An assessment of the plans for
the Paris climate change conference. EPA's Clean Power Plan (CPP) is
part of Obama's overall climate change scheme. This piece outlines the
issue. Quote: "CPP is loathed by most Republicans, some Democrats,
industry associations and business groups, utilities, coal companies,
and mining interests. Therefore, less than 12 hours after publication in
the Federal Register, it became “the most heavily litigated
environmental regulation ever”—with more than 15 separate cases from 26
states and countless industry groups filed against it in just two days.
All the lawsuits have been consolidated into one case at the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. It is widely expected
to ultimately be heard before the Supreme Court—which may not hear the
case until 2018. By the time a final ruling is made, the Obama
Administration believes that, as was the case with the Mercury and Air
Toxics Standards, industry will have already done so much to comply with
the rule that the high court’s decision will be almost irrelevant. The
Wall Street Journal (WSJ) states: “Even if CPP is … junked by the
courts, they’re hoping to intimidate the states and dictate the U.S.
energy mix for a generation.” http://www.cfact.org/2015/11/10/the-march-to-paris-has-begun/?
Even NASA now agrees global warming is not happening. The polar ice caps are growing. http://www.libertynewsnow.com/nasa-study-shocks-left-no-global-warming/article2621
Irresponsible scientists want
the government to protect them against those who oppose their
falsely declared truth. Quote: "The final word here is this: the heads
of George Mason University, the University of Washington, Rutgers
University, the University of Maryland, Florida State University, the
University of Miami, the University of Texas at Austin, and Columbia
University should be embarrassed to have professors on staff
with such a profound ignorance or intentional disregard for the First
Amendment and the need for robust, unchecked, vibrant debate not just in
the university setting, but in American society, culture, and
politics." http://dailysignal.com/2015/10/09/skeptical-climate-change-is-real-these-20-academics-think-you-should-be-prosecuted/?
Consequences may befall the scientists who requested Obama to arrest those who disagree with them. http://dailysignal.com/2015/10/26/lawmakers-probe-taxpayer-funded-academic-who-wants-obama-to-prosecute-climate-change-skeptics/?
The increasingly shrill challenges being made by global warming/climate
advocates suggests to me that they are frightened by their many failed
predictions and the rise of evidence of global cooling. They fear they
just may be wrong but cant or don't want admit it so they double down on
those who disagree with them. It will not work because truth will
eventually emerge. Go back to the first two items in this email. Their
whole commitment to their cause is built on lies.
This provides an example of the
tyrannical approach Obama takes in running his office. It is another
example of his defiance of the Constitution and repeated
bypassing Congress to do what he wants to do. This arrogance suggests
that only he knows what is right and proper. As we all know human
caused climate change is far, far from being settled science. He does
not care and continues actions that waste resources, hurt families,
especially the poor, and reeks havoc on the nation's economy. http://dailysignal.com/2015/10/09/how-obama-is-planning-to-bypass-congress-on-international-climate-change-regulations/?
Here is just one
more consequence of Obama's tyrannical reign. The claim scientists made
to refuse a Congressional request to release information about how they
arrived at numbers which do not match known data is a dodge. It
supports Obama's position on man made climate change and they cannot
reveal the truth which is that they likely cooked the books in support
of his agenda. Quote: "Earlier this summer, a group of “scientists” led
by a couple of US government employees, published an utterly fraudulent
paper which, in effect, erased the decline in global surface temperatures. They did this by the rather elegant method of simply changing the recorded temperatures to something else."
And, "The more we know about how NOAA, and the climate change Jerry
Sanduskys funded by NOAA, operate the more it is apparent that the
entire field is fraudulent up to its myopic eyeballs and exists solely
to suck cash out of the federal government and to arrogate power and
importance to a lot of very little and inconsequential men whose
inadequate personal lives make them want to lord it over the rest of
us." http://www.redstate.com/2015/10/31/climate-science-frauds-try-hide-data-congress/? Strong opionion I know but I suspect it is pretty accurate.
This is an example of the
corruption that results when government and science research mix. Two
quotes: "The plan by climate alarmists to have other scientists
imprisoned for their ‘global warming’ skepticism is backfiring horribly,
and the chief alarmist is now facing a House investigation into what
has been called “the largest science scandal in US history.” And,
Senator Lamar Smith "... has two main areas of concern. First, the
apparent engagement by the institute in “partisan political activity” –
which, as a non-profit, it is forbidden by law from doing. Second, what
precisely has the IGES institute done with the $63 million in taxpayer
grants which it has received since 2001 and which appears to have
resulted in remarkably little published research? For example, as Watts Up With That?
notes, a $4.2 million grant from the National Science Foundation to one
of the institute’s offshoots appears to have resulted in just one
published paper. But the amount which has gone into the pockets of
Shukla and his cronies runs into the many hundreds of thousands of
dollars. In 2013 and 2014, for example, Shukla and his wife enjoyed a
combined income in excess of $800,000 a year." http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/02/climate-alarmist-caught-largest-science-scandal-u-s-history/
More and more I am disgusted
with the dishonesty and ruthlessness of the climate change/global
warming crowd. In France the government sent the country's top weather
expert on enforced leave as punishment for not abiding the Climate
Change demand for total submission to its dogma. Quote: "The chief
weatherman for France’s top state broadcaster has been sent on enforced
leave after publishing a book that questions the accuracy of climate change
models. Philippe Verdier, a household name for his nightly forecasts
on France 2, the top state television channel, claims in the book Climat
Investigation (Climate Investigation) that leading climatologists and
political leaders have “taken the world hostage” with misleading
data." I ask you if the cause is cientifically sound, why punish those
who with good cause doubt the politically based consensus? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11931645/Frances-top-weatherman-sparks-storm-over-book-questioning-climate-change.html
Even high ranking members of the
Catholic Church disagree with the Pope's lurching to the left and
getting on the Climate Change band wagon. Quote: "Cardinal
George Pell has publicly criticised Pope Francis’ decision to place
climate change at the top of the Catholic Church’s agenda. Cardinal
Pell, a well-known climate change skeptic, told the Financial Times the
church had “no particular expertise in science”. “The church has got
no mandate from the Lord to pronounce on scientific matters,” he said,
“We believe in the autonomy of science.” http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/pell_vs_pope/
This helps to emphasize the oppressive controls the UN wishes to impose
on a global basis. Quote: Regarding climate science "... a sizable
percentage of the population that consists of both scientists and laymen
disagree with popular opinion, then it can hardly be called a settled
science. This situation calls for more research and debate until the
truth, whatever it may be, becomes indisputable and everyone can get on
board with that reality. You know what it doesn’t call for? Persecuting
and prosecuting the minority that has dared to disagree with popular
opinion. And that’s exactly what a secretive UN funded legal conference
decided to do last month, when they met to discuss climate change
and how the International Court of Justice should tackle it." This is
scarry. Note this, too. What is "... interesting about this whole
situation, is that I [author of the article] don’t remember hearing
about anyone calling for pro-global warming opinions to be made illegal
(as a matter of fact, if you can find a single instance of this
happening, post it in the comments.) This type of behavior seems to stem
exclusively from the other side of the aisle, and it doesn’t do their
argument any favors. If this is how top global warming proponents
approach science and debate, then it’s hard to imagine anyone taking
their assertions seriously in the future." http://www.thedailysheeple.com/secretive-un-legal-conference-wants-to-outlaw-climate-change-denial_102015?
George Burns
No comments:
Post a Comment