"Public health policy must be based upon accurate and independently verifiable data to optimize outcomes and strengthen the public's trust in the people leading them through this crisis," the Republican lawmakers, whose state has imposed some of the harshest and longest COVID restrictions, wrote in a letter with several attached exhibits.
File Thatcher-Linthicum-Grand-Jury-Petition-AUSA.pdf "I'm not sure there has ever been an allegation of government wrongdoing on this scale," so the group wanted to assess "Accuracy and safety" before going public, relationship manager Bailey Kuykendoll told Just the News.
The lawmakers did interviews with SHF before the effort went public.
Linthicum said the "Incessant case counts" for COVID jumped out at him early, explaining that his service on the legislative health committee led him to recognize "Confusion, or inaccuracies, or kind of manipulation" of statistics on influenza-like illnesses versus COVID. "It didn't take long to actually see that the data was being scrubbed or sculpted to fit a narrative," he said.
Regarding COVID diagnosis via RT-PCR tests, the CDC and FDA recommended a high cycle threshold that is widely known to produce false positives by finding insignificant viral loads, Thatcher and Linthicum told Asphaug.
Public health experts raised the same concerns more than a year ago with The New York Times, recommending cycle thresholds of 35 or lower.
Vaccinated people, by contrast, are tested using a cycle threshold of 28, removing false positives and making it "Virtually impossible for the public to trust the data they are being presented and the public health policies based upon this data," the senators wrote.
In a summary he blamed "Phony PCR tests" for the "Unnecessary lockdowns" crippling the U.S., comparing them to HPV tests that lead thousands of women each year to get "Needless colposcopic [cervical] biopsies." Unspecified biotech companies use "These questionable test results to move the goalposts arbitrarily in defining COVID-19 infections for statistics to cover up various business agendas at the expense of public interest," Lee wrote.
Feminist author-turned-COVID contrarian Naomi Wolf interviewed Thatcher in a little-noticed video a day after the lawmaker went public.
The effort started with a peer-reviewed paper published last year in the journal Science, Public Health Policy, and The Law.
Neither Thatcher nor Linthicum has responded to queries over the course of a month.
Tuesday, October 12, 2021
Lawmakers seek federal grand jury investigation for COVID-19 statistical manipulation
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment