I
have long been suspicious of the practice of medical psychiatry. There
are a number of reasons but I will not dwell on them here. But rest
assured I do not mean to suggest psychology is fake science. I think
much good can come from talking therapy administered by skilled
professionals. My beef is with Psychiatrists and their medication powers
and I believe far too many of them are self serving egomaniacs. I have
little real evidence to make the charge. My thoughts come from
the readings and observations made over the years. I find it disturbing
that so called medical professionals can collectively ban together and
render a determination of the mental health of someone without ever
meeting them in person or conducting a series of
interviews/tests/analysis to make such a determination. Most everyone
recognizes mental heath problems are extraordinarily complex and often
hard to establish without extensive efforts. To me such behavior
suggests supreme egoistic personalities are at hand. And, that to me is
dangerous. They seem to think their superior medical geniuses is real
enough to openly admit they actually think they have such powers. This
is the item which prompted these remarks.
https://www.westernjournal.com/group-psychiatrists-lobbying-testify-trumps-mental-health-despite-never-examining/?
Without knowing any of them it just seems obvious to me that they have
allowed their personal political views to cloud any professional
psychiatric or clinical observations in this case or any other similar
cases they may have rendered as an individual or as a part of a like
minded psychiatric group. It also seems to be a display of "group think"
behavior which reeks of a serious absence of professionalism. It is
notable that they did not render a similar assessment of former
president Obama who seems to exhibit a number of pathological
tendencies. Anyway, that is my two cents worth which is probably worth
close to zero.
If this does not bother you, it should.
Quote: "Elementary schools teach children at the most fragile and
impressionable ages. Ages six to twelve — children are innocent,
persuadable, malleable. For the proper care of our children, elementary
schools must be held to the highest standards of care and objectivity.
But what happens to these children when leftist politics invade and
alter their social studies curriculum to teach our kids that America is a
country of hate, inequity, and oppression? What happens when children
no longer recite the Pledge of Allegiance or celebrate Veterans Day, but
instead regurgitate the words “racism is a primary institution of the
United States” and celebrate “Indigenous Peoples Day”? What happens to
our future? Do we lose America as we know it? Do elementary schools fail
our children? Wake up America. Based on information published by the
propagandists behind the Pollyanna
“Racial Literacy Curriculum,” elementary schools in Virginia, North
Carolina, New Jersey, New York, California, Rhode Island, Missouri, and
Illinois have all adopted the mind-blowing, politically-charged
brainwash that they tout as education. Topics for Kindergarten to Grade 8
include: implicit bias, white privilege, intersectionality, LGBTQ
issues, racism as a “primary institution of the US,” and other such
leftist agenda talking points. Children are taught to see skin color
first, to assess the negative societal bias against that skin color, and
then to fix it by providing preferential treatment to that group. Of
course fixing it is complicated. So, children are taught to engage in
political activism in order to achieve this goal. Make no mistake, I am
not engaging in political hyperbole; the Pollyanna curriculum is clear
about their political activism objectives: “By the end of the unit,
students will set commitments for rectifying current social ills, such
as learning and planning how to carry out anti-racist activism and/or
social advocacy in their communities and/or to improve their everyday
lives.” Leftist political engagement is thus an educational requirement,
an “objective” standard."
https://townhall.com/columnists/marinamedvin/2019/11/12/new-leftist-racial-literacy-curriculum-brainwashing-elementary-school-children-n2556310?
There is no doubt that the political left is actively seeking to
destroy our country. We all have an obligation to work to stop this
insidious effort. Lobby your school board, your elected officials,
local, state and federal and demand they take action to reverse this
invasion.
While left wing progressive Democrat
politicians running the state of California claim Donald Trump
is responsible for California wildfires because of his dismissal of
their firm belief in the reality of popular but unscientific Climate
Science. He alone is the cause of all those wildfires even though they
have struggled with them for years. However, facts suggest they are
their own worst enemy. It is abundantly clear that their projection of
their wildfire problems on to Trump is grossly flawed. Those problems
squarely rests on the backs of their ridiculously stupid environmental,
insurance and land use laws. This item explains. Quote: "California's
Wonky Insurance and Land Use Regulations Make the State's Wildfires
Deadlier and More Destructive. The state has made it exceedingly
difficult to build in fire-safe cities, while also making insurance
rates in high-risk areas artificially cheap." And, amid a number of
other reasons is this: "Lost in the mix, however, is the way that
existing development restrictions in fire-safe regions have encouraged
home-building in high-risk areas, while perverse insurance regulations
have shielded property owners from the true costs of living there.
"Ultimately there are people living in high-risk zones who cannot afford
to bear the full risk of the places they've chosen to live," says R.J.
Lehmann, an insurance policy expert at R Street Institute. "They didn't
have accurate information through market signals." A lot of these
problems, he says, can be traced back to a 1988 state ballot measure,
Prop. 103, that created an elected insurance commissioner who must
approve rate increases proposed by insurance companies. "It's unpopular
when insurers either raise rates or don't renew policies so [the
insurance commissioner] follows those politics even if the market
conditions or the environmental conditions would recommend otherwise,"
Lehmann tells Reason."
https://reason.com/2019/10/30/californias-wonky-insurance-and-land-use-regulations-make-the-states-wildfires-deadlier-and-more-destructive/
This
item reveals just how insane way too many progressive Democrat
socialists have become. This Democrat Senator puts Climate Science in
the religion class rather than the science class. So, it seems the
truth is out. They think that what people "feel" emotionally about
certain matters is more important than factual science. That is a real
problem if not reversed which needs to happen real, real, real soon.
http://forliberty.news/2019/11/12/senator-mazie-hirono-makes-surprising-climate-admission/
You also know that some of them think there actually may be as many as
100 sexual genders. Unbelievable, right??? Some of these people really
need some serious mental health help before they go completely off the
deep end.
Here is another example of dysfunctional thinking that populates too many on the political left. Quote: "Ben
Shapiro Busts the Left’s Biggest Myth About Abortion." And, "Leftists
love to focus on one particular correlation, which is the drop in crime
with the rise of abortion. The suggestion is that liberals are saving
the world by slaughtering their babies in the womb." And: "The problem
with this is that, when you take a broader look at the data, you find
out that the crime rate took a very long time to drop — and Roe
v. Wade really had nothing to do with it. Believe it or not, mass
murder doesn’t actually prevent future crime."
https://www.libertyvideonews.com/ben-shapiro-busts-the-lefts-biggest-myth-about-abortion/
While I agree with this item it is not me speaking. It is what this poll is saying. Quote: "Poll Shows Democratic Voters are Literally Going Insane."
And, "Not long ago, it would be silly to assume that you couldn’t be
friends with someone because they vote differently than you do. In fact,
being able to put aside such differences has almost always been
considered a hallmark of maturity and tolerance. Unfortunately, with the
culture as divided as it is, it’s becoming normal for Americans to
become more atomized and tribal. This is dangerous for several reasons.
The first one is obvious: if Americans with different politics don’t
communicate with each other, maintaining a republic is essentially
impossible. But the real danger is the breakdown in our sense of
community. How can you possibly live among people that you believe are
out to get you? New research is showing that this is basically have
progressive Americans feel today. They have bought into the mainstream
media’s anti-conservative message with such vigor, that they are showing
symptoms of actual mental
disorders." https://www.libertyvideonews.com/poll-shows-democratic-voters-are-literally-going-insane/
Several years ago Michael Savage authored a book entitled "Liberalism
is a Mental Disease". He has a PhD in epidemiology. It looks like he may
well be right.
To me this is an example of the insanity
that so infects the political left. This Democrat actually claims that
hearsay evidence can be better than first hand knowledge. Simply
incredible. Quote: "During Wednesday's public impeachment inquiry,
Republicans rightfully reaffirmed the point that neither of the two
witnesses, Deputy Assistant Secretary for European and Eurasian Affairs
George Kent or Ambassador William Taylor, have any firsthand knowledge
of President Trump's phone call with Ukraine President Volodymyr
Zelensky. In fact, neither man has ever spoken with or met President
Trump. In an attempt to counter that rather devastating and inconvenient
fact for the Democrats, Illinois Democrat Congressman Mike Quigley
offered a bizarre defense of Kent and Taylor's lack of direct knowledge
of the pertinent details of the investigation."
https://pjmedia.com/trending/illinois-democrat-claims-hearsay-can-be-much-better-evidence-than-direct-evidence/ Here
is more: Quote: "Sorry, but it’s not their place to second-guess Trump
or his policies. The president sets foreign policy, not they; if he
thought it was important for Ukraine to help uncover evidence of
corruption, that’s his call. As for helping Ukraine defend itself, Trump
has done far more than President Barack Obama did, sending not only
financial aid but lethal weaponry. Wednesday’s first public impeachment
hearings showed that Democrats have shifted... Neither Taylor nor Kent
could even offer any direct, first hand evidence that Trump ever set
such must-meet conditions — proof that should be essential to remove a
duly elected president. Instead, they merely cited third- and
fourth-hand rumors. Neither man ever had direct contact with the
president." https://nypost.com/2019/11/13/adam-schiff-is-wasting-the-nations-time-with-impeachment-hearings/ The
lengths Democrats will go to cover their guilty behinds is
astonishing. If either Pelosi or Schiff think they are making a
convincing case against Trump they are sadly mistaken. Irrelevant and
irresponsible second/third/fourth hand rumors and hot air does not a
case make no matter how hard Congressman Quigley or dishonest
witnesses try to spin it.
A narrative worth reading
about the havoc Obama holdovers have caused within the National Security
Council (an arrogant group of so called SMEs on foreign policy) who
obviously think they should violate the Constitution and run foreign
policy rather than the president. For many years they have leaned left
and consequently many members disagree with Trump. Quote: "Officials at
the National Security Council (NSC), some of them Obama era holdovers,
waged an internal war against President Donald Trump and his political
appointees, transcripts from Rep. Adam Schiff’s closed-door impeachment
inquiry hearings show." Their so called role is to provide information
and advice to the President. Not to tell him/her what to do. Anyway,
here is the article.
https://freepressers.com/articles/transcripts-reveal-bitter-fight-within-nsc-over-ukraine-president-trump?
Here
are the opening remarks by Devin Nunes' senior minority member at the
fake impeachment hearings led by Adam
Schiff. https://pjmedia.com/trending/watch-devin-nunes-condemns-impeachment-sham-drama-in-search-of-a-crime/? What
he said should have resulted in the immediate halt to the waste of time
and money simply in place to scratch a Democrat party manufactured itch
and frontal assault of nothing but lies against Trump in hopes they
will ruin his chance at a second term. Dirty politicians bequeath dirty
politics.
Nancy
Pelosi and several other Democrats now probably regret they launched
impeachment proceedings against Trump. If they had not done so, maybe
this would not have happened. But it does fit the narrative that
Democrat politicians and their families make money while working for the
government. I am sure the same thing happens on the Republican side
too. Anyway, Pelosi's son Peter Pelosi, Jr has been arrested along with
three others and charged with securities fraud. Quote: "The Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged a company cofounded by Paul Pelosi
Jr. with fraud on Wednesday after learning that two convicted criminals
were running the business. Paul Pelosi Jr., the son of House Minority
Leader Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.), was the president and chief operating
officer of Natural Blue Resources Inc., an investment company he
cofounded that focuses on “environmentally-friendly” ventures. The SEC
charged four individuals with fraud, including former New Mexico Gov.
Toney Anaya, and suspended trading in the company’s stock. Pelosi owned
over 10 million shares in the company in 2009. The SEC said Wednesday
the company was “secretly controlled” by James E. Cohen and Joseph
Corazzi, both of whom had previous fraud convictions. Corazzi violated
federal securities laws and was barred from acting as an officer or
director of a public company. Cohen was previously incarcerated for
financial fraud." These two are the type of people some Democrat elites
hang with...remember Harvey Weinstein and Jeffrey Epstein?
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/company-founded-by-nancy-pelosis-son-paul-jr-is-charged-with-securities-fraud/?
This item elaborates further as to what the political left thinks is important and what sane people think. It is a real contrast to say the least. It compares the accomplishments of two different teenagers, one is dubious and the other spectacular. Guess which one gets the political left's accolades. http://www.strike-the-root.com/greta-thunberg-vs-boyan-slat
No comments:
Post a Comment