This writer explains his belief that Hillary is way worse than Trump. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/439494/never-trump-hillary-benefits?
And this item illustrates how ethically challenged this couple
is. Quote: "Bill Clinton used taxpayer money to subsidize his family's
Clinton Foundation as well as an associated business his wife Hillary's
private email server, Politico
reports. The former president was able to fund his endeavors through a
federal government program enacted in 1958 to keep past commanders in
chief from going broke. Politico said its investigation of records
obtained from the General Services Administration through the Freedom of
Information Act, does not indicate that Clinton did anything illegal.
"But it does offer fresh evidence of how the Clintons blurred the line
between their non-profit foundation, Hillary Clinton's State Department
and the business dealings of Bill Clinton and the couple's aides,"
Politico's Kenneth Vogel writes. "Taxpayer cash was used to buy IT
equipment — including servers — housed at the Clinton Foundation, and
also to supplement the pay and benefits of several aides now at the
center of the email and cash-for-access scandals dogging Hillary
Clinton's presidential campaign." If using tax payer money kept these
millionaires from going broke, I will eat my baseball cap.
Communist party pressuring
all progressives to work hard to assure Hillary wins. The author of
the best line in this piece is, however, Bill Clinton. He said "If you
want change, vote for Hillary." That is laughable. She has already
announced she will double down on many of Obama's failed policies. And,
her legacy as Secretary of State confirms she will be a foreign policy
disaster. And her penchant for secrecy, failure to follow the law,
socialistic policies and run-away lies will guarantee that her
administration will be as un-transparent and at least as unlawful as
Obama's. http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/communists-fret-as-some-progressives-shun-hillary/ And another thing. This couple is so ethically challenged the use taxpayer monies to support their private foundation.
This is the all white
leadership organization who provides Hillary with made up propaganda she
gladly spews calling Trump a racist. This is an ultra fart left
organization that pretends to be a watchdog but in truth is a leftist
propaganda machine. It has long labeled conservative organization
having no record of violence as hate groups while failing to list a
whole host of leftist groups actually and regularly involved in
violence. They have no credibility unless you are a leftist who
believes their trash because it fits with their unbelievably false
narratives. http://www.wnd.com/2016/08/hillary-taps-into-all-white-money-packing-hate-labeler/
Not a good narrative
regarding Hillary and all associated with the Clinton Foundation.
Quote: "Today, we know beyond the shadow of doubt that Hillary Clinton
and the Clinton Foundation have been the recipients of massive amounts
of Saudi money in the form of donations. The question is, how much
influence have they managed to purchase from her? One answer appears to
be, enough to secure very attractive weapons deals from the Clinton
State Department. In 2008, after a decade of refusing to reveal her
donors, Hillary Clinton dropped a large cache of names. Saudi Arabia
gave between $10 and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation. http://www.wealthauthority.com/articles/hillary-clinton-compromised-and-out-of-control/
The dishonesty displayed by
so many leftist shills for Hillary is palpable. This is but one of
many examples. The writer of this article tears apart the defense of
Hillary and the Clinton Foundation offered by Ruth Marcus of Washington
Post fame. Quote: "
This week, Marcus wrote an editorial
critical of Donald Trump’s “unhinged calls” for a special prosecutor to
look into the Clinton Foundation. She dismissed the claims that the
Foundation was a “pay to play” operation. Actually,
the facts so far don't come close to special prosecutor territory. The
"favors done" -- the supposed quo for the Clinton Foundation quid --
appear pretty meager. The
most critical remark she can manage is to suggest that since Hillary is
beset by “enemies” who apply a stricter standard to her she should
have been more careful. Why,
oh why, since the Clintons know their activities will be subjected to
microscopic scrutiny -- since, as Clinton partisans claim, with some
justification, she is pilloried for conduct for which others receive a
pass -- do they continue to operate in a manner that opens them to
attack by their enemies? Specifically,
why -- given that the notion of another run for the presidency wasn't
exactly off the table -- did Clinton (and the staff that was supposed to
be looking after her interests) not erect an impenetrable wall between
foundation and State? After
all, it's not as if the prospect of questions about self-dealing did
not occur at the time. The December 2008 agreement between the
foundation and the Obama administration cites the need to "ensure that
the activities of the foundation, however beneficial, do not create
conflicts or the appearance of conflict."
Her selection of examples of conduct for which Hillary is being criticized is laughably one-sided." http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/08/hillary_gets_more_than_a_little_help_from_her_media_friends.html
This is how bad it is.
Hillary gave a campaign speech which contained 20 provable lies. Is it
really possible that this compulsive liar is actually running for
president? http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/26/blue-state-blues-fact-check-top-20-lies-hillarys-alt-right-speech/?
This is about another lie she has repeated many times over. She says
she turned over ALL of her emails. Can anyone tell me this is NOT
obstruction of justice and unadulterated proof that she is a devious and
compulsive liar? http://responseaction.com/Article/state-dept-obstructing-release-hillarys-email-trove?
And, the State Department is aiding and abetting this devious,
dishonest and despicable person. This piece sums up Hillary's inability
to tell the truth. http://responseaction.com/Article/hillarys-estrangement-truth?
In the past Hillary has
made a big deal about Trump's Trump University. However, I have not
heard anything from her on this topic of late. Maybe this is why.
Quote: "Clinton University: Bill pocketed $17.6 million from for-profit
college Hillary assisted and now demonizes." That is what two-faced
hypocrites do. http://hotair.com/archives/2016/08/24/clinton-university-bill-pocketed-17-6-million-from-for-profit-college-hillary-assisted-and-now-demonizes/
Past items have highlighted
the dubious ethic of a whole host of Clinton pals and cronies.
Virginia's governor is another example. As noted many times before,
court orders and laws are fungible to Democrats. They follow the ones
they like and ignore those they don't like. This governor's defiant
actions following a court order serves as an example. Nothing new
here. Obama has done the same thing a number of times. http://townhall.com/columnists/monacharen/2016/08/26/hillary-clintons-felonious-friends-in-virginia-n2210205?
That the Clinton's harbor criminal traits is confirmed when reviewing
those with whom they associate. This provides just one more of many
examples. http://www.americanlibertyreport.com/articles/who-is-vinod-gupta/
The progressive based
education system has produced uninformed and uneducated students who
will cast their votes for Hillary. They support her view that the
Second Amendment needs to be repealed. Hillary is exploiting their
ignorance to get votes. http://responseaction.com/Article/hillary-supporters-are-all-repealing-second-amendment?
Need proof that CNN, fondly
called the CLINTON News Network, is all in for Hillary? They fired Dr.
Drew because he questioned Hillary's health. http://www.redstate.com/brandon_morse/2016/08/26/dr.-drew-stripped-cnn-show-mentioning-clintons-health/?
Discussing a legitimate
concern regarding their favored candidate is worth getting fired at CNN
which has a similar problem as Hillary when it comes to being truthful.
Some may disagree with Trump's charge that Hillary is contributing to inciting racial conflict. I do not. I agree with him. She is following Obama's lead in inciting racial discord. Pitting races/groups against each other has been a long standing socialistic tactic to impose dictatorial control over a population clamoring for cessation of the violence. Oppressive government control follows under the guise of bringing about peace. http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/293375-trump-accuses-clinton-of-race-baiting
What was it Hillary said
about Trump and the KKK? The KKK has endorsed Hillary and donated
money to her campaign. You must remember that both Bill and Hillary
were fond of the deceased Senator Robert Byrd. He was once a high power
player in the KKK. Hillary even claimed he was one of her mentors.
Don't believe me? Check it out. http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/KKK-leader-endorse-hillary/2016/04/27/id/726052/
It is almost a certainty that most if not all charges leveled against
those who oppose her are things she is guilty of too. But she is
Hillary and gets a pass so her guilt at least in her mind is she is not
guilty of anything bad.
Media is actively hiding
anything to do with Hillary's health instead of investigating and
informing the public with the facts. Honesty in reporting is no longer
in their journalistic manuals. They are her propagandists. http://www.wnd.com/2016/09/hillary-suffers-epic-coughing-fit-on-labor-day/ and, http://freedomoutpost.com/there-is-a-mainstream-media-conspiracy-to-hide-hillary-clintons-rapidly-failing-health/
George Burns
No comments:
Post a Comment