Explaining how the counter is increasing in supposedly real time, it states: "Human population was predicted using the FAOSTAT projected population for 2020 and 2021. A constant rate of growth over this periodwas assumed. Ruminant population size was predicted using FAOSTAT world livestock data from 1961-2019." It all sounds very scientific and accurate! The increase of 200,000 people a day is an estimated constant growth rate applied to a projection that is 3 years old.
How Accurate is Ripple's Population Estimate? Ripple writes as if the population increasing by 200,000 per day is a fact, even though it is an estimate of a 3-year-old projection.
In a 2019 blog, Happy Antipodeon noted the caveats on world population estimates given by the World Bank and the UN. It can be summed up by one sentence which Happy Antipodean quoted from the World Population Review's website, "It simply isn't possible to be sure exactly how many people there are on the Earth at any one time." The World Population Review's webpage titled 'World Population 2024' still includes these words.
Striking the death blow to Ripple's 'Global Human and Ruminant Livestock Counter', the World Population Review also states, "The process of tracking the exact number of births and deaths in every country and territory in the world in real time - and maintaining a precise tally of the number of people alive on the Earth at any given moment - is logistically infeasible." Here are some of the reasons why attempts to estimate the global population cannot be made with any accuracy: Historical population data before the 18th century are scarce and often based on rough estimates.
Population estimates are typically reported to the nearest million or billion, which means that the actual figure may be significantly different from the reported value.
Is our world population truly 7.4 billion? Are we forgetting people somewhere? How do we know this number is accurate? Quora, retrieved 9 October 2024 In 2014 The Guardian published an article stating that the population numbers "And most of what we think of as facts, are actually estimates." Carrington needs to read this article.
Development data: how accurate are the figures? The Guardian, 31 January 2014 A 2023 article published by the Chartered Professional Accountants Canada detailed some of the problems in obtaining accurate data: When it comes to global population estimates, "152 out of 237 countries reporting to the United Nations had a population census or population registrar as recent as 2015," Kerr explains.
"India, the world's largest country, with an estimated population of 1.4 billion, is still trying to complete a 2020 census that was held up by logistical problems from the covid-19 pandemic," Kerr said.
Patrick Gerland, the UN's chief of population estimates, confirms the difficulty in producing an accurate number in some cases.
Although the discrepancy in GP patient numbers has raised suspicions of fraud, it is also possible that the higher GP patient numbers are due to illegal immigrants, estimated to be around 745,000, who do not have to declare their status while registering with GPs. As The Spectator points out, the true population of Britain remains unknown due to the lack of accurate data and the complexities of tracking population numbers, particularly migration.
Britain's population is growing rapidly, primarily due to immigration, with estimates suggesting that around 3.6% of the population has arrived in the past two years.
https://expose-news.com/2024/10/10/climate-change-agenda-is-the-depopulation-agenda/
No comments:
Post a Comment