An Internal Revenue Service whistleblower hinted to congressional leaders last week that the FBI improperly blocked aspects of the Hunter Biden investigation and that Biden-appointed U.S. attorneys blocked an indictment against the president's son on tax charges.
The whistleblower's attorney, Mark Lytle, reportedly maintains his client can "Identify contemporaneous witnesses to corroborate his claims of political interference." The whistleblower will "Be able to talk about these meetings that he attended, that were with both agents and prosecutors and how he summarized those meetings and put it in writing and distributed those to folks within the IRS and sometimes other agents," Lytle claims, adding that those contemporaneous memoranda and emails will "End up corroborating his credibility." Sources also maintain DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz has already begun reviewing documents that purportedly corroborate the whistleblower's claims.
IRS Agent Is Nonpartisan and Credentialed The whistleblower's apparent nonpartisan pedigree is another reason for participants in the Biden protection racket to be afraid.
As an IRS special agent for more than 10 years, the whistleblower reportedly has been "Trusted with international investigations," received several commendations, and taught "Other agents how to properly do investigations." His lengthy experience will strengthen his claims that "Protocols that would normally be followed by career law enforcement professionals in similar circumstances" were not followed in the case of the politically connected Hunter Biden.
In the case of Hunter Biden, both career investigators and career prosecutors in the DOJ tax division signed off on the recommended charges, the whistleblower maintains.
The whistleblower's complaints indicated charges had been recommended and approved by the tax division but never materialized because the Biden-appointed U.S. attorneys did not seek grand jury indictments as recommended.
Either way, the whistleblower's claim conflicts with Garland's testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee that he had left the matter of Hunter Biden to the Delaware "U.S. Attorney's office and the FBI squad working with him." Garland's testimony suggests that whoever instituted those "Strictures" acted without the authority to do so.
No comments:
Post a Comment