The Historic Suppression of Scientific Debate in COVID

Never before in modern history have entire topics in Medicine been actively prevented from discussion in public forums

Because scientific data nor interpretations of that data, should ever be considered offensive.

You can argue that wrong interpretations of data can be harmful, but debate is how you resolve that, not censorship! Science literally rests on open debate and the sharing of data and exchanging of interpretations amongst not only experts, but the wider public.

We were not allowed to openly discuss our data or our interpretations and applications of that scientific data in major media or social media.

All because we had a scientific discussion where I had shared data and interpretations of that data.

The data could not be debated because any other interpretation than ivermectin being effective was pretty much indefensible in the face of a mountain of repeatedly and almost universally supportive data from myriad sources.

Yes, we all had biases when interpreting the data, but we debated.

We battled with debate using data, published literature, and deep knowledge of physiology.

https://alethonews.com/2022/08/30/the-historic-suppression-of-scientific-debate-in-covid/