Saturday, November 7, 2015

Hillary & Bill

Some may scoff at the contents of this piece and claim I am just biased.  Rest assured that my opinion of Hillary and Bill Clinton is founded on facts like those contained in this note.  I do not make this stuff up.  It is, too, a fact that anyone who relies on the mainstream media will not be as informed about their proclivities as they should be.  The media is decidedly to the left on the political spectrum and in case after case not only support but actively protect Democrat operatives no matter their morals, ethics or faulty/failing politics.  They will, however, gleefully report ad nausea any dirt they can find on Republicans or conservatives whether true or not.  Everything here can be verified and is a matter of public record.  Please with an open mind give the below content the consideration it deserves.

This item sets the stage for all that follows.  It is a reminder of Hillary's scandal plagued past which started when she was fired by her supervisor who was in charge of investigating the Nixon Watergate cover up scandal. Quote: "In what can only constitute a bizarre foreshadowing of her future scandals, Hillary Rodham Clinton’s link to Watergate is that she was fired for lying and unethical behavior from the Watergate Investigation. Hillary’s supervisor during the Watergate Investigation, lifelong Democrat, Jerry Zeifman, refused to give her a recommendation (only one of three refusals in his career)." And, "In 2008 Zeifman went on the record to state, “She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality… My own reaction was of regret that, when I terminated her employment on the Nixon impeachment staff, I had not reported her unethical practices to the appropriate bar associations.” And, that is from her supervisor, who again, fired her, from the Watergate Investigation.  http://conservativeamerica-online.com/7-scandals-hillary-wants-you-to-forget-watergate/  And,  http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/09/the_clintons_security_risks_squared.html  These seven examples are quite interesting.  http://conservativeamerica-online.com/7-scandals-hillary-wants-you-to-forget-watergate/    Regarding the unraveling email scandal a close advisor has encouraged Hillary to hire a good defense lawyer.   http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/ed-klein-hillary-fbi/2015/10/05/id/694774/?

This is a quick synopsis of the ethical and legal problems confronting Hillary.   http://constitutionalrightspac.com/articles/the-mistress-of-deception

When a nation of laws allows someone as dishonest and deceptive as Hillary to run for public office, much less the presidency, you are right to conclude we are in deep trouble.   http://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2015/08/20/who-printed-hillarys-emails-n2041050/page/full   This illustrates the state of politics today.  Political party loyalty is more important than loyalty to the United States and its citizens.  Quote: "But perhaps the California senator was simply more interested in trying to protect a fellow Democrat, than in protecting the secrets of this nation. Perhaps Sen. Feinstein needs to review her own obligations as the holder of a national security clearance, which also requires the fine senator to report any security violations she becomes aware of.  So while I appreciate your loyalty to party, Sen. Feinstein, I would appreciate your loyalty to the United States of America much more. Perhaps it’s time you review the same government security regulations that guided former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, since based on your comments it would seem you’re not quite up to speed on what the regulations governing classified information are."   http://townhall.com/columnists/dwwilber/2015/08/20/sen-feinstein-your-point-is-n2041034/page/full   By the way when someone does the disingenuous things this brief piece illustrates, do you think it represents presidential material?  http://www.redstate.com/2015/08/19/i-thought-you-called-them-spare-parts/? 

This document with her signature on it "should" finish her presidential aspirations.  Her claim that what she did with her emails was authorized.  That was a bold faced lie.  Read this.  She knowingly broke the law.    http://freebeacon.com/politics/clinton-signed-nda-laying-out-criminal-penalties-for-mishandling-of-classified-info/?   The question is whether or not she will get away with it.  If it were anybody but her they would already have been arrested and put in the slammer. 

Democrat Lincoln Chafee has dropped out of the race for president.  Before he left the scene, however, he had this to say.  Quote: "During an interview with CNN’s New Day Chafee reminded everyone that Hillary Clinton is far too corrupt to make a suitable president."   There is at least one honest Democrat willing to tell the truth.  http://eaglerising.com/25537/democrat-candidate-drops-out-of-the-race-told-everyone-that-hillary-clinton-is-too-corrupt-to-be-president/

Chafee is 100% right.  Here is an example. Quote: "Hillary's track record with Libya is poor to say the least."  As this piece shows she was involved in trafficking of weapons and terrorists in the Middle East. But during her recent congressional hearings she lied about what she and the State Department were up to.     http://www.activistpost.com/2015/10/hillary-clinton-and-the-real-issue-behind-the-benghazi-scandal.html?   And  boy did she lie.  http://eaglerising.com/25775/bombshell-email-shows-embassy-telling-obama-administration-that-the-youtube-video-had-nothing-to-do-with-benghazi-attack/   There is no way this compulsive liar should ever be elected to any public office, much less the presidency.  But the mainstream media is doing its best to get her elected.  They are a total disgrace.  http://eaglerising.com/25751/the-media-is-lying-to-you-while-covering-up-hillarys-benghazi-lies/

Anyone who believes this woman is worthy of the highest office in the land needs to rethink that belief.  She is most unworthy and would in all likelihood be a disaster as bad if not worse than Obama.  This item provides some insight into why I believe that harsh statement is warranted.  Quote: "On Friday, the State Department released more than 7,000 pages of Hillary Clinton e-mails under a court order. Among them were dozens of e-mails to and from Blumenthal. And there is more to come from the State Department, the Benghazi committee and lawsuits from watchdog groups such as Judicial Watch.  More troubling for the Clinton presidential campaign: The FBI is investigating security issues related to Clinton’s e-mail server.  Whether any crimes were committed remains to be seen. But despite the dismissal of the e-mail scandal in liberal circles, the recovered messages have already established a clear record of Clinton’s underhanded and unethical actions in office.  On Jan. 9, 2009, Hillary Clinton signed a letter pledging to stay out of Clinton Foundation business. In a document first disclosed by Judicial Watch, Clinton had promised State Department officials that she would keep to the “highest standards of ethical conduct” and “not participate” in foundation matters."  The record proves that she violated that pledge many times over.    http://nypost.com/2015/10/31/hillary-clintons-rogue-agenda-why-sid-blumenthal-matters/  

Should she be elected president rest assured the economy will get worse.  This analysis of her economic plan explains.  http://humanevents.com/2015/11/02/hillary-clinton-misunderstands-misrepresents-how-government-pummels-the-economy/?

This regards her recent testimony before the House committee investigating the Benghazi disaster.  This legal analyst/former judge suggests because of many of her answers suggest Hillary must have forgotten that the FBI is currently investigating her.  He noted several time when she likely committed perjury.  Quote: "Napolitano offered why Clinton’s testimony would be particularly damaging to the FBI audience listening to her testimony.  “The crime of misleading Congress carries the same penalty as lying to Congress – five years per misleading statement,” Napolitano pointed out. “Her frequent use of double negatives and her professed lack of memory may save her from perjury but not from the charge of misleading – being deceptive.  “What she plainly revealed is a willingness and natural proclivity to deceive,” he concluded.  “We know she knew the true source of the Benghazi attacks the day they happened, even as she was lying and blaming a cheap video,” he noted. ”The FBI knows how to build a case on ‘bad acts’ – here, persistent deception – and how to use that to trap and indict the perpetrator.”    http://www.wnd.com/2015/10/judge-rocks-hillarys-testimony-serious-legal-trouble/    Here's more bad news for Hillary found in the latest release of 7000 of her emails.   http://patriotupdate.com/bombshell-new-recovered-emails-spell-bad-news-for-hillary-could-this-be-the-end/ 

If you didn't already know this is the atmosphere that the Clinton's have long maintain in their business and private circles.  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3255037/Undercover-video-Clinton-campaign-worker-caught-breaking-election-law-registering-Nevada-Hispanics-meme-photo-Trump-reads-RESTING-B-CH-FACE.html?

Neither of the Clintons have any shame.  Hillary fronted for Bill during his rape and assault problems while in the White House and now Bill is returning the favor.  Both blame the Republicans for "Their" well documented indiscretions.  They of course claim they did nothing wrong.  Bill lost his law license for committing perjury (he lied) and their is ample proof already public that Hillary has lied multiple times in her fight to save her failing presidential candidacy.  There is much more to both of their problems.  Suffice it to say both are a disgrace to their party and our country.  http://patriotsandpolitics.com/the-other-clinton-sets-the-record-straight-on-whos-to-blame-for-hillarys-email-scandal/

This is a brief glimpse back at Hillary's campaign tactics during the 2008 campaign.  It was she who launched "Obama is a Muslim" charges against him.  Now she is lambasting the resurfacing of that mantra as being raised by some Republicans.  What hypocrisy!    http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2015/09/22/morning-joe-clinton-started-all-of-this-obama-could-be-a-muslim-nonsense-in-2008-n2055039?   Consider this way out of bounds rant.  As the item says, this in not a women fit to be president.   http://raisetheflagreport.com/hillary-makes-absolutely-disgusting-remark-about-republicans-she-never-expected-this-response/ 

This lady is unbelievably cold and calculating.  This piece provides just one example...her dismissal of responsibility for the Benghazi debacle and blatant lies as to the cause of the attack.  Her remarks are unconscionable.   http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/oct/22/clinton-benghazi-hearing-gowdy-dead-deserve-truth/?    Here's more.   http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/10/hillary_and_the_video_lie.html  And it gets worse.  http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/10/10_23_2015_5_47.html   And worse, http://www.westernjournalism.com/benghazi-heros-dad-reveals-bombshell-document-that-could-prove-hillary-lied-video/  And worse still.  http://www.westernjournalism.com/actor-sees-hillarys-bizarre-laughter-at-benghazi-hearing-and-makes-giant-prediction/?l  And yet more, http://conservativetribune.com/hillary-ambassador-stevens/?   For many reasons including those highlighted here, I am sorry to say this, but I truly believe she is a total and disgustingly unethical human being and should never, ever serve as President of the United States.  For those who think Obama has been bad, she could well be worse than him.



The avalanche of facts that keep coming mean nothing to Hillary.  She claims she followed all the rules and did nothing wrong.  This is another one of her countless lies regarding the email scam, let alone the other scandals plaguing her. http://eaglerising.com/25033/breaking-hillary-servers-were-wide-open-scanned-by-hackers/ 

The Clinton Foundation is coming under increasing scrutiny.  This item introduces the apparent illegal activities found by this Wall Street analyst.   The analyst's "...principal charge is that the Clintons and those running the Clinton Foundation have devised an elaborate scheme to steal from hundreds of thousands of small contributors worldwide, as well as from larger donors, including foreign donors.  He further alleges the Clintons have covered up the alleged fraud by a series of apparently technical violations of federal and state law governing the operation of tax-exempt foundations. Ortel says that even if a sophisticated financial analyst were able to discern the fraud, an explanation of how it was carried out would be beyond the comprehension of the average reader." http://www.wnd.com/2015/04/wall-street-analyst-uncovers-clinton-foundation-fraud/?     This New York Times article extends this discussion.  Things are not looking good for the Clintons. http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/04/blockbuster_nyt_story_on_clinton_foundation_money_and_deals_giving_russia_control_of_american_uranium_mines.html  

This item synopsizes the whole problem with the Clinton Foundation.  Facts suggest it is less a charitable organization and more a financial operation benefiting Clinton operatives and the Clintons themselves.  Facts backing that statement are contained herein.   http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/crime/item/20778-clinton-foundation-s-defenses-continue-to-unravel?   Matters are worsening as more details emerge.  Quote: “Legally mandated Clinton Foundation disclosures that are the responsibility of Clinton Foundation Trustees and must be wholly accurate, complete and, in the case of financial disclosures, verified by competent, informed, and independent accounting professionals,” Ortel writes.  “Instead, Clinton Foundation public disclosures concerning the period July 2002 to present are false, incomplete, inaccurate, and not appropriately verified by independent auditors.”   http://www.wnd.com/2015/09/wall-street-expert-clinton-foundation-a-vast-criminal-conspiracy/

Remember when Hillary said she and Bill were dead broke when Bill left the White House?  As you probably already knew it was just another one of her lies.  At the time he left office he was drawing an annual stipend funded by us of $200,000 and Hillary was just about to go on the government dole as a Senator making $190,000.   This piece helps put their view of themselves and we average folks into perspective.    http://www.westernjournalism.com/what-may-be-hillarys-biggest-lie-so-far-exposed-in-this-stunning-image/

Talking about lies here's a good one you will likely remember.  Quote:  "When a sleazy politician of the first order is faced with her own lie, there is always “something more important to discuss.”  And of course, she simply “misspoke.” Misspeaking is an action reserved for the few. It doesn’t apply to everyone else. Everyone else lies.  Sharyl Attkisson wrote an instructive article about Hillary’s perilous 1996 “sniper” trip to Bosnia. Instructive, because she was there with Hillary."  Others were there too and confirm what Hillary claimed was simply not true. https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/10/19/when-hillary-dodged-sniper-fire/ This may be overkill but it contributes to our examination of the character of this would be president.   http://eaglerising.com/25492/americas-crumbling-character-hillary-clintons-web-of-lies/ 

Its to the point where I do not believe a thing Hillary has to say.   Quote: "On MSNBC's The Rachel Maddow Show, Hillary Clinton said that it was the threat of a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage that led her husband President Bill Clinton to sign the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in 1996.  This statement is totally untrue. I [Dick Morris]was there and there was never any discussion of a constitutional amendment on the subject."    http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/dick-morris-hillary-clinton-lied-doma/2015/10/29/id/699664/

Things are not looking good for the Clinton Foundation which has until 16 November to correct a multitude of past filings with the IRS.  Quote: "The read of the day today is a long article by Ken Silverstein at Byline.com explaining the hole the Clinton Foundation is in over amending its IRS filings.  You see, the slush fund has a lot of 'splainin to do."  Because "There are potential felonies involved."   When it comes to the Clintons what else do you expect?http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/10/clinton_foundation_time_bomb_may_explode_on_november_16th.html
  
Who would want to work for her, much less be subjugated to her rule as president.  Quote: "'There's not an agent in the service who wants to be in Hillary's detail,' a current agent says. 'If agents get the nod to go to her detail, that's considered a form of punishment among the agents. She's hard to work around, she's known to snap at agents and yell at agents and dress them down to their faces, and they just have to be humble and say, 'Yes ma'am,' and walk away.'  The agent adds, 'Agents don't deserve that. They're there to do a job, they're there to protect her, they'll lay their life down for hers, and there's absolutely no respect for that. And that's why agents do not want to go to her detail.'"   http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3204827/Don-t-know-Hillary-s-arrogant-aide-Huma-Abedin-crosshairs-Servergate-tried-force-way-past-Secret-Service-agents-without-ID-expected-carry-luggage.html

Bob Woodward, of Watergate fame, says that the Hillary email scandal reminds him of the Nixon's Watergate scandal.   http://dailycaller.com/2015/08/17/bob-woodward-says-hillarys-emails-remind-him-of-nixons-tapes-video/   And her words and actions are increasingly offensive.  Here she accuses Republicans as treating women like terrorists????   Her record on women's rights is abysmal and characterizing her as a women's rights advocate is outrageous.  Dig into her history and you will see the truth.  This is a start.   http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2015/08/27/hillary-my-gop-opponents-are-just-like-isis-n2044628?

This reinforces Woodward's point.  "There is no other way to describe this than willful disregard of laws and protocols pertaining to national security protections. The materials exposed here might be more sensitive and potentially dangerous than some of the Wikileaks material exposed by Bradley Manning, especially for diplomatic security. And yet, Hillary Clinton has railed against Manning's "crimes."  She is different and need not be punished because she  wants to run for the office which carries the ultimate responsibility for enforcing those laws and securing the nation’s sensitive data.   http://hotair.com/archives/2015/08/25/classified-hillary-e-mail-contained-embassy-security-issues-sensitive-diplomatic-discussions/?

During the first Democrat presidential debate on 13 October we learned that "The five Democratic presidential candidates in the CNN debate closed ranks around their party’s self-serving demand for more immigration and migrant labor, leaving worried Americans with no Democratic candidates offering to shield them from the inevitable wage-and-salary cuts."  http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/14/five-democratic-candidates-champion-migrants-not-americans/   And, knowingly or not they heard Hillary offer up 27 lies according to this account.  http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/14/liar-liar-pantsuit-fire-27-hillary-fibs-obfuscations-lies/ 

How can anyone support this woman?  As usual, she claims she did nothing wrong.  It is always someone else who is to blame.  Quote: "So to review the bidding. We encouraged a civil war in Libya to overthrow a Gadhafi who was fairly harmless and chastened. Indeed, our intervention was in violation of international law and norms. By Clinton’s own admission we knew there were no civil structures in Libya that existed independent of Gadhafi. Yet we went anyway, based on Sid Blumenthal’s insistence that he knew people who would take charge, despite Defense and the Intelligence Community warning what would happen.  Now we have a seething, effervescing Islamist mess in Libya and Clinton blithely blames the Libyans for the situation:"   http://www.redstate.com/2015/10/25/hillary-says-libyans-just-dumb-govern/?


If you still think she is qualified to be president, read this.  She is as irresponsible if not totally incompetent as they come.   http://www.westernjournalism.com/shocking-what-ambassador-stevens-told-state-dept-just-before-benghazi-attack-is-awful-for-hillary/?
  

George Burns


Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)