A non-profit organization called the Climate Emergency Fund boasts that their mission is to "Raise funds for and make grants to the disruptive nonviolent climate movement." This effort has been extraordinarily successful.
"Climate Emergency Fund has quickly become the ATM that radical environmental activists turn to fund their latest disruptions," Caitlin Sutherland, executive director of the conservative watchdog Americans for Public Trust, told the Washington Examiner.
Climate Emergency Fund is paying people through their grants to close down schools for a month.
As the Climate Emergency Fund is paying activists to defile great works of art, shouldn't Climate Emergency Fund be responsible for the restoration to repair the damage to these priceless works of art?
As the Climate Emergency Fund is paying activists to damage parliament, shouldn't they also be responsible for repairing the damage?
"We need to wake up," said Margaret Klein Salamon, executive director of the U.S.-based Climate Emergency Fund, which has channeled millions of dollars to 95 "Disruptive activism" groups since it was set up in 2019.
Well, as I read their statement below, the Climate Emergency Fund states that they are basically a money laundering organization: they take donations, then they take the risk for laundering the money to their favorite organization - which then conducts illegal activity, for which CEF then asserts no knowledge of - that is, until they brag about it in their annual report or on their website, all the while again claiming that they only fund "Legal and eligible" activities.
No comments:
Post a Comment