The Third Big Lie of Vaccinology

  "The Third Big Lie of Vaccinology," which is the belief that an individual's immunity relies on the vaccinations of others. The author argues that this concept is illogical and stems from fear and misinformation.

1. Basic Logic of Immunity: The argument presented is straightforward: if a person (Person A) is vaccinated and that vaccination is effective, then they should not be at risk from unvaccinated individuals (Person B). If Person A claims that their immunity is somehow dependent on Person B being vaccinated, it implies that the vaccine does not work.

2. Intellectual Dishonesty: The article accuses some vaccine proponents of avoiding logical conclusions by "moving the goalposts"—changing the argument once it is disproven, such as insisting on herd immunity, which is not practical for most vaccines.

3. Medical Ethics: The author points out that forcefully vaccinating individuals violates medical ethics and a person’s autonomy over their own body, citing historical legal precedents.

4. Fear and Scapegoating: The piece argues that the notion of one’s immunity being dependent on another's vaccination is rooted in fear that scapegoats those who are unvaccinated. This fear not only misrepresents the efficacy of vaccines but also encourages magical thinking regarding public health.

5. Impacts of Vaccine Policy: The author uses the example of a measles outbreak following the confirmation of a new health secretary, suggesting that blaming unvaccinated individuals for outbreaks perpetuates a false narrative. Statistics show higher measles cases in vaccinated populations than expected, indicating lapses in the argument that vaccines alone would prevent outbreaks.

6. Resistance Against Mandatory Vaccination: The article concludes that the push for widespread vaccination is less about eradicating disease and more about eliminating dissent against vaccination, positioning the unvaccinated as a threat challenging the efficacy of vaccines.

The article asserts that claiming one's immunity is reliant upon the vaccinations of others undermines the credibility of vaccines. It emphasizes the need for logical reasoning against fear-based arguments in vaccination discussions and criticizes the strategies used to promote mandatory vaccination policies. The author advocates for respect for personal choice in health decisions without unjust blame towards unvaccinated individuals.

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-third-big-lie-of-vaccinology/

EXC: Trump Administration Hands Millions to Refugee Admission Groups

Recently, the Trump administration has approved significant financial support for organizations involved in refugee resettlement, despite ongoing concerns about illegal immigration and fraud.

• The Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) plans to grant nearly $7 million to two organizations for refugee case management and integration.

• One major recipient is the Community Sponsorship Hub in St. Paul, Minnesota, set to receive over $2.5 million. This area is notable for ongoing fraud investigations related to Somali immigrants.

• The Community Sponsorship Hub aims to enhance the number of refugees in the U. S. and is actively working against Trump’s immigration policies.

• The second grant, up to $4.5 million, will go to Catholic Charities USA, a large organization known for its refugee resettlement services. Critics argue that it enables mass migration and opposes strict immigration policies.

• Despite Trump administration rhetoric on immigration control and fraud investigations, the simultaneous funding actions highlight a disconnect between public statements and administrative actions.

These funding decisions underscore the complexities and contradictions in U. S. immigration policy. While the administration emphasizes fraud prevention, it continues to bolster refugee resettlement programs financially. 

https://substack.com/home/post/p-181729566

Pennsylvania Officials Let Unsent Mail Pile Up For A Month, But Promise Mail Voting Is Super Secure

 A recent issue in Pennsylvania reveals a significant mail delivery failure involving the state's contracts with mail vendors. This incident raises concerns about the reliability of mail-in voting, particularly in light of the upcoming elections.

• Mail Delivery Failures: Pennsylvania's mail vendor, Capitol Presort Services, failed to deliver approximately 3.4 million official letters from state agencies, leaving departments unable to communicate essential information. This period of halted mail delivery lasted for a month, from November 3 to December 3, 2025.

• Impact on Essential Services: The delayed mail included critical communications regarding food assistance programs (SNAP), health coverage, and various license and registration renewals from the Pennsylvania Department of Human Services and the Department of Transportation. These delays affected individuals who needed to respond by specific deadlines to retain benefits or ensure compliance with state regulations.

• Political Context: While the Pennsylvania Governor, Josh Shapiro, criticized former President Donald Trump during a government shutdown, his administration's failure to manage mail services raised questions about its competence in handling elections and voter services.

• Election Integrity Concerns: Following this scandal, concerns about the security and effectiveness of mail-in voting have resurfaced. The Pennsylvania Department of State's assurances of safe mail-in voting seem questionable given the recent mail mishaps. Historical instances of mail not being delivered properly reinforce doubts about mail-in ballots being reliably counted, as highlighted by various election-related mail delivery issues across the country.

• Vulnerabilities in Mail Voting: The article cites several incidents where undelivered mail, including ballots, was reported. Issues include lost ballots in ditches, undelivered mail piles, and even cases of individuals being prosecuted for ballot theft. In competitive elections, the margin for changing results is minimal, which makes mail-in voting vulnerabilities particularly concerning.

The mail delivery issues in Pennsylvania not only disrupt essential government services but also cast a shadow on the integrity of mail-in voting. Given these events, there is a heightened need for states to review their mail handling systems, especially as elections approach. The reliable delivery of ballots is critical for maintaining public trust in the electoral process.

https://thefederalist.com/2025/12/16/pennsylvania-officials-let-unsent-mail-pile-up-for-a-month-but-promise-mail-voting-is-super-secure/

Emails detail how Biden DOJ bowled over FBI concerns in raiding Donald Trump’s Florida home

Newly declassified emails reveal significant concerns from the FBI regarding the justification for the search warrant executed on Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in August 2022. These emails indicate that the FBI doubted the probable cause necessary for the search, while the Justice Department, under President Biden, proceeded without accommodating the FBI's reservations. This situation has led some lawmakers to suggest that Trump may have grounds to sue for civil rights violations.

1. FBI Doubts on Probable Cause: The FBI expressed concerns that there was not sufficient probable cause to support the search warrant against Trump, questioning if he had violated laws regarding classified documents.

2. Desire for Cooperation Ignored: The FBI agents suggested alternative approaches to resolve the issue, such as communicating with Trump's attorney to find a reasonable solution, but the Justice Department chose to expand the warrant's scope instead and refused further discussions.

3. Attempts at Compliance: Originally, on May 11, 2022, the Justice Department asked Trump to return all classified documents. Trump's attorney responded that the deadline was flexible, yet the department insisted there would be no extensions, which led to tensions.

4. Conflicted Opinions within the FBI: While some FBI agents pushed for caution and a professional approach to the search, others in the Justice Department disregarded concerns about optics, which could have impacted the search's perception as politically motivated.

5. The Role of Biden’s Administration: The Biden White House, along with the Justice Department, actively engaged in initiating the investigation into Trump’s handling of documents. They worked to waive Trump's executive privilege, enabling them to pursue the investigation further.

6. Potential Legal Outcomes: Congressman Tom Tiffany noted that the newly surfaced emails could provide grounds for Trump to sue the Justice Department or could prompt a criminal investigation into the DOJ’s handling of the process.

7. Upcoming Testimonies: The documents were submitted to Congress as Jack Smith, the special counsel overseeing investigations into Trump, is scheduled to give testimony regarding the federal prosecutions of Trump.

The declassified emails shed light on the internal disagreements within the FBI and the Justice Department regarding the search of Trump's property. The outcome of this ongoing investigation has the potential to influence both legal and political landscapes, particularly ahead of the upcoming elections. As discussions move forward, the implications of these findings may provide Trump with avenues for legal action based on civil rights or civil liberties violations concerning the search and investigation process. 

https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/biden-doj-expanded-warrant-refused-talks-trump-lawyer-discounted

The Marxist Transformation of the Democrat Party

Steve McCann discusses the evolution of the Democrat Party in the United States from its historical roots to its current Marxist/socialist leanings. It highlights how key events and figures, especially Barack Obama, have contributed to this transformation, marking it as a significant threat to the nation's founding principles.

• Historical Context: Since 1912, the Democrat Party has been viewed as America's left-wing political party, yet it has historically been connected, albeit tenuously, to the founding principles of the nation.

• Rise of Far-Left Influence: By 2020, the socialist wing of the party gained substantial ground, with 266 avowed socialists winning elections compared to only 86 in 2018. This shift solidified the party's leftist tendencies.

• Media Reporting: By summer and fall of 2025, even the mainstream media began reporting on the Marxist/socialist takeover of the party as a significant threat to American governance.

• Barack Obama's Influence: The article argues that the pivotal moment for the party's transformation was the 2008 election of Barack Obama, whose image and charisma distracted from his far-left beliefs, leading many loyal party members to overlook his agenda.

• Party Loyalty Over Ideology: The author criticizes Democratic officeholders for blindly supporting Obama despite his controversial policies, demonstrating a willingness to sacrifice principles for party loyalty.

• Legislative Changes: Under Obama's presidency, significant power was centralized in the executive branch, with controversial policies like ObamaCare being passed with minimal resistance from a congress largely supportive or intimidated by the president.

• Impact of Trump's Election: The unexpected victory of Donald Trump in 2016 exacerbated the Democratic Party's internal chaos, leading to a fixation on discrediting Trump, rather than addressing the leftist shift within their ranks.

• Emerging Leftist Groups: The article describes how alliances formed between established Democrats and newer far-left groups (e.g., the Democratic Socialists of America) facilitated the rise of younger, more radical elements within the party.

• Public Perception: A poll from July 2025 indicated that only 28% of Americans viewed the Democrat Party favorably, reflecting a growing discontent with its direction.

• Republican Response: The article criticizes establishment Republicans for failing to recognize and challenge the far-left agenda of the Democrat Party, suggesting a lack of urgency in confronting this perceived threat.

McCann concludes that the Democrat Party has transformed into a Marxist/socialist entity, representing a significant internal threat to America, especially as the old guard fades from power and more radical elements take control. The implications of this transformation are concerning for the political landscape and national identity, making it crucial for opposing parties to address these changes assertively. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/12/the_marxist_transformation_of_the_democrat_party.html

Gavin Newsom's Barbaric Stand on Young Children

California Governor Gavin Newsom's political rise and his controversial stance on gender issues affecting children. The author critiques Newsom’s political maneuvering within the Democratic Party and expresses strong opposition to his policies, particularly regarding transgender rights among young individuals.

1. Political Context:

• Gavin Newsom is positioned as a frontrunner for the Democratic nomination in the 2028 Presidential Election.

• Criticism of the Democratic Party’s elite decisions over regular voter participation in candidate selection.

• Historical context of previous Democratic primaries being influenced or rigged in favor of certain candidates, notably Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden.

2. Newsom’s Image and Governance:

• Newsom is described as a charismatic politician with a tendency to manipulate public perception.

• He has been criticized for his governance in California, with claims that he does not fit the ideal Democratic profile.

3. Controversial Policies on Gender:

• Newsom has made statements supporting transgender rights, particularly in terms of legislative achievements related to the LGBTQ community.

• He discusses the importance of fairness in sports for transgender individuals, suggesting a complex stance that tries to appeal to both progressive and moderate voters.

4. Concerns About Children and Gender Identity:

• The author raises concerns about young children making life-altering decisions regarding gender identity.

• Noting that children’s brains are not fully developed, the author argues against the influence of adults on children’s perceptions of gender fluidity.

5. Legislation and Parental Rights:

• Newsom has supported laws that allow children to change their gender identification without parental notification.

• This is seen as a coercive act rather than a choice made by the child, raising ethical concerns.

6. Statistical Context:

• The article cites high rates of suicidal thoughts and attempts among transgender individuals, linking this to the broader implications of Newsom’s policies.

7. Criticism of Terminology:

• The article critiques the language surrounding gender issues in legislation (e.g., terms like “gender-affirming care” vs. “chemical castration”).

• The author believes that the use of euphemisms masks the potential harm of these policies to children.

8. Calls for Protection:

• There is a call to protect children from what is deemed as “barbaric” practices related to gender transitions.

• The author refers to historical examples of extreme behaviors as a comparison to current policies, marking them as morally unacceptable.

The author concludes that Gavin Newsom’s advocacy for policies affecting young children’s gender identity is dangerous and morally reprehensible. Newsom is portrayed as unsuitable for leadership positions, including the presidency, due to his stance on these issues. The article reflects a deep concern for the welfare of children influenced by adult ideologies and the ramifications of gender transition practices. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/12/gavin_newsom_s_barbaric_stand_on_young_children.html

Liberal Washington Post Editorial Board Slams Mayor Johnson’s Budget Plan: ‘Chicago Has Lost its Mind’

The Washington Post Editorial Board has sharply criticized Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson's budget proposal, indicating a significant concern for the city's financial future. This critique is notable as it comes from an outlet typically aligned with liberal viewpoints.

1. Editorial Board's Concern: The Washington Post argues that Johnson’s budget plan does not address the city's deep financial issues, particularly underscoring that it relies on new taxes and raises already existing ones as a temporary solution to long-term problems.

2. Unfunded Pension Liabilities: Chicago faces serious structural issues, primarily due to underfunded pension programs. Johnson's proposed financial changes appear to be mere short-term fixes rather than genuine fiscal reform.

3. Historical Context: The critique reflects a broader historical pattern of short-sighted financial decisions in Chicago, such as the controversial 2008 parking meter deal, which still affects the city's budgeting negatively.

4. Increased Budget: Chicago's operating budget surged by nearly 40% from 2019 to 2025, largely benefiting from one-time federal pandemic funds. However, with these funds no longer available, the city could struggle to maintain programs initiated during the pandemic.

5. Tax Proposals: Johnson aims to tackle a $1.15 billion budget shortfall by increasing taxes on businesses and introducing a head tax effecting large employers, which may further hinder economic growth and job creation in Chicago.

6. Reactions to the Critique: In response to the Washington Post's editorial, Johnson dismissed the information as incorrect, suggesting a recurring theme of media misrepresentation of his policies.

7. Comparison with Previous Administration: The article notes that while former Mayor Lori Lightfoot faced criticism, Johnson's management appears to be under even more scrutiny, raising questions about the city's leadership.

The Washington Post's critique highlights the critical financial challenges that Chicago faces and questions the efficacy of Mayor Johnson's budget proposals. The reliance on increased taxation and short-term solutions raises concerns about the future of Chicago's economy and governance, as the city grapples with its fiscal realities. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/12/whoa-liberal-washington-post-editorial-board-slams-mayor/

Chinese Investment Firm Funded By Yale and Princeton Buys Slice of Shanghai Tech Company That Works With China's Military

Recent news highlights concerns regarding U. S. universities investing in a Chinese biotech company linked to the military and human rights abuses. The focus is on the investments made by prestigious institutions like Yale and Princeton, and the implications for U. S.-China relations.

1. Investment Details:

• Hillhouse Investment Management, a Chinese firm backed by Yale and Princeton, purchased part of WuXi AppTec, a company involved with the Chinese military and accused of aiding Beijing in identifying Uyghurs in Xinjiang.

2. Background of WuXi AppTec:

• Lawmakers, including former Congressman Mike Gallagher, criticized WuXi AppTec for operating genetic testing centers linked to the People's Liberation Army (PLA), which they argue is fundamental to the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) policies that have led to the genocide of Uyghurs.

3. University Involvement:

• Major American universities, including Yale, have invested significant sums in Hillhouse, with Yale reportedly receiving high returns on its investments.

• Concerns have grown in Congress about U. S. funds inadvertently supporting Chinese aggression and human rights violations, prompting calls for stronger regulations on university investments in China.

4. Legislative Response:

• House Speaker Mike Johnson and other lawmakers advocate for stopping investments that support China’s military efforts.

• Proposed legislation, such as Rep. Greg Murphy's Protecting Endowments From Our Adversaries Act, seeks to impose taxes on university endowment investments in Chinese firms.

5. Hillhouse's Compromising Links:

• Hillhouse has been scrutinized for its involvement in technology companies tied to human rights abuses in China, including Yitu Technology, which has been blacklisted by the U. S.

• The founder, Lei Zhang, has a history of strong ties to Yale and links to the CCP.

6. Broader Context:

• The Chinese government has detained approximately one million Uyghurs in reeducation camps since 2017, associating these actions with severe human rights violations, leading to the U. S. labeling it as genocide in 2021.

The financial links between prestigious U. S. universities and a Chinese company with military ties raise serious ethical and political questions. As Congress seeks to address these issues, the implications for U. S.-China relations and university investment strategies could be significant, demanding careful scrutiny and action from stakeholders. 

https://freebeacon.com/china/chinese-investment-firm-funded-by-yale-and-princeton-buys-slice-of-shanghai-tech-company-that-works-with-chinas-military/

Side Effects of 30 Antidepressants Ranked and Compared: Lancet Study

A groundbreaking study published in The Lancet analyzed 30 different antidepressants to understand their physical side effects, providing valuable insights for patients and doctors.

• The study is the first comprehensive ranking of antidepressants, revealing that they differ significantly in their effects on weight, heart health, and blood pressure.

• Data from over 58,000 participants was used for the analysis, which included a range of drugs, from older tricyclic antidepressants like amitriptyline to modern selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as sertraline (Zoloft).

• Some medications studied may not be available in the United States.

This comparison equips both patients and healthcare providers with critical information that can help in selecting the most appropriate antidepressant based on potential side effects. 

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/side-effects-of-30-antidepressants-ranked-and-compared-lancet-study-5939811?utm_source=partner&utm_campaign=ZeroHedge&src_src=partner&src_cmp=ZeroHedge

No, the “Appeal to Heaven” Flag is Not a “Christian Nationalist Flag”

The "Appeal to Heaven" flag, which has its roots in the American Revolution, has recently sparked controversy again due to its association with debates about Christian nationalism and natural rights. This flag, also known as the "Free Pine" flag, has been linked to political figures and certain events that have raised questions about its meaning and use in modern contexts.

1. Background of the Flag:

• The "Appeal to Heaven" flag was used during the American Revolution and has been raised by various groups over the years.

• The controversy involves media assertions labeling it as a "Christian nationalist" symbol, particularly its display outside the D. C. office of Education Department official Murray Bessette.

2. Recent Media Coverage:

• A USA Today article highlighted the flag's presence at Bessette's office, referencing its use during the January 6th insurrection.

• Critics question the validity of sources such as Wikipedia used in the article, which has faced claims of bias.

3. Historical Context:

• George Washington commissioned the Pine Tree flag, and its motto derives from John Locke’s writings on natural rights.

• Reverend Jonathan Mayhew's sermons in the 18th century challenged the idea that citizens must submit to authority, citing that denying rights was contrary to God’s will.

4. Natural Rights:

• Locke posited that natural rights exist independently of government, and when these rights are threatened, citizens may justifiably appeal to a higher authority (Heaven).

• This belief underpinning the flag emphasizes that rights belong to individuals universally, regardless of government.

5. Relation to Current Events:

• The discussions around the flag echo recent remarks by politicians, notably Senator Tim Kaine, who criticized beliefs in God-given rights as extreme. His comments drew parallels between these beliefs and those of religious extremists.

• A nominee for a State Department position, Riley Barnes, faced similar scrutiny for asserting that rights are inherent from the Creator rather than from government.

6. Cultural Implications:

• The debates surrounding the flag reflect a growing resistance against the idea of inherent natural rights, a concept fundamental to the founding of the United States.

• Proponents argue that the flag symbolizes the values that shaped the nation and should be accepted by all Americans as part of their heritage.

The Appeal to Heaven flag represents a significant part of American history and the foundational belief in natural rights bestowed upon individuals by a higher authority, rather than by any government. The ongoing controversies regarding its display indicate a broader discussion about the understanding and acceptance of these rights in contemporary society. This flag should thus be viewed not as a symbol of extremism but as an embodiment of the principles that form the bedrock of the United States. 

https://jonathanturley.org/2025/12/16/no-the-appeal-to-heaven-flag-is-not-a-christian-nationalist-flag/#more-239069

How California’s GOP Wasted $45 Million for Nothing

 The California Republican Party (GOP) has been struggling in state politics, facing major challenges from the dominant Democratic Party. This summary explores the decline of the California GOP, issues with its strategies, and the consequences of recent elections, particularly surrounding Proposition 50.

Decline of GOP Influence

• The Democrats control a significant majority in the California State Assembly and Senate.

• Republicans have not won a statewide office since 2006, losing influence in major cities and sectors.

• Special interests allied with the Democrats, such as public sector unions and corporations, further diminish Republican influence.

Public Perception and Funding Disparities

• The GOP suffers from a poor public image branded as racist, sexist, and tied to big corporations, driven by Democratic efforts.

• Democrats outspend Republicans by significant margins, making it challenging for the GOP to compete in elections.

Missed Opportunities in Recent Elections

• The Republican Party wasted $45 million attempting to defeat Proposition 50, which was largely anticipated to pass.

• Instead of investing in defeating the proposition, GOP leaders missed an opportunity to strengthen their voter base and galvanize support for upcoming elections.

Proposed Strategies for Future Success

• Two rational choices for Republicans were identified: conceding the election or focusing on grassroots efforts to improve voter registration and participation.

• The GOP should prioritize face-to-face engagement in communities, instead of relying solely on television and social media ads.

Acting for the Future

• A concerted effort could have been made to rally support against the perceived dishonesty of Proposition 50 and register new voters through direct outreach.

• With California's shifting voter demographics—growing numbers of "decline to state" voters—the GOP could appeal to these groups by promoting a platform focused on accessibility, competition, and accountability in energy, housing, and water policies.

Stagnation in GOP Registration

• Over two decades, the number of registered Republicans decreased, while the number of Democrats increased significantly.

• In contrast, independent voters have risen notably, illustrating a shift in voter sentiment that GOP could potentially leverage.

The California Republican Party faces a critical need for new strategies and leadership to reclaim influence in the state. By recognizing its failures and adapting to current political dynamics, the GOP can create a more effective strategy to rebuild its voter base and compete in future elections. With changing demographics and public sentiments, forging connections through grassroots efforts presents a potential pathway for revitalization in California's political landscape.

https://amgreatness.com/2025/12/17/how-californias-gop-wasted-45-million-for-nothing/

Bush v. Gore in retrospect

"Bush v. Gore," decided on December 12, 2000, is a pivotal Supreme Court case that determined the outcome of the closely contested 2000 presidential election. Its legacy is debated, particularly regarding implications for election law and perceptions of judicial impartiality.

1. Election Context:

• The 2000 presidential election was between Democratic candidate Al Gore and Republican candidate George W. Bush.

• Al Gore won the popular vote, but the election hinged on Florida’s 25 electoral votes.

• Initial calls for Florida's results were retracted, leading to uncertainty about who won.

2. Legal Proceedings:

• After the election, Bush was initially declared the winner in Florida by 537 votes, prompting Gore to contest the results.

• Florida's courts became involved, with decisions about counting uncounted ballots. The Florida Supreme Court eventually ordered a recount.

3. Supreme Court's Decision:

• On December 12, 2000, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to stop the recount, citing violations of the Equal Protection Clause. The court found that there were no established standards for counting votes, which could lead to inconsistent treatment of ballots.

• The ruling concluded that counting could not continue as it would miss the "safe harbor" deadline for states to certify their electors.

4. Dissenting Opinions:

• The dissenting justices criticized the majority's ruling, suggesting it undermined public trust in the judiciary. Justice Stevens, in his dissent, expressed concern over the court's credibility.

5. Aftermath and Legacy:

• The decision did not establish a legal precedent for future cases, as the court indicated their ruling was confined to the specific situation at hand.

• There remains uncertainty about who would have won the election if all votes had been counted, with various studies showing conflicting results.

6. Perception of Partisanship:

• The ruling has fostered the perception that the Supreme Court's decision was influenced by the justices’ political beliefs rather than legal principles.

• This case has led to ongoing debate about judicial independence and the role of the Supreme Court in political matters.

7. Comparative Analysis with Current Court:

• Current interpretations of similar issues raise questions about whether the court would decide similarly today.

• Recent cases indicate a trend towards limiting federal court involvement in election-related disputes, suggesting the conservative majority may favor political solutions over judicial intervention.

"Bush v. Gore" remains a significant topic in discussions about the Supreme Court, electoral integrity, and the perception of judicial impartiality. While it resolved the election in favor of Bush, it also led to questions about fairness in the electoral process and the role of the judiciary in political matters. The debates surrounding this case highlight continuing concerns about the potential partisan influences on the court and the importance of ensuring public confidence in judicial decisions. 

https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/12/bush-v-gore-in-retrospect/

Dem Chuck Schumer Says Obliterating Narco-Terrorists Who Poison Americans Really Turns His Stomach

The current political landscape reflects ongoing tensions and controversies surrounding various issues, particularly drug enforcement and the actions of specific political figures. Key discussions include reactions to military responses to drug trafficking and the statements from prominent politicians like Chuck Schumer.

1. Chuck Schumer's Reaction: Senator Chuck Schumer has publicly expressed his discomfort with military actions against Venezuelan narco-terrorists, stating that such strikes “turn his stomach. ” He met with Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio to demand transparency regarding unedited footage of the military operations.

2. Criticism of Schumer: Reactions from various online commentators criticize Schumer for his stance, suggesting that his outrage indicates a disconnect with the perspectives of many Americans. They also question why he prioritizes the lives of foreign drug operatives over domestic drug-related casualties.

3. Public Sentiment: Many commenters online interpret Schumer’s discontent as a sign that the military actions against drug dealers might be justified. If Schumer is unsettled, they assert, it may imply the government's actions align with American interests.

4. Political Dynamics: The political discourse surrounding Schumer also highlights accusations that some politicians may have vested interests related to drug trafficking, raising skepticism among voters concerning their loyalty to American citizens versus foreign entities.

5. Broader Implications: The ongoing discussion reflects broader themes concerning drug enforcement policies, national security, and the responsibilities of politicians to the American public. Critics juxtapose the moral dilemmas facing lawmakers against the real-world consequences of drug violence and its impact on communities.

This commentary encapsulates a significant moment in current political debate, focusing on the interactions between military strategy, political accountability, and public sentiment. Schumer’s pronounced discomfort emphasizes the contentious nature of drug war policies, revealing deeper divides within the political landscape and the views of concerned constituents. 

https://twitchy.com/warren-squire/2025/12/17/chuck-schumer-reveals-he-stormed-up-to-hegseth-and-rubio-narco-terrorist-strikes-turn-my-stomach-n2422937

Witnesses testify during second day of California's Prop. 50 redistricting lawsuit trial

The ongoing lawsuit regarding California's Proposition 50 redistricting has seen significant developments as witnesses testified in court. The lawsuit, which was filed by Republican Assemblymember David Tangipa, challenges the newly drawn congressional districts in California.

1. Background of Proposition 50:

• Proposition 50 was passed in a special election on November 4, 2025, with about 65% support.

• This proposition created new congressional districts intended to help Democrats gain additional seats in the house during the 2026 midterm elections.

2. Lawsuit Basis:

• David Tangipa filed a lawsuit claiming that the redrawn districts do not comply with the Voting Rights Act standards.

• He accused Paul Mitchell, a key consultant for the redistricting process, of not showing up to defend the drawn maps in court or at committee meetings, suggesting that this indicates he has something to hide.

3. Hearing Details:

• During the trial at the federal courthouse in Los Angeles, a three-judge panel heard testimonies from various witnesses.

• Testimonies included insights from another mapping consultant and a Stockton resident who voted for Prop. 50.

4. Concerns Raised by Plaintiffs:

• The plaintiffs argue that the new district maps were drawn to racially gerrymander the state.

• Sean Trende's report, used by the plaintiffs, focused primarily on race and political affiliation, allegedly neglecting other important redistricting factors.

5. Government's Position:

• Officials from Governor Gavin Newsom's office stated that Mitchell cannot be compelled to testify and expressed confidence in winning the case.

• They affirm that the newly drawn districts will be effective for the 2026, 2028, and 2030 elections, with subsequent redistricting to be done by an independent commission based on the 2030 census.

6. Impact on Republican Seats:

• The lawsuit could affect five Republican congressional representatives in California, potentially resulting in them losing their seats due to the changes made by Prop. 50.

• Specific representatives include Kevin Kiley, Doug LaMalfa, Darrell Issa, Ken Calvert, and David Valadao.

7. Community Testimony:

• Ines Ruiz-Huston, a resident from Stockton who supported the Proposition, testified about the importance of having representation that addresses local needs for low-income families.

The Proposition 50 redistricting lawsuit in California is actively unfolding, with critical testimonies highlighting the contention over the drawing of congressional district maps. The outcome of this case may significantly influence the political landscape in California, particularly for Republican representatives facing potential seat losses in upcoming elections. The government maintains confidence in their legal position, while the plaintiffs continue to challenge the legality and fairness of the newly drawn districts. 

https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/witnesses-testify-during-second-day-prop-50-lawsuit-trial

All 1,600 Kentucky battery plant employees laid off as Ford pivots away from EV business

 Ford Motor Company announced significant layoffs at its battery plant in Glendale, Kentucky, affecting all 1,600 employees. This decision is part of a shift away from electric vehicles (EVs) toward a new focus on battery storage for data centers and utility companies.

• Layoffs and Shift in Production:

• The Glendale battery plant was initially established for electric vehicle batteries but will transition to producing batteries for data storage and other utilities.

• Ford plans to fully transform the plant by late 2027 to focus on more profitable ventures, leading to all employees being laid off.

• Company's Profit Loss:

• Ford is restructuring due to significant financial losses, amounting to $19 billion, related to its EV business. The company's CEO, Jim Farley, stated that the decision to pivot was driven by a lack of profitability in their current EV line.

• Future Job Opportunities:

• Although all 1,600 employees are laid off, Ford will be hiring 2,100 workers for the new battery storage operations. A company spokesperson indicated that laid-off employees would be encouraged to apply for these new positions.

• State Support:

• Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear's office is working to assist affected employees with job placement and support services. The state remains optimistic about its status as a leader in electric vehicle battery manufacturing despite Ford's changes.

• Industry Context:

• Ford's pivot indicates a broader trend in the automotive industry where demand forecasts are leading companies to reconsider their strategies in EV manufacturing.

• Reports suggest demand for EVs has not met expectations, prompting Ford to rethink its operational focus and investment strategies in the light of changing emission regulations and market conditions.

• Impact on Regional Economy:

• Local lawmakers are cautiously optimistic about the transition, emphasizing the importance of ensuring that Ford meets its commitments to the community and its employees.

Ford's shift from electric vehicle production to battery storage systems highlights a significant change in its business strategy, resulting in extensive layoffs. While this move poses challenges for employees and the local economy, the company aims to adapt to market conditions and seek more profitable ventures moving forward.

https://www.wdrb.com/news/business/all-1-600-kentucky-battery-plant-employees-laid-off-as-ford-pivots-away-from-ev/article_32ef2a58-eb9d-4bf4-820d-c2417b6793ea.html

Acting ICE Director Denies Ilhan Omar’s Claims that Agents Pulled Over Her Son: ‘Zero Record’

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) claimed that her son was pulled over by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents after visiting Target. The Acting ICE Director, Todd Lyons, disputed this claim, stating that there is no record of such an incident.

Ilhan Omar stated in an interview that her son was stopped by ICE agents and released after showing his passport. She emphasized that he carries his passport to avoid issues if stopped.

• ICE’s Response: Todd Lyons, the Acting ICE Director, denied any record of the alleged traffic stop, calling Omar's accusations unfounded and accusing her of trying to vilify the agency without evidence.

• Spokesperson’s Support: Omar's spokesperson, Jacklyn Rogers, maintained that the incident did occur, branding it as racial profiling and expressing skepticism about ICE's record-keeping practices.

• Context of Criticism: This incident comes amidst ongoing scrutiny of Omar, who has faced backlash for her criticisms of the Trump administration's immigration policies and the handling of Somalian migrant welfare fraud in Minnesota. She has been accused of fostering divisions and has described the backlash against her as hate-driven.

• Fraud Cases: Omar has been linked to significant fraud cases involving Somalian migrants in her state, notably a child food assistance scheme that allegedly defrauded $250 million and other welfare fraud matters totaling over $550 million. Critics argue that Omar’s involvement in these issues raises questions about her integrity.

• Political Backlash: Fellow lawmakers, including House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-MN), have publicly criticized Omar, suggesting she is complicit in the fraud cases associated with her community and calling her an anti-Semite.

The debate surrounding Ilhan Omar's claims about her son and ICE highlights significant tensions in discussions about immigration, community issues, and political accountability. As both sides maintain their positions, the allegations against Omar continue to spark debate among lawmakers and the public. 

https://www.breitbart.com/pre-viral/2025/12/16/acting-ice-director-denies-ilhan-omars-claims-that-agents-pulled-over-her-son-zero-record/

MTG has announced her engagement to Brian Glenn

 Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (MTG) has announced her engagement to Brian Glenn, the lead White House correspondent for the conservative outlet Real America's Voice, sharing the news on social media on December 15, 2025.

 Glenn first revealed the engagement on X, posting a photo of the couple at Joe’s Seafood, Prime Steak & Stone Crab in Washington, D.C., with the caption, “She said 'yes’”.

 Greene reposted the image, adding, “Happily ever after!!! I love you @brianglenntv!!!”.

The proposal took place at the popular political dining spot, where Glenn had arranged for their usual table with a curtain for privacy, and the same waiter who served former President Donald Trump attended to them.

 Greene, 51, was seen wearing a large engagement ring she helped design.

 The couple began publicly dating in 2023 after both ended their long-term marriages.

 Perry Greene filed for divorce from Marjorie in 2022, followed just three days later by Brian Glenn filing for divorce from his wife Kerry, a sequence of events that has drawn public attention despite Glenn’s insistence the events were unrelated.

Their relationship has attracted scrutiny due to the intersection of media and politics, particularly as Glenn covers the Trump administration while being romantically linked to a prominent Republican figure who has recently broken with Trump over policy disagreements and her push for the release of Justice Department documents related to the Epstein case—actions that contributed to her decision to resign from Congress on January 5, 2026.

 Glenn has expressed support for her decision, stating, “No one fought for America harder than you”.

Following her departure from Congress, Glenn plans to relocate to Georgia to be with Greene full-time, though he intends to continue his journalism career from a new studio being built there, maintaining his support for Trump’s policies.

 Republican colleagues have publicly congratulated the couple, with Rep. Tim Burchett of Tennessee offering to officiate the wedding for free.

Part II – The Quiet Coup: Inside the Republican Shadow Network Rebuilding the Right

 

By Staff Writer

South Carolina Bulletin

Dec 16, 2025

Some revolutions end with explosions; others fizzle into committee assignments. But occasionally, they fade into the shadows reconstituting their energy into networks too decentralized to crush and too coordinated to ignore.

That’s where the Republican Party stands today. While House infighting dominates the headlines, and figures like Marjorie Taylor Greene and Nancy Mace trade shots over the meaning of conservatism, a quieter, more strategic reorganization is underway among the party’s governors, mega-donors, and exiled policy minds.

Call it the shadow leadership network a constellation of power brokers rebuilding the GOP away from Washington’s televised circus.

https://samueleburns.substack.com/p/part-ii-the-quiet-coup-inside-the

South Carolina’s Hidden War; Water, Contamination, and Bureaucratic Betrayal

 

Charleston’s Slow Drowning: A Managed Disaster Tidal Reality

South Carolina Bulletin

Dec 16, 2025

By Staff Writer

Charleston experiences 14–18 sunny-day floods annually triple the rate from the year 2000. The cause is a mixture of:

Natural sea‑level rise about 3 mm/year regionally,

Land subsidence from over‑pumping groundwater, and

Uncontrolled urban expansion sealing wetlands beneath asphalt.

Every new development promises resilience features raised roadways, artificial drainage retention ponds, or engineered dunes. Yet, according to former Army Corps engineers, 80 % of projects worsen downstream flooding, transferring water pressure rather than reducing it.

https://samueleburns.substack.com/p/south-carolinas-hidden-war-water