Nancy Pelosi proclaimed Thursday that the party-line impeachment vote in the House of Representatives was about protecting "Democracy." Madame Speaker was actually close to speaking the truth for once, because what the impeachment circus is about is protecting Democrats, particularly the Obama administration officials who sought to sabotage President Trump both during the 2016 election campaign and after Trump won.
A protégé of former CIA Director John Brennan has been identified by Paul Sperry of RealClearInvestigations as the so-called "Whistleblower" whose claims were the proximate cause of the Schiff-Pelosi impeachment proceeding against Trump.
Perhaps the most troubling revelation in Sperry's article was that Ciaramella also worked closely with Alexandra Chalupa, a Democratic National Committee operative who, in 2016, left her DNC job to pursue her own "Investigation" of the Trump campaign.
"Everyone knows who he is. CNN knows. The Washington Post knows. The New York Times knows. Congress knows. The White House knows. Even the president knows who he is," said Fred Fleitz, a former CIA analyst and national security adviser to Trump, who has fielded dozens of calls from the media.
Some suspect Ciaramella was one of the original leakers who told the media about classified conversations Trump had with Russian diplomat Sergei Lavrov.
Because Trump did not hesitate to release the transcript of that call why was it necessary for Schiff to hold secret hearings about this? Anyone could read the transcript and agree with what National Security Council official Tim Morrison told Schiff's committee: "I want to be clear, I was not concerned that anything illegal was discussed." Yet Schiff apparently wished to create the impression that he is privy to scandalous secrets that justify an impeachment proceeding, and why?
Given the role that Brennan's protégé Ciaramella has reportedly played in Schiff's probe, we have to ask: Is this "Ukrainegate" impeachment a continuation of the former CIA director's effort to cover up what he did to sabotage Trump's presidency?
https://spectator.org/this-impeachment-is-a-cover-up/
A protégé of former CIA Director John Brennan has been identified by Paul Sperry of RealClearInvestigations as the so-called "Whistleblower" whose claims were the proximate cause of the Schiff-Pelosi impeachment proceeding against Trump.
Perhaps the most troubling revelation in Sperry's article was that Ciaramella also worked closely with Alexandra Chalupa, a Democratic National Committee operative who, in 2016, left her DNC job to pursue her own "Investigation" of the Trump campaign.
"Everyone knows who he is. CNN knows. The Washington Post knows. The New York Times knows. Congress knows. The White House knows. Even the president knows who he is," said Fred Fleitz, a former CIA analyst and national security adviser to Trump, who has fielded dozens of calls from the media.
Some suspect Ciaramella was one of the original leakers who told the media about classified conversations Trump had with Russian diplomat Sergei Lavrov.
Because Trump did not hesitate to release the transcript of that call why was it necessary for Schiff to hold secret hearings about this? Anyone could read the transcript and agree with what National Security Council official Tim Morrison told Schiff's committee: "I want to be clear, I was not concerned that anything illegal was discussed." Yet Schiff apparently wished to create the impression that he is privy to scandalous secrets that justify an impeachment proceeding, and why?
Given the role that Brennan's protégé Ciaramella has reportedly played in Schiff's probe, we have to ask: Is this "Ukrainegate" impeachment a continuation of the former CIA director's effort to cover up what he did to sabotage Trump's presidency?
https://spectator.org/this-impeachment-is-a-cover-up/
No comments:
Post a Comment