Police Watch and Do Nothing as Masked Antifa Vandals Violently Attack TPUSA Students, Staff at UC Davis

On April 3, 2025, a violent incident occurred during a Turning Point USA (TPUSA) tabling event at UC Davis, where masked Antifa protesters attacked TPUSA staff and students.

• The TPUSA event, featuring former police officer Brandon Tatum, was disrupted when Antifa protesters destroyed their setup by stealing a tent, ripping banners, and attempting to steal electronics.

• Police officers present did not intervene as the attackers assaulted students and vandalized property.

• Protesters chanted slogans like "Antifascista! A! Anti! " while approaching the TPUSA team.

• An Antifa member reportedly hit a TPUSA supporter in the head with a sign, shouting insults during the attack.

• Just days earlier, a TPUSA Chapter President was attacked at the University of Texas at Dallas with a metal bike lock by a transgender individual, raising concerns over the safety of TPUSA members at events.

The assaults on TPUSA staff and students at UC Davis and UT Dallas highlight ongoing tensions and violence surrounding political events on campuses, raising important questions about safety and law enforcement response during such incidents. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/police-do-nothing-as-masked-antifa-vandals-violently/

Democrats Want 'Misgendering' And 'Deadnaming' To Be Considered Child Abuse

 In Colorado, Democrats have proposed a bill known as "The Kelly Loving Act," which aims to recognize "misgendering" and "deadnaming" as forms of child abuse for minors identifying as transgender.

• The legislation defines "deadnaming" as calling someone by their birth name instead of their chosen name, and "misgendering" as using pronouns or titles that do not align with the individual's gender identity.

• If passed, the law would influence child custody cases, where courts must consider misgendering and deadnaming as forms of "coercive control" by a parent.

• The bill was prompted by societal changes regarding gender identities, with concerns that non-affirming parents could risk losing custody of their children.

• The legislation also aims to prohibit enforcement of out-of-state laws that may remove children from parents supportive of transition-related procedures.

• Additionally, it mandates schools to implement policies for recognizing chosen names and to deter dress codes based on gender.

• The bill has passed a House committee and is proceeding to a full House vote.

The proposed bill in Colorado seeks to legally protect the identities of transgender minors by classifying certain parental behaviors as abusive. This has the potential to significantly impact custody decisions and school policies across the state.

https://modernity.news/2025/04/03/democrats-want-misgendering-and-deadnaming-to-be-considered-child-abuse/

Media Eviscerated For Claiming Jailing Marine Le Pen Is ‘Good For Democracy’

TIME Magazine is receiving criticism for stating that Marine Le Pen's conviction on a bureaucratic charge is “good for French democracy. ” This conviction bans her from office for five years and includes a prison sentence. Critics argue this is part of a broader effort across Europe to prevent nationalist candidates from gaining power.

Le Pen will serve two years of her four-year sentence under house arrest with an ankle monitor. The Paris Court of Appeal will decide on her election ban by next year. Le Pen sees this as positive news and plans to appeal the ruling, asserting that the ban violates the principle of innocence during appeals. Current polls indicate she is likely to win if she runs in 2027. 

https://modernity.news/2025/04/02/media-eviscerated-for-claiming-jailing-marine-le-pen-is-good-for-democracy/

Democrats Are Terrified Of Trump’s Plan To Make Election Secure

The SAVE Act has been proposed to improve election integrity by requiring documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote. This legislation follows President Trump's executive order and aims to address concerns about noncitizen voting.

• Executive Order and SAVE Act: President Trump signed an executive order that aligns with the SAVE Act, which mandates proof of citizenship for voter registration.

• Current Voting Laws: Although noncitizen voting is illegal, existing laws lack enforcement, making it difficult to ensure that only eligible voters participate in elections.

• Democratic Opposition: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer expressed strong disapproval of the SAVE Act, claiming it could disenfranchise millions of American citizens, although he provides no proof of this claim.

• Call for Proof of Citizenship: The SAVE Act would amend the National Voter Registration Act to require proof of citizenship. Critics argue that the current system is vulnerable to fraud, as it relies on individuals’ honesty regarding their citizenship status.

• Examples of Noncitizen Voting: Reports indicate that noncitizens have participated in elections, such as a Chinese student who voted illegally and a case in Iowa involving a noncitizen voting in a local election. Other states, like Oregon and Ohio, have also recorded instances of noncitizen voting.

• Need for Legislative Action: Advocates for the SAVE Act argue that without requiring proof of citizenship, there is no reliable way to confirm that noncitizens are not voting. The Department of Justice has reportedly shown little interest in prosecuting noncitizen voting cases.

• Accountability and Integrity: Proponents believe that safeguarding voter eligibility is essential for the integrity of elections, especially in closely contested races where every vote can change the outcome.

Supporters of election integrity advocate for the SAVE Act, believing it is crucial for preventing noncitizen voting. Opposition from Democrats raises questions about the enforcement of voter laws and the need for a system that ensures only eligible voters can participate. The ongoing debate emphasizes the importance of election security in American democracy. 

https://thefederalist.com/2025/04/04/democrats-are-terrified-of-trumps-plan-to-make-election-secure/

Sen. Ron Johnson Probes ‘Development’ And ‘Safety’ Of Big Pharma’s Covid Shots

Senator Ron Johnson has taken significant steps to examine the safety and development of COVID-19 vaccines. He has reached out to major pharmaceutical companies to gather information regarding their vaccine production.

1. Inquiry into Big Pharma: Sen. Johnson is demanding information from the CEOs of Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, and BioNTech about the creation and safety of their COVID-19 vaccines. This inquiry is part of a broader investigation being conducted by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.

2. Request for Documentation: In his letters, Johnson has requested detailed records including:

• Names and titles of employees involved in vaccine development.

• A complete list of entities involved in the testing and creation of their vaccines.

• All communications relating to vaccine development between these companies and federal entities since January 2020.

3. Concerns About Vaccine Safety: Johnson’s inquiry comes amidst growing concerns over the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. For instance, there have been reports of increased risks, such as myocarditis in young men, linked to the mRNA vaccines.

4. Communication with Big Tech: Johnson also demands records of communications between these pharmaceutical companies and major technology firms regarding adverse events connected to the vaccines. He specifically mentions companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter.

5. Government and Big Tech Collaboration: The senator points out that the Biden administration has been involved in efforts to censor information regarding vaccine safety on social media, raising concerns about First Amendment rights.

6. Deadline for Compliance: Johnson has set a deadline for the pharmaceutical companies to respond to his requests by April 16.

Sen. Ron Johnson's inquiries seek to uncover information that could address public concerns about COVID-19 vaccines. His requests for documentation and communications aim to ensure transparency regarding vaccine safety and efficacy. 

https://thefederalist.com/2025/04/04/exclusive-sen-ron-johnson-probes-development-and-safety-of-big-pharmas-covid-shots/

Big Pharma gravy train hits the skids under Trump, panicking revolving-door regulators, investors

The article discusses recent changes in the U. S. regulatory environment under the Trump administration, focusing on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and its relationship with the pharmaceutical industry. It highlights the implications of job cuts and leadership changes on drug approval processes and public health.

1. The Trump administration is undergoing significant changes in the public health workforce, leading to fears within the pharmaceutical industry about the future of drug approvals.

2. A notable departure is that of FDA's Peter Marks, whose exit has caused drug stock prices to drop and raised concerns about the FDA's future role in regulating drug safety and efficacy.

3. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced cuts to its workforce, including substantial job losses at the NIH, which has prompted further changes in health research priorities.

4. Many former regulators express concern that these changes will slow down drug discovery and approval, potentially causing delays for patients needing treatments, especially in the area of rare diseases.

5. Critics argue that the FDA has historically favored the pharmaceutical industry's interests over patient safety, and previous management allowed less rigorous studies for approvals.

6. There's contention regarding the effectiveness of COVID boosters authorized under Marks' leadership, with some researchers criticizing these decisions lacking solid scientific backing.

7. The reduction of federal funding and structural changes at key health agencies may impact scientific progress and discourage development of innovative therapies like gene therapies and mRNA vaccines.

The ongoing upheaval within the FDA and HHS raises significant concerns over the effectiveness and priorities of U. S. drug regulation. With a history of collaboration between regulators and the pharmaceutical industry, the current shifts could lead to a reevaluation of drug approval processes and raise questions about future public health outcomes. 

https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/big-pharma-gravy-train-hits-skids-under-trump-panicking-revolving-door

No Evidence Aired in the Media? No Duty. No Apologies.

Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national deported to El Salvador, is portrayed in the media as a victim of harsh Trump-era policies. However, allegations of his ties to the violent MS-13 gang raise questions about the media's narrative.

• Garcia is being depicted as a loving family man by outlets like CNN while omitting crucial details about his alleged gang connections.

• The media's outrage centers around the Trump administration's lack of transparency in providing evidence for the deportation.

• Critics argue that the administration has no obligation to disclose sensitive intelligence to the press, especially regarding national security matters.

• The demand for evidence by the media appears to serve a political agenda rather than a genuine quest for transparency.

• The piece highlights a double standard in media scrutiny, contrasting the treatment of Trump’s administration with that of President Biden, whose potential cognitive issues have not elicited similar demands for accountability.

• The author argues that actions taken against Garcia and others suspected of gang affiliation reflect law enforcement vigilance rather than cruelty.

• The discourse surrounding this case should prioritize community safety over media narratives that sensationalize immigration enforcement.

The media's focus on the lack of evidence for Garcia's deportation seems more politically motivated than concerned for justice. While the press demands accountability, law enforcement actions must prioritize public safety over media scrutiny. The administration is not obligated to satisfy hostile networks with evidence. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/04/no_evidence_aired_in_the_media_no_duty_no_apologies.html