Arizona passed rules to prevent ballot harvesting and other changes that would open elections to fraud.
The Supreme Court upheld Arizona voting rules that restrict ballot harvesting and the submission of provisional ballots outside of one's home precinct, following a challenge from the Democratic National Committee.
In a 6-3 decision on Tuesday, the court ruled that neither the policy requiring provisional ballots to be completely disregarded if submitted at the wrong precinct nor the law making it a felony to submit another person's ballot violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that Arizona rules that prevent ballot harvesting and voting outside of one's precinct did not violate the Voting Rights Act.
This decision is key, because Biden's DOJ just launched a case against Georgia's recent voting laws.
Key Takeaways:The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to uphold Arizona's voting restriction laws.
The court decided that such rules do not violate the Voting Rights Act.
It's becoming increasingly difficult to discern fact from fiction, and unfortunately the media has a strong bias. They spin stories to make conservatives look bad and will go to great lengths to avoid reporting on the good that comes from conservative policies. There are a few shining lights in the media landscape-brave conservative outlets that report the truth and offer a different perspective. We must support conservative outlets like this one and ensure that our voices are heard.
Monday, August 2, 2021
Supreme Rules On Historic 6-3 Election Case – They Just Sided With The State Of Arizona And Against Ballot Harvesting
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment