Understanding History 3

This is a most disturbing bit of history that the political left progressive Democrats have over time cleverly manipulated to fool far too many Americans into believing their lies that Republicans, conservatives and Christians are racists while they label themselves as the saviors and protectors of the oppressed.  Factual history paints a far different picture.  Quote: "The Liberal Democrats take credit for civil rights and blame Republicans for obstructing these rights among minorities. But their claim is a lie. In fact, Democrats fought against any form of civil rights for minorities and only conceded when they knew that their obstructionism would fail. History proves without question that Republicans have consistently fought racism while Democrats proved that they were racists."  And,  "Democrats constantly remind us that they have always been champions of civil rights and equality among races. But, the truth proves otherwise. The fact is that the Plessy v. Ferguson decision was made by a Republican led Supreme Court, in which Earl Warren was Chief Justice, and was supported, encouraged and enthusiastically enforced by a Republican President, Dwight D. Eisenhower, who had appointed Warren. It is hailed as perhaps the most important domestic political event in one of the most highly praised and most consequential periods of American 20th Century history. But the incontrovertible truth is that Democrats despised Brown v. Board of Education and did all they could to obstruct, and to reinstitute Jim Crow laws which had made second-class citizens of black Americans. Their vehicle for this disgraceful affront to freedom was known as The Southern Manifesto. It claimed that the Supreme Court had abused its power and promised to use all lawful means to bring about the reversal of the decision and to prevent the government (i.e., President Eisenhower) from implementing it. The Southern Manifesto was drafted and presented by 99 members of both houses of Congress, of whom two were Republicans and 97 were Democrats. Obstruction to freedom and civil rights for black people was nothing new for the Democrats."  And,  "Well, it may have gotten the Democrats black votes, but in the decades since the days of Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society, Democrat policies, with the aid of liberal Republicans, have led the so-called black community to untold social instability, generational welfare and indigence, disintegration of families, illegitimacy, and astonishing rates of crime and imprisonment among black men that has led them away from prosperity, their families and responsible behavior in the community. It has also led many black people to segregate themselves from whites according to attitude. Through the words and deeds of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Louis Farrakhan, Eric Holder and Barack Obama, to name only a few of the race-baiters among us, black people have too often been encouraged to develop and expect racist attitudes toward and from white people."     https://dcdirtylaundry.com/the-democrats-were-founded-by-racists-and-their-real-intent-is-to-exterminate-the-african-american-population/ 

This short video helps put the Russian issue into some degree of rational focus.   http://www.dickmorris.com/what-makes-russia-tick-history-video/?

This is an interesting piece regarding the Clinton White House's efforts to obstruct the special prosecutor Starr's investigation into Clinton era scandals.     https://www.dailysignal.com/2018/11/29/right-side-of-history-revisiting-scandals-of-the-clinton-era-with-ken-starr/?

This is about the Boston Tea Party and its related after effects. Quote: "The British responded to the Boston Tea Party harshly. Parliament answered by passing the Coercive Acts – deemed in the colonies as the Intolerable Acts. The Massachusetts Government Act altered the colonial government’s legislature such that one house would be chosen only by the crown only. The Boston Port Act closed Boston’s port to all foreign trade, crippling the city’s maritime economy. The Administration of Justice Act allowed the Royal governor to order trials against royal officials to be moved to Great Britain or elsewhere within the British Empire. The Quartering Act provided for involuntary housing for British military forces on the private property of the colonists.  Taken as a whole, the Intolerable Acts sparked detestation and resistance, polarizing many who had never before been predisposed to the patriot cause. The laws were viewed as malignant attack upon the fundamental nature of the British constitutional system and as an affront to individual rights. Undoubtedly, they would provide a catalyst that would eventually set the American colonies on a path of war and independence."      https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/2018/12/16/today-in-history-the-boston-tea-party/ 

This is definitely not something the political left Democrats want people to know.  Quote: "In a piece for the Brandies Center, Medoff shared some of the hateful/public anti-Semitic statements Roosevelt made when he let his guard down: In 1923, as a member of the Harvard board of directors, Roosevelt decided there were too many Jewish students at the college and helped institute a quota to limit the number admitted. ore, to blame for provoking anti-Semitism there. In 1941, he remarked at a Cabinet meeting that there were too many Jews among federal employees in Oregon. In 1943, he told government officials in Allied-liberated North Africa that the number of local Jews in various professions “should be definitely limited” so as to “eliminate the specific and understandable complaints which the Germans bore towards the Jews in Germany.”"    https://godfatherpolitics.com/caravanholocaust-no-way-because-fdr-was-most-bigoted-president-in-us-history/

This is a bit of history those on the political left do not want us to know.  Read and you will understand why.   https://www.americanlibertyreport.com/articles/democrats-using-the-fbi-to-spy-on-political-opponents-for-80-years/  

This item is about a book written in 1971 by Gary Allen entitled "None Dare Call It Conspiracy."  The book deals with the super rich and their promotion of socialism for their benefit. Quote: "Allen’s thesis was stark: super-rich American capitalists were financing socialism. This bizarre paradox was resolved when socialism was properly understood—not as “power to the people”—but as elite power over the people. In other words, as a hoax. These days, the socialist hoax is still unknown to most of the population. Cloak a global power grab as progress for all of humanity. Here, from chapter six of None Dare Call it Conspiracy, “The Rockefellers and the Reds,” is a devastating passage commenting on the period just after the Russian Revolution of 1917: “The Rockefellers assigned their public relations agent, Ivy Lee, to sell the American public the idea that the Bolsheviks were merely misunderstood idealists who were actually kind benefactors of mankind.”  It is history erased by progressives for obvious reasons. The author of the article also extensively quotes Professor Antony Sutton of the Stanford University Hoover Institution from his three volume tome "Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development".  The author of the article quotes Sutton and other authoritative sources and asserts that... "“Professor Sutton proves conclusively in his three volume history of Soviet technological development that the Soviet Union was almost literally manufactured by the U.S.A…”  “…Sutton shows that there is hardly a segment of the Soviet economy which is not a result of the transference of Western, particularly American, technology.” “This cannot be wholly the result of accident. For fifty years the Federal Reserve-CFR-Rockefeller-lnsider crowd has advocated and carried out policies aimed at increasing the power of their satellite, the Soviet Union. Meanwhile, America spends $75 billion a year on defense to protect itself from the enemy the Insiders are building up. QUOTE: The descendants of these bankers are now doing everything they can to build up the story that Donald Trump won the presidency by colluding with Russians. To call this an irony, in view of the above information, would be a vast understatement."  The piece is well worth the read.  I have read other sources with similar discussion so it is not out of the realm of the possible that what Allen and Suttton documented is either entirely true or at least has some basis in fact.    https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/08/06/erased-history-how-rockefeller-bankrolled-soviet-russia/

George Burns