media posts, suggesting that Jabbar was motivated by radical Islamic beliefs. This revelation contrasts with statements from the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and President Biden, who have stressed that white supremacists primarily pose the greatest terrorism risk. 

https://www.public.news/p/democrats-weaponized-fbi-to-falsely

Court Upholds $7.8 Million Verdict for Transit Workers Fired for Refusing COVID-19 Vaccine

A federal judge in California has decided not to overturn a jury's verdict that awarded $7. 8 million to six former BART employees who were fired for not getting the COVID-19 vaccine due to their religious beliefs. In a ruling on December 30, Judge William A. Alsup noted some minor mistakes in the trial, but these were not serious enough to change the original decision. The jury had ordered BART to compensate each of the six workers between $1. 2 million and $1. 5 million.

The judge explained that BART did not show enough evidence that accommodating the employees’ religious objections would cause undue hardship for the agency. He pointed out that BART needed to prove that alternative measures, like masking or remote work, would significantly burden the agency. BART had relied on expert testimony to claim that vaccination was the only effective solution. However, Alsup commented that the jury could question the credibility of these experts, especially because of their financial connections to BART.

BART’s evidence included differing statements from a supervisor who acknowledged that precautions like social distancing were working, which contradicted their experts' claims. The judge criticized BART for not providing proper documentation to support its vaccine mandate.

While he mentioned some flaws in juror instructions and a violation of pretrial orders by the plaintiffs, Alsup concluded these issues did not affect the fairness of the trial. He stated that the jury had determined BART failed to prove it would suffer undue hardship if the vaccine exemptions were granted.

Consequently, the jury's award of $7,825,859 to the six former employees remains in place. BART has chosen not to comment on the ruling. 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/court-upholds-7-8-million-verdict-for-transit-workers-fired-for-refusing-covid-19-vaccine-5784306?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge&src_src=partner&src_cmp=ZeroHedge

Georgia AG pushes state Supreme Court to uphold Fani Willis' removal from Trump case

Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr is urging the state Supreme Court to uphold a decision that removed Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis from the case against President-elect Donald Trump. The indictment claims Trump tried to overturn the 2020 election results. Willis was disqualified after it was revealed she had an affair with special prosecutor Nathan Wade, whom she hired. Although Wade resigned, the court felt the situation raised concerns about fairness.

Carr stated that the appeals court correctly found that Willis created her own conflict of interest. He criticized what he called "lawfare" in politics and hoped the Supreme Court would reject Willis's appeal, encouraging her to focus on prosecuting violent criminals in Fulton County instead.

In response, Willis accused Carr of trying to influence the case since he is also a witness. She suggested that Carr, who is running for governor, should prioritize his candidacy over his role as Attorney General. Additionally, Lt. Governor Burt Jones criticized Carr for not addressing the situation sooner and expressed intentions to hold Willis accountable at a Senate hearing.

There are indications that Willis may need to testify regarding her alleged misconduct. A recent ruling by a Fulton County Superior Court judge allows the state Senate to subpoena her. Willis's lawyer deemed this ruling incorrect and plans to appeal it. Furthermore, Trump's defense attorney believes that the Department of Justice might investigate Willis's actions in connection to the case.

This ongoing situation involves serious implications for both the legal proceedings against Trump and the conduct of officials involved in the case. 

https://www.theblaze.com/news/georgia-ag-pushes-state-supreme-court-to-uphold-fani-willis-removal-from-trump-case

House Releases Bombshell Report on January 6 Pipe Bomber Revealing FBI Engaged in Massive Coverup and Refuses to Cooperate with Investigators

 A new report from the Committee on House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight reveals that the FBI stopped searching for the January 6 pipe bomber in 2021 and covered up evidence. The FBI is now not cooperating with Congressional investigators.

Former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino mentioned that a whistleblower claimed that after pipe bombs were discovered at the RNC and DNC headquarters, law enforcement was told to stop looking for the suspect just two days later. This contradicts what FBI Director Christopher Wray has previously indicated.

Nearly four years after the incident, federal law enforcement has not identified the person who planted the bombs. Although the FBI initially took significant steps, such as issuing search warrants and reviewing security footage, they have not updated Congress on the investigation's status. There are also conflicting reports regarding whether the FBI received "corrupted" cellular data from major carriers, which might have contained the bomber's identity.

The identity of the person who planted the pipe bombs at the RNC and DNC headquarters remains unknown. The US Capitol was shut down on January 6 when the bombs were found nearby, raising questions about who actually planted them. Recent video footage suggests a police officer was seen carrying a bag to the DNC bomb site just before it was discovered.

Additionally, none of the Secret Service agents noticed the bomb during a sweep before Kamala Harris's arrival, and a bomb-sniffing dog had also failed to detect it earlier that morning. There are concerns that the bomb was planted by a police officer shortly before its discovery.

Darren Beattie from Revolver News discussed how unfazed law enforcement appeared when notified about the bomb's proximity to Kamala Harris. He noted that new footage suggests the FBI's surveillance might be fake and indicates that the bombs were actually placed on January 6, aligning with events at the Capitol. Furthermore, the FBI is withholding critical surveillance footage of the bomber.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/01/breaking-bombshell-house-report-reveals-new-information-fbis/

DATA: 60% Oppose Increase to H-1B Visas.

 A majority of Americans do not support increasing H-1B visas, which allow immigrants to potentially lower American wages, especially in the tech industry. A survey by Rasmussen Reports found that 60 percent believe there are enough skilled workers in the U. S. for white-collar jobs. This raises doubts about proposals in Congress to boost the number of H-1B visas, with only 26 percent in favor of increasing foreign workers.

The survey showed wide opposition, with 72 percent of Republicans, 63 percent of swing voters, and 47 percent of Democrats believing there is enough talent available domestically. The discussion on H-1B visas has gained attention after President-elect Donald J. Trump supported his advisers Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy in seeking to attract foreign talent. Trump previously claimed H-1B visas are unfair to American workers, stating in 2016 that he used them, although he believed they should not exist. Musk has been a strong supporter of these visas, with reports indicating that his company Tesla laid off thousands of American workers in favor of H-1B migrants.

https://thenationalpulse.com/2025/01/02/data-60-oppose-increase-to-h-1b-visas/

Biden Walks Away Without Taking Any Questions About New Orleans Terror Attack After Remarks at Camp David

 Joe Biden spoke to the nation from Camp David after a terrorist attack in New Orleans that resulted in at least 15 deaths and 35 injuries. The attacker, a 42-year-old named Shamsud Din Jabbar, drove through a crowd during New Year’s Eve celebrations. Law enforcement indicated that Jabbar was part of a larger group of terrorists.

Before heading to Camp David, Biden briefly spoke with reporters and delivered what many considered an unhelpful statement regarding the attack. He mentioned he had communicated with various agencies, including the CIA and FBI, expressing “anger and frustration. ”

Later that evening, Biden gave a public address, but he seemed disoriented and struggled with his prepared speech. He revealed that Jabbar had posted online videos showing his ISIS inspiration and a wish to kill just hours before the attack. Biden also labeled the situation as “very fluid” and stated that the FBI was leading the investigation.

However, Biden did not take any questions from the press about the terrorist attack and left the lectern without further engagement.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/01/biden-walks-away-without-taking-any-questions-about/

Clean Energy Benchmark Is Natural Gas: Today and for the Future

 Recent discussions in America focus on energy production and consumption, particularly the best energy sources for today and the future. Bloomberg Intelligence indicates that data centers might account for up to 17% of U. S. electricity use by 2030, with one data center using significantly more electricity than a typical office.

As the country addresses its energy future, it's clear that natural gas is an affordable, reliable, and clean energy option against which others should be compared. The American Gas Association notes a 61% reduction in carbon dioxide emissions from electricity generation due to more natural gas usage, contrasting the restart of coal plants as a sign that more gas-fired power plants are needed soon. Plans are in place to add 133 natural gas plants to the U. S. grid by 2030, as renewable energy isn't meeting increasing demands.

A specific case in Omaha, Nebraska, shows the urgency of energy needs. While some consider restarting an old coal plant amidst air pollution concerns, Kansas is taking a different approach. Energy plans to build two new natural gas plants to ensure dependable energy, reflecting a more sustainable and cleaner path as highlighted by Governor Laura Kelly.

The Energy Security ARC plan by The Empowerment Alliance emphasizes that natural gas is the best clean energy choice. Decisions about energy impact jobs and consumer costs, and the U. S. has successfully reduced carbon emissions largely through natural gas. While there are other options like nuclear and coal, natural gas remains a trusted choice for millions of households and businesses now and in the future.

https://realclearwire.com/articles/2024/12/30/clean_energy_benchmark_is_natural_gas_today_and_for_the_future_1081352.html

Trump Should Terminate The Bilateral Security Agreement Between The US & Ukraine

 Andrew Korybko argues that Trump should end the Bilateral Security Agreement with Ukraine on his first day in office if he is serious about his foreign policy plans. A recent op-ed by New York Times contributor Rajan Menon suggests that Trump is unlikely to meet Ukraine's security demands, which may overlook the agreement Biden's administration made with Ukraine. This agreement formalizes US military aid to Ukraine and would require a renewal of support if conflict arises again.

Korybko posits that terminating this agreement may help Trump in his strategy to shift focus back to Asia and China, as existing commitments to Ukraine could hinder such a pivot. The agreement allows either party to terminate it with written notice through diplomatic channels within six months, making it legally possible for Trump to end it, despite possible backlash from opposing factions.

By withdrawing US security guarantees, Korybko believes the chances for peace would increase, as Ukraine might be less likely to provoke further conflict with Russia if it cannot rely on American support. He also highlights that if NATO countries see no US intervention in Ukraine, they may take more responsibility for their own defense and increase their military spending.

Overall, Korybko views the termination of the agreement as beneficial for US strategic interests, allowing Trump to reallocate resources from Europe to focus on Asia. He insists that if Trump aims to implement his foreign policy effectively, canceling the agreement with Ukraine should be a priority. 

https://korybko.substack.com/p/trump-should-terminate-the-bilateral

The Ugly Residue of the Biden Presidency

  Most people are eagerly waiting for President Trump to take office, hoping for a restoration of America's reputation, improvement in the economy, and a rejection of the "woke agenda. " However, the process of recovery from the last four years will be challenging. People may become impatient, forgetting that significant changes take time. Inflation, damaged international relations, and national security issues will not resolve overnight. While Trump may be enthusiastic, he has a limited margin of support in Congress, assuming he gains Republican backing.

Biden's presidency has caused considerable damage. On the international front, relations with allies such as Saudi Arabia are strained, and there is confusion regarding Biden's stance towards Israel and Iran. His inconsistent approach to support Ukraine has weakened their defense efforts. The withdrawal from Afghanistan was seen as costly and poorly managed, and current issues with Russia, China, and Ukraine will create tough choices for Trump’s administration.

Biden’s foreign policy actions have contributed to a closer relationship between Russia and China, which poses a challenge for the U. S. The new administration will have to find ways to create division between these two countries to maintain America's global standing. Biden has also aligned with various non-democratic governments, undermining his narrative about democracy versus autocracy.

National security faces serious problems too, particularly regarding military funding. Biden's proposed military budget requests only a 1% increase, which amounts to a reduction after inflation. Major challenges include ongoing conflicts, such as the war in Ukraine and hostilities in the Middle East. The Army is reducing its troop numbers, and the Navy will have fewer ships, while China continues to increase its defense budget.

Biden's actions to reverse Trump's policies have proven unwise, leading to open borders and an increase in illegal immigration. As a result, deportation efforts will confront the incoming Trump administration. The Biden administration has lost significant public confidence, which may affect Trump's presidency. While some criticize Trump for exaggeration, Biden has been accused of telling numerous lies about critical issues, including the Afghanistan withdrawal and inflation.

Moreover, the legacy media's collusion with Biden, failing to challenge his falsehoods, complicates matters further. Moving forward, it is hoped that the public remains patient as Trump begins implementing changes, since reversing the effects of Biden's presidency will take time.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/01/the_ugly_residue_of_the_biden_presidency.html

Big Oil returns to core strengths, retreats from green energy investments as climate agenda loses steam

 In 2024, major European energy companies such as BP, Shell, and Equinor reduced their investments in renewable energy and shifted focus back to oil and gas. This decision was influenced by high oil and gas prices resulting from geopolitical issues like the Ukraine war, which made fossil fuels more profitable while renewable projects faced challenges such as inflation and supply chain problems.

The text argues that fossil fuels are not the main cause of climate change, pointing to the complexity of climate systems and asserting that affordable, reliable energy is crucial for global prosperity. It highlights how the election of Donald Trump, with his pro-fossil fuel policies, strengthened the oil and gas sector, aligning with the growing global energy demands.

The move back to fossil fuels by these energy giants indicates that they recognize the need for a balanced energy strategy rather than fully committing to renewable energy. Analysts, like Rohan Bowater from Accela Research, note that the current market dynamics favor oil and gas investments due to their profitability, unlike renewable energy which is dealing with financial setbacks.

BP, for example, is spinning off its offshore wind projects into a joint venture, while Shell is exiting power markets in Europe and China. This mirrors a trend where investors favor companies that focus on their traditional strengths over those that pursue renewable energy without sufficient returns.

The article disputes the common belief that fossil fuels are the main drivers of climate change, suggesting that natural variability, solar activity, and oceanic cycles also play significant roles. It states that the advantages of fossil fuels, such as providing reliable energy and helping to alleviate poverty, outweigh speculative climate risks.

Trump's recent policies have also played a role in reviving the oil and gas industry, promoting energy independence and supporting domestic energy production. The promotion of liquefied natural gas by the Trump administration emphasizes the strategic role of fossil fuels in national security and maintaining global stability.

Ultimately, the article asserts that the shift back to fossil fuels does not equate to a rejection of innovation or environmental responsibility. It suggests that fossil fuels can be utilized responsibly alongside environmental efforts, advocating for technologies like carbon capture to lessen emissions.

In summary, the current landscape shows fossil fuels as fundamental to the global economy, and the industry’s return to its core strengths is seen as sensible in the context of climate alarmism.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2025-01-02-big-oil-retreats-from-green-energy-investments.html

CyberTruck Explodes Outside Trump Hotel in Las Vegas

 Las Vegas police say Cybertruck that exploded at Trump hotel had fuel containers, large firework mortars

Virginia man had weapons cache, used Biden photo for target practice, prosecutors say
Johnson to meet with Trump at Mar-a-Lago to ‘map’ strategy ahead of speakership vote
Russia launches 111 drones at Ukraine in deadly New Year’s attack, Kyiv says
Mike Johnson protected from ouster, diversity office scrapped in House GOP’s new rules
These major companies want workers back in the office
Ten dead and dozens injured after driver plows car into crowd on Bourbon Street
Actor Justin Baldoni files $250 million defamation suit against New York Times
Jimmy Carter’s conservation legacy
4 Deep State Spy Tools The Trump Admin Can Leave In 2024
Joe Biden’s Top 5 Gaffes Of 2024
China-Enabling NBA Forced To Hand Down Suspensions To Rockets’ Amen Thompson, Heat’s Terry Rozier After Fight

Manufacturing Dissent

 On a Sunday morning, while drinking coffee and checking the news, the author noticed intense negativity towards Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. 's nomination as HHS Secretary. Media channels uniformly branded him as a "conspiracy theorist" and a "danger to public health," without addressing his actual views. These attacks reflect not just opinions but a broader issue of trust in institutions that were once seen as credible.

The author highlights a contradiction in the critiques, noting that many attackers supported harmful pandemic policies. The New York Times exhibited similar dismissive attitudes, particularly in pieces referencing declines in children's health while rejecting Kennedy's evidence without much engagement. There is an evident pattern of messaging aimed at undermining Kennedy’s credibility before he takes office.

The media appears to have a shared narrative, expressing a coordinated response that seems less about journalism and more about manipulating public perception. This collective dismissal contributes to a growing public skepticism. As Kennedy gains influence, media outlets face a dilemma; they must eventually engage with his ideas rather than dismiss them outright. Direct attacks and fear-mongering will not suffice, especially about pertinent health issues he raises.

Furthermore, the media misunderstands the changing political landscape, where Kennedy, aligned with various political values, connects with a wider audience. His message promotes unity and caring for future generations, and when media ignore these sentiments, it amplifies public distrust. The Times, in attempting to refute Kennedy's claims about unsafe ingredients in U. S. products, inadvertently reinforces his points, illustrating a failure to address significant concerns.

Senator Elizabeth Warren labeled Kennedy a public health threat but sidestepped the fundamental question of why safety testing for medical products is essential. This avoidance signals the institutional priorities and a fear of someone capable of demanding accountability.

The media's response to Kennedy echoes a broader narrative about public distrust. The public is increasingly aware of the constructed nature of news and the failure of institutions to live up to their roles. As Kennedy's influence in health policy rises, media institutions must confront this reality; superficial attacks will only deepen their credibility issues.

Moving forward, the author urges everyone to examine Kennedy's speeches and his positions directly instead of relying on biased media portrayals. The goal is to foster genuine dialogue based on evidence and critical analysis rather than fear or authority-based narratives. This helps build trust as institutions face increased scrutiny over their coverage of dissenting voices. 

https://brownstone.org/articles/manufacturing-dissent/

How the Biden Admin Allowed Iran To Rake in Illicit Oil Cash Amid Tehran's Terror Spree

 Earlier this year, U. S. officials were informed of a significant Iranian oil smuggling scheme involving Iraq, which a 45-page intelligence report detailed. The report indicated that Iraq is crucial to this operation, which has grown substantially. Iran is reportedly earning around $1 billion annually from this scheme, funding its threat network. Despite receiving briefings on the intelligence, the Biden-Harris administration did not take decisive action against it.

The Department of the Treasury drafted sanctions regarding Iraq but did not implement them. The report reveals that Iraq’s government, particularly Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, is closely allied with Iran and facilitates this smuggling of oil, mixing Iranian oil with legitimate supplies for export. This cooperation has strengthened ties between Iraq and Iran while allowing Iran to regain financial strength after previous sanctions had significantly impacted it.

Analysts suggest that the U. S. government had clear knowledge of the smuggling operations and chose not to act on it, viewing it as a sensitive issue. This laxity from the administration allowed Iran to boost its finances to around $200 billion since sanctions were eased. The report emphasizes the ongoing threat posed by Iranian militias and their operations within Iraq, indicating that the U. S. is attempting to maintain a constructive relationship with Iraq while ignoring its close ties with Iran.

The report lists various companies involved in the illegal oil dealings and points out that Iraqi oil facilities are effectively laundering Iranian crude oil, allowing it to be sold internationally despite sanctions. This illicit activity generates funds that return to Iranian militant groups, reinforcing their power and operations.

Michael Knights, a security analyst, highlighted the necessity for the forthcoming Trump administration to address these issues seriously. He noted that extensive options for sanctions against the Iraqi oil sector could be implemented, urging swift action to combat these ongoing violations. He believes that the incoming administration can leverage its understanding of these smuggling schemes to impose effective sanctions on the involved Iraqi institutions.

In summary, the Biden administration's inaction regarding critical intelligence on Iranian oil smuggling through Iraq reflects a broader strategy that allows Iran to regain financial and operational strength while undermining U. S. interests in the region. Analysts argue that significant changes are needed with the anticipated leadership shift in the U. S. government to tackle these challenges effectively. 

https://freebeacon.com/biden-harris-administration/how-the-biden-admin-allowed-iran-to-rake-in-illicit-oil-cash-amid-tehrans-terror-spree/

The Overlooked Power to Enlist Local Cops for Immigration Enforcement

 The discussion on immigration enforcement in a possible second Trump administration highlights an overlooked part of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA): section 103(a)(10). This provision allows state and local law enforcement officers to perform immigration duties under certain circumstances. Although it has never been used, it holds significant authority that may require updates and clarification in regulations.

1. Section 103(a)(10) Overview:

• This section of the INA permits the Attorney General to allow state and local police to exercise immigration powers during a mass influx of aliens near the U. S. borders, given the consent of their superiors.

2. Role of the Attorney General vs. DHS Secretary:

• The INA often mentions the Attorney General concerning immigration powers, despite many of these responsibilities having shifted to the Secretary of Homeland Security. Section 103(a)(1) clarifies this division of power.

3. Background Context:

• The Homeland Security Act of 2002 was created in response to issues within the former Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) highlighted after the 9/11 attacks. Immigration enforcement is now divided between various agencies under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Justice (DOJ), complicating the authority structure.

4. Past Immigration Enforcement Practices:

• Historically, the DOJ handled immigration enforcement, but structural changes have resulted in the division of responsibilities across multiple agencies. This has left some powers, such as those in section 103(a)(10), largely undefined or overlooked.

5. Potential for Implementation:

• Although section 103(a)(10) has not been utilized, regulatory frameworks provide guidance on how to declare an "immigration emergency" and call for local assistance. The criteria for such a declaration may include overwhelming demands on local law enforcement due to an influx of aliens or associated criminal activity.

6. Decision-Making Process:

• The Attorney General or the President can officially declare an immigration emergency. If the Attorney General decides to act, certain conditions must trigger this authority, primarily involving significant increases in asylum applications or threats to local safety.

7. Need for Updated Regulations:

• Current regulations need to reflect the realities of immigration enforcement today. The existing language refers to outdated positions and lacks clarity regarding authority, which could lead to potential legal challenges if enacted.

8. Comparison with Section 287(g):

• Section 103(a)(10) is often confused with section 287(g), which also involves delegating immigration authority to state and local officials; however, they serve different purposes and scopes.

The Unites States has faced considerable challenges at its borders due to the influx of aliens over recent years. Section 103(a)(10) of the INA provides a potential solution under the executive branch's authority, but it is hampered by outdated language and uncertain interpretations. For effective use, these regulations need to be revised and clarified to ensure appropriate application in current immigration scenarios.

https://cis.org/Arthur/Overlooked-Power-Enlist-Local-Cops-Immigration-Enforcement

Former CIA Officer Warns: 1,000 Al-Qaeda Fighters In US For Next Homeland Attack

 In a recent interview on the Shawn Ryan Show, former CIA officer Sarah Adams expressed concerns about a potential attack by Al-Qaeda on American soil. She indicated that Al-Qaeda may have activated sleeper cells in the U. S. following a terrorist incident in New Orleans and an explosion involving a rented vehicle outside Trump's hotel in Las Vegas. When asked about the presence of Al-Qaeda fighters in the U. S. , Adams stated that while the group claims to have trained over a thousand fighters, her belief is that there may be even more, albeit they might be exaggerating their numbers.

Adams shared frightening insights about a possible 2025 attack, mentioning that the threat includes undetectable devices. She highlighted a lack of successful major attacks using suicide vests in the U. S. to date, noting that previous attacks suggest a growing trend of violence. She also warned of the catastrophic moral impact on those who served in the military should an attack occur, stressing that they deserve better protection.

General Mike Flynn, former national security adviser, commented on the necessity of acting on intelligence to prevent attacks. He criticized the failure of decision-makers to act upon available information and mentioned that there might be a push to downplay the recent attack in New Orleans as terrorism, despite evidence suggesting otherwise.

A federal source in the counter-terrorism community indicated that pre-trained Al-Qaeda operatives may have entered the U. S. due to the policies of the current administration. This raises alarm about the risk of further terrorist actions. Following the withdrawal from Afghanistan, Al-Qaeda's global ambitions have reportedly surged, casting doubts on the current political landscape’s effect on security.

The discussion raises questions about the motivations behind public warnings of threats and the implications for domestic security measures and funding. 

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/former-cia-officer-warns-al-qaedas-us-homeland-attack-could-be-next

The Amish Are Doing More for Western North Carolina Than FEMA Has Done With Another 29 Billion

 The people of Western North Carolina have had a stable Christmas and a brighter New Year thanks to various organizations and individuals, who have provided food, shelter, and support to families affected by Hurricane Helene. Many families have experienced profound loss, but help has come from groups like Samaritan's Purse, United Cajun Navy, and individuals such as Shawn Hendrix and Chris Hall.

The Amish of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, have notably stepped up, traveling to the area to build homes for those who lost theirs. They set up their own camps to avoid disrupting cleanup efforts. However, the recovery efforts have been hindered by FEMA, which has faced criticism for its slow response. Despite claiming to help before, during, and after disasters, FEMA has done little for the residents of Western North Carolina, where many homes were destroyed, and winter is bringing additional challenges.

Local residents have called out Governor Roy Cooper and FEMA for not adequately addressing their needs. With 126,000 homes destroyed and $2. 2 billion in FEMA funds unaccounted for, people are demanding action. FEMA officials attempted to downplay the criticisms, which turned into an embarrassing apology when they were unable to deliver promised temporary homes to those displaced.

FEMA had only delivered a fraction of the promised homes by early December, leaving many families exposed to harsh winter conditions. Meanwhile, critics highlight that FEMA officials have not been responsive, with top leaders seemingly focused on their own political ambitions.

Despite these failures, the Amish continue to build tiny houses for the hurricane victims, showcasing the real spirit of America. Their work, along with the support from various organizations, helps give hope to the community. Through these efforts, many believe a happier and more stable future can be achieved.

https://redstate.com/jenniferoo/2024/12/31/the-amish-is-doing-more-for-western-north-carolina-than-fema-has-done-with-another-29-billion-n2183794

AI Data Centers Are Causing ‘Distortions’ in the Power Grid from Coast to Coast

 The rapid growth of AI data centers in the U. S. is straining power grids and affecting the quality of electricity supplied to homes, posing risks like appliance damage and increased fire hazards, according to a Bloomberg analysis. The surge in data centers is contributing to a problem called "bad harmonics," where normal electricity flow is disrupted, causing voltage spikes and dips. Most of the homes affected are near major data center operations, particularly in areas like Chicago and Northern Virginia.

Whisker Labs' tracking of power quality indicates that over three-quarters of the worst-affected homes are close to significant data center activity. Continuous exposure to distorted power can lead to overheating of electronics and malfunctions in appliances, resulting in potential damages worth billions. Experts warn that these power quality issues could escalate further, creating conditions that lead to fires or blackouts.

The major concern lies in the high demand for electricity from data centers, which can consume as much as 10,000 times the amount used by a single household. The U. S. is expected to see a 16 percent rise in power demand in the next five years due to the increasing number of data centers. This added strain comes on top of an already overloaded grid, which is affected by factors like aging infrastructure, extreme weather, and the rising electrification of transportation and heating.

Chicago shows significant harmonic distortions with over a third of sensors reporting high levels, and similar issues are prevalent in Northern Virginia. The impact is felt across urban and rural areas alike, with sensors near data centers consistently detecting more distorted power quality.

While there are various reasons for bad harmonics, such as industrial machinery and renewable energy inverters, the link to data centers is particularly strong. Although some solutions, like specialized substations and power filtering equipment, are being introduced, the lack of detailed, house-by-house monitoring by utilities poses a challenge. Issues with power quality often go unnoticed until they become serious.

Regulatory considerations highlight the utility customer's right to receive quality power, emphasizing the need for measurement and monitoring to ensure consumers receive what they deserve.

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2024/12/31/ai-data-centers-are-causing-distortions-in-the-power-grid-from-coast-to-coast/

Is This The Beginning Of A Terror Wave?

 The New Year began with one or possibly two terrorist attacks that resulted in over a dozen innocent deaths. In New Orleans, a driver crashed a truck into a crowd on Bourbon Street, killing 15 people. The driver, Shamsud-Din Jabbar, had an ISIS flag in the rented vehicle and is suspected to have acted with accomplices. Police discovered pipe bombs in the truck and placed in the French Quarter. There were also bomb-making materials found at the Airbnb where he was staying, which later caught fire.

On the same day, a Tesla Cybertruck exploded outside the Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas. Elon Musk confirmed via a post on X that the explosion resulted from very large fireworks or a bomb transported in the truck, and was unrelated to the vehicle itself. Both vehicles used in these attacks were rented through the Turo app, which is a platform for car-sharing.

Questions arise about whether this signifies the start of a wave of terrorist attacks in the U. S. Concerns are present, especially given the Biden administration’s perceived inaction on terror threats over the past four years. Following the U. S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, ISIS took control of significant territory, creating a threat that has inspired attacks both in Europe and the U. S. Evidence shows that Biden's open-border policy has allowed potential terrorists to enter the country, with 250 individuals on terrorist watch lists encountered at the southern border, 99 of whom were released into the U. S.

The FBI appears to be more focused on tracking right-wing terror threats rather than actual terrorists, demonstrated by their initial reluctance to label the New Orleans attack as terrorism. Biden’s comments following the attack suggested he prioritized caution regarding the suspect's background, despite evidence indicating his affiliation with ISIS and intent to harm.

These New Year’s Day incidents were not unexpected, and based on historical patterns, they might not be the last. The only reassurance noted is a possible change in leadership in 18 days.

The Issues and Insights platform, founded by experienced journalists, focuses on delivering fact-based news and analysis without bias. They operate independently, supporting free press ideals and the truth, while relying on ads and donations for funding their mission. Readers are encouraged to donate or subscribe to support this initiative.

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/01/02/is-this-what-were-in-for-in-2025/