Since the beginning of the pandemic, we have been assured that community masking compliance would solve our problems and halt the spread of SARS-CoV-2.
- Yet real-world application data has consistently shown them to fail as a mitigation measure for personal protection, and instead of correcting course on the haphazard guidance that was doled out, we were told to mask harder with increasingly restrictive, albeit effectively non-mitigating apparatuses.
- Here, we look at the output, particle- to- PFU ratio, and MID for N95s versus the hypothetical perfect capture capacity for NGCs.
Particle ranges and corresponding behavior of emitted matter
- Pandemic mitigation measures should have begun with minimum viable particle size, which for SARS-CoV-2 falls at 0.06-0.14 µm.
- More than 90% of exhaled particulates have been shown to fall under 0.3 µm, and matter remains aloft for extended periods - hours, even days, depending on air exchange rates within the given space.
Respiratory Emissions from "Sick" Patients
- PCR-Positive versus Negative Test Results
- 90%+ percent of emitted particulates by PCR-positive test subjects were under 0.3 µm, and counts of emitted matter were conducted comparing individuals with different severities of illness with PCR-negative subjects.
- If we use a respiratory emission rate of 4.3-29 liters per minute (from the EPA Exposure Factors Handbook), the highest-output range of 34,772 particles per liter multiplied by 29 liter per minute is as high as 1,008,388 particles emitted per minute.
Particle Sizes and Emission Rates
- The study previously discussed measures- emitted particle- size ranges in SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative subjects.
- Particle size distribution
- Available size channels (in total, 14 size channels from 0.15 to 5.0 μm) were analyzed in across three size bands: <0.3 μm, 0.5-5.5 μm and >0.9-10 μm
- For both groups, the majority of the aerosols (>90% in the SARS–COVID-positive group and >78%
- in the -negative group) were found in the smallest range (<0. 3 μm).
- Increases in total aerosol concentration were dominated by increases in particles ≤ 0.3μm.
The presence of RNA copies versus concentrations of viable virions
- Not all RNA copies or virus particles are capable of forming PFUs resulting in viral replication
- These are estimates on total viral production during an infection.
- "Dividing by estimates for the inverse of the viral clearance rate gives an estimated total production of 3 × 109 to 3 × 1012 virions,"
Virion output
- Different methods of establishing virion output offer slightly different ranges when viewed side-by-side
- Some studies show total virions emitted
- Others give total particle counts
- What is important to establish is that overall virus particulate output does not equal total viable virions, meaning virions capable of creating Plaque Forming Units (PFU).
PFUs
- Understanding virus particles needed to form individual Plaque Forming Units (PFU)
- One viable viral particle, or virion, is capable of creating one PFU, in which this viral particle replicates.
- The relationship between the total output of particles and the creation of PFUs is called a particle to PFU ratio.
PFU and Minimum Infective Dose Studies
- The average human respiratory rate is 16-20 breaths per minute.
- We will look into output as virions per minute, and minimum infective dose as PFUs and virions for transmission, as both are explored in available research.
Minimum Infective Dose (MID)
- Comparison studies of different respiratory viruses and SARS-CoV-2 animal studies have been used to contribute to many MID estimates, but this paper focuses solely on human studies as much as possible.
- The minimum infective dose of COVID-19 in assessed cross-sectional and case-series studies was low, and infection rates were comparable to other coronaviruses.
- Children had lower live virus growth, higher cycle thresholds, and lower viral concentration in comparison with adults, so children are not the main carriers of infection.
- The infection rate in children was lower than other groups (125 PFU).
- N95s provide meaningful protective value from infectious aerosols by looking at output contributions, infectivity potential of emitted viral matter, PFU ranges, then we can weigh these ranges against a hypothetical perfect capture capacity of N95S capturing 95% of matter, versus the remaining uncaptured 5% percent.
Why N95s failed/are failing/will fail
- Respirators with an N95 rating are designed and approved to capture 95% percent of non-oil-based matter greater than 0.3µm.
- For the purpose of an exercise in hypothetical perfect capture capacity, we will grant them an assumption of perfect 95% rate of capture
- If we apply 5% of the MID figures demonstrated in to demonstrated in output ranges A and B, it will demonstrate the infectivity of viable virions versus the 5% percent never captured
Summary
- We became lax with our mitigation standards during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak because this pathogen is not fatal for the overwhelming majority of people, with a survivability rate shown around 99.8% percent
- This flippancy toward a hazard-specific response is incredibly dangerous when applied to deadlier pathogens and exposure elements
Glossary
- aerosol - particles dispersed in air or gas, defined as less than 5 microns in size
- asymptomatic (spread) - the theoretical concept of transmitting a pathogen to others while not exhibiting any established symptoms of said pathogen
- Atmospheric saturation - the amount of viable matter that remains aloft within an enclosed space
- emissions - exhaled respiratory matter
- minimum infective dose - the minimum amount of a hazard one must be exposed to in order for onset of illness to be anticipated
- PCR-negative - a given test subject does not receive a positive test result when tested with PCR methodology for a given pathogen; PCR-positive = positive test using the polymerase chain reaction technique
- perfect capture capacity - capture of hazardous matter at a matched percent efficacy given by a product as its hypothetical best rate possible
https://brownstone.org/articles/why-n95-masks-fail-to-stop-spread/
No comments:
Post a Comment