Sunday, September 4, 2016

Right seeks to kill the lame duck

Conservative lawmakers and advocacy groups are fighting to prevent a lame-duck session after the elections, arguing that members of Congress who have been booted from office shouldn't be responsible for major policy decisions.
Opponents of a post-election session are primarily wary of lawmakers passing another catchall omnibus government spending package that would likely include a slew of policy riders.
“It’s the least accountable time for Congress,” Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-S.C.), a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, told The Hill. “We let people who have either quit or been fired or retired vote on spending billions and billions of taxpayer dollars after their period of accountability has ended.”“This is something that is supposed to be Republican orthodoxy. That the least accountable government is the worst government,” he said.
The last two lame-duck sessions in 2014 and 2012 featured difficult negotiations over an omnibus spending package and expired tax breaks.
The pressure to reach a deal in both work periods was intense, with lawmakers in both parties eager to return home for the holidays — and that desire to leave town is something that congressional leaders often count on when wrapping up difficult legislation.
Even though last year’s omnibus appropriations bill wasn’t passed during a lame-duck session, many Republicans are reluctant to vote on a similar measure this year. Multiple rank-and-file Republicans facing primaries this year were attacked for their votes in support of the 2015 omnibus.

http://thehill.com/homenews/house/294361-right-seeks-to-kill-the-lame-duck 

No comments: