The federal government suffered a major defeat today at the U.S.
Supreme Court in the case of
Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United States.
In their unanimous
decision, the justices rejected the government’s sweeping claim
that a series of recurring floods induced by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers did not qualify as a taking of property under the Fifth
Amendment because the flooding was only temporary in duration. As
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote for the Court:
Read more: http://reason.com/blog/2012/12/04/federal-government-loses-big-in-supreme
Because government-induced flooding can constitute a taking of property, and because a taking need not be permanent to be compensable, our precedent indicates that government-induced flooding of limited duration may be compensable. No decision of this Court authorizes a blanket temporary-flooding exception to our Takings Clause jurisprudence, and we decline to create such an exception in this case.
Read more: http://reason.com/blog/2012/12/04/federal-government-loses-big-in-supreme
No comments:
Post a Comment