The CDC caused an uproar in early September 2021, after it changed its definitions of "Vaccination" and "Vaccine." For years, the CDC had set definitions for vaccination/vaccine that discussed immunity.
The effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine falls over time, with an Israeli study reported in August 2021 as showing the vaccine being "Only 16% effective against symptomatic infection for those individuals who had two doses of the shot back in January." The CDC recognizes the waning effectiveness, thus explaining their promotion of booster shots.
Of course, the usual suspects defended the CDC. The Washington Post, for example, cast doubt that the CDC changed the definition because of issues with the COVID-19 vaccines.
CDC emails we obtained via the Freedom of Information Act reveal CDC worries with how the performance of the COVID-19 vaccines didn't match the CDC's own definition of "Vaccine"/"Vaccination".
In one August 2021 e-mail, a CDC employee cited to complaints that "Right-wing covid-19 deniers are using your 'vaccine' definition to argue that mRNA vaccines are not vaccines".
Getting no response, there was a follow-up e-mail a week later: "The definition of vaccine we have posted is problematic and people are using it to claim the COVID-19 vaccine is not a vaccine based on our own definition."
Why have them improve their vaccines when you can just change the definition of vaccine to fit their ineffective vaccines?
https://technofog.substack.com/p/cdc-emails-our-definition-of-vaccine?justPublished=true
No comments:
Post a Comment