At the same time as the alleged DNC hack, there were similar reports regarding the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee's server as well as DNC Chairman John Podesta's personal email devices.
Despite the spin, the whole DNC hack story had just flatlined.
The questions should have focused on what information Perkins Coie allowed to be transmitted to the FBI. The closest anyone came to getting at this issue was when Rep. Mike Conaway asked, "Did the DNC restrict anything that you shared with the FBI or that the FBI asked for? Did they tell you 'no' at any point?".
What? Redacted? Restriction? Does this mean that the DNC withheld some of CrowdStrike's findings and work product from the FBI?
In an effort to debunk the DNC hack story, Stone's lawyers requested that the Department of Justice produce the full, unredacted CrowdStrike investigative report.
Was there a hack of the DNC server? Don't ask the FBI or the DOJ. They only know what Perkins Coie - which was representing a client that was heavily invested in spreading the Russian hack story - allowed them to know.
Thanks to the release of Shawn Henry's testimony before the HPSCI, what we now know is that CrowdStrike never found any "Direct," "Concrete," or other evidence that proves the DNC emails "Actually left" the DNC server.
https://spectator.org/john-durham-and-the-amazing-disappearing-dnc-hack/
No comments:
Post a Comment