The IG's report on FISA abuse is due to be released any time.
The Justice Department inspector general's office told witnesses set to review draft sections of its long-awaited report on the FBI investigation of President Trump's 2016 campaign that they would not be allowed to submit written feedback, but later asserted that was not their intention after a Washington Post report disclosing the unusual restriction.
"As part of our factual accuracy review, and consistent with our usual practice, we are providing witnesses with the opportunity to review portions of the report that relate to them," Logan said.
The Post had reported hours earlier that - as is the case in most inspector general probes - witnesses were being invited to review draft sections of the report and offer comments and corrections.
The other fact to consider here is that the entire document, not just selected paragraphs, is labeled Top Secret and coup plotters - I mean people named in the report and their lawyers - must sign non-disclosure agreements as a condition of viewing their "Mentions" in the document.
With their ability to attack the report before its release effectively shut down, one of the leading purveyors of the Russia Hoax from a blog which, next to the New York Times, was THE leading purveyor of the Russia Hoax, has taken to attacking the integrity of the IG.This is extremely irregular.
There are growing signs that there are serious problems with the IG report and questions as to whether this is designed to be an honest accounting of the views of the IG or a political document driven by Barr's conspiracy theories.
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2019/11/15/deep-state-coup-supporters-begin-attacking-doj-igs-integrity-panic-builds-fisa-investigation-report/
The Justice Department inspector general's office told witnesses set to review draft sections of its long-awaited report on the FBI investigation of President Trump's 2016 campaign that they would not be allowed to submit written feedback, but later asserted that was not their intention after a Washington Post report disclosing the unusual restriction.
"As part of our factual accuracy review, and consistent with our usual practice, we are providing witnesses with the opportunity to review portions of the report that relate to them," Logan said.
The Post had reported hours earlier that - as is the case in most inspector general probes - witnesses were being invited to review draft sections of the report and offer comments and corrections.
The other fact to consider here is that the entire document, not just selected paragraphs, is labeled Top Secret and coup plotters - I mean people named in the report and their lawyers - must sign non-disclosure agreements as a condition of viewing their "Mentions" in the document.
With their ability to attack the report before its release effectively shut down, one of the leading purveyors of the Russia Hoax from a blog which, next to the New York Times, was THE leading purveyor of the Russia Hoax, has taken to attacking the integrity of the IG.This is extremely irregular.
There are growing signs that there are serious problems with the IG report and questions as to whether this is designed to be an honest accounting of the views of the IG or a political document driven by Barr's conspiracy theories.
https://www.redstate.com/streiff/2019/11/15/deep-state-coup-supporters-begin-attacking-doj-igs-integrity-panic-builds-fisa-investigation-report/
No comments:
Post a Comment