The court described Giuliani's offenses as, "Statements [he] made following the 2020 election at press conferences, state legislative hearings, radio broadcasts, podcasts, television appearances and one court appearance."
Pennsylvania lawyers Trump had hired before the election withdrew on the eve of the hearing.
The premise of the challenge was that votes had been improperly counted in certain Florida precincts and that Gore actually won the election.
Boies mounted a spirited challenge to the election but lost.
David Boies could be a zealous advocate in the collision of facts that resolved the 2000 election, even though he lost, because civilization requires it.
There is nothing inherently wrong with probing for facts about election tampering.
Obviously, the powers that be do not want an honest assessment of disputed facts about the election.
https://thenationalpulse.com/analysis/the-persecution-of-rudy-giuliani/
No comments:
Post a Comment