No Worries, They All Are Obama Judges — With a Touch of Clinton and Biden

 Trump’s initiatives as consistently undermined by partisan judges while contrasting his actions with historical precedents. It portrays his attempts to restore law and order, reform trade through tariffs, and confront woke/DEI policies in academia as necessary corrections to systemic problems, only to be met with rulings of “Illegal! Unconstitutional! Fascist!” from Obama- and Biden-appointed judges. The narrative suggests that while judges once tried to fit personal leanings within the law, today’s liberal judges outright distort or disregard the law to advance ideological ends.

Tariffs, once predicted to spark runaway inflation, are defended as successful tools of economic fairness, leveling the trade playing field while generating massive revenue. Similarly, Trump’s pushback against anarchist violence, antisemitic universities, and illegal immigration is presented as rooted in justice and common sense, but obstructed by courts serving political agendas.

The article concludes with a strategic prescription: Trump must flood the system with executive orders, banking on higher courts to overturn activist rulings, and Republicans must ensure a long-term MAGA succession—echoing Reagan’s era—to undo decades of policy failures.

• National Guard Precedent

  • Eisenhower, Kennedy, and LBJ were praised for deploying troops to restore order.

  • Trump faces accusations of authoritarianism for the same action.

  • Judges aligned with Obama/Biden block interventions, labeling them unconstitutional.

• Tariffs and Trade

  • For decades, America endured one-way tariffs and trade manipulation.

  • Trump’s tariffs challenge unfair practices (currency games, forced partnerships, environmental regulations).

  • Predicted inflation hasn’t materialized—foreign companies still profit and keep prices stable.

  • Tariffs projected to raise trillions in U.S. revenue over time.

• Universities, DEI, and Antisemitism

  • Trump withholds federal funding from schools entrenched in DEI and antisemitism.

  • Courts repeatedly strike down his actions.

• Immigration

  • Law explicitly allows deportation unless asylum fits one of five categories.

  • Judges routinely block deportations, stretching the law to fit political goals.

• Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Honesty

  • Past judges bent law to personal leanings but acknowledged legal constraints.

  • Current liberal justices (esp. Sotomayor and Jackson) portrayed as dishonest, prioritizing ideology over law.

  • Barrett, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch seen as more honest interpreters, though occasionally frustrating conservatives.

• Strategic Outlook

  • Expect near-constant judicial obstruction of Trump’s executive orders.

  • Key: issue a flood of executive actions early; higher courts will eventually uphold many.

  • Long-term solution: secure three MAGA terms to solidify reforms, similar to Reagan-Bush era.

  • Strong bench of successors exists: Vance, Rubio, Cruz, Cotton, Hawley, etc.

• Underlying Principle

  • Democracy requires true justice and impartial courts.

  • Current judicial partisanship threatens rule of law and undermines voter mandates.

https://spectator.org/no-worries-they-all-are-obama-judges-with-a-touch-of-clinton-and-biden/