Infants and Children Under 12 Given the Pfizer mRNA COVID “Vaccine” Seven Months BEFORE Pediatric Approval. 71% Suffered Serious Adverse Events.

 The War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Analysis Project Post-Marketing Group (Team 1) produced a shocking review of the pediatric data found in Pfizer document 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of PF-07302048 (BNT162B2)

Important points from this report include

• Of the 34 cases, 24 (71%) were classified as serious
• Predominantly female patients were affected - at least 25 of 34 (73.5%) patients
• Table 6 reports 34 cases of use in pediatric individuals
• 28 additional cases were excluded because details such as height and weight were not consistent with pediatric subjects

The Results

• It is important to note 1) that the adverse events in the 5.3.6 document were reported to Pfizer for only a 90-day period starting on December 1, 2020, the date of the United Kingdom's public rollout of Pfizer's COVID-19 experimental mRNA "Vaccine" product and 2) no pediatric dose of the Pfizer product was approved for use during that time frame. What dose(s) of Pfizer's mRNA "Vaccine" was given to these children since no approved dose existed? One infant had a kidney adverse event, either kidney injury or failure. Table 6 reports 34 cases of use in pediatric individuals. 28 additional cases were excluded because details such as height and weight were "Not consistent with pediatric subjects." Ages ranged from two months to nine years, with median 4.0 years, which means half the children were under four years of age. 132 adverse events were reported in the 34 children - i.e., an average of 3.88 AEs per child. Please read the disturbing, two-page report by the Post-Marketing Group below.

https://dailyclout.io/report-54-infants-and-children-under-12-given-the-pfizer-mrna-covid-vaccine-seven-months-before-pediatric-approval-71-suffered-serious-adverse-events/

China: House Divided

 There have been claims that China's enormous economic growth and widely shared prosperity are the result of turning to capitalism. I think this is not true; China is not capitalist. Of course, that depends on having a definition of capitalism that is clear, and that does not simply apply to all nations

Exchange Relations

• Exchange is a means of improving the welfare of both (all) parties to an exchange, if the exchange is voluntary
• Voluntary exchange must leave the exchangers better off
• The bases of voluntary exchange are three: Different preferences, same endowments, same preferences
• Division of labor and specialization that creates what looks like different endowerments, on steroids
• If I like bananas and you like oranges, and we both have bananas and oranges, then I'll give up some of my oranges in exchange for your bananas
• We are both better off, even with the same total amount of stuff

Market relations

• Exchange, in the sense of barter, is cumbersome, and transaction costs can hinder all but the simplest exchanges.
• Markets enable the degree of division of labor to reach much greater elaboration, and create much faster growth in the wealth of market participants.

Capitalism

• Capital is the product of saving, or foregone consumption, that allows entrepreneurs to use abstract value in the form of money to give physical form to their conceptions of production
• Ownership in a capitalist system is both the mechanism for raising liquid capital-by selling shares that are claims against the value of future profits-and a means of controlling substantial resources independent from state direction and control

Capitalism is a system for raising liquid capital and creating countervailing power centers that constrain totalitarian aspirations of government

• As long as the Chinese state is primarily centralized and authoritarian, capitalism will be blocked
• This means that Chinese economic growth will be strangled, as capital becomes more and more constrained

https://www.aier.org/article/china-house-divided/

Is the FDA “doubling down” on a failed strategy?

 The FDA convened its Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) to discuss the future of covid vaccines. The panel voted 21 to 0 in favor of moving towards a more simplified vaccine schedule - an annual shot which would be updated as new variants emerge - much like the annual flu shot

Still no correlate of protection

• Three years into the pandemic, the FDA has still not established a "correlate of protection" for the vaccines
• The idea is, the more antibodies produced, the better you are protected
• But neutralizing antibodies do not predict the degree to which someone is protected from infection... and the FDA knows it
• We are at risk of doubling down on a failed strategy
• Ofer Levy, VRBPAC member and Professor of Pediatrics at Boston Children's Hospital, voiced his concern that we may be using poor man's immune correlates of protection here
• Peter Marks, FDA's top vaccine official, agreed that there is not a clear, perfect immune correlate
• Fast forward to this latest meeting, and it becomes clear that we're all still in the dark
• Doctors are refusing to give any more COVID shots until there are better studies

No Update on Subclinical Myocarditis

• Pfizer is obligated to conduct a study involving people aged 16 to 30 to look at rates of subclinical myocarditis (i.e. underlying damage to the heart muscle without causing symptoms).
• The final report was due 31 December 2022, but that deadline lapsed, and the FDA said nothing.
• Jessica Adams, an expert in drug regulatory affairs, pointed out that the FDA had quietly changed the due date for the study to 30 June 2023.

FDA still working from home

• Since all federal employees have been mandated to take the COVID-19 vaccine to "protect themselves and those around them," why aren't they conducting face-to-face meetings?
• "FDA leaders are in a bubble. How much longer will the FDA (18,000-employees) continue to work remotely?" asked Marty Makary, surgeon and public policy researcher at Johns Hopkins University.

https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/is-the-fda-doubling-down-on-a-failed?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=583200&post_id=100007151&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email

Keeping You Informed

 Quote: "Are the COVID Yarns Slowly Beginning to Unravel?

It has been three years since COVID-19 entered the scene. It probably emerged in the previous year based on COVID antibodies found in banked blood from the fall of 2019 and a severe non-influenza respiratory illness sweeping through ICUs in the early winter of 2019. In those days it was simply called the Chinese coronavirus, based on the reported origin but we still don’t know that for sure.

In fact, much of what we have been told about COVID over the past three years has turned out to be “misinformation”, as government, corporate media, and big tech described everything that went against their preferred COVID narrative. Who are the real deniers?

Start with the origin of the Chinese coronavirus, initially said to have definitively originated in a Wuhan market due to a chance encounter of a bat with a pangolin. The latter supposedly ended up on someone’s dinner table, the virus making a miraculous leap from bat to pangolin to human in record time with no intermediate hosts or time to mutate.

In fact, the virus was likely man-made, manufactured via gain of function research which Dr Anthony Fauci adamantly denied. Such research is illegal in the US but not elsewhere in the world. “The Pentagon reportedly controls bioweapons labs in some 25 different countries including Ukraine.” What are they doing in those labs? Will the Republican-controlled Congress ask

Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland told a Senate committee, “Ukraine has biological research facilities.” Could have that been a factor in Putin’s Ukraine invasion? The media and Congress are incurious.

Recently released Project Veritas undercover videos captured Pfizer executive Dr. Jordon Trishton Walker unraveling some COVID yarns. When asked, “So, Pfizer ultimately is thinking about mutating COVID?” he replied, “Well, that is not what we say to the public. No.” That sure sounds like gain of function, or as the Pfizer executive euphemistically called it, “directed evolution”.        Are the COVID Yarns Slowly Beginning to Unravel? - American Thinker

How the “Unvaccinated” Got It Right

 The COVID “vaccine” was rolled out without long-term testing

• The argument that reduced transmission from the non-vulnerable to the vulnerable as a result of mass vaccination was only able to stand if the safety of the vaccine had been established
• Given the lack of proof, the mass vaccination policy was clearly putting at risk young or healthy lives to save old and unhealthy ones
• Policy makers did not even acknowledge this, express any concern about the grave responsibility they were taking on for knowingly putting people at risk, or indicate how they had weighed the risks before reaching their policy positions
• This was a very strong reason not to trust the policy or the people setting it
• Data and data-supported analyses showed no evidence of the efficacy of the COVID vaccine, and the only way to know for sure was to actively seek it out and test it

Suppressing information a priori suggests that the information has persuasive force

• In the case of the COVID pandemic, almost all people who acted as if the "vaccine" was safe and effective had no physical or informational evidence for the claims of safety and efficacy beyond the supposed authority of other people who made them
• How do the people who are generating the data that we saw on the news every night and were being used to justify the mass "vaccination" policy handle the uncertainty around PCR-based diagnoses?

Keep an eye out for published safety and efficacy data as the pandemic progresses

• Pfizer’s Six-month Safety and Efficacy Study was notable
• The data in the paper showed more deaths per head in the "vaccinated" group than the “unvaccinated” group
• This difference does not statistically establish that the virus is dangerous or ineffective, the generated data were clearly compatible with the incomplete safety of the vaccine
• As time went on, it became very clear that some of the informational claims that had been made to convince people to get “vaccinated,” especially by politicians and media commentators, were false

The overall political and cultural context in which the entire discourse on "vaccination" was being conducted was such that the evidential bar for the safety and efficacy of the "vaccine" was raised yet further while our ability to determine whether that bar had been met was reduced.

• In such a context, accurate determination of facts is almost impossible: moral judgment always inhibits objective empirical analysis. When dispassionate discussion of an issue is impossible because judgment has saturated discourse, drawing conclusions of sufficient accuracy and with sufficient certainty to promote rights violations and the coercion of medical treatment is next to impossible.

Precision is not accuracy

• Under great uncertainty and complexity, model outputs are dominated by the uncertainties on the input variables that have very wide (and unknown) ranges and the multiple assumptions that themselves warrant only low confidence.
• Any claimed precision of a model's output is bogus and the apparent accuracy is only and entirely that - apparent.

An honest approach to COVID and policy development would have driven the urgent development of a system to collect accurate data on COVID infections and the outcomes of COVID patients

• Instead, the powers that be did the very opposite, making policy decisions that knowingly reduced the accuracy of collected data in a way that would serve their political purposes
• They stopped distinguishing between dying with and without COVID, incentivized medical institutions to identify deaths as caused by COVID when there was no clinical data to support that conclusion, etc.
• The dishonesty of the pro-"vaccine" side was revealed by the repeated changes of official definitions of clinical terms like "vaccine".

https://brownstone.org/articles/how-the-unvaccinated-got-it-right/

Arizona Regime Is Investigating Kari Lake And Trying To JAIL Her On Felony Charges For Exercising First Amendment And Exposing Election Fraud

 Arizona is now targeting Kari Lake with felony charges for speaking out against the rigged election in Arizona

• Secretary of State Adrian Fontes sent out a letter asking Attorney General Kris Mayes to investigate and take appropriate enforcement action against Lake
• Mayes revealed that the AG's Election Integrity Unit (EIU) will become a Voter Protection Unit to fight efforts to eliminate vote by mail and prosecute alleged voter intimidation

Fontes' letter claims that Lake violated ARS 16-168 (f), which states:

• Nothing in this section shall preclude public inspection of voter registration records at the office of the county recorder for the purposes prescribed by this section, except that the month and day of birth date, the social security number, the driver license number or any portion thereof, the Indian census number, and the state or country of birth of the voter shall not be accessible or reproduced by any person other than the voter, by an authorized government official in the scope of the official's duties, for any purpose by an entity designated by the secretary of state as a voter registration agency pursuant to the national voter registration act of 1993 (P.L. 103-31; 107 Stat. 77), for signature verification on petitions and candidate filings, for election purposes and for news gathering purposes by a person engaged in newspaper, radio, television or reportorial work, or connected with or employed by a newspaper or television station or pursuant to a court order.

Local patriot Anthony Dewitt shared the letter on Twitter, saying, “This is horrible! They are now trying to come after and investigate @KariLake for speaking up about our mismanaged elections! This is political persecution!”

• These are the same tactics used by the illegitimate Hobbs regime when Katie Hobbs threatened the Mohave County Board of Supervisors with felony arrests if they did not vote to certify the election

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/01/breaking-horrible-arizona-regime-investigating-kari-lake-trying-jail-felony-charges-exercising-first-amendment-exposing-election-fraud/

Federal Jury Blows up Biden Administration Persecution of Pro-Life American Raided by the FBI

 In September of 2022, the FBI raided the home of a man named Mark Houck with guns drawn in front of his children. The show of force left onlookers confused. Was he a drug kingpin? Did he murder someone? Had he committed fraud at the highest levels?

Today, a federal jury has told the Biden administration and its DOJ where it can shove its persecution of pro-life Americans.

• Pro-life activist Mark Houck was found NOT GUILTY on federal FACE Act charges brought on him by Biden’s DOJ for pushing a Planned Parenthood escort who threatened his son while he was sidewalk counseling.

A victory has been won, and it's an important one.

• Had the precedent been set in this case that the government can imprison you for peacefully protesting a hundred yards away from an abortion clinic, who knows how many more convictions would have followed?

https://redstate.com/bonchie/2023/01/30/federal-jury-tells-the-biden-administration-to-shove-its-persecution-of-pro-life-americans-n696272

Pfizer Virus Mutations Aren’t the Only Inconvenient Truth About Project Veritas’s Latest Scoop

 A Soros-funded Grinch tried to steal Revolver this Christmas but was thwarted thanks to you, The People. Please help us weather any cancel culture storm by making a recurring monthly donation - whether it’s $1 or $1,000, every bit helps.

Who is Jordon Walker and how did he get a job at Pfizer?

• According to Project Veritas, Walker works for Pfizer as Director of Research and Development Strategic Operations and mRNA Scientific Planning
• Critics of the Veritas scoop have zeroed in on the idea that Walker could not possibly hold a senior role with Pfizer, citing his relatively recent graduation and unremarkable research history

The pharmaceutical giant Pfizer offers fellowships that literally don’t even allow white people to apply for them

• “Breakthrough Fellowship” offers college students multiple internships, a fully funded master’s degree, and several years of employment at the pharmaceutical giant.
• It also restricts applications to “Black/African American, Latino/Hispanic and Native American” students.

The American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) mandates that medical school admissions teams include the MCAT score among the many variables they use in evaluating applicants

• Proponents tout the test as the great equalizer of applicant competency assessments - leveling the playing field for students who come from varying academic backgrounds and testing their basic scientific knowledge.
• The MCAT clearly favors White applicants who have the wealth and resources to help them achieve competitive scores on the test - and disadvantages those from a lower socioeconomic background.
• Soon, there may be no MCAT at all.

Step 1 of the USMLE played a central role in which residencies students are accepted to; a strong score is crucial for acceptance into the most challenging specialties

• Not anymore, though! Now, Step 1 is a Pass/Fail test. Why?
• A 2020 Health Science Reports research article sought to determine whether Step 1 exam scores affected the diversity in the medical school interview process.
• The analysis showed that mean Step 1 scores were significantly higher among White applicants compared with URiM applicants.

The American affirmative action cult has always been about favoring less able people over more able ones, purely based on skin color or other superficial identity traits

• And right now, left unchecked, it's all getting worse
• There is a comforting myth that racial discrimination in the form of affirmative action is just a "tiebreaker," or a way of elevating those with more promise but less superficial polish
• That is not how it works, and it never has been

https://www.revolver.news/2023/01/pfizer-virus-mutations-arent-the-only-inconvenient-truth-about-project-veritass-latest-scoop/

Ambitious renewables mandates by local governments are eroding the electric grid’s reliability, with alarming consequences.

 The power grid is one of humanity's greatest achievements, helping to boost prosperity and cut mortality rates

• Now, those benefits are at risk.
• Dozens of states have enacted renewable-energy standards, despite the massive technological and infrastructure challenges that presents
• When citizens have looked at the scale and type of projects necessary to retrofit the American power grid, though, resistance has exploded
• Public campaigns have now held up hundreds of green projects around the country
• Some states, the pushback is so fierce that legislatures are enacting laws that make it easier for communities to opt out of the projects

The European Union has urged its members to slash energy consumption 15 percent to get through winter

• The U.S. is now the world's largest natural-gas producer, extracting nearly 1-third more than the next most productive country-Russia
• America's new stores of energy have also helped the country significantly lower its greenhouse gas emissions, as power provision shifts from coal to cleaner natural gas
• American emissions today are back to 1985 levels, though the country now uses about 42 percent more energy annually
• Green-energy mandates affect the cost and availability of energy
• Some differences have to do with geographical factors, but state regulatory policies also play a part

Over the last decade, 12 plants, representing about 9.4 gigawatts of generating power, have closed.

• Another seven plants, with 7.1 gigawatts, are scheduled to enter decommissioning by 2025
• Natural-gas plants in some states have been closing, and utilities are finding it hard to gain approvals for new stations
• An energy grid based solely on renewable power is virtually a scientific impossibility
• To account for the intermittent nature of wind and solar energy, green-energy advocates bank on utilities building massive storage facilities, deploying huge numbers of lithium-ion batteries, and building high-speed transmission systems and battery-storage facilities

https://www.city-journal.org/local-govt-renewables-mandates-eroding-electric-grid-reliability

108 new state legislative leaders elected across U.S.

 Thirty-nine Senate president elections have taken place as of this writing.

Just one Senate president change resulted in a change in party leadership.

In Minnesota, whose divided government became a Democratic trifecta as a result of the 2022 elections, Democratic legislators elected Bobby Joe Champion as Senate president, replacing Republican Rep. David Osmek.

Out of all the Senate president elections, 12 Democratic presidents remained the same, and three changed leaders.

On the Republican side, 14 Republican presidents remained the same while nine changed leaders.

Two House speaker changes resulted in a change in party leadership.

Out of all the House speaker elections, 13 Democratic speakers remained the same, and three changed leaders.

https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/108-new-state-legislative-leaders-elected-across-u-s/article_c1ad2531-a728-52bb-bb19-73f75ff8f5ba.html

$60 Billion In COVID Fraud? Try $4 Trillion

 As auditors and congressional investigators try to figure out just how much federal COVID relief went to fraudsters, they are missing the trillions of dollars in fraud committed by the federal government itself in a war that we had no chance of winning.

This Wednesday, the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability will hold a hearing "To investigate rampant waste of taxpayer dollars in COVID relief programs."

What we really need is an investigation into how the war against COVID wasted trillions of taxpayer dollars, imposed massive disruptions, handicapped millions of students, and probably didn't save many, if any, lives.

"As many as 200,000 to 1.7 million people could die." That assumed the country did nothing to mitigate COVID's spread. So, the U.S. embarked on an unprecedented effort to slow the disease's spread and develop vaccines in record time, spending trillions of dollars in the process.

By the following March, COVID relief spending was close to $4 trillion.

Researchers at Johns Hopkins University did a meta-analysis of studies done on the effectiveness of COVID mitigation efforts.

We will concede that the rapid development of COVID tests, three different vaccines, and improved treatment regimens saved lives, although just how many is unknowable.

https://issuesinsights.com/2023/01/30/60-billion-in-covid-fraud-try-4-trillion/

Maybe No One Trusts the Media Because Of All the Lies

 Trump waged war on the press, and he won, or nearly won. He persuaded millions of Americans not to believe anything they saw or heard in the non-Trumpified media, including the results of the 2020 Presidential election. The press wasn't silenced in the Trump years. It was censorship by other means

In 1976, seventy-two percent of the public trusted the news media. Today, it is thirty-four percent. Why?

• The level of media trust has steadily declined since 1976
• In 2008, the media whored out whatever shreds of its credibility to launch a full-scale cult of personality campaign for Obama
• Under Obama, media trust dipped to 40 and by 2016 hit 32

The problem is the media is too objective and not biased enough

• When all it does is scream through a megaphone, "OUR POLITICAL ENEMIES ARE EVIL AND MUST BE BUTCHERED IN THE STREETS" 24 hours a day, then finally public trust in the media will be restored

https://www.frontpagemag.com/maybe-no-one-trusts-the-media-because-of-all-the-lies/