The Third Big Lie of Vaccinology

  "The Third Big Lie of Vaccinology," which is the belief that an individual's immunity relies on the vaccinations of others. The author argues that this concept is illogical and stems from fear and misinformation.

1. Basic Logic of Immunity: The argument presented is straightforward: if a person (Person A) is vaccinated and that vaccination is effective, then they should not be at risk from unvaccinated individuals (Person B). If Person A claims that their immunity is somehow dependent on Person B being vaccinated, it implies that the vaccine does not work.

2. Intellectual Dishonesty: The article accuses some vaccine proponents of avoiding logical conclusions by "moving the goalposts"—changing the argument once it is disproven, such as insisting on herd immunity, which is not practical for most vaccines.

3. Medical Ethics: The author points out that forcefully vaccinating individuals violates medical ethics and a person’s autonomy over their own body, citing historical legal precedents.

4. Fear and Scapegoating: The piece argues that the notion of one’s immunity being dependent on another's vaccination is rooted in fear that scapegoats those who are unvaccinated. This fear not only misrepresents the efficacy of vaccines but also encourages magical thinking regarding public health.

5. Impacts of Vaccine Policy: The author uses the example of a measles outbreak following the confirmation of a new health secretary, suggesting that blaming unvaccinated individuals for outbreaks perpetuates a false narrative. Statistics show higher measles cases in vaccinated populations than expected, indicating lapses in the argument that vaccines alone would prevent outbreaks.

6. Resistance Against Mandatory Vaccination: The article concludes that the push for widespread vaccination is less about eradicating disease and more about eliminating dissent against vaccination, positioning the unvaccinated as a threat challenging the efficacy of vaccines.

The article asserts that claiming one's immunity is reliant upon the vaccinations of others undermines the credibility of vaccines. It emphasizes the need for logical reasoning against fear-based arguments in vaccination discussions and criticizes the strategies used to promote mandatory vaccination policies. The author advocates for respect for personal choice in health decisions without unjust blame towards unvaccinated individuals.

https://brownstone.org/articles/the-third-big-lie-of-vaccinology/

EXC: Trump Administration Hands Millions to Refugee Admission Groups

Recently, the Trump administration has approved significant financial support for organizations involved in refugee resettlement, despite ongoing concerns about illegal immigration and fraud.

• The Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) plans to grant nearly $7 million to two organizations for refugee case management and integration.

• One major recipient is the Community Sponsorship Hub in St. Paul, Minnesota, set to receive over $2.5 million. This area is notable for ongoing fraud investigations related to Somali immigrants.

• The Community Sponsorship Hub aims to enhance the number of refugees in the U. S. and is actively working against Trump’s immigration policies.

• The second grant, up to $4.5 million, will go to Catholic Charities USA, a large organization known for its refugee resettlement services. Critics argue that it enables mass migration and opposes strict immigration policies.

• Despite Trump administration rhetoric on immigration control and fraud investigations, the simultaneous funding actions highlight a disconnect between public statements and administrative actions.

These funding decisions underscore the complexities and contradictions in U. S. immigration policy. While the administration emphasizes fraud prevention, it continues to bolster refugee resettlement programs financially. 

https://substack.com/home/post/p-181729566

Pennsylvania Officials Let Unsent Mail Pile Up For A Month, But Promise Mail Voting Is Super Secure

 A recent issue in Pennsylvania reveals a significant mail delivery failure involving the state's contracts with mail vendors. This incident raises concerns about the reliability of mail-in voting, particularly in light of the upcoming elections.

• Mail Delivery Failures: Pennsylvania's mail vendor, Capitol Presort Services, failed to deliver approximately 3.4 million official letters from state agencies, leaving departments unable to communicate essential information. This period of halted mail delivery lasted for a month, from November 3 to December 3, 2025.

• Impact on Essential Services: The delayed mail included critical communications regarding food assistance programs (SNAP), health coverage, and various license and registration renewals from the Pennsylvania Department of Human Services and the Department of Transportation. These delays affected individuals who needed to respond by specific deadlines to retain benefits or ensure compliance with state regulations.

• Political Context: While the Pennsylvania Governor, Josh Shapiro, criticized former President Donald Trump during a government shutdown, his administration's failure to manage mail services raised questions about its competence in handling elections and voter services.

• Election Integrity Concerns: Following this scandal, concerns about the security and effectiveness of mail-in voting have resurfaced. The Pennsylvania Department of State's assurances of safe mail-in voting seem questionable given the recent mail mishaps. Historical instances of mail not being delivered properly reinforce doubts about mail-in ballots being reliably counted, as highlighted by various election-related mail delivery issues across the country.

• Vulnerabilities in Mail Voting: The article cites several incidents where undelivered mail, including ballots, was reported. Issues include lost ballots in ditches, undelivered mail piles, and even cases of individuals being prosecuted for ballot theft. In competitive elections, the margin for changing results is minimal, which makes mail-in voting vulnerabilities particularly concerning.

The mail delivery issues in Pennsylvania not only disrupt essential government services but also cast a shadow on the integrity of mail-in voting. Given these events, there is a heightened need for states to review their mail handling systems, especially as elections approach. The reliable delivery of ballots is critical for maintaining public trust in the electoral process.

https://thefederalist.com/2025/12/16/pennsylvania-officials-let-unsent-mail-pile-up-for-a-month-but-promise-mail-voting-is-super-secure/

Emails detail how Biden DOJ bowled over FBI concerns in raiding Donald Trump’s Florida home

Newly declassified emails reveal significant concerns from the FBI regarding the justification for the search warrant executed on Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in August 2022. These emails indicate that the FBI doubted the probable cause necessary for the search, while the Justice Department, under President Biden, proceeded without accommodating the FBI's reservations. This situation has led some lawmakers to suggest that Trump may have grounds to sue for civil rights violations.

1. FBI Doubts on Probable Cause: The FBI expressed concerns that there was not sufficient probable cause to support the search warrant against Trump, questioning if he had violated laws regarding classified documents.

2. Desire for Cooperation Ignored: The FBI agents suggested alternative approaches to resolve the issue, such as communicating with Trump's attorney to find a reasonable solution, but the Justice Department chose to expand the warrant's scope instead and refused further discussions.

3. Attempts at Compliance: Originally, on May 11, 2022, the Justice Department asked Trump to return all classified documents. Trump's attorney responded that the deadline was flexible, yet the department insisted there would be no extensions, which led to tensions.

4. Conflicted Opinions within the FBI: While some FBI agents pushed for caution and a professional approach to the search, others in the Justice Department disregarded concerns about optics, which could have impacted the search's perception as politically motivated.

5. The Role of Biden’s Administration: The Biden White House, along with the Justice Department, actively engaged in initiating the investigation into Trump’s handling of documents. They worked to waive Trump's executive privilege, enabling them to pursue the investigation further.

6. Potential Legal Outcomes: Congressman Tom Tiffany noted that the newly surfaced emails could provide grounds for Trump to sue the Justice Department or could prompt a criminal investigation into the DOJ’s handling of the process.

7. Upcoming Testimonies: The documents were submitted to Congress as Jack Smith, the special counsel overseeing investigations into Trump, is scheduled to give testimony regarding the federal prosecutions of Trump.

The declassified emails shed light on the internal disagreements within the FBI and the Justice Department regarding the search of Trump's property. The outcome of this ongoing investigation has the potential to influence both legal and political landscapes, particularly ahead of the upcoming elections. As discussions move forward, the implications of these findings may provide Trump with avenues for legal action based on civil rights or civil liberties violations concerning the search and investigation process. 

https://justthenews.com/accountability/political-ethics/biden-doj-expanded-warrant-refused-talks-trump-lawyer-discounted

The Marxist Transformation of the Democrat Party

Steve McCann discusses the evolution of the Democrat Party in the United States from its historical roots to its current Marxist/socialist leanings. It highlights how key events and figures, especially Barack Obama, have contributed to this transformation, marking it as a significant threat to the nation's founding principles.

• Historical Context: Since 1912, the Democrat Party has been viewed as America's left-wing political party, yet it has historically been connected, albeit tenuously, to the founding principles of the nation.

• Rise of Far-Left Influence: By 2020, the socialist wing of the party gained substantial ground, with 266 avowed socialists winning elections compared to only 86 in 2018. This shift solidified the party's leftist tendencies.

• Media Reporting: By summer and fall of 2025, even the mainstream media began reporting on the Marxist/socialist takeover of the party as a significant threat to American governance.

• Barack Obama's Influence: The article argues that the pivotal moment for the party's transformation was the 2008 election of Barack Obama, whose image and charisma distracted from his far-left beliefs, leading many loyal party members to overlook his agenda.

• Party Loyalty Over Ideology: The author criticizes Democratic officeholders for blindly supporting Obama despite his controversial policies, demonstrating a willingness to sacrifice principles for party loyalty.

• Legislative Changes: Under Obama's presidency, significant power was centralized in the executive branch, with controversial policies like ObamaCare being passed with minimal resistance from a congress largely supportive or intimidated by the president.

• Impact of Trump's Election: The unexpected victory of Donald Trump in 2016 exacerbated the Democratic Party's internal chaos, leading to a fixation on discrediting Trump, rather than addressing the leftist shift within their ranks.

• Emerging Leftist Groups: The article describes how alliances formed between established Democrats and newer far-left groups (e.g., the Democratic Socialists of America) facilitated the rise of younger, more radical elements within the party.

• Public Perception: A poll from July 2025 indicated that only 28% of Americans viewed the Democrat Party favorably, reflecting a growing discontent with its direction.

• Republican Response: The article criticizes establishment Republicans for failing to recognize and challenge the far-left agenda of the Democrat Party, suggesting a lack of urgency in confronting this perceived threat.

McCann concludes that the Democrat Party has transformed into a Marxist/socialist entity, representing a significant internal threat to America, especially as the old guard fades from power and more radical elements take control. The implications of this transformation are concerning for the political landscape and national identity, making it crucial for opposing parties to address these changes assertively. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/12/the_marxist_transformation_of_the_democrat_party.html

Gavin Newsom's Barbaric Stand on Young Children

California Governor Gavin Newsom's political rise and his controversial stance on gender issues affecting children. The author critiques Newsom’s political maneuvering within the Democratic Party and expresses strong opposition to his policies, particularly regarding transgender rights among young individuals.

1. Political Context:

• Gavin Newsom is positioned as a frontrunner for the Democratic nomination in the 2028 Presidential Election.

• Criticism of the Democratic Party’s elite decisions over regular voter participation in candidate selection.

• Historical context of previous Democratic primaries being influenced or rigged in favor of certain candidates, notably Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden.

2. Newsom’s Image and Governance:

• Newsom is described as a charismatic politician with a tendency to manipulate public perception.

• He has been criticized for his governance in California, with claims that he does not fit the ideal Democratic profile.

3. Controversial Policies on Gender:

• Newsom has made statements supporting transgender rights, particularly in terms of legislative achievements related to the LGBTQ community.

• He discusses the importance of fairness in sports for transgender individuals, suggesting a complex stance that tries to appeal to both progressive and moderate voters.

4. Concerns About Children and Gender Identity:

• The author raises concerns about young children making life-altering decisions regarding gender identity.

• Noting that children’s brains are not fully developed, the author argues against the influence of adults on children’s perceptions of gender fluidity.

5. Legislation and Parental Rights:

• Newsom has supported laws that allow children to change their gender identification without parental notification.

• This is seen as a coercive act rather than a choice made by the child, raising ethical concerns.

6. Statistical Context:

• The article cites high rates of suicidal thoughts and attempts among transgender individuals, linking this to the broader implications of Newsom’s policies.

7. Criticism of Terminology:

• The article critiques the language surrounding gender issues in legislation (e.g., terms like “gender-affirming care” vs. “chemical castration”).

• The author believes that the use of euphemisms masks the potential harm of these policies to children.

8. Calls for Protection:

• There is a call to protect children from what is deemed as “barbaric” practices related to gender transitions.

• The author refers to historical examples of extreme behaviors as a comparison to current policies, marking them as morally unacceptable.

The author concludes that Gavin Newsom’s advocacy for policies affecting young children’s gender identity is dangerous and morally reprehensible. Newsom is portrayed as unsuitable for leadership positions, including the presidency, due to his stance on these issues. The article reflects a deep concern for the welfare of children influenced by adult ideologies and the ramifications of gender transition practices. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/12/gavin_newsom_s_barbaric_stand_on_young_children.html

Liberal Washington Post Editorial Board Slams Mayor Johnson’s Budget Plan: ‘Chicago Has Lost its Mind’

The Washington Post Editorial Board has sharply criticized Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson's budget proposal, indicating a significant concern for the city's financial future. This critique is notable as it comes from an outlet typically aligned with liberal viewpoints.

1. Editorial Board's Concern: The Washington Post argues that Johnson’s budget plan does not address the city's deep financial issues, particularly underscoring that it relies on new taxes and raises already existing ones as a temporary solution to long-term problems.

2. Unfunded Pension Liabilities: Chicago faces serious structural issues, primarily due to underfunded pension programs. Johnson's proposed financial changes appear to be mere short-term fixes rather than genuine fiscal reform.

3. Historical Context: The critique reflects a broader historical pattern of short-sighted financial decisions in Chicago, such as the controversial 2008 parking meter deal, which still affects the city's budgeting negatively.

4. Increased Budget: Chicago's operating budget surged by nearly 40% from 2019 to 2025, largely benefiting from one-time federal pandemic funds. However, with these funds no longer available, the city could struggle to maintain programs initiated during the pandemic.

5. Tax Proposals: Johnson aims to tackle a $1.15 billion budget shortfall by increasing taxes on businesses and introducing a head tax effecting large employers, which may further hinder economic growth and job creation in Chicago.

6. Reactions to the Critique: In response to the Washington Post's editorial, Johnson dismissed the information as incorrect, suggesting a recurring theme of media misrepresentation of his policies.

7. Comparison with Previous Administration: The article notes that while former Mayor Lori Lightfoot faced criticism, Johnson's management appears to be under even more scrutiny, raising questions about the city's leadership.

The Washington Post's critique highlights the critical financial challenges that Chicago faces and questions the efficacy of Mayor Johnson's budget proposals. The reliance on increased taxation and short-term solutions raises concerns about the future of Chicago's economy and governance, as the city grapples with its fiscal realities. 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/12/whoa-liberal-washington-post-editorial-board-slams-mayor/