Thursday, September 8, 2016

George Soros And Hillary, two peas in a pod 4

This writer explains his belief that Hillary is way worse than Trump.    http://www.nationalreview.com/article/439494/never-trump-hillary-benefits?   And this item illustrates how ethically challenged this couple is. Quote: "Bill Clinton used taxpayer money to subsidize his family's Clinton Foundation as well as an associated business his wife Hillary's private email server, Politico reports.  The former president was able to fund his endeavors through a federal government program enacted in 1958 to keep past commanders in chief from going broke.  Politico said its investigation of records obtained from the General Services Administration through the Freedom of Information Act, does not indicate that Clinton did anything illegal.  "But it does offer fresh evidence of how the Clintons blurred the line between their non-profit foundation, Hillary Clinton's State Department and the business dealings of Bill Clinton and the couple's aides," Politico's Kenneth Vogel writes.  "Taxpayer cash was used to buy IT equipment — including servers — housed at the Clinton Foundation, and also to supplement the pay and benefits of several aides now at the center of the email and cash-for-access scandals dogging Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign."  If using tax payer money kept these millionaires from going broke, I will eat my baseball cap.

Communist party pressuring all progressives to work hard to assure Hillary wins.  The author of the best line in this piece is, however, Bill Clinton. He said "If you want change, vote for Hillary."  That is laughable.  She has already announced she will double down on many of Obama's failed policies.  And, her legacy as Secretary of State confirms she will be a foreign policy disaster. And her penchant for secrecy, failure to follow the law, socialistic policies and run-away lies will guarantee that her administration will be as un-transparent and at least as unlawful as Obama's.   http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/communists-fret-as-some-progressives-shun-hillary/   And another thing.  This couple is so ethically challenged the use taxpayer monies to support their private foundation.

This is the all white leadership organization who provides Hillary with made up propaganda she gladly spews calling Trump a racist.  This is an ultra fart left organization that pretends to be a watchdog but in truth is a leftist propaganda machine.  It has long labeled conservative organization having no record of violence as hate groups while failing to list a whole host of leftist groups actually and regularly involved in violence.  They have no credibility unless you are a leftist who believes their trash because it fits with their unbelievably false narratives.  http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/hillary-taps-into-all-white-money-packing-hate-labeler/ 

Not a good narrative regarding Hillary and all associated with the Clinton Foundation.  Quote: "Today, we know beyond the shadow of doubt that Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation have been the recipients of massive amounts of Saudi money in the form of donations. The question is, how much influence have they managed to purchase from her?  One answer appears to be, enough to secure very attractive weapons deals from the Clinton State Department.  In 2008, after a decade of refusing to reveal her donors, Hillary Clinton dropped a large cache of names. Saudi Arabia gave between $10 and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation.    http://www.wealthauthority.com/articles/hillary-clinton-compromised-and-out-of-control/

The dishonesty displayed by so many leftist shills for Hillary is palpable.  This is but one of many examples.  The writer of this article tears apart the defense of Hillary and the Clinton Foundation offered by Ruth Marcus of Washington Post fame.  Quote: "
This week, Marcus wrote an editorial critical of Donald Trump’s “unhinged calls” for a special prosecutor to look into the Clinton Foundation. She dismissed the claims that the Foundation was a “pay to play” operation.  Actually, the facts so far don't come close to special prosecutor territory. The "favors done" -- the supposed quo for the Clinton Foundation quid -- appear pretty meager.  The most critical remark she can manage is to suggest that since Hillary is beset by “enemies” who apply a stricter standard to her she should have been more careful.  Why, oh why, since the Clintons know their activities will be subjected to microscopic scrutiny -- since, as Clinton partisans claim, with some justification, she is pilloried for conduct for which others receive a pass -- do they continue to operate in a manner that opens them to attack by their enemies?    Specifically, why -- given that the notion of another run for the presidency wasn't exactly off the table -- did Clinton (and the staff that was supposed to be looking after her interests) not erect an impenetrable wall between foundation and State?  After all, it's not as if the prospect of questions about self-dealing did not occur at the time. The December 2008 agreement between the foundation and the Obama administration cites the need to "ensure that the activities of the foundation, however beneficial, do not create conflicts or the appearance of conflict."
Her selection of examples of conduct for which Hillary is being criticized is laughably one-sided."    http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/08/hillary_gets_more_than_a_little_help_from_her_media_friends.html

This is how bad it is.  Hillary gave a campaign speech which contained 20 provable lies. Is it really possible that this compulsive liar is actually running for president?  http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/26/blue-state-blues-fact-check-top-20-lies-hillarys-alt-right-speech/?   This is about another lie she has repeated many times over.  She says she turned over ALL of her emails.  Can anyone tell me this is NOT obstruction of justice and unadulterated proof that she is a devious and compulsive liar?    http://responseaction.com/Article/state-dept-obstructing-release-hillarys-email-trove?   And, the State Department is aiding and abetting this devious, dishonest and despicable person.  This piece sums up Hillary's inability to tell the truth. http://responseaction.com/Article/hillarys-estrangement-truth?

In the past Hillary has made a big deal about Trump's Trump University.  However, I have not heard anything from her on this topic of late.  Maybe this is why.  Quote: "Clinton University: Bill pocketed $17.6 million from for-profit college Hillary assisted and now demonizes."   That is what two-faced hypocrites do.     http://hotair.com/archives/2016/08/24/clinton-university-bill-pocketed-17-6-million-from-for-profit-college-hillary-assisted-and-now-demonizes/

Past items have highlighted the dubious ethic of a whole host of Clinton pals and cronies.  Virginia's governor is another example.  As noted many times before, court orders and laws are fungible to Democrats. They follow the ones they like and ignore those they don't like.  This governor's defiant actions following a court order serves as an example.  Nothing new here.  Obama has done the same thing a number of times.   http://townhall.com/columnists/monacharen/2016/08/26/hillary-clintons-felonious-friends-in-virginia-n2210205?   That the Clinton's harbor criminal traits is confirmed when reviewing those with whom they associate.  This provides just one more of many examples.    http://www.americanlibertyreport.com/articles/who-is-vinod-gupta/  

Interesting isn't it?  Hillary accuses Trump of what she has done all her public life.  Disparage, throw dirt on, lie about those with whom she differs, doesn't like, considers to be her enemies.  She is so used to her dysfunctional psychological make-up that she probably does not recognize her own hypocrisy and she even seems to believes he lies are true.   http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/trumps-black-support-explodes-in-biggest-battleground-state/   It has be noted before but this is another example.  While Secretary of State she cut deals that landed over $150 million for her Clinton Foundation.  She is now under FBI investigation once again for doing something she accused Obama of doing during 2008 campaign.  Hypocrite.  http://eaglerising.com/36254/flashback-hillary-attacked-obama-for-his-ties-to-pay-to-play-schemer-tony-rezko/ 

The progressive based education system has produced uninformed and uneducated students who will cast their votes for Hillary.  They support her view that the Second Amendment needs to be repealed.  Hillary is exploiting their ignorance to get votes.  http://responseaction.com/Article/hillary-supporters-are-all-repealing-second-amendment?

Need proof that CNN, fondly called the CLINTON News Network, is all in for Hillary?  They fired Dr. Drew because he questioned Hillary's health.  http://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/2016/08/26/dr.-drew-stripped-cnn-show-mentioning-clintons-health/?  
Discussing a legitimate concern regarding their favored candidate is worth getting fired at CNN which has a similar problem as Hillary when it comes to being truthful.

Some may disagree with Trump's charge that Hillary is contributing to inciting racial conflict.  I do not. I agree with him.  She is following Obama's lead in inciting racial discord.  Pitting races/groups against each other has been a long standing socialistic tactic to impose dictatorial control over a population clamoring for cessation of the violence.  Oppressive government control follows under the guise of bringing about peace.   http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/293375-trump-accuses-clinton-of-race-baiting

What was it Hillary said about Trump and the KKK?   The KKK has endorsed Hillary and donated money to her campaign.  You must remember that both Bill and Hillary were fond of the deceased Senator Robert Byrd.  He was once a high power player in the KKK.   Hillary even claimed he was one of her mentors.  Don't believe me?  Check it out.      http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/KKK-leader-endorse-hillary/2016/04/27/id/726052/     It is almost a certainty that most if not all charges leveled against those who oppose her are things she is guilty of too.  But she is Hillary and gets a pass so her guilt at least in her mind is she is not guilty of anything bad. 

Media is actively hiding anything to do with Hillary's health instead of investigating and informing the public with the facts.  Honesty in reporting is no longer in their journalistic manuals.  They are her propagandists.  http://www.wnd.com/2016/09/hillary-suffers-epic-coughing-fit-on-labor-day/  and,  http://freedomoutpost.com/there-is-a-mainstream-media-conspiracy-to-hide-hillary-clintons-rapidly-failing-health/    

George Burns

No comments: