"The Steady State: A Political Organization with a Controversial Past"
The Steady State, a political action group formed by former U.S. national security officials, has made its presence known once again, sparking controversy with its recent actions and endorsements. The group, which describes itself as a 501(c)(4) tax-exempt "social welfare organization," claims to have over 300 members, all of whom are former intelligence, State Department, and other national security professionals. Its primary objective is to promote democracy, the rule of law, and national security based on American values. However, it is also becoming increasingly involved in the political arena, endorsing Democratic candidates while continuing to oppose figures associated with Donald Trump, such as FBI Director Kash Patel and former Congressman Tulsi Gabbard.
The group’s history reveals that it was formed in 2016, largely in response to the election of Donald Trump. The Steady State’s involvement in politics has been contentious, especially due to its connections to the infamous Hunter Biden laptop letter, which many critics view as an attempt to discredit the laptop's authenticity during the 2020 election cycle. The group has maintained a level of secrecy about its operations and membership, yet many of its members, such as former CIA officials and intelligence operatives, have become prominent figures within it.
-
Origins and Ideology: Formed in 2016, the Steady State was created as a response to the perceived threat of Donald Trump’s presidency, focusing on preserving U.S. national security and democratic values.
-
Hunter Biden Laptop Letter: The Steady State has ties to the infamous October 2020 letter signed by several former intelligence officials, which attempted to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the Hunter Biden laptop story by labeling it as Russian disinformation.
-
Political Endorsements: The group has publicly endorsed several Democratic candidates, including Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D-Va.), Rep. Eugene Vindman (D-Va.), and other progressive figures. These endorsements focus on candidates who oppose the Trump administration’s policies, positioning the Steady State as a staunch anti-Trump entity.
-
Secrecy and Transparency: While the group claims to have over 300 members, there has been a lack of transparency regarding who exactly makes up the Steady State. Its website launched in March 2020, coinciding with its endorsement of Joe Biden, raising questions about its public profile and activities.
-
Controversial Actions: The Steady State has taken a number of actions that have drawn criticism. It has attacked figures like Kash Patel, Tulsi Gabbard, and others, citing their alleged threats to democratic institutions and national security. It also criticized the declassification efforts by Gabbard related to Russiagate.
-
Political Involvement and Messaging: The group has endorsed several candidates running for office, framing its involvement as a necessary corrective to what it views as the growing politicization of intelligence in U.S. governance. This aligns the Steady State closely with the broader "Resistance" movement against Trump-era policies.
-
Contradictions and Criticism: Despite its claim of being a stabilizing force within U.S. governance, many critics argue that the group’s actions often contradict its stated goals. The endorsements of left-wing candidates who oppose Trump could suggest an agenda more focused on partisan politics rather than safeguarding democracy.
Pros:
-
Strong network of experienced national security professionals.
-
Clear dedication to preserving democratic norms and the rule of law.
-
Well-organized political endorsements for candidates who share their vision of American values.
Cons:
-
Secretive nature and lack of transparency regarding membership and funding.
-
Heavy political bias, particularly in opposition to Trump, which might undermine claims of neutrality.
-
Ties to controversial events such as the Hunter Biden laptop letter raise questions about credibility.
The Steady State’s re-emergence in the political landscape is marked by ideological polarization and political partisanship. Its roots in national security and intelligence give it some credibility, but its political actions and endorsements have alienated certain factions. Whether it can maintain its original mission of promoting democracy and national security, or if it will continue to be seen as a political tool in the ongoing battle between the left and right, remains to be seen.
Report on the Biden Laptop
There are, at the very least, 459 documented violations of state & federal laws & regulations on the infamous device.
https://marcopolo501c3.substack.com/p/report-on-the-biden-laptop
No comments:
Post a Comment