Elections Have Consequences; Cheating Doesn't

You see, Democrats consider elections to be their most legitimate means of seizing power, but not necessarily the most effective.

Let's stick with elections because any political party that controls elections ultimately controls everything else.

The Constitution gives authority over federal elections to the individual states that make up the Union, but Pelosi's H.R. 1 would strip that authority from the states and give it to Congress.

In other words, until all those Montana elections have real consequences.

Democrat super-lawyer Marc Elias, the guy whom Hillary Clinton hired to engineer the Russia hoax, wasted no time trying to make sure that Montana elections remain a safe haven for fraud and abuse.

Why is the Democratic Party so intent on eliminating these laws? For that matter, why don't Democrats want a serious impartial investigation of voting irregularities in Georgia, Arizona and elsewhere in the 2020 election? If cheating took place, shouldn't we try to find out about it? Apparently not, because Marc Elias has filed lawsuit after lawsuit to prevent anyone from auditing or reviewing the election results from Nov. 3.

Taken together, the message of all these lawsuits is clear: Elections have consequences, but cheating doesn't.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2021/04/26/elections_have_consequences_cheating_doesnt_145650.html